Advertisement
by Republica Newland » Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:37 am
by Questers » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:00 am
Republica Newland wrote:So anyways is anyone interested in writing up a guide to create a military? Am willing to help the best I can although not that knowledgeable myself.
by Immoren » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:03 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Questers » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:05 am
by Immoren » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:07 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Questers » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:11 am
How many tanks per battalion? Do armoured infantry have tanks in their subunits?Immoren wrote:Lean, mean armoured division.
by Immoren » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:26 am
Questers wrote:How many tanks per battalion? Do armoured infantry have tanks in their subunits?Immoren wrote:Lean, mean armoured division.
It's possible a Questarian tank regiment has more tanks than your division. :>
And they are small divisions. They're as lean as I could really get them.
Btw I dont like the two subunit structure. So what do you do with one tank division, where holding one brigade in reserve means you lose 50% of your combat power? If you make ad-hoc firegroups, then why not just have smaller, or more, subunits?
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Republica Newland » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:31 am
Questers wrote:Republica Newland wrote:So anyways is anyone interested in writing up a guide to create a military? Am willing to help the best I can although not that knowledgeable myself.
https://sites.google.com/site/nsmatinsk ... y-military
by Questers » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:40 am
it is supposed to be for beginners, who often do not want to read a several thousand word essay on how to structure a division.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:42 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Republica Newland » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:24 am
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:29 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Republica Newland » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:37 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:There is such a thing as a Lieutenant-Captain.
It's an old rank, largely disused. But it exists.
Many ranks have a Lieutenant modifier.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:51 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Questers » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:08 am
Captain First Class, Captain Second Class.Republica Newland wrote:I need something higher than First Lieutenant and lower than Captain. ( or alternatively something higher than Captain but lower than Major )
Edit: Maybe a First Captain, 2nd Captain?
by Republica Newland » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:09 am
by East Vlaricstan » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:12 am
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:14 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Republica Newland » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:22 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:What did you actually want a Lieutenant-Captain level rank for?
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:29 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Immoren » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:33 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Republica Newland » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:35 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:I believe that the 2ic of a Company would traditionally be the commander of the first Platoon - likely a Lieutenant.
Obviously nothing objectively wrong with designating this person as a Lieutenant-Captain, or creating the rank to exist solely as a component of the command section.
by Republica Newland » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:37 am
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:41 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: National Paranormal Investigation Bureau, Tramontanum, Transitional Global Authority
Advertisement