NATION

PASSWORD

Silly SC proposals - post them here!

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Diatraba
Diplomat
 
Posts: 640
Founded: Dec 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Diatraba » Sat May 08, 2010 6:00 am

Condemn Mukkanism

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation


Nominee: FlagMukkanism


Proposed by: FlagThee Cheshire Cat

Description: The Security Council,

COMMITTING: Itself to diplomatic efforts to end injustice, Internationally -- a commitment which current General Assembly (GA) legislation demands from every member nations.

CONDEMING: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism for publicly stating that Government sanctioned agents have brutally and deliberately committed human rights violations against those suspected of being sympathetic to a communist ideal. This has included torture, degrading and inhuman acts of violence.

NOTING: That The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, is hereby in violation of General Assembly Resolution #9, #27, #30, #35; Article 1. C, #37, #38. All of which are Resolution which have been passed to work for mankind's protection from accusations, unlawful prosecution, and simple moral human rights.

AWARE: That The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, is currently only committing such atrocious acts against people of Communist Parties.

DENOUNCING: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, genocidal acts towards The Accused peoples of their nations, and 'Prosecuted Communist' in their country

DEEPLY CONCERNED: That if no punishment is delivered, then The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, will not only continue such monstrous acts, The Armed Republic of Mukkanism may take their political executions farther to other groups

HEREBY CONDEMNS: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism


House of cards rule breach in the red text
Last edited by Diatraba on Sat May 08, 2010 6:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dimitri MacCarinson - Honourary Chief Ambassador on behalf of the Communist State of Diatraba (PMT)- One nation, one vision!
DEFCON: 3 - army at rediness - rediness levels above normal
UK Threat Level: Substantial - an attack is a strong possibility
REDCON: 2 - Full Alert - Army ready to fight
My Nation's Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.50
Social Libertarian Authoritarian: 3.69
My Political Compass
Our economic report



User avatar
South Norwega
Senator
 
Posts: 3981
Founded: Jul 13, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby South Norwega » Sat May 08, 2010 6:18 am

Diatraba wrote:
Condemn Mukkanism

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation


Nominee: FlagMukkanism


Proposed by: FlagThee Cheshire Cat

Description: The Security Council,

COMMITTING: Itself to diplomatic efforts to end injustice, Internationally -- a commitment which current General Assembly (GA) legislation demands from every member nations.

CONDEMING: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism for publicly stating that Government sanctioned agents have brutally and deliberately committed human rights violations against those suspected of being sympathetic to a communist ideal. This has included torture, degrading and inhuman acts of violence.

NOTING: That The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, is hereby in violation of General Assembly Resolution #9, #27, #30, #35; Article 1. C, #37, #38. All of which are Resolution which have been passed to work for mankind's protection from accusations, unlawful prosecution, and simple moral human rights.

AWARE: That The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, is currently only committing such atrocious acts against people of Communist Parties.

DENOUNCING: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, genocidal acts towards The Accused peoples of their nations, and 'Prosecuted Communist' in their country

DEEPLY CONCERNED: That if no punishment is delivered, then The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, will not only continue such monstrous acts, The Armed Republic of Mukkanism may take their political executions farther to other groups

HEREBY CONDEMNS: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism


House of cards rule breach in the red text

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=31423&p=1265150&hilit=House+of+Cards#p1265150

House of Cards is a GA only rule, I think.
Worship the great Gordon Brown!
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Please sig this.

Jedi 999 wrote:the fact is the british colonised the british

Plains Nations wrote:the god of NS

Trippoli wrote:This here guy, is smart.

Second Placing: Sarzonian Indoor Gridball Cup

User avatar
The Emmerian Unions
Minister
 
Posts: 2407
Founded: Jan 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emmerian Unions » Sat May 08, 2010 11:51 am

South Norwega wrote:
Diatraba wrote:
Condemn Mukkanism

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation


Nominee: FlagMukkanism


Proposed by: FlagThee Cheshire Cat

Description: The Security Council,

COMMITTING: Itself to diplomatic efforts to end injustice, Internationally -- a commitment which current General Assembly (GA) legislation demands from every member nations.

CONDEMING: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism for publicly stating that Government sanctioned agents have brutally and deliberately committed human rights violations against those suspected of being sympathetic to a communist ideal. This has included torture, degrading and inhuman acts of violence.

NOTING: That The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, is hereby in violation of General Assembly Resolution #9, #27, #30, #35; Article 1. C, #37, #38. All of which are Resolution which have been passed to work for mankind's protection from accusations, unlawful prosecution, and simple moral human rights.

AWARE: That The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, is currently only committing such atrocious acts against people of Communist Parties.

DENOUNCING: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, genocidal acts towards The Accused peoples of their nations, and 'Prosecuted Communist' in their country

DEEPLY CONCERNED: That if no punishment is delivered, then The Armed Republic of Mukkanism, will not only continue such monstrous acts, The Armed Republic of Mukkanism may take their political executions farther to other groups

HEREBY CONDEMNS: The Armed Republic of Mukkanism


House of cards rule breach in the red text

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=31423&p=1265150&hilit=House+of+Cards#p1265150

House of Cards is a GA only rule, I think.


Word of Mods says HoC is GA-only.
The Cake is a lie!
<<Peace through Fear and Superior Firepower>>

STOP AMERICAN IMPERIALISM? America is ANTI-IMPERIAL!
Ifreann wrote:"And in world news, the United States has recently elected Bill Gates as God Emperor For All Time. Foreign commentators believe that Gates' personal fortune may have played a role in his victory, but criticism from the United States of Gates(as it is now known) has been sparse and brief."
For good Russian Rock Radio, go here.
Please note, I rarely go into NSG. If I post there, please do not expect a response from me.
ALL HAIL THE GODDESS REPLOID PRODUCTIONS!

User avatar
Unibotian WASC Mission
Diplomat
 
Posts: 729
Founded: Oct 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibotian WASC Mission » Sat May 08, 2010 8:57 pm

Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:
Commend A mean old man
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation | Nominee: A mean old man | Proposed by: Unibotian WASC Mission


Description: The Security Council,

REALIZING that a commendation of a Mean Old Man was defeated at vote only a few months ago with many citing the defeat as retribution for a Mean Old Man’s supposed “public backstabbing and reprisal” against Unibot and the members of The Security Council, regarding SC#15-16,

UNDERSTANDING that just prior to SC#16 being voted on, a Mean Old Man and Unibot privately reconciled through telegrams, during which this conversation, Unibot became self-aware of what a stubborn git he had been to others, and a Mean Old Man promised he would not pursue the adoption of SC#16 as actively as he had previously been,

ATTEMPTING to make right what was previously wronged in the subsequent public discussions regarding a Mean Old Man as they were unfairly critical,

DETERMINING that a Mean Old Man since the beginning of his activity in the hallowed halls of the WA has been a vigorous supporter of quality in resolution writing and the drafting process…

(I) HAVING ADVOCATED for a diversity of opinions, independence, public drafting and and a system of democracy in the World Assembly free from manipulation,

(II) HAVING DENOUNCED the practice of stacking voting floors immediately as a manipulation of democracy that depreciates the individual vote,

(III) HAVING CRITICIZED the herd mentality of voters that “vote-stackers” exploit, which he popularized the phrase, “lemming-effect”, to describe,

BELIEVING that if more players articulated and acted upon their opinions and and principles such as a Mean Old Man has done without fear of reprisal, the World Assembly would be a more enlightened and democratic institution,

ADMIRING a Mean Old Man’s more lighthearted activities such as providing comedic caricatures of different In-Character entities, participating in various roleplays and advocating for more humor in the proceedings of the Security Council,

GIGGLING at the irony of commending an advocate of openness and accessibility with a proposal that was drafted in secret because it is inherently illegal due to a newly established rule -- “Rule #4” stipulates that proposals cannot be written entirely out-of-character,

APPLAUDING a Mean Old Man’s bold support of a campaign to rid the World Assembly of “Rule #4” in its entirety,

HOPING a Mean Old Man will take this opportunity to put his feet up, eat a cookie and quietly lurk in his own commendation thread -- a well-deserved break for one of the most lively critics in debate threads,

HEREBY COMMENDS A Mean Old Man for being who he is, instead of who he pretends to be.



A GHR was filed. This breaks Rule #4.

Keep on rocking in the free world, Old Man Eloquence.


Submitted again, with the typo changed.

User avatar
A mean old man
Senator
 
Posts: 4386
Founded: Jun 27, 2008
Father Knows Best State

Postby A mean old man » Sat May 08, 2010 8:59 pm

Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:
Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:
Commend A mean old man
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation | Nominee: A mean old man | Proposed by: Unibotian WASC Mission


Description: The Security Council,

REALIZING that a commendation of a Mean Old Man was defeated at vote only a few months ago with many citing the defeat as retribution for a Mean Old Man’s supposed “public backstabbing and reprisal” against Unibot and the members of The Security Council, regarding SC#15-16,

UNDERSTANDING that just prior to SC#16 being voted on, a Mean Old Man and Unibot privately reconciled through telegrams, during which this conversation, Unibot became self-aware of what a stubborn git he had been to others, and a Mean Old Man promised he would not pursue the adoption of SC#16 as actively as he had previously been,

ATTEMPTING to make right what was previously wronged in the subsequent public discussions regarding a Mean Old Man as they were unfairly critical,

DETERMINING that a Mean Old Man since the beginning of his activity in the hallowed halls of the WA has been a vigorous supporter of quality in resolution writing and the drafting process…

(I) HAVING ADVOCATED for a diversity of opinions, independence, public drafting and and a system of democracy in the World Assembly free from manipulation,

(II) HAVING DENOUNCED the practice of stacking voting floors immediately as a manipulation of democracy that depreciates the individual vote,

(III) HAVING CRITICIZED the herd mentality of voters that “vote-stackers” exploit, which he popularized the phrase, “lemming-effect”, to describe,

BELIEVING that if more players articulated and acted upon their opinions and and principles such as a Mean Old Man has done without fear of reprisal, the World Assembly would be a more enlightened and democratic institution,

ADMIRING a Mean Old Man’s more lighthearted activities such as providing comedic caricatures of different In-Character entities, participating in various roleplays and advocating for more humor in the proceedings of the Security Council,

GIGGLING at the irony of commending an advocate of openness and accessibility with a proposal that was drafted in secret because it is inherently illegal due to a newly established rule -- “Rule #4” stipulates that proposals cannot be written entirely out-of-character,

APPLAUDING a Mean Old Man’s bold support of a campaign to rid the World Assembly of “Rule #4” in its entirety,

HOPING a Mean Old Man will take this opportunity to put his feet up, eat a cookie and quietly lurk in his own commendation thread -- a well-deserved break for one of the most lively critics in debate threads,

HEREBY COMMENDS A Mean Old Man for being who he is, instead of who he pretends to be.



A GHR was filed. This breaks Rule #4.

Keep on rocking in the free world, Old Man Eloquence.


Submitted again, with the typo changed.


Don't get yourself in trouble, Uni. :meh:
A: SC#16 - Repeal "Liberate The Security Council"
A: SC#26 - Commend The Joint Systems Alliance
A: SC#30 - Commend 10000 Islands
A: SC#37 - Condemn NAZI EUROPE
A: SC#38 - Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"
A: GA#149 - On Expiration Dates
C: SC#58 - Repeal "Commend Sedgistan"
A: SC#62 - Repeal "Condemn Swarmlandia"
C: SC#63 - Commend Ballotonia
A: SC#65 - Condemn Punk Reloaded
C: GA#163 - Repeal "Law of the Sea"
A: SC#72 - Repeal "Commend Mikeswill"
C: SC#74 - Condemn Lone Wolves United
C: SC#76 - Repeal "Condemn Thatcherton"
A: SC#81 - Repeal "Condemn Anthony Delasanta"
C: SC#83 - Condemn Automagfreek
C: SC#84 - Repeal "Liberate Islam"
C: SC#111 - Commend Krulltopia ← please forget

User avatar
Unibotian WASC Mission
Diplomat
 
Posts: 729
Founded: Oct 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibotian WASC Mission » Sat May 08, 2010 9:17 pm

A mean old man wrote:
Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:
Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:
Commend A mean old man
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation | Nominee: A mean old man | Proposed by: Unibotian WASC Mission


Description: The Security Council,

REALIZING that a commendation of a Mean Old Man was defeated at vote only a few months ago with many citing the defeat as retribution for a Mean Old Man’s supposed “public backstabbing and reprisal” against Unibot and the members of The Security Council, regarding SC#15-16,

UNDERSTANDING that just prior to SC#16 being voted on, a Mean Old Man and Unibot privately reconciled through telegrams, during which this conversation, Unibot became self-aware of what a stubborn git he had been to others, and a Mean Old Man promised he would not pursue the adoption of SC#16 as ac
tively as he had previously been,

ATTEMPTING to make right what was previously wronged in the subsequent public discussions regarding a Mean Old Man as they were unfairly critical,

DETERMINING that a Mean Old Man since the beginning of his activity in the hallowed halls of the WA has been a vigorous supporter of quality in resolution writing and the drafting process…

(I) HAVING ADVOCATED for a diversity of opinions, independence, public drafting and and a system of democracy in the World Assembly free from manipulation,

(II) HAVING DENOUNCED the practice of stacking voting floors immediately as a manipulation of democracy that depreciates the individual vote,

(III) HAVING CRITICIZED the herd mentality of voters that “vote-stackers” exploit, which he popularized the phrase, “lemming-effect”, to describe,

BELIEVING that if more players articulated and acted upon their opinions and and principles such as a Mean Old Man has done without fear of reprisal, the World Assembly would be a more enlightened and democratic institution,

ADMIRING a Mean Old Man’s more lighthearted activities such as providing comedic caricatures of different In-Character entities, participating in various roleplays and advocating for more humor in the proceedings of the Security Council,

GIGGLING at the irony of commending an advocate of openness and accessibility with a proposal that was drafted in secret because it is inherently illegal due to a newly established rule -- “Rule #4” stipulates that proposals cannot be written entirely out-of-character,

APPLAUDING a Mean Old Man’s bold support of a campaign to rid the World Assembly of “Rule #4” in its entirety,

HOPING a Mean Old Man will take this opportunity to put his feet up, eat a cookie and quietly lurk in his own commendation thread -- a well-deserved break for one of the most lively critics in debate threads,

HEREBY COMMENDS A Mean Old Man for being who he is, instead of who he pretends to be.



A GHR was filed. This breaks Rule #4.

Keep on rocking in the free world, Old Man Eloquence.


Submitted again, with the typo changed.


Don't get yourself in trouble, Uni. :meh:


Abraham Lincoln once said “The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly.”

The more the Moderators enforce Rule IV, the more injustice they perpetuate. I refuse to leave the game I've come to love (like others have in the past when they don't like something) because the gaming experience and our community's culture has been threatened by an unprecedented and unfair law. If the moderators wish to force me to the leave the game I've come to love, then so be it, it won't be that much more of a void in my life since they're already taken the game as we know it from us without a single deletion. Inaction or leaving dramatically is making a choice to legitimize the authority of Rule IV. Sometimes, instead of obeying the wrongs of your authorities, you have to commit a wrong to do what you think is right. When I began my mission in the Security Council, I attempted to get more roleplayed commendations and condemnations in the Security Council, and my gameplayer colleagues supported me in my efforts, generally. Thus it's my duty to support them with all my power to see it that their voice is heard and not silenced by Rule IV.
Last edited by Unibotian WASC Mission on Sat May 08, 2010 9:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Pythria
Minister
 
Posts: 2664
Founded: Feb 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pythria » Sat May 08, 2010 9:40 pm

I don't know if this should go in here, but it seems relatively silly...
Last edited by Pythria on Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Allrulian WA Mission
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 9
Founded: Apr 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Allrulian WA Mission » Sat May 08, 2010 9:55 pm

Repeal "Condemn Great Nepal"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal


Resolution: SC#24


Proposed by: FlagVorograd

Description: WA Security Council Resolution #24: Condemn Great Nepal shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Argument: Great Nepal was held under unfair judgement before the Council with recognition for it's other honorable acts.

RECOGNISING that child labour laws were active in Great Nepal BEFORE the WA voted against the proposition.

NOTING that a member of Nation States has the right to choose how his government is run, from dictatorship to democracy.

COMENDING Great Nepal for putting safety of his citizens as a first priority.

REMINDING that Great Nepal has not ever launched a nuclear missle without provocation, if any for that matter.

ASKING to ensure that internal affairs are recognized only by the nation.

WISHING to maintain the time honoured tradition of World Assembly neutrality and fairness to all nations regardless of government system.

HEREBY repeals "Repeal Great Nepal", to ensure safety and fairness of him and others to come.

Approvals: 8 (West-Side, GRiMMNeSS, Architeuthis, Jimmy Hart, Mital, Dainbramage, Joshuahood, Magna Omega)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 49 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days, 11 hours

Maybe it's just me, but if that line right there was true, then the WA wouldn't exist.
-WA Delegate Vladimir Illyich, Order of Military Merit, Second Class

User avatar
Virtualila
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 181
Founded: Mar 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Virtualila » Sun May 09, 2010 6:41 am

Allrulian WA Mission wrote:
Repeal "Condemn Great Nepal"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal


Resolution: SC#24


Proposed by: FlagVorograd

Description: WA Security Council Resolution #24: Condemn Great Nepal shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Argument: Great Nepal was held under unfair judgement before the Council with recognition for it's other honorable acts.

RECOGNISING that child labour laws were active in Great Nepal BEFORE the WA voted against the proposition.

NOTING that a member of Nation States has the right to choose how his government is run, from dictatorship to democracy.

COMENDING Great Nepal for putting safety of his citizens as a first priority.

REMINDING that Great Nepal has not ever launched a nuclear missle without provocation, if any for that matter.

ASKING to ensure that internal affairs are recognized only by the nation.

WISHING to maintain the time honoured tradition of World Assembly neutrality and fairness to all nations regardless of government system.

HEREBY repeals "Repeal Great Nepal", to ensure safety and fairness of him and others to come.

Approvals: 8 (West-Side, GRiMMNeSS, Architeuthis, Jimmy Hart, Mital, Dainbramage, Joshuahood, Magna Omega)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 49 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days, 11 hours

Maybe it's just me, but if that line right there was true, then the WA wouldn't exist.


And don't forget the line that is now in italics. I guess if this is true, and that we don't have to follow WA legislation because we can make our own rules that contradict the WA rulings, I guess we can close the WA down right now.
Last edited by Virtualila on Sun May 09, 2010 6:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
When you are too far to one side that you can no longer see even the near borders of the other, regardless of the cause, you have gone too far.

Proud Centrist Social Libertarian
Political Compass: Left: -3.00, Libertarian: -6.10
Political Spectrum: Left: 0.36, Libertarian: 5.27

User avatar
Unibotian WASC Mission
Diplomat
 
Posts: 729
Founded: Oct 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibotian WASC Mission » Mon May 10, 2010 3:05 pm

Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:
A mean old man wrote:
Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:
Unibotian WASC Mission wrote:
Commend A mean old man
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation | Nominee: A mean old man | Proposed by: Unibotian WASC Mission


Description: The Security Council,

REALIZING that a commendation of a Mean Old Man was defeated at vote only a few months ago with many citing the defeat as retribution for a Mean Old Man’s supposed “public backstabbing and reprisal” against Unibot and the members of The Security Council, regarding SC#15-16,

UNDERSTANDING that just prior to SC#16 being voted on, a Mean Old Man and Unibot privately reconciled through telegrams, during which this conversation, Unibot became self-aware of what a stubborn git he had been to others, and a Mean Old Man promised he would not pursue the adoption of SC#16 as ac
tively as he had previously been,

ATTEMPTING to make right what was previously wronged in the subsequent public discussions regarding a Mean Old Man as they were unfairly critical,

DETERMINING that a Mean Old Man since the beginning of his activity in the hallowed halls of the WA has been a vigorous supporter of quality in resolution writing and the drafting process…

(I) HAVING ADVOCATED for a diversity of opinions, independence, public drafting and and a system of democracy in the World Assembly free from manipulation,

(II) HAVING DENOUNCED the practice of stacking voting floors immediately as a manipulation of democracy that depreciates the individual vote,

(III) HAVING CRITICIZED the herd mentality of voters that “vote-stackers” exploit, which he popularized the phrase, “lemming-effect”, to describe,

BELIEVING that if more players articulated and acted upon their opinions and and principles such as a Mean Old Man has done without fear of reprisal, the World Assembly would be a more enlightened and democratic institution,

ADMIRING a Mean Old Man’s more lighthearted activities such as providing comedic caricatures of different In-Character entities, participating in various roleplays and advocating for more humor in the proceedings of the Security Council,

GIGGLING at the irony of commending an advocate of openness and accessibility with a proposal that was drafted in secret because it is inherently illegal due to a newly established rule -- “Rule #4” stipulates that proposals cannot be written entirely out-of-character,

APPLAUDING a Mean Old Man’s bold support of a campaign to rid the World Assembly of “Rule #4” in its entirety,

HOPING a Mean Old Man will take this opportunity to put his feet up, eat a cookie and quietly lurk in his own commendation thread -- a well-deserved break for one of the most lively critics in debate threads,

HEREBY COMMENDS A Mean Old Man for being who he is, instead of who he pretends to be.



A GHR was filed. This breaks Rule #4.

Keep on rocking in the free world, Old Man Eloquence.


Submitted again, with the typo changed.


Don't get yourself in trouble, Uni. :meh:


Abraham Lincoln once said “The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly.”

The more the Moderators enforce Rule IV, the more injustice they perpetuate. I refuse to leave the game I've come to love (like others have in the past when they don't like something) because the gaming experience and our community's culture has been threatened by an unprecedented and unfair law. If the moderators wish to force me to the leave the game I've come to love, then so be it, it won't be that much more of a void in my life since they're already taken the game as we know it from us without a single deletion. Inaction or leaving dramatically is making a choice to legitimize the authority of Rule IV. Sometimes, instead of obeying the wrongs of your authorities, you have to commit a wrong to do what you think is right. When I began my mission in the Security Council, I attempted to get more roleplayed commendations and condemnations in the Security Council, and my gameplayer colleagues supported me in my efforts, generally. Thus it's my duty to support them with all my power to see it that their voice is heard and not silenced by Rule IV.


This last submission was deleted after it made it into the queue.

Telegram Ruling:

"Your Security Council proposal commending a Mean Old Man has been removed from queue due to two clauses which are clearly OOC for their reference to SC rules. You may resubmit your proposal once those two clauses have been removed."

I will be submitting an unaltered version again when I have time to campaign it once again into the queue.

User avatar
Omigodtheyplutoedkenny
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Mar 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Omigodtheyplutoedkenny » Mon May 10, 2010 3:09 pm

If you're going to continue breaking the rules, shouldn't you at least wait until the queue is shorter and the mods don't have the time to notice the infraction? :roll:

User avatar
Quintessence of Dust
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1986
Founded: Nov 21, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Quintessence of Dust » Mon May 10, 2010 3:12 pm

I certainly hope such deliberate flouting of the rules is met with, at the very least, nation deletion.
The fight is long and tough, but together, we can make it. -- José Carlos Mariátegui

Two kinds of pork in one soup? Bring it on. -- Christina Hendricks

User avatar
Unibotian WASC Mission
Diplomat
 
Posts: 729
Founded: Oct 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibotian WASC Mission » Mon May 10, 2010 3:22 pm

Omigodtheyplutoedkenny wrote:If you're going to continue breaking the rules, shouldn't you at least wait until the queue is shorter and the mods don't have the time to notice the infraction? :roll:


That's not the point, I even submitted a GHR the first time I submitted it to inform them of the noncompliance, I figured this time, posting here would be enough.

It's not about 'breaking the rules' to be a dickhead, it's about disobeying an unjust one to do what I think is right.

If I get deleted, Qod, at least I'll know I haven't left the game without atleast trying to revert what has been wronged, instead of the infamous, 'I'm leaving because .. because.. you're unfair' bit. I mean, aren't we all tired of that bit? I love this game, I wouldn't willingly abandon it, and I have things I still want to do with it. But I can't love it with Rule #4 in place, and that makes it worth fighting -- If I sacrifice a gaming existence with it, in desire of a gaming existence without it -- so be it.
Last edited by Unibotian WASC Mission on Mon May 10, 2010 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
A mean old man
Senator
 
Posts: 4386
Founded: Jun 27, 2008
Father Knows Best State

Postby A mean old man » Mon May 10, 2010 4:58 pm

Unibot, please refrain from submitting it again. I'm all for removing rule #4, but this is making me uncomfortable.
A: SC#16 - Repeal "Liberate The Security Council"
A: SC#26 - Commend The Joint Systems Alliance
A: SC#30 - Commend 10000 Islands
A: SC#37 - Condemn NAZI EUROPE
A: SC#38 - Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"
A: GA#149 - On Expiration Dates
C: SC#58 - Repeal "Commend Sedgistan"
A: SC#62 - Repeal "Condemn Swarmlandia"
C: SC#63 - Commend Ballotonia
A: SC#65 - Condemn Punk Reloaded
C: GA#163 - Repeal "Law of the Sea"
A: SC#72 - Repeal "Commend Mikeswill"
C: SC#74 - Condemn Lone Wolves United
C: SC#76 - Repeal "Condemn Thatcherton"
A: SC#81 - Repeal "Condemn Anthony Delasanta"
C: SC#83 - Condemn Automagfreek
C: SC#84 - Repeal "Liberate Islam"
C: SC#111 - Commend Krulltopia ← please forget

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35491
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Tue May 11, 2010 4:03 pm

Commend Yourselves

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation


Nominee: Yourselves


Proposed by: Enosilla

Description: For all of the time and effort that you've dedicated to your flourishing nation. Here's to you!


Funny, but it has an absolute lack of argument. Plus the reference to "you" probably violates Rule #4 in some kind of way.
Last edited by Sedgistan on Tue May 11, 2010 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Chorridonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 210
Founded: Mar 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chorridonia » Tue May 11, 2010 6:25 pm

Condemn Lazarus

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Lazarus

Proposed by: Tendlaund

Description: 1.
A. CONDEMNATION OF NATION
"The Dictatorship of Nazi Adolf Hitler"
for the Nationstate's anti-semitic, prejudiced, and morally insulting motto "Death To Jews".

B. DEMAND OF DELETION of Nationstates account "The Dictatorship of Nazi Adolf Hitler" and any puppet states linked to owner's account.

2.
A. CONDEMNATION OF REGION: GLOBAL RIGHT ALLIANCE, for allowing this nation to dwell in it's domain, and demand of review of nations belonging to this region for inappropriate Nation titles and mottos.

B. DEMAND OF A NEW SYSTEM TO PREVENT HATE SPEECH WITHIN TITLES AND MOTTOS OF SAID NATIONSTATES!!!


Metagaming, condemnation on ideological grounds, asks for a "new system" that already exists and, above all... what the fuck has Lazarus to do with any of this???

(Not to mention the excess of caps).
Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.79

User avatar
Grandais
Minister
 
Posts: 2070
Founded: Jan 06, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Grandais » Tue May 11, 2010 6:34 pm

Chorridonia wrote:
Condemn Lazarus

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Lazarus

Proposed by: Tendlaund

Description: 1.
A. CONDEMNATION OF NATION
"The Dictatorship of Nazi Adolf Hitler"
for the Nationstate's anti-semitic, prejudiced, and morally insulting motto "Death To Jews".

B. DEMAND OF DELETION of Nationstates account "The Dictatorship of Nazi Adolf Hitler" and any puppet states linked to owner's account.

2.
A. CONDEMNATION OF REGION: GLOBAL RIGHT ALLIANCE, for allowing this nation to dwell in it's domain, and demand of review of nations belonging to this region for inappropriate Nation titles and mottos.

B. DEMAND OF A NEW SYSTEM TO PREVENT HATE SPEECH WITHIN TITLES AND MOTTOS OF SAID NATIONSTATES!!!


Metagaming, condemnation on ideological grounds, asks for a "new system" that already exists and, above all... what the fuck has Lazarus to do with any of this???

(Not to mention the excess of caps).

I was JUST going to post this. There is absolutely nothing right about this proposal, it's not formatted properly, the title and category is all wrong, the grammar is awful, etc.

I found this humourous:

Condemn Ootsaria

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation


Nominee: Ootsaria


Proposed by: Ootsaria


Description: REALIZING: That the Rogue Nation of Ootsaria constantly ignores World Assembly Resolutions.

NOTING: Ootsaria currently violates resolutions 7, 9, 18, 19, 20, 21, 34, 35, 37, 43, 47, 48, 50, 57, 62, 63, 66, 67, 68, 70, 79, 82, 84, 89, 90, and 91.

FURTHER NOTING: That Ootsaria has also made a hostile takeover of the region Heaven and now rules it with an iron fist.

DECLARING: That Ootsaria should be condemmed due to it's actions.
DEFCON 5 [4] 3 2 1
Grandais News|Factbook|Embassies

User avatar
Satirius
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5197
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Satirius » Tue May 11, 2010 6:46 pm

That's a long line of resolutions broken.
ODECON | Pact of the Bros | Your Typical International Incidents Alliance
Satirius on WS, note this is for better RPers than you


Franberry - Sharfghotten - Rosbaningrad - Tyrandis - Jeuna
Unjustly Deleted by Unjust Tyranny, and I Don't Think I Need to Mention What I Mean by Tyranny

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35491
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Wed May 12, 2010 7:43 am

Repeal "Condemn Macedon"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal


Resolution: SC#1


Proposed by: Goku43

Description: WA Security Council Resolution #1: Condemn Macedon shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: i believe this resolution harms the private and personal freedoms of a sovereign state abd undermines its authority


No argument - and certainly doesn't address anything the original resolution says.

User avatar
Diatraba
Diplomat
 
Posts: 640
Founded: Dec 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Diatraba » Fri May 14, 2010 7:52 am

Allrulian WA Mission wrote:
Repeal "Condemn Great Nepal"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal


Resolution: SC#24


Proposed by: FlagVorograd

Description: WA Security Council Resolution #24: Condemn Great Nepal shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Argument: Great Nepal was held under unfair judgement before the Council with recognition for it's other honorable acts.

RECOGNISING that child labour laws were active in Great Nepal BEFORE the WA voted against the proposition.

NOTING that a member of Nation States has the right to choose how his government is run, from dictatorship to democracy.

COMENDING Great Nepal for putting safety of his citizens as a first priority.

REMINDING that Great Nepal has not ever launched a nuclear missle without provocation, if any for that matter.

ASKING to ensure that internal affairs are recognized only by the nation.

WISHING to maintain the time honoured tradition of World Assembly neutrality and fairness to all nations regardless of government system.

HEREBY repeals "Repeal Great Nepal", to ensure safety and fairness of him and others to come.

Approvals: 8 (West-Side, GRiMMNeSS, Architeuthis, Jimmy Hart, Mital, Dainbramage, Joshuahood, Magna Omega)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 49 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days, 11 hours

Maybe it's just me, but if that line right there was true, then the WA wouldn't exist.


and there's a typo in the red text
Dimitri MacCarinson - Honourary Chief Ambassador on behalf of the Communist State of Diatraba (PMT)- One nation, one vision!
DEFCON: 3 - army at rediness - rediness levels above normal
UK Threat Level: Substantial - an attack is a strong possibility
REDCON: 2 - Full Alert - Army ready to fight
My Nation's Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.50
Social Libertarian Authoritarian: 3.69
My Political Compass
Our economic report



User avatar
Diatraba
Diplomat
 
Posts: 640
Founded: Dec 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Diatraba » Fri May 14, 2010 7:54 am

Sedgistan wrote:
Commend Yourselves

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation


Nominee: Yourselves


Proposed by: Enosilla

Description: For all of the time and effort that you've dedicated to your flourishing nation. Here's to you!


Funny, but it has an absolute lack of argument. Plus the reference to "you" probably violates Rule #4 in some kind of way.


what is rule four?
Dimitri MacCarinson - Honourary Chief Ambassador on behalf of the Communist State of Diatraba (PMT)- One nation, one vision!
DEFCON: 3 - army at rediness - rediness levels above normal
UK Threat Level: Substantial - an attack is a strong possibility
REDCON: 2 - Full Alert - Army ready to fight
My Nation's Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.50
Social Libertarian Authoritarian: 3.69
My Political Compass
Our economic report



User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35491
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon May 24, 2010 9:46 am

Condemn Teliviv

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation


Nominee: Teliviv


Proposed by: Zinmanoria

Description: The region of Teliviv is horrified at the way that Evil is allowed to treat their citizens.
Whereas they rule through terror and fear.
Whereas they do not contribute to the free world.
Whereas since they have not heeded our warning will declare war with Evil and all they stand for.
Unless Evil surrenders on our terms the state of war is inevitable.


Violates Rule 3, as it doesn't actually condemn the specified region.

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35491
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon May 24, 2010 10:40 am

Commend Goddess Relief Office

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation


Nominee: FlagGoddess Relief Office


Proposed by: FlagDorky Islands

Description: REALIZING:
That Godess Relief Office has been a force for good in many regions, many forms, and many ways.
ALSO repeating that he has been a force to contend with when attacked by evil forces

SUBMITTING: That GRO be given his reward for his time, valour, and virtues.

HEREBY commends GRO & his related nations for his outstanding work.


Violates Rules 3 & 4, by trying to commend other nations, and by referring to GRO as a person, not a nation.

Pity, as he definitely deserves a commendation.

Condemn MUNLASALAND

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation


Nominee: MUNLASALAND


Proposed by: FlagAeukera

Description: AWARE of the evil nations housed within Munlasaland

NOTING the regions recent growth

ALARMED by the numerous border skirmishes and “pseudo” wars held between the nations of this region

SUPPORTIVE of others nations actions to bring this region to justice, including the attempted condemnation of The Sharp.

FRIGHTENED by the lack of concern held by the leaders of this region and their collective failure to hold any of the nations within to World Assembly standards

CONCERNED by the high growth rate and expansionist policies held by the region as a whole

ASTONISHED that this committee has not taken previous action against MUNLASALAND and its nations

ACKNOWLEDING that the Security Council is the only avenue to help reign in this region, and that this must be accomplished through condemning it

GRATEFUL to those nations which have endorsed this nation in its attempts to persecute this rogue region

THE SECURITY COUNCIL

CONDEMNS the region of MUNLASALAND


Curious - MUNLASALAND is a school region - are SC resolutions allowed to apply to them?

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35491
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon May 24, 2010 3:36 pm

Condemn Evil

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation


Nominee: Evil


Proposed by: Zinmanoria

Description: The region of Teliviv is horrified at the way that Evil reigns with the iron fist of tyranny.
Whereas we the region of Teliviv will declare war on Evil unless a complete and full surrender occurs.
Whereas the region of Evil must not be allowed to rule the way they do.
Whereas they are taking away from the free world.
For these reasons if Evil does not comply we will enter war!


And another one, basically the same as the proposal a couple of posts above. Violates Rule 3, as it doesn't actually condemn the specified region.
Last edited by Sedgistan on Mon May 24, 2010 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Diatraba
Diplomat
 
Posts: 640
Founded: Dec 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Diatraba » Tue May 25, 2010 7:53 am

Sedgistan wrote:
Condemn Evil

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation


Nominee: Evil


Proposed by: Zinmanoria

Description: The region of Teliviv is horrified at the way that Evil reigns with the iron fist of tyranny.
Whereas we the region of Teliviv will declare war on Evil unless a complete and full surrender occurs.
Whereas the region of Evil must not be allowed to rule the way they do.
Whereas they are taking away from the free world.
For these reasons if Evil does not comply we will enter war!


And another one, basically the same as the proposal a couple of posts above. Violates Rule 3, as it doesn't actually condemn the specified region.


It's the same guy who wrote the resolution two posts above - he's trying to get around the rulebook
Dimitri MacCarinson - Honourary Chief Ambassador on behalf of the Communist State of Diatraba (PMT)- One nation, one vision!
DEFCON: 3 - army at rediness - rediness levels above normal
UK Threat Level: Substantial - an attack is a strong possibility
REDCON: 2 - Full Alert - Army ready to fight
My Nation's Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.50
Social Libertarian Authoritarian: 3.69
My Political Compass
Our economic report



PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gebet, Velaskevin

Advertisement

Remove ads