Ardchoille wrote:Dammit, what's elusive about that? And didn't your mum ever tell you about not making personal correspondence public? (But at least you were gentleman enough to leave out the bit about my unrequited passions for various NSers.)
Always be careful when having "private" conversations with a region founder... we're prone to making those public if it benefits us in any way.
Speaking of which, I wonder what your friends in Zhaucauozian Friendship would say about those little details I left out? I'm sure there are a few things in there that might not make your region look very "friendly" - perhaps Corporate could use a bit of compensation to keep me quiet... a few WA members forfeitted to us, maybe your delegate's undyielding allegiance to our voting results on WA resolutions...
Trying again: there are two things you have to fix up to make this a "safe" proposal: the title, because of PG-11 (so no "shitty"; I took that one to the Hive Mind for comment); and the justification for the condemnation, because it has to be NS-related and based on more than the name of the region.
Got that one.
Of course, "safe" from mod annihilation doesn't mean safe from delegate rejection. If the SC delegates disapprove of this sort of finagling the purpose of C&Cs, or don't want to finagle in this particular case, well, it's done for, however valid I think it.
Understood.
I'll figure something out when I have the time. I'm sure I could twist the actual region into something condemnable gameplay-wise, or at least close enough. Thanks.
