by Sinfulthep » Mon Feb 26, 2024 10:24 pm
by Stalin as a DEAT » Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:18 pm
by The Overmind » Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:27 pm
Stalin as a DEAT wrote:C) I suspect this was ChatGPT-written, I’m not sure but if it was, delete it and write a human-written version
by Keltionialang » Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:29 pm
by Cyptopir » Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:57 am
by Refuge Isle » Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:58 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:46 am
I’m am making a draft let me know if there needs to be anything change
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by The Overmind » Tue Feb 27, 2024 4:01 am
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:No need for ChatGPT detectors - all you have to do is look at their introduction to the draft and the poor grammar there and compare it to the text submitted.
by Sinfulthep » Tue Feb 27, 2024 5:29 am
The Overmind wrote:Cyptopir wrote:This proposal is probably ChatGPT, yeah. But aren't ChatGPT detectors fake, snake oil-esque tools that have abysmal accuracy ratings?
No, and their interrater reliability is a testament to that.Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:No need for ChatGPT detectors - all you have to do is look at their introduction to the draft and the poor grammar there and compare it to the text submitted.
I didn't read nearly close enough to notice that. My interaction with this thread was seeing it in the wrong forum and requesting for it to be moved to the right place. Using the ChatGPT detectors was ex post facto and confirmatory, after it had already been suggested that that's what was going on.
by The Overmind » Tue Feb 27, 2024 5:41 am
Sinfulthep wrote:The Overmind wrote:
No, and their interrater reliability is a testament to that.
I didn't read nearly close enough to notice that. My interaction with this thread was seeing it in the wrong forum and requesting for it to be moved to the right place. Using the ChatGPT detectors was ex post facto and confirmatory, after it had already been suggested that that's what was going on.
I need people to stay on topic regardless of the formatting . I can care less about the format remember it’s a draft. Criticism is highly encouraged but I need some feedback on the situation here . Do you think it should be repealed ?
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Tue Feb 27, 2024 5:58 am
Sinfulthep wrote:The Overmind wrote:
No, and their interrater reliability is a testament to that.
I didn't read nearly close enough to notice that. My interaction with this thread was seeing it in the wrong forum and requesting for it to be moved to the right place. Using the ChatGPT detectors was ex post facto and confirmatory, after it had already been suggested that that's what was going on.
I need people to stay on topic regardless of the formatting . I can care less about the format remember it’s a draft. Criticism is highly encouraged but I need some feedback on the situation here . Do you think it should be repealed ?
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Omphalos » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:03 am
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Sinfulthep wrote:
I need people to stay on topic regardless of the formatting . I can care less about the format remember it’s a draft. Criticism is highly encouraged but I need some feedback on the situation here . Do you think it should be repealed ?
What you need is of no concern. You are using an AI created draft, you have no idea of the SC rules as one can see from the number of illegalities in the draft and the Condemnation does not need repealing. Also you have no idea why SC Condemnations are granted in the first place.
All in all it’s a bloody awful badge hunt.
Fahran wrote:Jewish people do not have to be Zionists. Just as black people do not have to support the Voting Rights Act, trans people can be upset about Easter falling on TDOV, and indigenous people do not have to support treaty rights. Is it contrary to the collective interests of the group they belong to? Absolutely.
by Rosartemis » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:06 am
Omphalos wrote:Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:What you need is of no concern. You are using an AI created draft, you have no idea of the SC rules as one can see from the number of illegalities in the draft and the Condemnation does not need repealing. Also you have no idea why SC Condemnations are granted in the first place.
All in all it’s a bloody awful badge hunt.
Just realized I read your feedback on drafts in a Gordon Ramsay voice
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:26 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Sinfulthep » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:40 am
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Sinfulthep wrote:
I need people to stay on topic regardless of the formatting . I can care less about the format remember it’s a draft. Criticism is highly encouraged but I need some feedback on the situation here . Do you think it should be repealed ?
What you need is of no concern. You are using an AI created draft, you have no idea of the SC rules as one can see from the number of illegalities in the draft and the Condemnation does not need repealing. Also you have no idea why SC Condemnations are granted in the first place.
All in all it’s a bloody awful badge hunt.
by Cyptopir » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:42 am
Sinfulthep wrote:Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:What you need is of no concern. You are using an AI created draft, you have no idea of the SC rules as one can see from the number of illegalities in the draft and the Condemnation does not need repealing. Also you have no idea why SC Condemnations are granted in the first place.
All in all it’s a bloody awful badge hunt.
Ok where does it say in the reference on what can I do ? Show me the rules and the guidelines sir . Let me get this clear you’re telling me things based on opinions or you’re telling me based on facts? So educate me . Your not bringing a solution it’s counterproductive .
by Neonian Imperium » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:43 am
Sinfulthep wrote:Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:What you need is of no concern. You are using an AI created draft, you have no idea of the SC rules as one can see from the number of illegalities in the draft and the Condemnation does not need repealing. Also you have no idea why SC Condemnations are granted in the first place.
All in all it’s a bloody awful badge hunt.
Ok where does it say in the reference on what can I do ? Show me the rules and the guidelines sir . Let me get this clear you’re telling me things based on opinions or you’re telling me based on facts? So educate me . Your not bringing a solution it’s counterproductive .
by Sinfulthep » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:44 am
Cyptopir wrote:Sinfulthep wrote:
Ok where does it say in the reference on what can I do ? Show me the rules and the guidelines sir . Let me get this clear you’re telling me things based on opinions or you’re telling me based on facts? So educate me . Your not bringing a solution it’s counterproductive .
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=8809
by Sinfulthep » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:49 am
Neonian Imperium wrote:Sinfulthep wrote:
Ok where does it say in the reference on what can I do ? Show me the rules and the guidelines sir . Let me get this clear you’re telling me things based on opinions or you’re telling me based on facts? So educate me . Your not bringing a solution it’s counterproductive .
read this kid.
by Bhadeshistan » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:53 am
Sinfulthep wrote:Neonian Imperium wrote:read this kid.
I don’t appreciate the way you text that like I’m a man . If you don’t have anything positive to say don’t message at all.
by Sinfulthep » Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:58 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Tue Feb 27, 2024 7:25 am
Sinfulthep wrote:Bhadeshistan wrote:You can’t make a proposal totally written off Chat-GPT. Stop copying from AI and be original and clean. Enough said
What are you talking about ? We solved that issue 4 posts ago . You’re not bringing any new information the other gentlemen or ladies talked about . Let me ask you a question are you going help me write something new and original ? If your not then don’t say anything your just wasting my time .
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Crazy girl » Tue Feb 27, 2024 2:36 pm
by Wallenburg » Tue Feb 27, 2024 5:34 pm
by Outer Sparta » Sat Mar 02, 2024 6:32 am
Sinfulthep wrote:Bhadeshistan wrote:You can’t make a proposal totally written off Chat-GPT. Stop copying from AI and be original and clean. Enough said
What are you talking about ? We solved that issue 4 posts ago . You’re not bringing any new information the other gentlemen or ladies talked about . Let me ask you a question are you going help me write something new and original ? If your not then don’t say anything your just wasting my time .
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: United Calanworie
Advertisement