NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation [NO MECHS] Mark 8

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25549
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:39 pm

Orussia wrote:
Gallia- wrote:
There are like 10 T-84s they probably just sit in a parking lot.

T-64s tended (or still) to pop.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/653 ... ot-t64.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/653 ... 64-ial.jpg

Why does that second tank look like it has a T-55 turret?


I'm seeing a T-64B turret.

Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:How do armies which use ERA on their AFVs deal with ERA being dangerous to nearby infantry? It kinds negates any possibility of tanks and infantry working closely together, no?


By not using them on vehicles which are going to operate very close to infantry.

Generally, this is all vehicles tbh. Infantry tend to be tens of meters away from a given AFV when dismounted and assaulting, since tanks or IFVs will sit in a place and provide a base of fire rather than run them over with their tracks or whatever.
Last edited by Gallia- on Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Orussia
Minister
 
Posts: 2894
Founded: Jan 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orussia » Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:45 pm

Gallia- wrote:
Orussia wrote:Why does that second tank look like it has a T-55 turret?


I'm seeing a T-64B turret.

Hmmm...the front curves look wrong, but the gunner's and commander's sights are where they should be.
Might just be the perspective.
RIP Rhoderberg
14/9/2013 - 15/8/2015
May your spirit live on in FALhalla.
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:His penetrator is MASSIVE!
Talon independent nation wrote:And so missiles did come unto man, and man did see it was good, and did smite down the land battleships of his foe with totally awesome explosions.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:25 pm

Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:How do armies which use ERA on their AFVs deal with ERA being dangerous to nearby infantry? It kinds negates any possibility of tanks and infantry working closely together, no?


In addition to the above, a missile or RPG strike will probably cause a larger explosion than the ERA tile going off, so it won't be the ERA that's the biggest hazard to infantry.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Prosorusiya
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1605
Founded: Oct 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Prosorusiya » Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:44 pm

Thanks for the feedback guys. The tread I found discussed the problems with the era tiles being a hazard to the APC which is why I asked. Slat armor for everybody then: cheap and effective. New questions: trying to upgrade\uparm my old BTR-60 and -152 APCs.

Konkors, Recoiless Rifle ala Joker, or late model SCALOS Sagger? Could any be mounted, therotectically speaking, on these APCs?

Also, Smoke Grenade dispensers? Y/N?
Last edited by Prosorusiya on Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
AH Ossetia (1921-1989)

10th Anniversary: NS User Since 2012

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25549
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:46 pm

Prosorusiya wrote:Thanks for the feedback guys. The tread I found discussed the problems with the era tiles being a hazard to the APC which is why I asked. Slat armor for everybody then: cheap and effective. New questions: trying to upgrade\uparm my old BTR-60 and -152 APCs.

Konkors, Recoiless Rifle ala Joker, or late model SCALOS Sagger? Could any be mounted, therotectically speaking, on these APCs?


There exist BTR turrets with ATGW. Presumably they're drop in replacements, but I don't know much of anything about BTR differences.

I'm not sure if any have Saggers though.

User avatar
Prosorusiya
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1605
Founded: Oct 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Prosorusiya » Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:59 pm

Cool, I'll have to look into that. Should that mod be on every vehicle or just AT platoons?

The BTR-152 is pretty old school, so I might have to get creative with it, possibly mount an auto grenade launcher instead. I know it carried a Sagger in East Germany, but only the man portable version.

Are smoke grenade dispensers are good upgrade to spring for?
Last edited by Prosorusiya on Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:22 pm, edited 3 times in total.
AH Ossetia (1921-1989)

10th Anniversary: NS User Since 2012

User avatar
Eisarn-Ara
Minister
 
Posts: 2383
Founded: Oct 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eisarn-Ara » Tue Oct 06, 2015 10:50 pm

Slightly on topic here, but I've recently been informed about the "2B9 Vasilek" by Orussia and absolutely love the damn thing.

If possible, could I mount an equivalent or "NOT"-style expy of the 2B9 into a vehicle turret?

This would be for use in an M44 APC Expy with some spaced armor and/or Schürzen slapped onto it to use in a recently plotted out WW3 Equivalent in the 50s (Cupola mounted HMG in a domestically produced caliber?)IRL Cupolas suc;, so I've heard, but, well, hey they were all the rage in years prior, right?)
Last edited by Eisarn-Ara on Wed Oct 07, 2015 3:43 am, edited 5 times in total.
Ave Nex Alea
Glory & Victory unto the Pact!
I'm pro thrall-taking, are you?
Immigrants're grody; Paris, Berlin & Brussels proved that.
Serbia, Hungary, Austria & Finland have the right idea, preserve European Cultural Integrity!
Dictating matters of policy & legality because of "feelings" is foolhardy at best, and the reason why SJWism is cancerous at worst.
Altruism is worthless outside of a community and in small doses.
We owe you nothing, and you'll like it.
Arabs cannot do "Modern War"
You are all terrible.

Blacksmith/Metallurgist btw(Mostly Blades) & Academic Reconstructionist Heathen of the Continental Variety, Legitimate Sneering Western Imperialist, Western Classicalist

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:38 am

Yes, definitely. It was done irl, on an MT-LB.
Last edited by Questers on Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Restore the Crown


User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:49 am

Trials were even conducted mounting the 2B9 on a Humvee flatbed.
Though that was for EOD purposes, not as a SP mortar.
Nachmere wrote:
Prosorusiya wrote:What say you to fitting ERA to the outside of slat amour? It's been done in Ukraine on BTR-80s, but what about older vehicles like the BTR-60?


Its like wearing your underwear iver your pants.

Yeah, but how many STIs did Superman ever catch?
Nachmere wrote:Ukraine is so last year. All the lolz will come from Syria now.

Are there any ground operations believed to be going on or is it just an air campaign the Russians are putting on?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Eisarn-Ara
Minister
 
Posts: 2383
Founded: Oct 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eisarn-Ara » Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:54 am

Questers wrote:Yes, definitely. It was done irl, on an MT-LB.


Imperializt Russia wrote:Trials were even conducted mounting the 2B9 on a Humvee flatbed.
Though that was for EOD purposes, not as a SP mortar.


Awesome! thanks guys, hey, any advice on what to half-assedly steal & tweak for the turret basis?
Last edited by Eisarn-Ara on Wed Oct 07, 2015 5:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ave Nex Alea
Glory & Victory unto the Pact!
I'm pro thrall-taking, are you?
Immigrants're grody; Paris, Berlin & Brussels proved that.
Serbia, Hungary, Austria & Finland have the right idea, preserve European Cultural Integrity!
Dictating matters of policy & legality because of "feelings" is foolhardy at best, and the reason why SJWism is cancerous at worst.
Altruism is worthless outside of a community and in small doses.
We owe you nothing, and you'll like it.
Arabs cannot do "Modern War"
You are all terrible.

Blacksmith/Metallurgist btw(Mostly Blades) & Academic Reconstructionist Heathen of the Continental Variety, Legitimate Sneering Western Imperialist, Western Classicalist

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Wed Oct 07, 2015 5:28 am

Eisarn-Ara wrote:
Questers wrote:Yes, definitely. It was done irl, on an MT-LB.


Imperializt Russia wrote:Trials were even conducted mounting the 2B9 on a Humvee flatbed.
Though that was for EOD purposes, not as a SP mortar.


Awesome! thanks guys, hey, any advice on what to half-assedly steal & tweak for the turret basis?

Just do what I did and go crazy. Take your standard IFV turret, put one of those in and than convert it to use an autoloader.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Eisarn-Ara
Minister
 
Posts: 2383
Founded: Oct 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eisarn-Ara » Wed Oct 07, 2015 7:36 am

Purpelia wrote:
Eisarn-Ara wrote:


Awesome! thanks guys, hey, any advice on what to half-assedly steal & tweak for the turret basis?

Just do what I did and go crazy. Take your standard IFV turret, put one of those in and than convert it to use an autoloader.



Frankly, at this point, I am considering a DuK88 style revolving magazine fitted under the gun (just ram in a four or five round revolving enbloc or whatever) with an ejection chute going somewhere (semi-cased mortar projectiles of the 85mm or 92mm persuasion in regard to caliber) or some sort of positively obscene belt feed mechanism (of which, might I add, the belts might be a liability to the crew due to the "clunk factor").


All things considered, this caddywhompus mechanical abomination went off the deep end a ways back (conceptually speaking).
Last edited by Eisarn-Ara on Wed Oct 07, 2015 7:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ave Nex Alea
Glory & Victory unto the Pact!
I'm pro thrall-taking, are you?
Immigrants're grody; Paris, Berlin & Brussels proved that.
Serbia, Hungary, Austria & Finland have the right idea, preserve European Cultural Integrity!
Dictating matters of policy & legality because of "feelings" is foolhardy at best, and the reason why SJWism is cancerous at worst.
Altruism is worthless outside of a community and in small doses.
We owe you nothing, and you'll like it.
Arabs cannot do "Modern War"
You are all terrible.

Blacksmith/Metallurgist btw(Mostly Blades) & Academic Reconstructionist Heathen of the Continental Variety, Legitimate Sneering Western Imperialist, Western Classicalist

User avatar
Prosorusiya
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1605
Founded: Oct 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Prosorusiya » Wed Oct 07, 2015 8:40 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:Trials were even conducted mounting the 2B9 on a Humvee flatbed.
Though that was for EOD purposes, not as a SP mortar.
Nachmere wrote:
Its like wearing your underwear iver your pants.

Yeah, but how many STIs did Superman ever catch?
Nachmere wrote:Ukraine is so last year. All the lolz will come from Syria now.

Are there any ground operations believed to be going on or is it just an air campaign the Russians are putting on?


Putin claims he will avoid land operations, so mostly ari for now. Plenty to ground equipment coming in on ships from the Black Sea fleet as aid though.

Are smoke grenade launchers a good feature for APCs? Also, how much bar armor should I put on my APCs, because Ive seen everything from critical areas only to near full encasement.

From this:http://www.fototime.com/A54FE07AE7D5560/orig.jpg

To this:
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/andrei_bt/18425682/189110/189110_900.jpg

Also are there any good texts on APC tactics? I'm less than familiar, so shall we say.
Last edited by Prosorusiya on Wed Oct 07, 2015 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
AH Ossetia (1921-1989)

10th Anniversary: NS User Since 2012

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Oct 07, 2015 8:49 am

Smoke grenade launchers can provide concealment for the vehicle, for the dismounts, or (if they're hefty), blast them towards the ATGM team who will be your primary threat so they can't really shoot at anything.

All-round cage armour will massively increase the weight of the vehicle. It's a tradeoff you're willing to make.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26058
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:03 am

All around cage armor will also limit the capability of the infantry to rapidly enter and exit the vehicle.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Orussia
Minister
 
Posts: 2894
Founded: Jan 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orussia » Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:49 am

Allanea wrote:All around cage armor will also limit the capability of the infantry to rapidly enter and exit the vehicle.

>not making your infantry use the bars of the cage armor to ride desant

That said, if you have a rear entrance/exit on your APC/IFV, you could probably just cage in the other three sides of the vehicle and be fine.
RIP Rhoderberg
14/9/2013 - 15/8/2015
May your spirit live on in FALhalla.
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:His penetrator is MASSIVE!
Talon independent nation wrote:And so missiles did come unto man, and man did see it was good, and did smite down the land battleships of his foe with totally awesome explosions.

User avatar
New Vihenia
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Apr 03, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby New Vihenia » Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:52 am

i wonder if smokes or battlefield obscurants will provide effective measure against top attack munitions.
So far i haven't seen "upward facing" hardkill APS.
We make planes,ships,missiles,helicopters, radars and mecha musume
Deviantart|M.A.R.S|My-Ebooks

Big Picture of Service

User avatar
Orussia
Minister
 
Posts: 2894
Founded: Jan 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orussia » Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:54 am

New Vihenia wrote:i wonder if smokes or battlefield obscurants will provide effective measure against top attack munitions.
So far i haven't seen "upward facing" hardkill APS.

Not even the vertical Afghanit launchers on the prototype Armata turrets? :meh:
#4 on this image.
Last edited by Orussia on Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
RIP Rhoderberg
14/9/2013 - 15/8/2015
May your spirit live on in FALhalla.
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:His penetrator is MASSIVE!
Talon independent nation wrote:And so missiles did come unto man, and man did see it was good, and did smite down the land battleships of his foe with totally awesome explosions.

User avatar
New Vihenia
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Apr 03, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby New Vihenia » Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:00 am

Orussia wrote:Not even the vertical Afghanit launchers on the prototype Armata turrets? :meh:


Is that launcher firing the same grenade as one located around the turret ?

From what i see so far.. it seems the hardkill portion of Afghanit at T-14 and T-15 are those "large grenades" while the one mounted within the small multi launch "turret" and those mounted in upward firing launchers are battlefield obscurants.
We make planes,ships,missiles,helicopters, radars and mecha musume
Deviantart|M.A.R.S|My-Ebooks

Big Picture of Service

User avatar
Orussia
Minister
 
Posts: 2894
Founded: Jan 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orussia » Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:05 am

New Vihenia wrote:
Orussia wrote:Not even the vertical Afghanit launchers on the prototype Armata turrets? :meh:


Is that launcher firing the same grenade as one located around the turret ?

From what i see so far.. it seems the hardkill portion of Afghanit at T-14 and T-15 are those "large grenades" while the one mounted within the small multi launch "turret" and those mounted in upward firing launchers are battlefield obscurants.

Huh. I actually thought they were both hardkill systems. The large tubes for LRPs and other heavy shells, the smaller trainable launchers for RPGs and their ilk, and the fixed vertical launchers for dealing with top-attack munitions.

Could be wrong, though. Wouldn't be the first time. :P
RIP Rhoderberg
14/9/2013 - 15/8/2015
May your spirit live on in FALhalla.
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:His penetrator is MASSIVE!
Talon independent nation wrote:And so missiles did come unto man, and man did see it was good, and did smite down the land battleships of his foe with totally awesome explosions.

User avatar
Korva
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6468
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korva » Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:08 am

Orussia wrote:
Allanea wrote:All around cage armor will also limit the capability of the infantry to rapidly enter and exit the vehicle.

>not making your infantry use the bars of the cage armor to ride desant

That said, if you have a rear entrance/exit on your APC/IFV, you could probably just cage in the other three sides of the vehicle and be fine.

you can also cage the ramp

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:14 am

Well, anything LOBL won't see the target and anything that overflies a target rather than a "top attack" will also struggle to be in the right place to deploy a payload. So it will certainly have an effect. The only way to defeat a smokescreen between the weapon and target, even with top attack, will be a smart weapon that can autonomous detect, find, target and engage a target without human control, or possibly a TV-guided missile.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12484
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:16 am

New Vihenia wrote:i wonder if smokes or battlefield obscurants will provide effective measure against top attack munitions.
So far i haven't seen "upward facing" hardkill APS.

Yes they do, because it obscures the vehicle from the team firing the top attack munition, who then can't get a lock on the vehicle to launch their munitions, and the smoke will obscure the whole vehicle in cases where the munition has already been launched.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Transvaal Vrystaat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 534
Founded: Sep 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Transvaal Vrystaat » Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:41 am

Orussia wrote:
Allanea wrote:All around cage armor will also limit the capability of the infantry to rapidly enter and exit the vehicle.

>not making your infantry use the bars of the cage armor to ride desant.

>not using infantry as applique armor
Literal Space Boers in the Asteroid Belt. Factbook tbd.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: National Paranormal Investigation Bureau

Advertisement

Remove ads