[ABANDONED] Repeal "Liberate Anarchy"

[Yokiria]

So I go from a proposal about Hell, a region I enjoyed my time in and grew to respect, to Anarchy, a region I hated my time in but still grew to respect.

Description: The Security Council,

Relieved that the Liberation served its purpose against occupations by now-defunct invader organizations in the past couple of years,

Serving a reminder that the Liberation of Anarchy disallows the delegate from controlling the entry of nations into the region,

Noting that Anarchy currently has twelve regional officers assisting the delegate with controlling its borders, which was an impossibility when the Liberation of Anarchy was originally passed two years ago,

Believing that Anarchy is now more than capable of safely securing itself against invaders,

Concerned that continuing to disallow Anarchy from controlling nation entry will cause them to suffer more occupations in the future,

Desiring an Anarchy that is safer due to the actions of the native delegate and native community, without our intervention,

Convinced that the above is possible at present,

Hereby Repeals Security Council Resolution #135, "Liberate Anarchy"

The intent behind this is pretty simple. The region has been 'Warzone Anarchy' for a while. The native delegate has a lot of influence at the moment, though. If the lib is repealed, he can lock it up.

So, whether or not I end up going forward with this is pretty simple too. If it has native backing, I'll do it. If it doesn't, it goes in the trash.

EDIT: No native backing. In the trash.

[New Dukaine]

If this has native support, full support from me

[Drasnia]

I've seen several people make this mistakes recently - you should usually get native support before posting a draft. That's more of a nitpick though. I'd recommend contacting somebody who has been very vocal about Anarchy here on the forums. Somebody like YoriZ or Natapoc. Good luck!

[We Are Not the NSA]

Description: The Security Council,

Relieved that the Liberation served its purpose against occupations by now-defunct invader organizations in the past couple of years,

Didn't Europeia invade Anarchy a few months ago? They aren't defunct. Unless you're specifically talking about The Black Riders, the only group of raiders mentioned in the liberation, in which case the use of plurals is unnecessary.

Serving a reminder that the Liberation of Anarchy disallows the delegate from controlling the entry of nations into the region,

I think "reminding" or "reminded" would fit better than "serving a reminder". I've never actually heard someone say it that way before.

Noting that Anarchy currently has twelve regional officers assisting the delegate with controlling its borders, which was an impossibility when the Liberation of Anarchy was originally passed two years ago,

Believing that Anarchy is now more than capable of safely securing itself against invaders,

Concerned that continuing to disallow Anarchy from controlling nation entry will cause them to suffer more occupations in the future,

Desiring an Anarchy that is safer due to the actions of the native delegate and native community, without our intervention,

Convinced that the above is possible at present,

Hereby Repeals Security Council Resolution #135, "Liberate Anarchy"

I have no other comments.

[Benevolent Thomas]

If this has native support, full support from me

No such indication has been given yet.

[Tim-Opolis]

Once native support is confirmed, full support.

[New Dukaine]

If this has native support, full support from me

No such indication has been given yet.

No dirt, Sherlock. That's not what I was trying to say. I was trying to say if the natives support this, I will support it.

[Tim-Opolis]

No such indication has been given yet.

No dirt, Sherlock. That's not what I was trying to say. I was trying to say if the natives support this, I will support it.

I think BT was just indicating that it hadn't been given yet as a general update

[Benevolent Thomas]

No dirt, Sherlock. That's not what I was trying to say. I was trying to say if the natives support this, I will support it.

I think BT was just indicating that it hadn't been given yet as a general update

Just more of that great hospitality that the SC has grown to become synonymous with.

[Drasnia]

I think BT was just indicating that it hadn't been given yet as a general update

Just more of that great hospitality that the SC has grown to become synonymous with.

I thought SC stood for Salty Curmudgeons.

[Europe and Oceania]

If this has native support, full support from me

Same here.

[Tim-Opolis]

Just more of that great hospitality that the SC has grown to become synonymous with.

I thought SC stood for Salty Curmudgeons.

Shit, they're onto us!

[Westercourt]

I'm going to telegram the World Assembly Delegate for Anarchy to see if this has native support.

[Herby]

I thought SC stood for Salty Curmudgeons.

You called? Anyway:

I've seen several people make this mistakes recently - you should usually get native support before posting a draft. That's more of a nitpick though. I'd recommend contacting somebody who has been very vocal about Anarchy here on the forums. Somebody like YoriZ or Natapoc. Good luck!

This exactly dude. In the future you really ought to gage if you have native support before you post a draft here:

[YoriZ]

No support from the native resolution author & WAD.

[Benevolent Thomas]

No support from the native resolution author & WAD.

I figured that was the case.

[Yokiria]

No support from the native resolution author & WAD.

Alright then. Repeal goes in the trash.

As I said in my last proposal, I'm no SC buff, so thank you to everyone who gave me advice.
Next time I write something like this, I'll make sure it has native backing first.

[Wrapper]

Locked by request of OP.