NATION

PASSWORD

[D] Condemn / Repeal Condemn Mallorea and Riva

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Elke and Elba
Minister
 
Posts: 2761
Founded: Aug 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

[D] Condemn / Repeal Condemn Mallorea and Riva

Postby Elke and Elba » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:44 am

Step 2: Remove Mall of what most raiders want. Eh I have no idea now, condemn or repeal condemnation
Original.

The Security Council,

UNDERSTANDING that Mallorea and Riva is an abhorrent state that conducted raids on the South Pacific, which this state had tried to blame on Haven in its pretense to 'free' Haven from its password, yet,

NOTING that Mallorea and Riva is only a state that conducts its raiding activities, due to its sidelining by the international community and inability to provide further value to this international community,

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING that Mallorea and Riva's childish acts were all intended to ensure outrage in the international community and gain credence and leverage through fear,

DISGUSTED that Mallorea and Riva has tricked the international community in condemning the aforementioned state due to its opportunistic belief that such a condemnation would allow the state to gain further credence and leverage, and that the condemnation itself was wholly wanted by the government of Mallorea and Riva, rendering any amount of condemnation of Mallorea and Riva useless,

EXPOSING that by condemning Mallorea and Riva, the international community only legitimizes its actions and affirms that the rogue state is to be feared despite not being so, which fully defeats the purpose and intent of the condemnation,

CONVINCED that the international community should not fear Mallorea and Riva for its despicable acts, and instead should despise, rather than condemn the state of Mallorea and Riva and its government for conducting these actions,

FURTHER CONVINCED that through such an act, the international community will signal its intent and willingness to stand up to the absolute abusive tyranny of Mallorea and Riva, and call its bluff,

HEREBY REPEALS SC#121, "Condemn Mallorea and Riva'.
Last edited by Elke and Elba on Sun Jul 06, 2014 6:37 am, edited 2 times in total.
Represented permanently at the World Assembly by Benjamin Olafsen, and on an ad-hoc basis by Alethea Norrland and rarely Gaia Pao and Gabriel Dzichpol.
OOCly retired from the GA/SC for something called 'real life'.
Author of GA#288 and SC#148.
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.

User avatar
Nierr
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1211
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nierr » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:51 am

Against this.

For reasons.

User avatar
Ramaeus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1024
Founded: Dec 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ramaeus » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:53 am

No. Mall deserves his Condemnation.
Just some weeb.

User avatar
Applebania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 875
Founded: Dec 17, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Applebania » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:55 am

Nah, despite the BS with Haven, I still like Mall.

Besides, if you repealed Condemn Mallorea and Riva, you'd need to repeal pretty much every condemnation other than Condemn Macedon and Condemn Allied States of EuroIslanders (Though there may be more unwanted condemnations out there)
AKA Karlsefni
Citizen of the Rejected Realms
Sergeant of the Rejected Realms Army

User avatar
United States of Cascadia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1923
Founded: Jun 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Cascadia » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:56 am

Those sound like reasons to be given a condemnation, not to have one repealed. To be honest though, I suspect Mall will care little if he were to lose the condemnation anyways.
The Archregimancy wrote:Max called the light “RP forums,” and the darkness he called “NSG.”

Geniasis wrote:Gay midget albino rottweiler porn.

I've yet to have a successful Lent... :(

Risottia wrote:The heterosexuals want a pride march so they can look at other half-naked heterosexuals of the same sex without feeling guilty.

H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:I want my sperm to taste like peanut butter and jelly, because I am firmly of the belief that what is holding me back in life is my penis not being sufficiently appealing to six year olds.

Other people wrote:

Let's go Ravens!
Factbook of Cascadia
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

User avatar
Cormac A Stark
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1034
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cormac A Stark » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:57 am

As opposed as I am to Liberate Haven, I'm also against this. The "badge of honor" argument, when taken too far, would essentially mean never passing a condemnation resolution. Most of the bad guys in NationStates are playing to be the bad guy, and take pride in a condemnation resolution.

Today, Mall's condemnation, but tomorrow Lone Wolves United's when they raid something someone doesn't like, and eventually there won't be any condemnations on the books except possibly RP condemnations. There have to be limits to the "badge of honor" argument.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 10000
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:57 am

Yikes. If you're going to yank my badge at least make the draft one that sounds good and flows well.

EDIT: I admit that the notion of being TOO EVIL TO CONDEMN does sound kinda neat.
Last edited by Mallorea and Riva on Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Major of The Black Hawks
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Tal and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: Mall is following those weird beef-only diets now.

User avatar
Elke and Elba
Minister
 
Posts: 2761
Founded: Aug 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Elke and Elba » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:10 am

Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yikes. If you're going to yank my badge at least make the draft one that sounds good and flows well.

EDIT: I admit that the notion of being TOO EVIL TO CONDEMN does sound kinda neat.


That is the point. :p

It seems giving you ANOTHER condemnation shiny medal will probably have more ability to live in the SC forums than this after all. :lol:
Represented permanently at the World Assembly by Benjamin Olafsen, and on an ad-hoc basis by Alethea Norrland and rarely Gaia Pao and Gabriel Dzichpol.
OOCly retired from the GA/SC for something called 'real life'.
Author of GA#288 and SC#148.
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.

User avatar
Tim-Opolis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Feb 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Tim-Opolis » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:19 am

As much as the Liberate Haven proposal frustrated me, I'm opposed. Mall is one of the R/D'ers of this era that actually deserves his Condemnation. Yeah, basically all C&C's are backpats, but this is a deserving one. Ya'll are really taking this much farther than necessary. Let Liberate Haven fail, and then head back to the status quo of the loose DMZ we have between RP and GP. Both are cool and okay, and Admin has repeatedly stated that R/D is not being removed. Passwords and/or Founders are excellent opt-outs from invasion, and I highly recommend you use them.

The proposing of Liberate Haven isn't going to usher in an era of Liberation Proposals against every RP Region know to man. Hell, it takes about 5 minutes of reading about Game Mechanics to realize 99% of RP regions are safe anyway. The remaining 1% are honestly outside of the target range for any Raiders except those who specifically aim to piss of RPers. Those, however, are far too few to pull off an RP Region's SC Liberation without anything short of a Miracle.

Apologies for the slight derailment. Essentially, Mall's Condemn should stay and we should all calm down a bit, read how game mechanics work if necessary, and realize most of us GPers thing RP is cool and okay.
Want to be a hero? Join The Grey Wardens - Help Us Save Nationstates
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Commended by Security Council Resolution #420 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Author of SC#74, SC #203, SC #222, and SC #238 | Co-Author of SC#191
Founder of Spiritus | Three-Time Delegate of Osiris | Pharaoh of the Islamic Republics of Iran | Hero of Greece
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

User avatar
Vicious Debaters
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1079
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Vicious Debaters » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:21 am

Way on the fence about this- probably against. On one hand we could strip Mallorea of all his fancy titles, but making someone out to be so bad that you un-condemn them doesn't make sense.

If this ever gets far, the meta totally could change with condemnations and commendations.

We could always start randomly commending raiders. Why the fuck not.
Last edited by Vicious Debaters on Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tim-Opolis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Feb 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Tim-Opolis » Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:28 am

Vicious Debaters wrote:We could always start randomly commending raiders. Why the fuck not.


Assuming such a proposal actually was drafted, proposed, made it to vote, and somehow passed with a majority if votes... I imagine that, for most Raiders, a badge is a badge. Hell, I'm a Defender but I wouldn't say no to a Condemnation badge :P
Want to be a hero? Join The Grey Wardens - Help Us Save Nationstates
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Commended by Security Council Resolution #420 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Author of SC#74, SC #203, SC #222, and SC #238 | Co-Author of SC#191
Founder of Spiritus | Three-Time Delegate of Osiris | Pharaoh of the Islamic Republics of Iran | Hero of Greece
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

User avatar
Mekhet
Envoy
 
Posts: 306
Founded: Oct 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mekhet » Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:34 am

Against, this is starting to get into the "petty" zone Elke and Elba

Equinox
"Join the Church of Hat-thiesm. ALL THINGS THAT COVER YOUR HEAD IS A HAT! HATS!!!" - Pope Hatchard I

User avatar
Rephesus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8061
Founded: Aug 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rephesus » Sun Jul 06, 2014 9:12 am

Personally I think Repeal Condemn would make more sense than Condemn in this case.

User avatar
Benevolent Thomas
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1483
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Benevolent Thomas » Sun Jul 06, 2014 9:20 am

I'd also be against this one. Mallorea is one of the most condemn-worthy individuals that are still kicking. Mall may like the badge, but I like to think of the countless number of newbies that see that badge and know to not be like him.
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.

User avatar
Rephesus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8061
Founded: Aug 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rephesus » Sun Jul 06, 2014 9:34 am

Or, aspire to be like him.

User avatar
Ikania
Senator
 
Posts: 3692
Founded: Jun 28, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ikania » Sun Jul 06, 2014 9:38 am

Like Liberate Haven, passing this would set a precedent that condemnations are just badges of honor and being bad makes you undeserving, and so we should repeal most condemnations. So against. I appreciate the effort though.
Ike Speardane
Executive Advisor in The League.
Proud soldier in the service of The Grey Wardens.
Three-time Defendervision winner. NSG Senate veteran.
Knuckle-dragging fuckstick from a backwater GCR. #SPRDNZ
Land Value Tax would fix this
СЛАВА УКРАЇНІ

User avatar
Rephesus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8061
Founded: Aug 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rephesus » Sun Jul 06, 2014 9:45 am

Ikania wrote:Like Liberate Haven, passing this would set a precedent that condemnations are just badges of honor and being bad makes you undeserving, and so we should repeal most condemnations. So against. I appreciate the effort though.

That precedent has always been in place. Many people, especially Raiders, like to be condemned and see it as a prize.

User avatar
Elke and Elba
Minister
 
Posts: 2761
Founded: Aug 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Elke and Elba » Sun Jul 06, 2014 10:17 am

Ikania wrote:Like Liberate Haven, passing this would set a precedent that condemnations are just badges of honor and being bad makes you undeserving, and so we should repeal most condemnations. So against. I appreciate the effort though.


I'm feeling conflicted.

While a repeal removes the badge, the more IC RP way to go about it is to condemn.

Mhmm. :p
Represented permanently at the World Assembly by Benjamin Olafsen, and on an ad-hoc basis by Alethea Norrland and rarely Gaia Pao and Gabriel Dzichpol.
OOCly retired from the GA/SC for something called 'real life'.
Author of GA#288 and SC#148.
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 10000
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Sun Jul 06, 2014 10:20 am

Elke and Elba wrote:
Ikania wrote:Like Liberate Haven, passing this would set a precedent that condemnations are just badges of honor and being bad makes you undeserving, and so we should repeal most condemnations. So against. I appreciate the effort though.


I'm feeling conflicted.

While a repeal removes the badge, the more IC RP way to go about it is to condemn.

Mhmm. :p

For whatever it's worth "Mall" is a gameplay character, born the night that I switched to raiding from the UDL to The Black Hawks :p In the same way that Zakath is my GA character.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Major of The Black Hawks
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Tal and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: Mall is following those weird beef-only diets now.

User avatar
Hobbesistan
Minister
 
Posts: 2448
Founded: Jul 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hobbesistan » Sun Jul 06, 2014 10:21 am

Mekhet wrote:Against, this is starting to get into the "petty" zone Elke and Elba

This.


Mall deserves the shiny.
Hobbes
ra, ra rasputin

(Ret.) Maintainer of the Nationstates FAQ and Deletiger (Ret.) of The East Pacific
russia's greatest

Hobbes is always winning, like Charlie Sheen. - Jurisdictions
love machine

Stop right there (hobbes), your rational thought and intellect will destroy the internet. - Sovreignry
it was a shame how

Giraffes think Hobbes regret a lot. A lot of giraffes do. - Rachel
he carried on.

User avatar
Vetok
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1986
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Vetok » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:23 pm

Let him keep it as a sop to his pride.

User avatar
Vistulange
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5472
Founded: May 13, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Vistulange » Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:15 pm

Against, though it's a good thing that this idea has been brought up to debate, symbolically.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 10000
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:30 pm

I'm not sure if I'm being threatened with a condemnation, commendation, or a repeal of my condemnation :unsure:
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Major of The Black Hawks
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Tal and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: Mall is following those weird beef-only diets now.

User avatar
Rephesus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8061
Founded: Aug 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rephesus » Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:31 pm

Mallorea and Riva wrote:I'm not sure if I'm being threatened with a condemnation, commendation, or a repeal of my condemnation :unsure:

You can probably take Commendation off that list.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 10000
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:34 pm

Rephesus wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:I'm not sure if I'm being threatened with a condemnation, commendation, or a repeal of my condemnation :unsure:

You can probably take Commendation off that list.

Really it would be a commendation that would trouble me most, but you're probably right.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Major of The Black Hawks
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Tal and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: Mall is following those weird beef-only diets now.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads