Advertisement
by Of The Aryan People » Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:30 pm
by Far-Tortuga » Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:07 pm
by Bears Armed » Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:12 am
by Goobergunchia » Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:25 am
by Bears Armed » Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:40 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:02 am
by Greater Americania » Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:46 pm
by Goobergunchia » Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:50 pm
by SilentScope4 » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:12 pm
by Goobergunchia » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:16 pm
by TannerFrankLand » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:31 pm
Security Council FanaticWA Security Council:
SC #3 ~ Condemn Nazi Europe [SORRY!]
SC #12 ~ Commend Todd McCloud
SC #18 ~ Commend Sedgistan
SC #27 ~ Condemn Unknown
SC #36 ~ Liberate Eastern Europe
SC #51 ~ Commend Fudgetopia
SC #67 ~ Commend Naivetry
SC #71 ~ Repeal Condemn Unknown.
WA General Assembly:
GA #81 ~ Disaster Preparedness Act
GA #105 ~ Preparing For Disasters
GA #164 ~ Consular Rights
GA #278 ~ Repeal "Right to Privacy"
by Scarsaw » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:01 pm
by Mad Sheep Railgun » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:12 pm
Goobergunchia wrote:[OOC: I consider the Security Council to be an odd merger of Gameplay-IC and standard RP-IC, with the former generally prevailing. However, I can't justify IC knowledge of Nazism from either perspective. As much as I dislike Nazis IRL, I can't justify my nation's vote based solely on OOC knowledge.]
by Goobergunchia » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:44 pm
TannerFrankLand wrote:And in case anyone else cares, THE DRAFT PROCESS IS OVER AND HAS BEEN FOR MANY WEEKS! This thread is closed...
Mad Sheep Railgun wrote:I think it's a bit late to be worrying about IC and OOC in a Security Council resolution when we just got through commending "the player behind Kandarin".
by Kandarin » Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:33 am
Mad Sheep Railgun wrote:I think it's a bit late to be worrying about IC and OOC in a Security Council resolution when we just got through commending "the player behind Kandarin".
I wish I remember who wrote:Games like Nationstates are like a big cardboard box, and there are two kinds of people in the world. The kind who look at the empty void inside the box and ask "Where the hell is it?" and the kind who jump into the box with their friends and make it into a fort, or a spaceship.
by Mad Sheep Railgun » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:39 pm
Kandarin wrote:Mad Sheep Railgun wrote:I think it's a bit late to be worrying about IC and OOC in a Security Council resolution when we just got through commending "the player behind Kandarin".
To expand on what Goobergunchia said, that shouldn't be taken as a binding precedent to guide what future C&Cs should be like. That wording was only sensible due to a confluence of play styles that most nations simply don't share. It wouldn't work for purely OOC Gameplay nations (as an IC version could be fabricated on the spot), nor for purely IC RP nations (as they should be judged on the virtues or vices of their IC nation), nor for those whose OOC and IC match closely (no conflict). Commend Kandarin was only worded the way it was because I have an OOC and IC that are blatantly and deliberately different, thus an ICly-worded resolution would be based on demonstrably false premises. While I'm far from the only player who does that kind of contrast, the vast majority do not and so the wording of Commend Kandarin should not be seen as the precedent upon which all further Commendations are built.
by Scarsaw » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:44 pm
by Sound Systems » Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:18 pm
by Nazi Occupied Europe » Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:04 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: New Westmore, Virifortis
Advertisement