The Atlasian Regional Geographic Society [Atlas only]

by **West Aurelia** » Wed Dec 24, 2014 7:48 am

Estenia wrote:Fale Ocean to be renamed Noastra Ocean.

I still want to know which one is the Fale Ocean.

by **Estenia** » Wed Dec 24, 2014 7:49 am

West Aurelia wrote:
Estenia wrote:Fale Ocean to be renamed Noastra Ocean.

I still want to know which one is the Fale Ocean.

The one which is above me, which separates the ocats of me and Valarana, the one on which Ceneria's on.

by **The Nation of Ceneria** » Wed Dec 24, 2014 7:52 am

Estenia wrote:Fale Ocean to be renamed Noastra Ocean.

See geographical map in OP here.

by **Estenia** » Wed Dec 24, 2014 7:53 am

The Nation of Ceneria wrote:
Estenia wrote:Fale Ocean to be renamed Noastra Ocean.

See geographical map in OP here.

Northern Ocean ain't hot, Noastra's better. Or just Joresia Ocean.

by **West Aurelia** » Wed Dec 24, 2014 7:55 am

Estenia wrote:
West Aurelia wrote:
I still want to know which one is the Fale Ocean.

The one which is above me, which separates the ocats of me and Valarana, the one on which Ceneria's on.

According to the physical map the one above you is the Northern Ocean.

by **Estenia** » Wed Dec 24, 2014 7:55 am

West Aurelia wrote:
Estenia wrote:The one which is above me, which separates the ocats of me and Valarana, the one on which Ceneria's on.

According to the physical map the one above you is the Northern Ocean.

Soon to be Noastra! All hail Moldova's Anthem.

by **Roski** » Sun Jan 04, 2015 5:27 pm

We need a time zone map, with UTC somewhere in Sempit methinks

by **The High Lords** » Sun Jan 04, 2015 5:33 pm

Roski wrote:We need a time zone map, with UTC somewhere in Sempit methinks

UTC in Calingus, Lovarium

by **Roski** » Sun Jan 04, 2015 5:54 pm

Actually, if we use the middle of the map, New Kvenland and The Ancient Worlds are in the UTC area...

by **New Kvenland** » Sun Jan 04, 2015 6:42 pm

Roski wrote:Actually, if we use the middle of the map, New Kvenland and The Ancient Worlds are in the UTC area...

That's what I was saying in my post on your thread.

(I'm still sorry ;-;)

by **Roski** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:58 am

List of Landmass by Area, National Boundaries

(using blank atlas map, number of pixels beside it)

by **West Aurelia** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:05 am

According to Wraland, plot 86 (West Aurelia) is slightly larger than Bolivia (1,098,581 km squared).

by **Roski** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:11 am

West Aurelia wrote:According to Wraland, plot 86 (West Aurelia) is slightly larger than Bolivia (1,098,581 km squared).

Would you like me to check?

by **West Aurelia** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:12 am

Roski wrote:
West Aurelia wrote:According to Wraland, plot 86 (West Aurelia) is slightly larger than Bolivia (1,098,581 km squared).

Would you like me to check?

Sure.

by **Roski** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:15 am

West Aurelia wrote:
Roski wrote:
Would you like me to check?

Sure.

Its not technically true, you come just short at 999,893

by **West Aurelia** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:16 am

Roski wrote:
West Aurelia wrote:
Sure.

Its not technically true, you come just short at 999,893

Alright, thanks. Will edit my factbook.

by **Roski** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:41 am

If you are helping, I used GIMP 2.8, blocked out extreme white and extreme black in the histogram, blacked out the territories of the surrounding nations (select tool the nation first), changed the nation number to fit the gray of the back, blacked out the oceans, then counted the pixels via histogram.

Just take the list out of my post, spoiler it, and then continue from where the previos poster left off. Thank you.

by **Roski** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:44 am

Am I blind or does our map go from 48 to 59?

by **West Aurelia** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:47 am

Roski wrote:Am I blind or does our map go from 48 to 59?

I second this.

by **West Aurelia** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:49 am

West Aurelia wrote:
Roski wrote:Am I blind or does our map go from 48 to 59?

I second this.

Just checked the sign-up's OP. The "Member Nations and their Locations" spoiler misses quite a few numbers, including everything between 48 and 61 (as well as random others).

by **Roski** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:50 am

West Aurelia wrote:
West Aurelia wrote:
I second this.

Just checked the sign-up's OP. The "Member Nations and their Locations" spoiler misses quite a few numbers, including everything between 48 and 61 (as well as random others).

I just had a through look, seems like Cen is aware of it.

That's fine by me, that's 11-ish nations someone doesn't have to make out. I've edited the numbers of the list in light of the missing numbers.

by **New Kvenland** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:15 pm

Roski wrote:List of Landmass by Area, National Boundaries

(using blank atlas map, number of pixels beside it)

Curente Continent:
1 530,508 (8714) (rounded down)
2 961,052 (15786) (rounded up)
3 1,220,827 (20053) (rounded up)
4 995,632 (16354) (rounded up)
5 2,397,881 (39387) (rounded up)
6 1,710,667 (28099) (rounded down)
7 3,521,117 (53838) (rounded down)
8 2,321,111 (38126) (rounded up)
9 1,538,133 (25265) (rounded down)
10 2,270,215 (37290) (rounded down)
11 2,951,280 (48477) (rounded up)
12 3,137,775 (51540) (rounded down)
13 3,924,447 (64462) (rounded up)
14 406,922 (6684) (rounded up)
15 1,709,084 (28073) (rounded down)
16: 5,788,936 (95081) (60.88 sq km/p) (control)
17 8,831,983 (145072) (rounded down)
18 1,217,539 (19999) (rounded down)
19 491,058 (8066) (rounded down)
20 686,970 (11284) (rounded up)
21 1,137,421 (18683) (rounded down)
22 379,891 (6240) (rounded down)
23 465,123 (7640) (rounded down)
24 282,909 (4647) (rounded down)
25 1,722,052 (28286) (rounded up)
26 886,048 (14554) (rounded up)
27 2,234,052 (26696) (rounded down)
28 4,717,469 (77488) (rounded down)
29 820,297 (13474) (rounded down)
30 1,124,901 (18478) (rounded up)
31 3,279,362 (53866) (rounded down)
32 593,519 (9749) (rounded down)
33 267,994 (4402) (rounded up)
34 1,169,200 (19205) (rounded down)
35 516,993 (8492) (rounded up)
36 4,447,710 (73057) (rounded down)
37 568,984 (9346) (rounded down)
Islands North of Curente:
38 67,577 (1110) (rounded up)
39 19,664 (323) (rounded down)
40 50,957 (837) (rounded up)
41 54,122 (889) (rounded down)
42 214,298 (3520) (rounded up)
43 501,469 (8237) (rounded up)
44
45
46
47
48
59
60
61
Unnamed Continent
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
Buralia
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86 999,893 (16424) (rounded down)
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Cetlaso
94
95
96
97
98
99: 1,222,714 (20084) (rounded up) (original test)
Western Islands
100
101
Malaestri
102
Northwestern Islands
103
104
Sempit
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124

So I'm much bigger than Tanzania, but much smaller than Egypt. Herm. I assume that 117 million is feasible, then?

by **The High Lords** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:19 pm

Roski wrote:
West Aurelia wrote:
Just checked the sign-up's OP. The "Member Nations and their Locations" spoiler misses quite a few numbers, including everything between 48 and 61 (as well as random others).

I just had a through look, seems like Cen is aware of it.

That's fine by me, that's 11-ish nations someone doesn't have to make out. I've edited the numbers of the list in light of the missing numbers.

So, I'm assuming you're putting this against Earth's surface area, when you determine the sq mi/sq km?

by **Roski** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:28 pm

The High Lords wrote:
Roski wrote:
I just had a through look, seems like Cen is aware of it.

That's fine by me, that's 11-ish nations someone doesn't have to make out. I've edited the numbers of the list in light of the missing numbers.

So, I'm assuming you're putting this against Earth's surface area, when you determine the sq mi/sq km?

No - I'm putting it against Bratislav's numbers. It's ok to have slightly larger or bigger.

Basically, the founder of the region has set the rate, I'm just following it. But if you use Earth's numbers, that means I need to do earth's pixels as well, which means a drawing of earth done exactly the way the current regional map has been done - which just isn't that easy to do.

by **The High Lords** » Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:33 pm

Roski wrote:
The High Lords wrote:
So, I'm assuming you're putting this against Earth's surface area, when you determine the sq mi/sq km?

No - I'm putting it against Bratislav's numbers. It's ok to have slightly larger or bigger.

Basically, the founder of the region has set the rate, I'm just following it. But if you use Earth's numbers, that means I need to do earth's pixels as well, which means a drawing of earth done exactly the way the current regional map has been done - which just isn't that easy to do.

well not really

pixels counted / total pixels in map (3m) = X%

X% x 196M (I think) = size in sq mi

The Atlasian Regional Geographic Society [Atlas only]

Who is online