Questers wrote:Depending on your strategic position, you could have no militia whatsoever, or you could have every able bodied man with a military rifle in his home.
You could do that last one anyway
its called legalizing the weapons.
Advertisement
by Roski » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:06 am
Questers wrote:Depending on your strategic position, you could have no militia whatsoever, or you could have every able bodied man with a military rifle in his home.
by Yuketobaniac » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:07 am
Korva wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:should the Iraqi Army look into replacing or upgrading its aging fleet of BMP-1's? I have read that they are acquiring (or in a deal to, at least) M2 Bradley's.
Eventually.
The BMP-1 has very thin armor, the seating arrangement for the commander is weird, the Grom has a short effective range, the autoloader was bad enough that according to Zaloga the Iraqis removed it and used manual loading, and the vehicles are getting rather old.
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD
by Roski » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:36 am
by Questers » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:39 am
by Roski » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:42 am
Questers wrote:Roski wrote:are military grade rifles easily accessible?
Pro-tip: Class 3s are very difficult to get.
Bad anaology.
Jesus christ.
Please stop shitposting for a minute.
In Switzerland, every male who is able bodied undergoes military training and keeps his rifle (not the ammunition) in his house. He is trained with this weapon in a military training environment.
That is not the same effect as "legalizing weapons." If that doesn't make sense to you, try reading comprehension exercises. For your level, I recommend Roger Red Hat.
by Confederacy of Bavarian States » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:45 am
Questers wrote:P.S. Even before gun control, the US never managed to achieve Switzerland levels of military arms ownership & proficiency.
by Questers » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:46 am
I didn't say it was because the US tried and failed. It didn't even try, because it didn't need to. It could probably do it, if it wanted to, but it has a different strategic concept for defence.Confederacy of Bavarian States wrote:Questers wrote:P.S. Even before gun control, the US never managed to achieve Switzerland levels of military arms ownership & proficiency.
You do realize Switzerland has a population 2% the size of America's right? It's much easier to distribute rifles to a smaller population than it is to distribute to a populace of 314+ Million.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:47 am
Roski wrote:Questers wrote:
Jesus christ.
Please stop shitposting for a minute.
In Switzerland, every male who is able bodied undergoes military training and keeps his rifle (not the ammunition) in his house. He is trained with this weapon in a military training environment.
That is not the same effect as "legalizing weapons." If that doesn't make sense to you, try reading comprehension exercises. For your level, I recommend Roger Red Hat.
K
Well, while you put shifty snark and compare something to an absolutely neutral country I've already given the beginning step to a heavily armed country.
Check your fucking privilege
by Korva » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:52 am
by Scandinavian Nations » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:53 am
Confederacy of Bavarian States wrote:You do realize Switzerland has a population 2% the size of America's right? It's much easier to distribute rifles to a smaller population than it is to distribute to a populace of 314+ Million.
by Questers » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:58 am
by Versail » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:25 am
Questers wrote:Depending on your strategic position, you could have no militia whatsoever, or you could have every able bodied man with a military rifle in his home.
by Imperializt Russia » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:33 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Yukonastan » Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:20 am
Ainin wrote:I have a pretty trivial question.
Say, in the name Leo2A5 or M1A2, does the A actually stand for anything?
by Laywenrania » Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:46 am
Ainin wrote:I have a pretty trivial question.
Say, in the name Leo2A5 or M1A2, does the A actually stand for anything?
Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.
Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.
by Tule » Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:49 am
by Scandinavian Nations » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:12 am
Tule wrote:Seriously, the people most willing to overthrow the US government tend to be the people least qualified to do so. You can't be an effective soldier if you have a problem with authority.
by Gallia- » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:19 am
Questers wrote:I didn't say it was because the US tried and failed. It didn't even try, because it didn't need to. It could probably do it, if it wanted to, but it has a different strategic concept for defence.Confederacy of Bavarian States wrote:You do realize Switzerland has a population 2% the size of America's right? It's much easier to distribute rifles to a smaller population than it is to distribute to a populace of 314+ Million.
Scandinavian Nations wrote:Tule wrote:Seriously, the people most willing to overthrow the US government tend to be the people least qualified to do so. You can't be an effective soldier if you have a problem with authority.
That's an oversimplified way of looking at it.
The current executive branch of the US government isguiltynot found so by the court, so let's say "strongly suspected" of multiple violations of the Constitution and just plain crimes as serious as feeding guns to Mexican cartels just to have them illegally imported back to use as a political point.
I wish I could say "it doesn't get worse", but that would be total bullcrap - it does get worse and from there on inevitably much worse still. Just visit our best friend Obiang, who declared himself friggin' god.
And at that point, and long before it really, it's not authority you have a problem with; it's with who holds that authority and how much of it they hold.
by United Marxist Nations » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:30 am
Yuketobaniac wrote:Korva wrote:Eventually.
The BMP-1 has very thin armor, the seating arrangement for the commander is weird, the Grom has a short effective range, the autoloader was bad enough that according to Zaloga the Iraqis removed it and used manual loading, and the vehicles are getting rather old.
they should get more abrams, not for replacing the bmp-1
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Husseinarti » Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:08 am
Scandinavian Nations wrote:Tule wrote:Seriously, the people most willing to overthrow the US government tend to be the people least qualified to do so. You can't be an effective soldier if you have a problem with authority.
That's an oversimplified way of looking at it.
The current executive branch of the US government isguiltynot found so by the court, so let's say "strongly suspected" of multiple violations of the Constitution and just plain crimes as serious as feeding guns to Mexican cartels just to have them illegally imported back to use as a political point.
I wish I could say "it doesn't get worse", but that would be total bullcrap - it does get worse and from there on inevitably much worse still. Just visit our best friend Obiang, who declared himself friggin' god.
And at that point, and long before it really, it's not authority you have a problem with; it's with who holds that authority and how much of it they hold.
by Elan Valleys » Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:14 am
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Danternoust
Advertisement