[PASSED] Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

by **Goddess Relief Office** » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:50 pm

Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Goddess Relief Office wrote:Version 3 up.

I appreciate the changes.

Sure thing Mall.

~GRO~

by **Goddess Relief Office** » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:57 pm

Hakio wrote:
We know that it says on the Passed WA proposals the date of which a resolution is passed, but would using it in a repeal or resolution make it a RL violation?

Dates by themselves are not illegal. They've been done numerous times in SC resolutions. However, calling Christmas a "holiday" would be illegal, like this author did here: http://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vie ... 1396686247

~GRO~

by **Chester Pearson** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:08 pm

Bump as this is now a vote

by **Ramaeus** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:09 pm

I voted for.

The natives requested this, so who are we to stand in their way?

by **Serendypity** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:15 pm

Even if dates may differ, the feelings of the natives stay the same.
I vote for, if the natives wish it then it should be passed.

by **Teronia** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:23 pm

Serendypity wrote:Even if dates may differ, the feelings of the natives stay the same.
I vote for, if the natives wish it then it should be passed.

Exactly. It is THEIR region, who are we to go against their wishes?

For.

by **Veranda** » Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:53 pm

I see no reason not to support this.

by **Hakio** » Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:45 am

91% for
9% against

1 day 12 hours left

It's really coming down to the wire isn't it?

by **Exiled Siberian Royals** » Sun Apr 13, 2014 11:48 am

If the elected delegate of the South Pacific states that he is in support of its removal, there is no reason to stand in opposition to this legislation. Especially regarding the harm it causes to the culture of the South Pacific (according to the delegate).

Still, I feel as if the point is now moot, as the vote is currently passing with ~91% approval.

[Also, it is silly to pretend that there is still a threat if a threat no longer exists. Some of the opposition arguments revolve around whether or not there will be future attacks. It seems that, for now, this legislation should be passed and any new threat that may arise will be dealt with later (possibly with the passage of another piece of legislation to Liberate the South Pacific, if need be).]

by **The Greater Ohio Valley** » Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:38 am

If the natives want it then I don't see why not.

by **Goddess Relief Office** » Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:34 pm

The Goddess would like to express her thanks to everyone who voted for the above and wish South Pacific the best in its future endeavors.

:bow:

[PASSED] Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

Who is online