Advertisement
by Paragania » Mon May 23, 2016 5:59 pm
by Korva » Mon May 23, 2016 6:02 pm
Husseinarti wrote:([url=http://s33.postimg.org/p9gjaex6n/a7fstrikefighter2.png]Image)[/url]
Now with shading and basic colors.
(Image)
To go with it, I also remade my older AIM-120C and AIM-9M to look allot nicer.
by Husseinarti » Mon May 23, 2016 6:19 pm
Korva wrote:Husseinarti wrote:([url=http://s33.postimg.org/p9gjaex6n/a7fstrikefighter2.png]Image)[/url]
Now with shading and basic colors.
(Image)
To go with it, I also remade my older AIM-120C and AIM-9M to look allot nicer.
u need bombs and snacks
by Celritannia » Mon May 23, 2016 7:24 pm
Paragania wrote:So, recently, NASA has tested an 'Impossible' engine, and apparently, it worked or something. I found it rather intriguing, so it inspired me to do a redux of my old X-54B Lancer space fighter!
(Image)
It has now been upgraded with a powerful pulse driver cannon and some new engines at the rear, as well as some cool Space Shuttle esque heat tiles.
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Husseinarti » Mon May 23, 2016 9:49 pm
by New Visegrad » Thu May 26, 2016 7:06 am
by Husseinarti » Thu May 26, 2016 3:34 pm
by Gallan Systems » Thu May 26, 2016 4:43 pm
by Korva » Thu May 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Gallan Systems wrote:is that a tank for small children?
by Gallan Systems » Thu May 26, 2016 4:54 pm
by The Alexanderians » Fri May 27, 2016 1:30 am
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
by Stahn » Fri May 27, 2016 1:59 am
The Alexanderians wrote:Anyone know a decent 3-d rendering program for buildings? Low cost preferably.
by The Soodean Imperium » Fri May 27, 2016 8:48 am
by Paragania » Fri May 27, 2016 6:11 pm
by Gallan Systems » Fri May 27, 2016 6:12 pm
by Eisarn-Ara » Fri May 27, 2016 8:56 pm
by Novorden » Sat May 28, 2016 7:24 am
Come at me Bro!The Soodean Imperium wrote:OP destroyer is OP
Lineart
Old designs
Newer Designs
by Torrocca » Sat May 28, 2016 6:59 pm
by The Soodean Imperium » Mon May 30, 2016 8:16 am
Novorden wrote:As i don't think I ever posted the finished version:([url=http://i.imgur.com/PcL8Phh.png?1]Image)
Click for full size[/url]
A fast WW2 heavy cruiser, able to either outgun or outrun anything it comes across.Stats
Length: 202 m
Beam: 22 m
Draft: 6.4 m
Max speed: 35 knots (65 km/s)
Range: 12,500 km
Main Armament: 4 x 3 203 mm (8 in) naval guns.
Secondary Armament: 6 x 2 102 mm (4 in) dual-purpose guns
Tertiary Armament: 4 x 4 40 mm Bofors, 24 x 2 20 mm Oerlikons.
Torpedoes: 4 x 3 533 mm (21 in) Torpedoes.
by Celibrae » Mon May 30, 2016 10:03 am
by The Soodean Imperium » Tue May 31, 2016 1:08 pm
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Novorden wrote:As i don't think I ever posted the finished version:([url=http://i.imgur.com/PcL8Phh.png?1]Image)
Click for full size[/url]
A fast WW2 heavy cruiser, able to either outgun or outrun anything it comes across.Stats
Length: 202 m
Beam: 22 m
Draft: 6.4 m
Max speed: 35 knots (65 km/s)
Range: 12,500 km
Main Armament: 4 x 3 203 mm (8 in) naval guns.
Secondary Armament: 6 x 2 102 mm (4 in) dual-purpose guns
Tertiary Armament: 4 x 4 40 mm Bofors, 24 x 2 20 mm Oerlikons.
Torpedoes: 4 x 3 533 mm (21 in) Torpedoes.
Nice work. It has a very British aesthetic to it. Did you run this through SpringSharp by any chance? I'm interested in the displacement, how thick the belt armor is... and how much SHP you needed to get 35 knots out of a hull like thatNovorden wrote:Come at me Bro!
It doesn't have to, it just has to drop Long Lances and run
Currently I'm illustrating an in-canon "paper project" for a heavy cruiser with 4x2 250mm L/55 and 200mm armor... it was never built, but I wonder if the more modest design it evolved into would be a match for your cruiser class. Undergunned, but possibly better armored.
by Husseinarti » Tue May 31, 2016 1:09 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Aphrilia, Google [Bot]
Advertisement