by Krioval » Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:41 pm
by Mad Sheep Railgun » Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:51 pm
Krioval wrote:CONCERNED that the level of secrecy is eroding confidence the Security Council's function,
by Sedgistan » Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:52 pm
Krioval wrote:CONCERNED that this rogue nation's crusade will disrupt civil communications between raiders and defenders alike,
by Martyrdoom » Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:58 pm
by Kalibarr » Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:07 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Krioval wrote:CONCERNED that this rogue nation's crusade will disrupt civil communications between raiders and defenders alike,
There's civil communication between raiders and defenders? I don't think that Unibot - or even the WASC, has had an affect on the level of civility in comunications between defenders & invaders.
by Cinistra » Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:24 pm
by Great Brutopia » Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:11 pm
by Krioval » Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:04 pm
by Parthenon » Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:38 pm
by Quintessence of Dust » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:01 pm
by Krioval » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:26 pm
Quintessence of Dust wrote:Personally, I'd rather he was condemned for this sort of thing.
by Khornate Worshippers » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:34 pm
by Paradoxany » Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:09 pm
by Sedgistan » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:31 pm
Unibot has been one of the major players in the Security Council, and has written several good resolutions. Liberate The Security Council was good for establishing an IC introduction to the GA-SC split, and demonstrating player support for that split. Liberate Utopia was a good liberation resolution, even if the region was fairly small - but its worked. I wasn't enthusiastic about Liberate Land of the Liberals, but I have to admit that so far - from looking at the region, its turned out extremely well.
The complaints in your resolution are pretty trivial too - I haven't seen any proof of Unibot stifling public debate of liberations, or of this 'secrecy' - that sounds like AMON's conspiracy theories. The terms "native" and "liberation" retain all their old strength, and now have definitions which people can easily check up on. The 'Star Chamber' accusation is similarly lacking in evidence, and its certainly not the generally polite Unibot who is disrupting civil communications in the Security Council. The 'manipulation' accusation is really just an repeating earlier claims, adding an attack for actually daring to use the Security Council. Again, 'destructive agenda' is lacking in any kind of evidence to support that claim.
All in all, your resolution is full of the 'unverifiable claims' which you seek to condemn Unibot for.
by Reseda Island » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:58 pm
by SC Compliance Ministry » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:17 pm
by Badge Removal Machine » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:21 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ostrovskiy, Perishna, Tungstan
Advertisement