Thought about it, but wasnt sure if I should use that idea, because it might have already been used or was in current use. I dunnae. It is a nifty idea though.
Advertisement
by Ramsetia » Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:05 am
Canadai wrote:Does any nation even still field old-school flak AA?
by United NW Canada » Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:41 am
by Ramsetia » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:52 am
Wolohanistan wrote:Well, I tried to make some statistics. I barely know what any of these things mean due to my limited aircraft knowledge. Any comments would be extremely helpful.
Role: Air Superiority
Manufacturer: Warmonger Avionics
Status: Operational
Users: Wolohanistani United Tribal Airforce
Crew: 1 (Combat configuration)
Length: 18.6 metres
Wingspan: 14.5 metres
Height: 5.8 metres
Empty Weight: 15,550 kg
Loaded Weight:23,500 kg
Max Takeoff Weight: 30,000 kg
Power plant: 2 engines (Unnamed due to aircraft noobery)
Fuel Capacity: 8000 kg Internally can be increased with external fuel tanks
Max Speed: Mach 2.25 (1500 MPH)
Range: 1825 Miles
Surface Ceiling:19,800 Metres
Rate Of Climb: 330 M/S
Guns: 2 30mm Cannons
Hard points: 8 under wing, 2 internal, 2 under fuselage
by Imeriata » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:23 am
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!
by Ramsetia » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:35 am
Imeriata wrote:While not a fighter... or a plane it is in fact an autogyro but it flies and that is good enough for me!
However more to my point does anyone here know what’s the difference between an autogyro and a proper helicopter is? I mean will it be able to hover and will it be faster as it is able to fly like an airplane? Also any criticism on the design would be splendid.
by Imeriata » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:48 am
Ramsetia wrote:I still prefer the pusher propeller...But I digress.
Ramsetia wrote:You may need a larger frontal propeller, depending on the number of blades and rotation speed of the one present... The wings CAN be smaller, much smaller, due to the vertical propeller providing lift, but you may want to move them back a bit, closer to the centre of gravity anyway. To fit with other aircraft in your military, maybe the front guns should fire through the propeller blades, and to aid in it's gunship duty, additional guns on other facings?
Ramsetia wrote:Effectively, an Autogyro is a hybrid much like a tilt-rotor, but without as many moving parts. Either propeller can (usually) be set to free-wheel to allow either hovering (with a VERY slight frontal motion), or (slightly restricted due to drag and structural concerns) aeroplane-like motion without interfering in the craft's operation.
Ramsetia wrote:It's not as fast as a proper aeroplane, but it's generally more agile. It's just as fragile as any helicopter out there, but doesn't necessarily have any more moving parts. It's more about the aerodynamics of having a vehicle built with this manner of operation and the complexity that it entails. There's also the fuel concerns if you're using two separate engines for each propeller.
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!
by Ramsetia » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:59 am
Imeriata wrote:Ramsetia wrote:I still prefer the pusher propeller...But I digress.
I must admit that I took a lot of inspiration from this and a lot of earlier variants of autogyros in the second generation and the front propeller were one of the few things I could do to make it look a bit olderRamsetia wrote:You may need a larger frontal propeller, depending on the number of blades and rotation speed of the one present... The wings CAN be smaller, much smaller, due to the vertical propeller providing lift, but you may want to move them back a bit, closer to the centre of gravity anyway. To fit with other aircraft in your military, maybe the front guns should fire through the propeller blades, and to aid in it's gunship duty, additional guns on other facings?
Move wings back and larger propeller on the way! However the wings were intentional as it looked... well... retarded with smaller wings.
Imeriata wrote:Ramsetia wrote:Effectively, an Autogyro is a hybrid much like a tilt-rotor, but without as many moving parts. Either propeller can (usually) be set to free-wheel to allow either hovering (with a VERY slight frontal motion), or (slightly restricted due to drag and structural concerns) aeroplane-like motion without interfering in the craft's operation.
All right thank you.Ramsetia wrote:It's not as fast as a proper aeroplane, but it's generally more agile. It's just as fragile as any helicopter out there, but doesn't necessarily have any more moving parts. It's more about the aerodynamics of having a vehicle built with this manner of operation and the complexity that it entails. There's also the fuel concerns if you're using two separate engines for each propeller.
So it has to land a bit more often to refuel? A small price to pay to keep our armies free of those eyesores of helicopters that seems to be the fad nowadays!
by Imeriata » Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:14 pm
Ramsetia wrote:Looking at that picture (and most other auto-gyro pictures around) You can also see that the cockpit is behind the lifting propeller, not that I actively suggest you do the same, but it's something that's worth noticing, and maybe taking steps to emulate.
Also worth noticing, a few auto-gyro models have support struts leading from their wings to the vertical rotor's hub. Not the most elegant-looking affair, but should help with underwing carrying capacity, and making the craft seem older.
Ramsetia wrote:Psh. I bet you're just jealous of our awesome tilt-turbine gunships, all sleek smooth lines and nary a propeller in sight.
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!
by Crookfur » Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:48 pm
by New Ravania » Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:25 pm
by Imeriata » Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:31 pm
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!
by Jordtopia » Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:36 pm
by Strykla » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:39 pm
New Ravania wrote:Fighter Role: RMV-1F Falken (MT, concept aircraft, name pending)
Wingspan: 52 ft
Length: 24.0mbr
Height: 19.9 ft
Weight: 23,300kg
Max Speed: Mach 2.2
Engine: WWX-GD-425x2
Manufactured by: RavaCorp.
Info: Though it can be viewed a multi-role aircraft, the Falken is better suited for Air-to-air combat. It's most prominent feature other than forward-swept wings is what seems to be an armoured, glassless cockpit. This is in actuality, a 360° celestial-spherical screen cockpit layout, giving the pilot an immense advantage in combat. Instead of a traditional glass canopy, the plane utilizes a prototype of the COFFIN (COnnection For Flight INterface) system, which is similar in effect to a one-way mirror. The pilot can still see out, but no one can see in. This is achieved via a series of real-time hexagonal monitors and external cameras that transmit the visual data to the pilot. It also makes use of the prototype system, ENSI (Electro-Neuron-Synapse-Interface) which, if developed to its full potential, will connect the pilot directly to the aircraft's systems via neural cables.
(FT, these systems are perfected and standard on all military aircraft)
by Licana » Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:26 pm
New Ravania wrote:Fighter Role: RMV-1F Falken (MT, concept aircraft, name pending)
Wingspan: 52 ft
Length: 24.0mbr
Height: 19.9 ft
Weight: 23,300kg
Max Speed: Mach 2.2
Engine: WWX-GD-425x2
Manufactured by: RavaCorp.
Info: Though it can be viewed a multi-role aircraft, the Falken is better suited for Air-to-air combat. It's most prominent feature other than forward-swept wings is what seems to be an armoured, glassless cockpit. This is in actuality, a 360° celestial-spherical screen cockpit layout, giving the pilot an immense advantage in combat. Instead of a traditional glass canopy, the plane utilizes a prototype of the COFFIN (COnnection For Flight INterface) system, which is similar in effect to a one-way mirror. The pilot can still see out, but no one can see in. This is achieved via a series of real-time hexagonal monitors and external cameras that transmit the visual data to the pilot. It also makes use of the prototype system, ENSI (Electro-Neuron-Synapse-Interface) which, if developed to its full potential, will connect the pilot directly to the aircraft's systems via neural cables.
(FT, these systems are perfected and standard on all military aircraft)
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by The Nuclear Fist » Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:39 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
by Tidera » Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:40 pm
by Satirius » Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:46 pm
by Imeriata » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:34 pm
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!
by Sucrati » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:40 pm
George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
by Ramsetia » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:28 pm
by Sucrati » Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:04 am
George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
by Arkinesia » Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:19 am
Licana wrote:New Ravania wrote:Fighter Role: RMV-1F Falken (MT, concept aircraft, name pending)
Wingspan: 52 ft
Length: 24.0mbr
Height: 19.9 ft
Weight: 23,300kg
Max Speed: Mach 2.2
Engine: WWX-GD-425x2
Manufactured by: RavaCorp.
Info: Though it can be viewed a multi-role aircraft, the Falken is better suited for Air-to-air combat. It's most prominent feature other than forward-swept wings is what seems to be an armoured, glassless cockpit. This is in actuality, a 360° celestial-spherical screen cockpit layout, giving the pilot an immense advantage in combat. Instead of a traditional glass canopy, the plane utilizes a prototype of the COFFIN (COnnection For Flight INterface) system, which is similar in effect to a one-way mirror. The pilot can still see out, but no one can see in. This is achieved via a series of real-time hexagonal monitors and external cameras that transmit the visual data to the pilot. It also makes use of the prototype system, ENSI (Electro-Neuron-Synapse-Interface) which, if developed to its full potential, will connect the pilot directly to the aircraft's systems via neural cables.
(FT, these systems are perfected and standard on all military aircraft)
The Falken was a brilliant plane in AC, but it would probably be highly impractical in somewhere with realistic physics (like most of NS). If you want a badass Ace combat fighter, go with the X-02 or XFA-27A, and you could outfit all of the Falken's systems onto these planes (with enough effort).
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Kannap
Advertisement