For a small nation whose defense funding is limited and whose population mostly resides in small and medium-sized cities, do main battle tanks make sense as a main part of the army?
Advantages:
-Firepower + + + +
-Protection + +
-Mobility + + +
Disadvantages:
-Logistics Cost - - - -
-Target Profile - - -
-Flexibility - -
On the one hand, they offer very good firepower, armor and mobility. However, they are susceptible to an increasing variety of anti-tank weapons to include AT missiles mounted on IFVs or man-portable; explosive-formed penetrator mines/bombs; SADARM artillery shells and air-to-ground missiles. They're also a heavy logistical burden due to the manpower, fuel, ammunition, supplies, etc... they need to stay effective. For that reason, I'm leaning towards eschewing tanks in favor of lower cost IFVs (i.e. M3 Bradley) equipped with AT missiles and more flexible Stryker wheeled armored vehicles. Given my nation's small size, limited defense budget and primarily defensive military stance, I'm not sure if main battle tanks are a necessity at this time.
I am curious to see what other small nations have done to meet their army's combat vehicle needs. No god-modders, please