NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread Type 08

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Roski
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15601
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Roski » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:06 am

Questers wrote:Depending on your strategic position, you could have no militia whatsoever, or you could have every able bodied man with a military rifle in his home.


You could do that last one anyway

its called legalizing the weapons.
I'm some 17 year old psuedo-libertarian who leans to the left in social terms, is fiercly right economically, and centrist in foriegn policy. Unapologetically Pro-American, Pro-NATO, even if we do fuck up (a lot). If you can find real sources that disagree with me I will change my opinion. Call me IHOP cause I'm always flipping.

Follow my Vex Robotics team on instagram! @3921a_vex

I am the Federal Republic of Roski. I have a population slightly over 256 million with a GDP of 13.92-14.25 trillion. My gross domestic product increases each year between .4%-.1.4%. I have a military with 4.58 million total people, with 1.58 million of those active. My defense spending is 598.5 billion, or 4.2% of my Gross Domestic Product.

User avatar
Yuketobaniac
Diplomat
 
Posts: 649
Founded: May 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Yuketobaniac » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:07 am

Korva wrote:
United Marxist Nations wrote:should the Iraqi Army look into replacing or upgrading its aging fleet of BMP-1's? I have read that they are acquiring (or in a deal to, at least) M2 Bradley's.

Eventually.

The BMP-1 has very thin armor, the seating arrangement for the commander is weird, the Grom has a short effective range, the autoloader was bad enough that according to Zaloga the Iraqis removed it and used manual loading, and the vehicles are getting rather old.

they should get more abrams, not for replacing the bmp-1
Reblian civil war -Won
The Great War of geneviena 2014-Won
Eleventh Gilean war 2014-Won
The Bosakian Invasion of Daritii 2014-Withdrawl
World War I-Lost
Operation southern comfort 2015-Won
War On Ravon-Won
World war II-Lost
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:34 am

Roski wrote:
Questers wrote:Depending on your strategic position, you could have no militia whatsoever, or you could have every able bodied man with a military rifle in his home.


You could do that last one anyway

its called legalizing the weapons.
Does every American male aged 21+ have a military rifle in their home that they have undergone extensive training to use in a combat situation?
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Roski
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15601
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Roski » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:36 am

Questers wrote:
Roski wrote:
You could do that last one anyway

its called legalizing the weapons.
Does every American male aged 21+ have a military rifle in their home that they have undergone extensive training to use in a combat situation?

are military grade rifles easily accessible?

Pro-tip: Class 3s are very difficult to get.

Bad anaology.
I'm some 17 year old psuedo-libertarian who leans to the left in social terms, is fiercly right economically, and centrist in foriegn policy. Unapologetically Pro-American, Pro-NATO, even if we do fuck up (a lot). If you can find real sources that disagree with me I will change my opinion. Call me IHOP cause I'm always flipping.

Follow my Vex Robotics team on instagram! @3921a_vex

I am the Federal Republic of Roski. I have a population slightly over 256 million with a GDP of 13.92-14.25 trillion. My gross domestic product increases each year between .4%-.1.4%. I have a military with 4.58 million total people, with 1.58 million of those active. My defense spending is 598.5 billion, or 4.2% of my Gross Domestic Product.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:39 am

Roski wrote:
Questers wrote: Does every American male aged 21+ have a military rifle in their home that they have undergone extensive training to use in a combat situation?

are military grade rifles easily accessible?

Pro-tip: Class 3s are very difficult to get.

Bad anaology.


Jesus christ.

Please stop shitposting for a minute.

In Switzerland, every male who is able bodied undergoes military training and keeps his rifle (not the ammunition) in his house. He is trained with this weapon in a military training environment.

That is not the same effect as "legalizing weapons." If that doesn't make sense to you, try reading comprehension exercises. For your level, I recommend Roger Red Hat.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:40 am

P.S. Even before gun control, the US never managed to achieve Switzerland levels of military arms ownership & proficiency.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Roski
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15601
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Roski » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:42 am

Questers wrote:
Roski wrote:are military grade rifles easily accessible?

Pro-tip: Class 3s are very difficult to get.

Bad anaology.


Jesus christ.

Please stop shitposting for a minute.

In Switzerland, every male who is able bodied undergoes military training and keeps his rifle (not the ammunition) in his house. He is trained with this weapon in a military training environment.

That is not the same effect as "legalizing weapons." If that doesn't make sense to you, try reading comprehension exercises. For your level, I recommend Roger Red Hat.


K

Well, while you put shifty snark and compare something to an absolutely neutral country I've already given the beginning step to a heavily armed country.

Check your fucking privilege
I'm some 17 year old psuedo-libertarian who leans to the left in social terms, is fiercly right economically, and centrist in foriegn policy. Unapologetically Pro-American, Pro-NATO, even if we do fuck up (a lot). If you can find real sources that disagree with me I will change my opinion. Call me IHOP cause I'm always flipping.

Follow my Vex Robotics team on instagram! @3921a_vex

I am the Federal Republic of Roski. I have a population slightly over 256 million with a GDP of 13.92-14.25 trillion. My gross domestic product increases each year between .4%-.1.4%. I have a military with 4.58 million total people, with 1.58 million of those active. My defense spending is 598.5 billion, or 4.2% of my Gross Domestic Product.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:43 am

This thread is English only, please ensure your posts are in read-able English.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Confederacy of Bavarian States
Envoy
 
Posts: 224
Founded: Jan 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Confederacy of Bavarian States » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:45 am

Questers wrote:P.S. Even before gun control, the US never managed to achieve Switzerland levels of military arms ownership & proficiency.

You do realize Switzerland has a population 2% the size of America's right? It's much easier to distribute rifles to a smaller population than it is to distribute to a populace of 314+ Million.
Anthem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeOVsI5SAhg
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=10537434
The day I sniped the WA: https://i.gyazo.com/b91eab0181bf2408cdbfd0efac69e2e6.png
"Now I just imagined an American in WWII running into a house holding a pineapple by the leaves and whacking Germans with it" - Confederacy of Bavarian States
I can be a bit of a sociopath, I haven't been tested (Nor can I afford it) so I can't tell whether I'm messed up in the head or have a terrible personality so forgive me for anything that might seem blunt

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:46 am

Confederacy of Bavarian States wrote:
Questers wrote:P.S. Even before gun control, the US never managed to achieve Switzerland levels of military arms ownership & proficiency.

You do realize Switzerland has a population 2% the size of America's right? It's much easier to distribute rifles to a smaller population than it is to distribute to a populace of 314+ Million.
I didn't say it was because the US tried and failed. It didn't even try, because it didn't need to. It could probably do it, if it wanted to, but it has a different strategic concept for defence.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27931
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:47 am

Roski wrote:
Questers wrote:
Jesus christ.

Please stop shitposting for a minute.

In Switzerland, every male who is able bodied undergoes military training and keeps his rifle (not the ammunition) in his house. He is trained with this weapon in a military training environment.

That is not the same effect as "legalizing weapons." If that doesn't make sense to you, try reading comprehension exercises. For your level, I recommend Roger Red Hat.


K

Well, while you put shifty snark and compare something to an absolutely neutral country I've already given the beginning step to a heavily armed country.

Check your fucking privilege

I hate smilies but sometimes they are appropriate, like this instance.
:palm:
The Holy Romangnan Empire of Ostmark
something something the sole legitimate Austria-Hungary larp'er on NS :3

MT/MagicT
The Armed Forces|Embassy Programme|The Imperial and National Anthem of the Holy Roman Empire|Characters|The Map


User avatar
Scandinavian Nations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1088
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Scandinavian Nations » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:53 am

Confederacy of Bavarian States wrote:You do realize Switzerland has a population 2% the size of America's right? It's much easier to distribute rifles to a smaller population than it is to distribute to a populace of 314+ Million.

It does take 50 times more labor and approximately 1+log 50 ~= 2.5x more time. Other than that, it's not.

The real problem with the US is the large number of disenfranchised citizens and non-citizens in its borders, who do not adhere to the nation's values and will use the weapons for purposes including but not limited to gang warfare. Whereas Switzerland is, even despite its multiple languages and origins, relatively culturally homogenic.

Plus, the Swiss model isn't "give everyone a rifle", it's "put everyone through boot camp and have them keep their weapon". Distributing the rifles is like 1% of this model's cost and effort.
Those who don't remember history, are blessed to believe anything is possible when they're repeating it.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:58 am

Yes, the point isn't just that everyone has a gun, it's that they know how to use it, and behave in a military context. It is expensive, but for a solely defensive force, frankly quite cheap.

The old myth resurfaces.

Kaiser Willy visited the Swiss militia on manoeuvres in 1913. He said to a militiaman: "This is all very impressive, but what can half a million Swiss do against a million Germans?"

To which the militiaman replied: "Shoot twice and go home."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoHECVnQC7A
Last edited by Questers on Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:00 am, edited 2 times in total.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Versail
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5246
Founded: May 21, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Versail » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:25 am

Questers wrote:Depending on your strategic position, you could have no militia whatsoever, or you could have every able bodied man with a military rifle in his home.

A semi-autonomus region of a empire seperated from the rest of the empire via water.
Military junta for a government.
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, Whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or in the holy name of liberty or democracy?~ Gandhi.
http://freerice.com/#/english-vocabulary/2499

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:33 am

Versail wrote:
Questers wrote:Depending on your strategic position, you could have no militia whatsoever, or you could have every able bodied man with a military rifle in his home.

A semi-autonomus region of a empire seperated from the rest of the empire via water.
Military junta for a government.

Stop stealing my material :o
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:15 am

I have a pretty trivial question.

Say, in the name Leo2A5 or M1A2, does the A actually stand for anything?
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:20 am

Ainin wrote:I have a pretty trivial question.

Say, in the name Leo2A5 or M1A2, does the A actually stand for anything?


The A number (for lack of a better name) is a production or variant of the vehicle. Higher numbers indicate more recent variants or production, or older production rebuilt slash modified to the newer production's standard. It's used for keeping track of roughly what the capabilities of something are.

For example: Leopard 2 through 2A4 had the slab turrets, 2A5 on has wedge turrets.
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd

User avatar
Laywenrania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 825
Founded: Aug 05, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Laywenrania » Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:46 am

Ainin wrote:I have a pretty trivial question.

Say, in the name Leo2A5 or M1A2, does the A actually stand for anything?

I guess for the Leopard 2 it could mean "Ausführung" -> "model"
Factbook on II-Wiki
NationStates Factbooks
Factbook website

Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.

Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.

User avatar
Tule
Senator
 
Posts: 3886
Founded: Jan 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tule » Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:49 am

Questers wrote:
Roski wrote:
You could do that last one anyway

its called legalizing the weapons.
Does every American male aged 21+ have a military rifle in their home that they have undergone extensive training to use in a combat situation?


"So, Mr. Tea Party member, you're going to use your AR-15 to overthrow the government for being authoritarian huh?

Who is your commanding officer?"

Seriously, the people most willing to overthrow the US government tend to be the people least qualified to do so. You can't be an effective soldier if you have a problem with authority.
There is a reason why most regime changes are the result of military coups.
Last edited by Tule on Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Formerly known as Bafuria.

User avatar
Scandinavian Nations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1088
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Scandinavian Nations » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:12 am

Tule wrote:Seriously, the people most willing to overthrow the US government tend to be the people least qualified to do so. You can't be an effective soldier if you have a problem with authority.

That's an oversimplified way of looking at it.

The current executive branch of the US government is guilty not found so by the court, so let's say "strongly suspected" of multiple violations of the Constitution and just plain crimes as serious as feeding guns to Mexican cartels just to have them illegally imported back to use as a political point.

I wish I could say "it doesn't get worse", but that would be total bullcrap - it does get worse and from there on inevitably much worse still. Just visit our best friend Obiang, who declared himself friggin' god.

And at that point, and long before it really, it's not authority you have a problem with; it's with who holds that authority and how much of it they hold.
Last edited by Scandinavian Nations on Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Those who don't remember history, are blessed to believe anything is possible when they're repeating it.

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25549
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:19 am

Questers wrote:
Confederacy of Bavarian States wrote:You do realize Switzerland has a population 2% the size of America's right? It's much easier to distribute rifles to a smaller population than it is to distribute to a populace of 314+ Million.
I didn't say it was because the US tried and failed. It didn't even try, because it didn't need to. It could probably do it, if it wanted to, but it has a different strategic concept for defence.


Every sailor a rifleman. ;_;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navy_Exped ... at_Command

;_________________________________________________________;

Scandinavian Nations wrote:
Tule wrote:Seriously, the people most willing to overthrow the US government tend to be the people least qualified to do so. You can't be an effective soldier if you have a problem with authority.

That's an oversimplified way of looking at it.

The current executive branch of the US government is guilty not found so by the court, so let's say "strongly suspected" of multiple violations of the Constitution and just plain crimes as serious as feeding guns to Mexican cartels just to have them illegally imported back to use as a political point.

I wish I could say "it doesn't get worse", but that would be total bullcrap - it does get worse and from there on inevitably much worse still. Just visit our best friend Obiang, who declared himself friggin' god.

And at that point, and long before it really, it's not authority you have a problem with; it's with who holds that authority and how much of it they hold.


Now let me tell you I've read my Bible and I know the Book of Revelation by heart.

Obama is the Antichrist and Netanyahu is his False Prophet.

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:30 am

Yuketobaniac wrote:
Korva wrote:Eventually.

The BMP-1 has very thin armor, the seating arrangement for the commander is weird, the Grom has a short effective range, the autoloader was bad enough that according to Zaloga the Iraqis removed it and used manual loading, and the vehicles are getting rather old.

they should get more abrams, not for replacing the bmp-1

They are already getting more Abrams. But most conflicts today are mostly infantry, so having a military capable of engaging and supporting primarily infantry engagements effectively is a good thing. Tanks can accomplish that, but have sort of evolved to absorb the niche of the tank destroyer as well. Now, it may be cheaper to just refurbish and rearm (replace the gun on the BMP-1 with a more modern weapon), but I do know Iraq is already negotiating for some M2 Bradley's, which is probably a good idea.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
Husseinarti
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Mar 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Husseinarti » Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:08 am

Scandinavian Nations wrote:
Tule wrote:Seriously, the people most willing to overthrow the US government tend to be the people least qualified to do so. You can't be an effective soldier if you have a problem with authority.

That's an oversimplified way of looking at it.

The current executive branch of the US government is guilty not found so by the court, so let's say "strongly suspected" of multiple violations of the Constitution and just plain crimes as serious as feeding guns to Mexican cartels just to have them illegally imported back to use as a political point.

I wish I could say "it doesn't get worse", but that would be total bullcrap - it does get worse and from there on inevitably much worse still. Just visit our best friend Obiang, who declared himself friggin' god.

And at that point, and long before it really, it's not authority you have a problem with; it's with who holds that authority and how much of it they hold.


>MIL realism
>Conservativeism
Bash the fash, neopup the neo-cons, crotale the commies, and super entendard socialists

User avatar
Elan Valleys
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1780
Founded: Aug 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Elan Valleys » Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:14 am

Roski wrote:
Questers wrote:Depending on your strategic position, you could have no militia whatsoever, or you could have every able bodied man with a military rifle in his home.


You could do that last one anyway

its called legalizing the weapons.

Having the weapons is the easy part.
I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished for ever.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Danternoust

Advertisement

Remove ads