by Saxe-Wittenburg » Fri May 29, 2015 10:42 pm
by Kemintiri of Kemet » Fri May 29, 2015 11:35 pm
by Steven Mccully » Fri May 29, 2015 11:41 pm
by Saxe-Wittenburg » Fri May 29, 2015 11:47 pm
Steven Mccully wrote:Have DEN really been around long enough for a Condemnation? All of their previous deeds are still condemned under old resolutions, just under a different name. Do we really want to give them another 'badge of honor'?
by Saxe-Wittenburg » Fri May 29, 2015 11:48 pm
Kemintiri of Kemet wrote:That coding: [region=<region>]...
by Steven Mccully » Fri May 29, 2015 11:50 pm
Saxe-Wittenburg wrote:Steven Mccully wrote:Have DEN really been around long enough for a Condemnation? All of their previous deeds are still condemned under old resolutions, just under a different name. Do we really want to give them another 'badge of honor'?
The region has a very long history and DEN's original founder apparently was highly influential in developing raiding tactics used today on NS, however like the Black Riders commander he got his nation deleted for violating NS rules which caused a similar series of events to what happened in TBR. However somebody almost a year ago re-founded the region.
by Saxe-Wittenburg » Sat May 30, 2015 12:33 am
Steven Mccully wrote:Saxe-Wittenburg wrote:The region has a very long history and DEN's original founder apparently was highly influential in developing raiding tactics used today on NS, however like the Black Riders commander he got his nation deleted for violating NS rules which caused a similar series of events to what happened in TBR. However somebody almost a year ago re-founded the region.
So you want to condemn a region that was refounded? What does that achieve?
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Sat May 30, 2015 2:14 am
Therefore we of the security council herby condemn DEN.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Laanvia » Sat May 30, 2015 2:16 am
by Kemintiri of Kemet » Sat May 30, 2015 2:20 am
Laanvia wrote:We should commend them. That would be really embarrassing for them.
by Laanvia » Sat May 30, 2015 2:23 am
by Herby » Sat May 30, 2015 5:16 am
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Therefore we of the security council herby condemn DEN.
Herby was a VW Beetle in a number of Disney movies.
(Ok it was Herbie, but you get the point.)
by We Are Not the NSA » Sat May 30, 2015 6:14 am
Laanvia wrote:We should commend them. That would be really embarrassing for them.
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by The Stalker » Sat May 30, 2015 2:14 pm
by Naginii » Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:42 am
by Saxe-Wittenburg » Mon Jun 01, 2015 9:36 am
Naginii wrote:It seems to me this is a piece of legislation wanting to make a boogeyman, and to try again to continue to kick the TBR corpse.
Their nation was raided, destroyed and occupied. That region now has 500+ nations in it and growing. The TBR refugees were homeless and scattered and it's obvious some want them kept that way. Left to wander the desert. Yes, they've pulled together 100+ nations in remaking a regional home. Normally, we'd consider this healthy for the game. But these are raiders, so the hypocrisy card is played and they are framed to fit the necessary worldview that they're the second coming of Attila the Hun. That's ludicrous. What's at issue here is the audacity of these TBR emigres to refuse to die, to go away.
So, to keep them down the proposal needs to paint them as a clear-and-present danger to all of NS. It's the oldest, and saddest, tactic in all of geopolitics. Use fictionalized threats of impending danger and fear in order to justify government action against someone. Their current tactics aren't my style, but they're also not likely to continue as they mature.
What they've done thus far as DEN hardly rises to anyone's measure or metric for barbarity nor threat. They're not the DEN of General Franks, the DEN of your NS nightmares. The only thing they're really guilty of is being ex-TBR and not leaving the game when their region was destroyed. I applaud them for that.
by Evil Wolf » Mon Jun 01, 2015 6:13 pm
Saxe-Wittenburg wrote:That coming from a resident of DEN......
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by -Larry- (Ancient) » Mon Jun 01, 2015 6:18 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Mon Jun 01, 2015 6:32 pm
by Greater Soviet Ukraine » Mon Jun 01, 2015 6:34 pm
by Saxe-Wittenburg » Mon Jun 01, 2015 6:39 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Mon Jun 01, 2015 6:41 pm
Saxe-Wittenburg wrote:This proposal has now been submitted to the security council! May DEN's members reap what it has sown.
by Naginii » Mon Jun 01, 2015 7:37 pm
by Jean Pierre Trudeau » Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:24 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement