NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Condemn Right Wing Uprising

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Prince Richard of Valconesia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

[DRAFT] Condemn Right Wing Uprising

Postby Prince Richard of Valconesia » Tue Jul 22, 2014 11:36 am

The Security Council,

ACKNOWLEDGING the region of Right Wing Uprising is an inter-regional alliance created for the purpose of disrupting active leftist regions,

REALIZING that Right Wing Uprising is a major threat to the safety of the world,

FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGING the destruction Right Wing Uprising has caused by its considerably large raiding forces,

ALARMED that some of the most harmful raider regions make up Right Wing Uprising, including Nazi Europa, The Fascist Union, The Greater German Reich, Fifth Empire, and many more.

NOTING that victims of its raids include Hell, Liberal Haven, The Middle East, and many others,

FURTHER NOTING that The Middle East was utterly and completely destroyed by Right Wing Uprising,

DISMAYED that Right Wing Uprising is not held accountable for its raids, even though the main structure is organized by Right Wing Uprising,

DISTURBED at the complete disregard for peace, freedom, and regional sovereignty,

CONCLUDING the actions of Right Wing Uprising to be in complete opposition of the Security Council's goal of spreading interregional peace,

HEREBY CONDEMNS Right Wing Uprising


So, here's my draft.
Last edited by Prince Richard of Valconesia on Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:34 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Ramaeus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1024
Founded: Dec 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ramaeus » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:14 pm

It...needs work. Expound upon their raiding activities.
Just some weeb.

User avatar
Prince Richard of Valconesia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Prince Richard of Valconesia » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:17 pm

Ramaeus wrote:It...needs work. Expound upon their raiding activities.


I'm open to any suggestions. This is my first time making a WA proposal.

User avatar
Republic of Minerva
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 190
Founded: Oct 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Minerva » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:39 pm

Try including their recent raid on Hell in there.
Retired former military general of Libertatem
Economic Right: 8.38 Social Libertarian: -5.95

User avatar
Prince Richard of Valconesia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Prince Richard of Valconesia » Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:20 pm

Republic of Minerva wrote:Try including their recent raid on Hell in there.


Edited it to pin point some of their raids.

User avatar
Casita
Envoy
 
Posts: 280
Founded: Oct 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Casita » Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:40 pm

I think it's time to free the middle east, instead of giving them a trophy badge.

User avatar
Achaemenida
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Achaemenida » Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:14 pm

Casita wrote:I think it's time to free the middle east, instead of giving them a trophy badge.


Yeah, good luck 'freeing' The Middle East from the RWU founder.

User avatar
Prince Richard of Valconesia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Prince Richard of Valconesia » Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:38 pm

Casita wrote:I think it's time to free the middle east, instead of giving them a trophy badge.


We can't simply "free" the middle east.

User avatar
Prince Richard of Valconesia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Prince Richard of Valconesia » Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:55 am

I'm going to go ahead and submit it, even though it's not completely ready.

User avatar
Luna Amore
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 15751
Founded: Antiquity
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Luna Amore » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:40 am

Prince Richard of Valconesia wrote:I'm going to go ahead and submit it, even though it's not completely ready.

Why bother posting it at all? You had it up less than a day. The point of posting it is to get adequate feedback before submitting. You can't edit it once it's submitted.

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21479
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:42 am

FURTHER NOTING that The Middle East was utterly and completely destroyed by Right Wing Uprising, ruining not only the region, but also ruining the gameplay experience for its residents,

R4?
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Mundiferrum
Diplomat
 
Posts: 830
Founded: Apr 07, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Mundiferrum » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:58 am

Bears Armed wrote:
FURTHER NOTING that The Middle East was utterly and completely destroyed by Right Wing Uprising, ruining not only the region, but also ruining the gameplay experience for its residents,

R4?

What are you talking about? R4? I don't get it....
Although what "gameplay" is the ambassador referring to here? The game of war? The game of politics? By jove, those things should not be just games to you, ambassador!

OOC: Yeah, R4
MARCVSGRAVELLIVSCISTERNAEMAGNORATOR-ORATORMVNDIFERRIADCONCILIVMMNDVM
Marcus Gravellius Cisternae Magnorator, Mundiferri Representative to the World Assembly
"Call me Gravey. Only my really close friends call me Marcus, and I don't think we're that close yet. Maybe."
No, we are not a nation of cat people. We're all humans (and a few annoying gnomes) here. The cat's just there because our king is such a genius, he saw that it would be a good military strategy to have a distractingly cute flag, to blind our enemies to (our) victory!
Technological level: FUTURE TECH. We also have MAGICAL TECH, and a lot of the people here still play with MEDIEVAL TECH and PRESENT TECH. We're cool that way.

User avatar
Casita
Envoy
 
Posts: 280
Founded: Oct 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Casita » Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:07 am

Achaemenida wrote:
Casita wrote:I think it's time to free the middle east, instead of giving them a trophy badge.


Yeah, good luck 'freeing' The Middle East from the RWU founder.


It's okay cowboy, RWU will lose it one day.

User avatar
Casita
Envoy
 
Posts: 280
Founded: Oct 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Casita » Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:13 am

Prince Richard of Valconesia wrote:
Casita wrote:I think it's time to free the middle east, instead of giving them a trophy badge.


We can't simply "free" the middle east.


I didn't say simply.

Liberations have been implemented on at least one region with a founder that I know of. It maybe useless at the time; however, if the founder cte etc then it would be open to be defended.

User avatar
Crazy girl
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 6276
Founded: Antiquity
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Crazy girl » Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:17 am

Bears Armed wrote:
FURTHER NOTING that The Middle East was utterly and completely destroyed by Right Wing Uprising, ruining not only the region, but also ruining the gameplay experience for its residents,

R4?



Indeed. Removed.

User avatar
Republic of Minerva
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 190
Founded: Oct 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Minerva » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:29 pm

Fail. Try again this time. Before you do that, clean it up a bit. Don't use repetitive words. Make things flow a bit better.
Retired former military general of Libertatem
Economic Right: 8.38 Social Libertarian: -5.95

User avatar
Misley
Diplomat
 
Posts: 609
Founded: Jan 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Misley » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:35 pm

I would use a matter-of-fact tone. If the Security Council is going to recognize RWU through a condemnation, it should at least not give them the satisfaction of having the SC admit to being "alarmed", "dismayed," and "disturbed" by them. Simply note what they have done, that it is bad, and that they are therefore condemned.
EGO·VERO·CUSTOSFRATRIS·MEI·SUM
Socialist People's Provinces of Misley

   
Editor of the Red & Black
Fleet Admiral of The Red Fleet
Custodian of The Internationale

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:56 pm

Misley wrote:I would use a matter-of-fact tone. If the Security Council is going to recognize RWU through a condemnation, it should at least not give them the satisfaction of having the SC admit to being "alarmed", "dismayed," and "disturbed" by them. Simply note what they have done, that it is bad, and that they are therefore condemned.

So, we should be "A LITTLE UPSET" or "SLIGHTLY BOTHERED" or "KIND OF IRKED" by what they've done? No, condemnations virtually demand that we be ALARMED or DISMAYED or DISTURBED by nations/regions that deserve them.
Last edited by Wrapper on Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Misley
Diplomat
 
Posts: 609
Founded: Jan 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Misley » Wed Jul 23, 2014 2:58 pm

Wrapper wrote:No, condemnations virtually demand that we be ALARMED or DISMAYED or DISTURBED by nations/regions that deserve them.


Not really. "Condemn Macedon," which is an exemplar as it is the first SC resolution, the first SC Condemnation, and a condemnation for one of the most notorious groups in NS history, uses the preambulatory words "Noting," "Understanding," "Believing," "Accepting," and "Condemning." Nowhere does the SC say that we are "alarmed" or "dismayed" or "disturbed" by Macedon.

The condemnation for TBH is straightforward, with the highest level of emotion present in the three clauses that begin "CONCERNED that ..."

The condemnation for LWU is similarly matter-of-fact, although it does include a single "appaled" amidst the far more common "NOTING"s and "RECOGNIZING"s.

RWU is not so special that the Security Council should pretend to be more horrified by their actions than these far more successful and far more notorious raiding groups.
EGO·VERO·CUSTOSFRATRIS·MEI·SUM
Socialist People's Provinces of Misley

   
Editor of the Red & Black
Fleet Admiral of The Red Fleet
Custodian of The Internationale

User avatar
Prince Richard of Valconesia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Prince Richard of Valconesia » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:36 pm

It's opened up as a draft again.

User avatar
Venico
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1389
Founded: Mar 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Venico » Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:10 pm

Nope, have barely raided. Not condemnable by any means.
Priest of Raider Unity

Raider Unity, Maintain a Founder, Sign a Treaty

Malice Never Dies...

User avatar
Save All the Animals
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: Jul 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Save All the Animals » Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:58 pm

I am against this proposal because I believe that when we condemn raider regions they take it as an achievement and it only encourages them to continue raiding. I do not believe RWU deserves WA recognition.
DETERMINED to pass a World Assembly Resolution! Been trying on and off for 4 months now!


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Giovanniland, Hiybkk, Tesseris, Zandos

Advertisement

Remove ads