Advertisement
by The Germania Alliance » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:10 pm
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:24 am
by Samozaryadnyastan » Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:32 am
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Kouralia » Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:50 pm
by Immoren » Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:58 pm
Kouralia wrote:Okay, here's my (almost finished) Battalion. This is a combined arms battalion, there are more specialised ones, however this is the most deployed formation.
4x Light Role Infantry Company1x L.R. Company = 3 platoons and a command echelon, or:
3x Infantry Section (24 men)
3x Infantry Section (24 men)
3x Infantry Section (24 men)
3x Platoon Command unit (6 men)
1x Comapny Command unit (4 men)
(all in Land Rovers)
4x Mechanised Infantry Company1x Mech company = 3x mech platoons and command echelon, or:
3x platoons (78 men)
1x command echelon (4 men)
9x AMV w/ 27 crew
1x Ape w/ 3 crew
2x Airborne Infantry Company1x Airborne COmpany = 2x Line Airborne Platoons, and one SpecWar platoon, or:
2x Platoons (52 men)
2x Chinooks w/ 8 crew
1x platoon (26 men)
3x Black Hawks w/ 12 crew
1x command echelon (4 men)
2x Armoured Company1x Armoured Company = 3x Squadron, or:
9 Main Battle Tanks w/ 27 crew, and then
1 COmmand Vehicle w/ 5 men and
2x ARVs w/ 6 crew.
2x UAV Recon Detachment1x UAV unit =
1x UAV COntrol Vehicle w/ 3 crew
1x ACTL UAV Transport w/ 3 crew
1x Generator Vehicle w/ 3 crew
1x Transport for Controllers w/ 6 crew
2x AAA Detachment1x Air Defence Unit =
3x Mobile AAA w/ 9 men
3x ACTL Ammo Trucks w/ 9 men
1x Command vehicle w/ 8 men
2x Artillery DetachmentOne detachment = 1 MLRS Battery and 2 AS90 Batteries, or:
1) 3x MLRS with 9 crew
3x ACTL Missle Transport w/ 9 crew
1x Command Vehicle w/ 7 crew
2)3x AS90 w/ 30 crew
2x ACTL Ammo transport w/ 6 crew
1x Co-ordination vehicle w/ 7 crew
3x Land Rovers, long Wheel-base.
2)3x AS90 w/ 30 crew
2x ACTL Ammo transport w/ 6 crew
1x Co-ordination vehicle w/ 7 crew
3x Land Rovers, long Wheel-base.
(I believe all 'crew member count ups' are for the total number of that type (e.g. 30 crew for 3 AS90s, not 30 crew for each of the 3 AS90s))
The above comes to 1,544 men, so is the remainign '356' men enough to crew the air support I'll need AND fulfill all support roles needed in a Battalion (cooks, medics, engineers, people driving things, signallers, mechanics etc.) when out in an FoB in a foreign nation?
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Strykla » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:16 pm
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:19 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:This 'calculator' allows you to work out how large a fleet you could maintain assuming it was identical to the USN in quality and funding.
Since the USN is probably one of the most well-funded navies on Earth, it's probably a good benchmark.
by Licana » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:22 pm
Strykla wrote:Even with the zero point ponies explanation, most of which was ridiculous, I was not fully convinced. But I cede the position for IC purposes and only in IC.
Strykla wrote:Obviously they aren't as good as fighters; a Vulcan cannon alone is as large as them and they can't carry thousands of pounds of weapons.
Strykla wrote:Heck, I doubt you could strap an MG on without compromising their abilities.
Strykla wrote:So are they like backpack UAVs? Zero direct combat capabilities but good scouts?
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by Senestrum » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:24 pm
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Samozaryadnyastan wrote:This 'calculator' allows you to work out how large a fleet you could maintain assuming it was identical to the USN in quality and funding.
Since the USN is probably one of the most well-funded navies on Earth, it's probably a good benchmark.
According to this I can feasibly field 193.4 million tonnes of blue water vessel. I think I may have fudged.
Can someone check my math and make sure I got this right?
21,124.91 GDP per capita
474,000,000 population
7% spending on defense
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:30 pm
Senestrum wrote:Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:According to this I can feasibly field 193.4 million tonnes of blue water vessel. I think I may have fudged.
Can someone check my math and make sure I got this right?
21,124.91 GDP per capita
474,000,000 population
7% spending on defense
What portion of your defense spending goes towards your navy?
by Immoren » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:37 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Senestrum » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:42 pm
by Crookfur » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:44 pm
Kouralia wrote:Okay, here's my (almost finished) Battalion. This is a combined arms battalion, there are more specialised ones, however this is the most deployed formation.
4x Light Role Infantry Company1x L.R. Company = 3 platoons and a command echelon, or:
3x Infantry Section (24 men)
3x Infantry Section (24 men)
3x Infantry Section (24 men)
3x Platoon Command unit (6 men)
1x Comapny Command unit (4 men)
(all in Land Rovers)
4x Mechanised Infantry Company1x Mech company = 3x mech platoons and command echelon, or:
3x platoons (78 men)
1x command echelon (4 men)
9x AMV w/ 27 crew
1x Ape w/ 3 crew
2x Airborne Infantry Company1x Airborne COmpany = 2x Line Airborne Platoons, and one SpecWar platoon, or:
2x Platoons (52 men)
2x Chinooks w/ 8 crew
1x platoon (26 men)
3x Black Hawks w/ 12 crew
1x command echelon (4 men)
2x Armoured Company1x Armoured Company = 3x Squadron, or:
9 Main Battle Tanks w/ 27 crew, and then
1 COmmand Vehicle w/ 5 men and
2x ARVs w/ 6 crew.
2x UAV Recon Detachment1x UAV unit =
1x UAV COntrol Vehicle w/ 3 crew
1x ACTL UAV Transport w/ 3 crew
1x Generator Vehicle w/ 3 crew
1x Transport for Controllers w/ 6 crew
2x AAA Detachment1x Air Defence Unit =
3x Mobile AAA w/ 9 men
3x ACTL Ammo Trucks w/ 9 men
1x Command vehicle w/ 8 men
2x Artillery DetachmentOne detachment = 1 MLRS Battery and 2 AS90 Batteries, or:
1) 3x MLRS with 9 crew
3x ACTL Missle Transport w/ 9 crew
1x Command Vehicle w/ 7 crew
2)3x AS90 w/ 30 crew
2x ACTL Ammo transport w/ 6 crew
1x Co-ordination vehicle w/ 7 crew
3x Land Rovers, long Wheel-base.
2)3x AS90 w/ 30 crew
2x ACTL Ammo transport w/ 6 crew
1x Co-ordination vehicle w/ 7 crew
3x Land Rovers, long Wheel-base.
(I believe all 'crew member count ups' are for the total number of that type (e.g. 30 crew for 3 AS90s, not 30 crew for each of the 3 AS90s))
The above comes to 1,544 men, so is the remainign '356' men enough to crew the air support I'll need AND fulfill all support roles needed in a Battalion (cooks, medics, engineers, people driving things, signallers, mechanics etc.) when out in an FoB in a foreign nation?
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:46 pm
by Strykla » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:54 pm
Licana wrote:Strykla wrote:Even with the zero point ponies explanation, most of which was ridiculous, I was not fully convinced. But I cede the position for IC purposes and only in IC.
I don't think you've got a lot of room to claim things as "ridiculous", given some of your history.Strykla wrote:Obviously they aren't as good as fighters; a Vulcan cannon alone is as large as them and they can't carry thousands of pounds of weapons.
Durr hurr.Strykla wrote:Heck, I doubt you could strap an MG on without compromising their abilities.
Why is this? I could see one being able to heft a light, belt-fed MG mounted on their stomach.Strykla wrote:So are they like backpack UAVs? Zero direct combat capabilities but good scouts?
This seems to be what they are stating, yes.
by Samozaryadnyastan » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:57 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Licana » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:03 pm
Strykla wrote:I meant an MG that might do something other than send a few piffs of dirt at soldiers, or scuff up a plane. You might get away with a SAW but most certainly not with 7.62mm or higher.
Strykla wrote:There's a reason planes don't use 5.56mm ammunition in their cannons.
Strykla wrote:Giving pegasi them would just be like, "Oh, well, we have fliers, why not stap on a gun and see what happens"? At best, some injuries from strafing.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by Vitaphone Racing » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:15 pm
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by Samozaryadnyastan » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:22 pm
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Apparently I can get a navy of 52 million tonnes.
This gives me room to operate 346 Queen Mary 2's. Excellent.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:25 pm
by Strykla » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:40 pm
Licana wrote:Strykla wrote:I meant an MG that might do something other than send a few piffs of dirt at soldiers, or scuff up a plane. You might get away with a SAW but most certainly not with 7.62mm or higher.Weight: 10 kg (22 lb)
Length:40.89 in (1,039 mm)Weight: 22.3 pounds (10.1 kg)
Length: 49.7 in (1,263 mm)Weight 10.5 kg (23.15 lb)
Length 1,105 mm (43.5 in)
Yes, that whole extra pound and handful of inches are going to cause serious problems.Strykla wrote:There's a reason planes don't use 5.56mm ammunition in their cannons.
It's a shame that magical flying horses aren't planes, otherwise your reasoning might make an iota of sense.Strykla wrote:Giving pegasi them would just be like, "Oh, well, we have fliers, why not stap on a gun and see what happens"? At best, some injuries from strafing.
I wasn't aware machine gun fire resulted in effects best described as "some injuries." In fact, I'm pretty sure it generally results in "horrible death from sustained fire."
by Samozaryadnyastan » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:41 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:42 pm
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:*Agni-III plays the Accuracy Card*
*your player misses a turn*
*all your ships are belong to Poseidon*
by Samozaryadnyastan » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:44 pm
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:46 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Marquesan
Advertisement