I was thinking of making a modern vehicle inspired by it, with a closed top, thicker armor and a more sensible seating arrangement
I personally love the look of the thing
Advertisement
by Erusuia » Fri Oct 31, 2014 5:53 pm
by Tryienne » Fri Oct 31, 2014 5:59 pm
by Lydenburg » Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:03 pm
Erusuia wrote:Lydenburg wrote:
Eh...the open top isn't great, and having the embarked troops facing each other in that staggered pattern really isn't for the best. Plus it's really too lightly armoured for a modern IMV.
I was thinking of making a modern vehicle inspired by it, with a closed top, thicker armor and a more sensible seating arrangement
I personally love the look of the thing
by Erusuia » Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:09 pm
by New Visegrad » Fri Oct 31, 2014 7:27 pm
by Heicliffe » Fri Oct 31, 2014 7:29 pm
New Visegrad wrote:Is it a military ground vehicle if it doesn't touch the ground?
(Image)
Prototype AG Rapid Assault Vehicle - XKA-9931 Iry-Kitoyo
Current design specs:
Propulsion - dual KSN AC Hierenny 18 fusion drives (as fitted to Challenge-type assault shuttle)
Traction - KSN AC Lightweight 48.3 controlled gravitic field system
Armament - 1.5TW pulse laser
Defensive - multilayer composite armour, energy shielding, electronic countermeasuresThe only military ground vehicle I'm aware of with an "afterburner" button. Imagine - your tank sits in its hardened position on a ridgeline. In the distance, a trail of dust. You raise your binoculars - it's an Iry-Kitoyo, racing along with its AG raising an impressive cloud. As you watch, a spike of flame erupts from its rear end, and with an audible rumble, it accelerates to a terrifying pace. You begin to give an order to your gunner, but the RAV's sensors detect the tank. Riding smooth on AG despite the rough ground, its turret swivels. There is a stuttering of ear-splitting cracks, and a gigantic invisible paper-punch slams a line of scorched holes across the side of the tank. Coughing in the cloud of smoke, you watch the Iry-Kitoyo howl past you, blackening the front of your vehicle's armour with its drive flare.
by New Visegrad » Fri Oct 31, 2014 7:31 pm
Heicliffe wrote:New Visegrad wrote:Is it a military ground vehicle if it doesn't touch the ground?
(Image)
Prototype AG Rapid Assault Vehicle - XKA-9931 Iry-Kitoyo
Current design specs:
Propulsion - dual KSN AC Hierenny 18 fusion drives (as fitted to Challenge-type assault shuttle)
Traction - KSN AC Lightweight 48.3 controlled gravitic field system
Armament - 1.5TW pulse laser
Defensive - multilayer composite armour, energy shielding, electronic countermeasuresThe only military ground vehicle I'm aware of with an "afterburner" button. Imagine - your tank sits in its hardened position on a ridgeline. In the distance, a trail of dust. You raise your binoculars - it's an Iry-Kitoyo, racing along with its AG raising an impressive cloud. As you watch, a spike of flame erupts from its rear end, and with an audible rumble, it accelerates to a terrifying pace. You begin to give an order to your gunner, but the RAV's sensors detect the tank. Riding smooth on AG despite the rough ground, its turret swivels. There is a stuttering of ear-splitting cracks, and a gigantic invisible paper-punch slams a line of scorched holes across the side of the tank. Coughing in the cloud of smoke, you watch the Iry-Kitoyo howl past you, blackening the front of your vehicle's armour with its drive flare.
We need more FT in here tbh.
Isn't the laser on the YAL-1 only a megawatt? Wouldn't a 1.5 TW laser like, melt a skyscraper?
by Talon Independent Nation » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:17 pm
Heicliffe wrote:We need more FT in here tbh.
Isn't the laser on the YAL-1 only a megawatt? Wouldn't a 1.5 TW laser like, melt a skyscraper?
by Saphirasia » Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:32 am
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You can do some really incredible stuff in your kitchen. And I'm talking more than just a phenomenal sandwich.
Shanix wrote:Somepony really took the time of their MLP to do life?
Olthar wrote:I prefer "I Came, I Saw, I Came Again."
Rupudska wrote:Except Nightkill, of course. Nightkill has obtained a level of badassery where his pants depart his legs of their own accord.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by Democratic Koyro » Sat Nov 01, 2014 4:42 am
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Korouse wrote:What's a good APC/Maybe tank a really shitty Militia force could use?
Depends on what you mean by "militia."
If you mean a militia that's an arm of the State, like one step below the reserves, then the old hand-me-down gear you're phasing out of the reserves. Provided, of course, that it still works - tanks built during WW2, for example, will probably be sufficiently old that only a small portion of them will reliably work, and with parts no longer in production, maintenance will be far from cheap.
If you mean a militia that's fighting an insurgency, then they'll have whatever they can get their hands on, if anything at all. This generally limits them to vehicles that they've captured from government bases or defecting units, which means not a terribly large number of vehicles, especially given that your problems with parts and training will be even worse than the scenario above. Indeed, if you're fighting a low-level insurgency against a competent opponent, it may not be worth having a (highly visible but too small to be useful) mechanized force of your own. If you want something extra, maybe you can weld steel plates onto a tractor or truck to get Syrian Box Tanks. But the whole "we're fighting a long-term rebellion, let's design a new MBT for ourselves!" or "wee r terurists sel us 1000x T55 plz" is not particularly realistic.
by The Kievan People » Sat Nov 01, 2014 4:45 am
Tryienne wrote:Eh, I have a question regarding some of the tracked vehicles.
I'm quite a fan of Warhammer 40K, and I was thinking if it is allowed if I could talk about some of the vehicles in this massive fictional world, or would I just stick to actual vehicles of our world?
by New Visegrad » Sat Nov 01, 2014 7:57 am
Talon independent nation wrote:But really, unless you like the idea of trying to drive a heavily lubricated hockey puck through urban environments, I can't imagine a hovering armored vehicle would be any practical use.
Also the fact that it would devour stupid amounts of energy at a constant rate just to operate, let alone mounting a laser with the power consumption of around half the continental United States.
by Purpelia » Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:09 am
by Erusuia » Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:13 am
by Lydenburg » Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:37 am
Erusuia wrote:Are tank support vehicles like the BMPT a good idea?
by Auroya » Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:42 am
by Purpelia » Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:45 am
by Auroya » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:12 am
by Purpelia » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:15 am
Auroya wrote:Sure, but it's nice to have the kind of firepower I'm talking about when dealing with a scenario such as urban combat. After all, if a regular IFV with an infantry team comes up against a tank in such circumstances it might not fare so well.
by San-Silvacian » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:21 am
Purpelia wrote:Auroya wrote:Sure, but it's nice to have the kind of firepower I'm talking about when dealing with a scenario such as urban combat. After all, if a regular IFV with an infantry team comes up against a tank in such circumstances it might not fare so well.
You do not need anything more than a BMP-3. Seriously, you do not. If you run into a tank, the thing can fire missiles to make it go away. If you run into a city, the thing has a 10cm gun that can accurately place shells on stuff inside from 8km away. And if you have to drive in, you have a 30mm autocanon that elevates up to 60 degrees to clear out every room and roof top.
Auroya wrote:Sure, but it's nice to have the kind of firepower I'm talking about when dealing with a scenario such as urban combat. After all, if a regular IFV with an infantry team comes up against a tank in such circumstances it might not fare so well.
by The Soodean Imperium » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:24 am
Auroya wrote:Sure, but it's nice to have the kind of firepower I'm talking about when dealing with a scenario such as urban combat. After all, if a regular IFV with an infantry team comes up against a tank in such circumstances it might not fare so well.
by Gallia- » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:27 am
San-Silvacian wrote:Purpelia wrote:You do not need anything more than a BMP-3. Seriously, you do not. If you run into a tank, the thing can fire missiles to make it go away. If you run into a city, the thing has a 10cm gun that can accurately place shells on stuff inside from 8km away. And if you have to drive in, you have a 30mm autocanon that elevates up to 60 degrees to clear out every room and roof top.
If only this was true.
I don't think the ATGMs the BMP-3 fires are top-down attack capable.
Serious please quit fapping to the BMP-3, since really CV90 with BILL-2 ATGMs does the same job.Auroya wrote:Sure, but it's nice to have the kind of firepower I'm talking about when dealing with a scenario such as urban combat. After all, if a regular IFV with an infantry team comes up against a tank in such circumstances it might not fare so well.
Good but not necessarily needed for urban combat.
by Immoren » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:28 am
San-Silvacian wrote:Serious please quit fapping to the BMP-3, since really CV90 with BILL-2 ATGMs does the same job.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Talon Independent Nation » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:40 am
New Visegrad wrote:Talon independent nation wrote:But really, unless you like the idea of trying to drive a heavily lubricated hockey puck through urban environments, I can't imagine a hovering armored vehicle would be any practical use.
Its primary method of propulsion is a pair of fusion reaction drives designed to be fitted to a spacecraft. That's like arguing that a drag racer is useless for commuting - of course it is, that's not what you use it for.
New Visegrad wrote:Talon independent nation wrote:Also the fact that it would devour stupid amounts of energy at a constant rate just to operate, let alone mounting a laser with the power consumption of around half the continental United States.
The laser's output can be modified to be more realistic. Aside from that, this is FT. It has a functional antigravity system and the unrealistic part is that it might be unable to produce enough power? I also note that you're apparently okay with a tracked vehicle powered by black holes, but not with the idea of an antigravity vehicle with a relatively tame cold fusion reactor.
by Saphirasia » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:59 am
San-Silvacian wrote:Serious please quit fapping to the BMP-3
Saphirasia wrote:Question for those who know powertrains, does 1500HP sound realistic for a 41 litre opposed-piston diesel? I was fooling around in Rhino and ended up making a pretty good set of cylinders. Decided to inquire here as to whether I may need to make them bigger or not.
EDIT: Exact figures are 6,896cc per cylinder, 41,376cc overall.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You can do some really incredible stuff in your kitchen. And I'm talking more than just a phenomenal sandwich.
Shanix wrote:Somepony really took the time of their MLP to do life?
Olthar wrote:I prefer "I Came, I Saw, I Came Again."
Rupudska wrote:Except Nightkill, of course. Nightkill has obtained a level of badassery where his pants depart his legs of their own accord.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Mesothallania, Ratmen, Tangatarehua
Advertisement