NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:06 pm

Lubyak wrote:
Kouralia wrote:Hmm, okay then.

Accuracy request still stands...


I always thought a platoon was a lieutenant's responsibility, captains got companies, majors and light colonels got batallions and full colonels got regiments....

Or was that wrong?


sort of, majors get companies. captain is 2ic. Lt colonels get Battalions, regimental colonels are either much higher ranking (general ranks) or honourary (the queen for example.)
this is because british regiments do not deploy as regiments.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Bunny Haven
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 118
Founded: Jan 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bunny Haven » Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:22 pm

The Amyclae wrote:
Bunny Haven wrote:i'm going to rp my nation as very young and nation's military as a having a very large enlistment but strapped for cash and having very uneven rations per division and few vehicles. The vehicles will have been only recently purchased used from other nations looking to upgrade to better stuff.

Enlisted personal will be divided between.
Army - 75%
Navy - 15%
Air-force - 5%
Special Ops - 5%

Army
1 M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS)
18 MOWAG Eagle 2 personal transport / patrol vessels
22 non-weaponized Simple Jeeps

Navy
1 Amphibious transport dock San Antonio class
4 small landing craft
2 anti ari fragate Horizon class
1 type 42 destoyrer - flagship
1 mutilpurposs corvette
12 fast patrol boats

Air-force
2 F-111F fighter bomber
5 Mirage III fighter / intercepter

any comments or suggestion would be greatly appreciated.


I'm not sure what you mean by a 'large enlistment.' When I think enlistment I think contracted/volunteer soldiers but you're so strapped for cash that you have a problem acquiring food. On the face of it that's quite the conundrum. If your nation's military budget is so lacking it has trouble purchasing the simplest supplies why would they keep accepting contracts, why would your people find it an acceptable economic avenue? Food for thought.

Also, five percent in the 'Special Ops' seems dreadfully high. Take the U.S. for instance. They have about 2.2 million in the armed forces, and about 60,000 are a part of Special Operations Command. That's less than .1%; you should revise that number downwards.

You should probably nix the San Antonio LPD; you don't need it.

thank you
i had no idea about the special ops percentage and i was already toying with the idea of getting rid of the San Antonio, i think i will.
Bunny Haven FactBook
Economic Left/Right -5.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -4.00

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:48 pm

Bunny Haven wrote:i'm going to rp my nation as very young and nation's military as a having a very large enlistment but strapped for cash and having very uneven rations per division and few vehicles. The vehicles will have been only recently purchased used from other nations looking to upgrade to better stuff.

Enlisted personal will be divided between.
Army - 75%
Navy - 15%
Air-force - 5%
Special Ops - 5%

Army
1 M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS)
18 MOWAG Eagle 2 personal transport / patrol vessels
22 non-weaponized Simple Jeeps

Navy
1 Amphibious transport dock San Antonio class
4 small landing craft
2 anti ari fragate Horizon class
1 type 42 destoyrer - flagship
1 mutilpurposs corvette
12 fast patrol boats

Air-force
2 F-111F fighter bomber
5 Mirage III fighter / intercepter

any comments or suggestion would be greatly appreciated.

That is a lot of special forces.
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:46 pm

    • Flashlight.
    • Chemlight.
    • IFAK.
    • Canteen Cup.
    • Earplugs.
    • Internal Communications Radio
    • 70 ounces of water in a second hydration bladder.
    • Two Meals, Ready to Eat (MREs).
    • Poncho and/or Bivy Sack.
    • Poncho liner.
    • Undershirt.
    • Spare batteries.
    • Two pair of socks.
    • Polypropylene or silk long sleeve undershirt.
    • Rifle Cleaning Kit.
    • E-Tool.
    • Personal hygiene kit.
    • Sling rope with two snap links.

    • Camouflage Uniform with Infrared Tape on left sleeve (1”x1”).
    • Flag Patch
    • Combat Boots.
    • Dog Tags.
    • ID Card.
    • Undershirt.
    • Socks.
    • Tactical gloves.
    • IR Night Vision Monocular Device.
    • Boonie Hat.
    • Rigger belt.
    • Notebook and pen.
    • Watch.
    • Knee and elbow pads.
    • Goggles or Glasses.
    • Folding Knife/Multi-tool.
    • 64 ounces of water in two 1-quart canteens.
    • 100 ounces of water in a hydration bladder.
    • Casualty and witness cards.
    • Flex cuffs.


That look about right for a light combat loadout? I left out the weapons and ammo.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Jagalonia
Senator
 
Posts: 4921
Founded: Jun 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jagalonia » Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:50 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
    • Flashlight.
    • Chemlight.
    • IFAK.
    • Canteen Cup.
    • Earplugs.
    • Internal Communications Radio
    • 70 ounces of water in a second hydration bladder.
    • Two Meals, Ready to Eat (MREs).
    • Poncho and/or Bivy Sack.
    • Poncho liner.
    • Undershirt.
    • Spare batteries.
    • Two pair of socks.
    • Polypropylene or silk long sleeve undershirt.
    • Rifle Cleaning Kit.
    • E-Tool.
    • Personal hygiene kit.
    • Sling rope with two snap links.

    • Camouflage Uniform with Infrared Tape on left sleeve (1”x1”).
    • Flag Patch
    • Combat Boots.
    • Dog Tags.
    • ID Card.
    • Undershirt.
    • Socks.
    • Tactical gloves.
    • IR Night Vision Monocular Device.
    • Boonie Hat.
    • Rigger belt.
    • Notebook and pen.
    • Watch.
    • Knee and elbow pads.
    • Goggles or Glasses.
    • Folding Knife/Multi-tool.
    • 64 ounces of water in two 1-quart canteens.
    • 100 ounces of water in a hydration bladder.
    • Casualty and witness cards.
    • Flex cuffs.


That look about right for a light combat loadout? I left out the weapons and ammo.

I didn't give this a full look-through, but I sure as hell aren't carrying 2 cantines ontop of a camelback. Drop one of them. I suggest keeping the camelback.
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Ifreann wrote:
Computer Land wrote:I don't want someone hacking my fridge :meh:

fridge.setTempC(100);
sysout("I'm melting! I'm meeeeelting! Oh what a world, what world!");
I'm Amish...Problem?
Unsigable. >.>
I am a Magnificent Titan who likes to Devour Heroes
All tech.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:52 pm

Jagalonia wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
    • Flashlight.
    • Chemlight.
    • IFAK.
    • Canteen Cup.
    • Earplugs.
    • Internal Communications Radio
    • 70 ounces of water in a second hydration bladder.
    • Two Meals, Ready to Eat (MREs).
    • Poncho and/or Bivy Sack.
    • Poncho liner.
    • Undershirt.
    • Spare batteries.
    • Two pair of socks.
    • Polypropylene or silk long sleeve undershirt.
    • Rifle Cleaning Kit.
    • E-Tool.
    • Personal hygiene kit.
    • Sling rope with two snap links.

    • Camouflage Uniform with Infrared Tape on left sleeve (1”x1”).
    • Flag Patch
    • Combat Boots.
    • Dog Tags.
    • ID Card.
    • Undershirt.
    • Socks.
    • Tactical gloves.
    • IR Night Vision Monocular Device.
    • Boonie Hat.
    • Rigger belt.
    • Notebook and pen.
    • Watch.
    • Knee and elbow pads.
    • Goggles or Glasses.
    • Folding Knife/Multi-tool.
    • 64 ounces of water in two 1-quart canteens.
    • 100 ounces of water in a hydration bladder.
    • Casualty and witness cards.
    • Flex cuffs.


That look about right for a light combat loadout? I left out the weapons and ammo.

I didn't give this a full look-through, but I sure as hell aren't carrying 2 cantines ontop of a camelback. Drop one of them. I suggest keeping the camelback.

Actually you're right. I modeled this after America's Iraq loadout so there probably isn't a need for that much water in a temperate forest area.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Jagalonia
Senator
 
Posts: 4921
Founded: Jun 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jagalonia » Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:03 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Jagalonia wrote:I didn't give this a full look-through, but I sure as hell aren't carrying 2 cantines ontop of a camelback. Drop one of them. I suggest keeping the camelback.

Actually you're right. I modeled this after America's Iraq loadout so there probably isn't a need for that much water in a temperate forest area.

I still don't understand why people post loadouts here, they're dependant entirely on the weather, and enviroment...
Last edited by Jagalonia on Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Ifreann wrote:
Computer Land wrote:I don't want someone hacking my fridge :meh:

fridge.setTempC(100);
sysout("I'm melting! I'm meeeeelting! Oh what a world, what world!");
I'm Amish...Problem?
Unsigable. >.>
I am a Magnificent Titan who likes to Devour Heroes
All tech.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:05 pm

Jagalonia wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Actually you're right. I modeled this after America's Iraq loadout so there probably isn't a need for that much water in a temperate forest area.

I still don't understand why people post loadouts here, they're dependant entirely on the weather, and enviroment...

This is only one loadout. More specifically it's my general purpose combat load that I'm going to use as model for my other loadouts.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Jagalonia
Senator
 
Posts: 4921
Founded: Jun 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jagalonia » Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:07 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Jagalonia wrote:I still don't understand why people post loadouts here, they're dependant entirely on the weather, and enviroment...

This is only one loadout. More specifically it's my general purpose combat load that I'm going to use as model for my other loadouts.

The difference in loadouts can be imense though, you're not going to have near the same equipment between desert, arctic, or even jungle operations.
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Ifreann wrote:
Computer Land wrote:I don't want someone hacking my fridge :meh:

fridge.setTempC(100);
sysout("I'm melting! I'm meeeeelting! Oh what a world, what world!");
I'm Amish...Problem?
Unsigable. >.>
I am a Magnificent Titan who likes to Devour Heroes
All tech.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:10 pm

Jagalonia wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:This is only one loadout. More specifically it's my general purpose combat load that I'm going to use as model for my other loadouts.

The difference in loadouts can be imense though, you're not going to have near the same equipment between desert, arctic, or even jungle operations.
I plan on creating one for Temperate (forests, plains, highlands), Desert, Arctic, Mountain, and Jungle. It's going to take a while, but I want every meticulous detail of my military on paper. So to speak anyway.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Jagalonia
Senator
 
Posts: 4921
Founded: Jun 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jagalonia » Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:12 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Jagalonia wrote:The difference in loadouts can be imense though, you're not going to have near the same equipment between desert, arctic, or even jungle operations.
I plan on creating one for Temperate (forests, plains, highlands), Desert, Arctic, Mountain, and Jungle. It's going to take a while, but I want every meticulous detail of my military on paper. So to speak anyway.

That sounds like too much work...lol.
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Ifreann wrote:
Computer Land wrote:I don't want someone hacking my fridge :meh:

fridge.setTempC(100);
sysout("I'm melting! I'm meeeeelting! Oh what a world, what world!");
I'm Amish...Problem?
Unsigable. >.>
I am a Magnificent Titan who likes to Devour Heroes
All tech.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:17 pm

Jagalonia wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote: I plan on creating one for Temperate (forests, plains, highlands), Desert, Arctic, Mountain, and Jungle. It's going to take a while, but I want every meticulous detail of my military on paper. So to speak anyway.

That sounds like too much work...lol.

That's just baseline infantry. Then you've got snipers, designated marksman, AT units, Squad automatic, Dismounted units, special operations divisions, my as-of-yet unnamed super soldier program. Right now my factbook and combat doctrine are unorganized emaciated messes. They don't have nearly as much info as I want and it's not as neat as I'd like.

Factbook
CD Open to suggestions from anyone and everyone.
Last edited by Nirvash Type TheEND on Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Jagalonia
Senator
 
Posts: 4921
Founded: Jun 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jagalonia » Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:24 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Jagalonia wrote:That sounds like too much work...lol.

That's just baseline infantry. Then you've got snipers, designated marksman, AT units, Squad automatic, Dismounted units, special operations divisions, my as-of-yet unnamed super soldier program. Right now my factbook and combat doctrine are unorganized emaciated messes. They don't have nearly as much info as I want and it's not as neat as I'd like.

Factbook
CD Open to suggestions from anyone and everyone.

I could go through that and make suggestions.....Maybe when I'm more sober....
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Ifreann wrote:
Computer Land wrote:I don't want someone hacking my fridge :meh:

fridge.setTempC(100);
sysout("I'm melting! I'm meeeeelting! Oh what a world, what world!");
I'm Amish...Problem?
Unsigable. >.>
I am a Magnificent Titan who likes to Devour Heroes
All tech.

User avatar
Sevvania
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6893
Founded: Nov 12, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sevvania » Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:39 pm

Military installations.

Namely forts. I need them. More specifically, functions for them. There are five major forts in Sevvania, and I have nothing more in-depth than "They're forts."

So, what could these forts be used for?

i.e. One of these forts is a training ground/federal depository.
"Humble thyself and hold thy tongue."

Current Era: 1945
NationStates Stat Card - Sevvania
OFFICIAL FACTBOOK - Sevvania
4/1/13 - Never Forget

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26061
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:00 pm

What forts are we talking about?

Are we talking abuot "a single-building fortress" or "arrangement of small bunkers and dots stretching for thousands of miles"?
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
The Grand World Order
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9619
Founded: Nov 03, 2007
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The Grand World Order » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:03 pm

Bafuria wrote:America is spending only 5% and despite having a relatively poor welfare system it is dealing with a budget crisis.


You're a funny guy.

NOTE: I am well aware that the percentages are only of the US Government's budget. However, I wanted to point out that welfare programs account for much more of the debt than the military, and the US military overpays for anything anyways. There's also factors such as unemployment (caused by the huge outsourcing of labor, which in turn reduces purchasing power, which reduces revenue, which affects the government's ability to pay its debt) and corruption. I'm not advocating any sort of wank arguments by Greater Valencia/Urceo-Carthage, but the idea that the military is the primary causer of the Federal Deficit is bogus.


Additionally, I'd like to offer this to people wondering about organization. Sure, it's wikipedia, but APP-6A's not really a subjective thing.
Last edited by The Grand World Order on Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:14 pm, edited 3 times in total.
United States Marine Corps Non-Commissioned Officer turned Private Military Contractor
Basque American
NS's only post-apoc, neo-western, cassette-punk, conspiracy-laden, pseudo-mystic Fascist UN-clone utopia
Peace sells, but who's buying? | Right is the new punk
A Better Class of Fascist
Got Discord? Add me at griff1337
Economic Left/Right: 4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 8.13
Amerikians: That sir, is one Epic Tank.
Altamirus: Behold the fascist God of War.
Aelosia: Shiiiiit, you are hot. More pics, I demand.

User avatar
The Amyclae
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 471
Founded: Jan 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Amyclae » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:55 pm

Sevvania wrote:Military installations.

Namely forts. I need them. More specifically, functions for them. There are five major forts in Sevvania, and I have nothing more in-depth than "They're forts."

So, what could these forts be used for?

i.e. One of these forts is a training ground/federal depository.

What could modern forts be used for... Target practice, perhaps? It worked smashingly for the French at Dien Bien Phu.
Call me Ishmael.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:01 pm

The Amyclae wrote:
Sevvania wrote:Military installations.

Namely forts. I need them. More specifically, functions for them. There are five major forts in Sevvania, and I have nothing more in-depth than "They're forts."

So, what could these forts be used for?

i.e. One of these forts is a training ground/federal depository.

What could modern forts be used for... Target practice, perhaps? It worked smashingly for the French at Dien Bien Phu.


I'm not sure even the best efforts of La colonial, legion De estrange and french airborne compares to a purpose built fortification, more or less the entirety of dien bien phu was dug out by hand on both sides.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26061
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:20 pm

The Amyclae wrote:
Sevvania wrote:Military installations.

Namely forts. I need them. More specifically, functions for them. There are five major forts in Sevvania, and I have nothing more in-depth than "They're forts."

So, what could these forts be used for?

i.e. One of these forts is a training ground/federal depository.

What could modern forts be used for... Target practice, perhaps? It worked smashingly for the French at Dien Bien Phu.


A great example. French casualties were between 1600a and 2200 dead, while Vietnamese casualties were between 4,000 and 22,000.

But there are far better examples of the use of fortifications in defense. The Battle for Damansky Island seems more appropriate here, or the Soviet regiment (whose name I cannot off-hand remember) that held its fort for 900 days of constant Mujahedin attacks in Afghanistan.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Sevvania
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6893
Founded: Nov 12, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sevvania » Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:09 am

I suppose they'd be more along the lines of modern "forts," rather than the traditional sense of the word. Like Fort Knox, I suppose, but not quite to that degree. Maybe more of a military installation than a true fort.
"Humble thyself and hold thy tongue."

Current Era: 1945
NationStates Stat Card - Sevvania
OFFICIAL FACTBOOK - Sevvania
4/1/13 - Never Forget

User avatar
Sevvania
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6893
Founded: Nov 12, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sevvania » Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:11 am

Sevvania wrote:I suppose they'd be more along the lines of modern "forts," being found within Sevvania itself, rather than the traditional sense of the word. Like Fort Knox, I suppose, but not quite to that degree. Maybe more of a military installation than a true fort.
"Humble thyself and hold thy tongue."

Current Era: 1945
NationStates Stat Card - Sevvania
OFFICIAL FACTBOOK - Sevvania
4/1/13 - Never Forget

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:31 am

The Amyclae wrote:
Sevvania wrote:Military installations.

Namely forts. I need them. More specifically, functions for them. There are five major forts in Sevvania, and I have nothing more in-depth than "They're forts."

So, what could these forts be used for?

i.e. One of these forts is a training ground/federal depository.

What could modern forts be used for... Target practice, perhaps? It worked smashingly for the French at Dien Bien Phu.

Dien Bien Phu is a bad example, the French were in a really shitty position. Depending on the terrain I suppose you could use a fort with an air base, some AA, and lots of artillery to control an area, however forts as we know them are largely obsolete. At best I would probably give them a fence or some small (8 feet tall, 2 feet wide or something) concrete or stone walls, and just use them as a regular military base. Regardless you will never have a use for concentric castles or Vauban style forts, the days of giant walls are long gone.
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
The Amyclae
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 471
Founded: Jan 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Amyclae » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:21 am

Allanea wrote:
The Amyclae wrote:What could modern forts be used for... Target practice, perhaps? It worked smashingly for the French at Dien Bien Phu.


A great example. French casualties were between 1600a and 2200 dead, while Vietnamese casualties were between 4,000 and 22,000.

But there are far better examples of the use of fortifications in defense. The Battle for Damansky Island seems more appropriate here, or the Soviet regiment (whose name I cannot off-hand remember) that held its fort for 900 days of constant Mujahedin attacks in Afghanistan.


Ah, right, since the French were able to kill more Vietnamese than the other way around, it must've been a victory; right? It must have been something other than one of France's most crushing defeats of the 20th Century! That thinking worked so well for Westmoreland.

Seriously, I don't know what you guys are all smoking. Forts are dead. Army manuals haven't incorporated the use of of them in... Almost a century now.

Someone feel free to correct me, but the last field manual that addressed the issue of fortifications was from '85 and even then it's merely entitled 'survivability.' Defensive fortifications are seen as a tactical advantage, and there is literally no inclination to turn back the clock to strategic emplacements.

Link
Call me Ishmael.

User avatar
The Reliquary
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 424
Founded: Aug 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Reliquary » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:23 am

The Amyclae wrote:
Allanea wrote:
A great example. French casualties were between 1600a and 2200 dead, while Vietnamese casualties were between 4,000 and 22,000.

But there are far better examples of the use of fortifications in defense. The Battle for Damansky Island seems more appropriate here, or the Soviet regiment (whose name I cannot off-hand remember) that held its fort for 900 days of constant Mujahedin attacks in Afghanistan.


Ah, right, since the French were able to kill more Vietnamese than the other way around, it must've been a victory; right? It must have been something other than one of France's most crushing defeats of the 20th Century! That thinking worked so well for Westmoreland.

Seriously, I don't know what you guys are all smoking. Forts are dead. Army manuals haven't incorporated the use of of them in... Almost a century now.

Someone feel free to correct me, but the last field manual that addressed the issue of fortifications was from '85 and even then it's merely entitled 'survivability.' Defensive fortifications are seen as a tactical advantage, and there is literally no inclination to turn back the clock to strategic emplacements.

Link

What is an FOB/Platoon 'house' if it isn't a fort?
They train young people to drop fire on people. But their commanders won't allow them to write the word f*** on their airplanes ... because ... it's obscene

User avatar
The Amyclae
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 471
Founded: Jan 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Amyclae » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:26 am

The Reliquary wrote:
The Amyclae wrote:
Ah, right, since the French were able to kill more Vietnamese than the other way around, it must've been a victory; right? It must have been something other than one of France's most crushing defeats of the 20th Century! That thinking worked so well for Westmoreland.

Seriously, I don't know what you guys are all smoking. Forts are dead. Army manuals haven't incorporated the use of of them in... Almost a century now.

Someone feel free to correct me, but the last field manual that addressed the issue of fortifications was from '85 and even then it's merely entitled 'survivability.' Defensive fortifications are seen as a tactical advantage, and there is literally no inclination to turn back the clock to strategic emplacements.

Link

What is an FOB/Platoon 'house' if it isn't a fort?

I'm just going to use Wikipedia as signpost here: "Forts in modern usage often refer to space set aside by governments for a permanent military facility."

Is there something permanent about a FOB-Platoon 'house' that I don't know about?
Call me Ishmael.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads