Advertisement
by The New World Oceania » Thu Sep 22, 2016 7:57 am
by Normandy and Picardy » Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:10 am
by Arkolon » Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:12 am
by The Nihilistic view » Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:55 am
by Britanno 3 » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:15 am
by Eol Sha » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:32 am
by Tectonix » Thu Sep 22, 2016 1:09 pm
by Tumbra » Thu Sep 22, 2016 6:42 pm
by Argentarino » Thu Sep 22, 2016 7:11 pm
Tumbra wrote:"All votes below those of the Hon. Ujang Duong are not counted due to the vote ending at 12.35 am."
"With 4 votes for, 10 against and 1 abstention, this motion fails and debating resumes."
by FreYhill » Thu Sep 22, 2016 7:11 pm
Argentarino wrote:Tumbra wrote:"All votes below those of the Hon. Ujang Duong are not counted due to the vote ending at 12.35 am."
"With 4 votes for, 10 against and 1 abstention, this motion fails and debating resumes."
"Mr. Speaker, point of order, the Constitution requires that the Confidence Resolution take precedence over all other business, per Part II, Article VIII of the Elizian Constitution."
by Coconut Isle » Thu Sep 22, 2016 7:20 pm
by Lykens » Thu Sep 22, 2016 7:26 pm
by Arkolon » Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:19 pm
Lykens wrote:"Mister Speaker, allow me to rise in the staunchest opposition to this bill.
It is shortsighted and will cause more harm than what it views as harmful. Yes, there were unintended consequences passed in the recent constitutional amendment, but several extremely important parts such as the election of the speaker, powers of the speaker, and disciplinary procedures that are extremely important to regulate the observance of decorum within the august body. I will support an amended version, but as presented this bill will cause much more confusion and chaos than its supporters think.
This will simply gut the previous amendment, and not restore the constitution to how it stood before, and will prevent us from voting at all. If this bill is no amended to fix such issues, I implore my honorable colleagues on both sides of this house to vote down this bill."
by The Sarian » Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:11 pm
Argentarino wrote:Tumbra wrote:"All votes below those of the Hon. Ujang Duong are not counted due to the vote ending at 12.35 am."
"With 4 votes for, 10 against and 1 abstention, this motion fails and debating resumes."
"Mr. Speaker, point of order, the Constitution requires that the Confidence Resolution take precedence over all other business, per Part II, Article VIII of the Elizian Constitution."
by Belmaria » Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:58 am
The Sarian wrote:Argentarino wrote:"Mr. Speaker, point of order, the Constitution requires that the Confidence Resolution take precedence over all other business, per Part II, Article VIII of the Elizian Constitution."
"Point of Information, Mr Speaker. Confidence motions may only be tabled if there is no other business pending - 'A resolution of no confidence... may be tabled for twenty four hours of debate ... provided no other business is pending.'
As there are plenty of bills in the depository, I think it is clear that this motion may not be tabled."
by FreYhill » Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:04 am
The Sarian wrote:Argentarino wrote:"Mr. Speaker, point of order, the Constitution requires that the Confidence Resolution take precedence over all other business, per Part II, Article VIII of the Elizian Constitution."
"Point of Information, Mr Speaker. Confidence motions may only be tabled if there is no other business pending - 'A resolution of no confidence... may be tabled for twenty four hours of debate ... provided no other business is pending.'
As there are plenty of bills in the depository, I think it is clear that this motion may not be tabled."
by Electrum » Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:39 am
Freyhill wrote:The Sarian wrote:"Point of Information, Mr Speaker. Confidence motions may only be tabled if there is no other business pending - 'A resolution of no confidence... may be tabled for twenty four hours of debate ... provided no other business is pending.'
As there are plenty of bills in the depository, I think it is clear that this motion may not be tabled."
''Point of Information, Mr. Speaker. The Constitution's (Chi said whilst holding a pocket version) mention of "Business Pending" refers to business within the chamber, with the ParliPro Amendment making that Confidence votes can be tabled by anyone, when there is NO DEBATE OR VOTING OCCURRING.''
by FreYhill » Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:50 am
Electrum wrote:Freyhill wrote:
''Point of Information, Mr. Speaker. The Constitution's (Chi said whilst holding a pocket version) mention of "Business Pending" refers to business within the chamber, with the ParliPro Amendment making that Confidence votes can be tabled by anyone, when there is NO DEBATE OR VOTING OCCURRING.''
"We are currently debating a constitutional amendment, if the Senator would stop proposing no-confidence every five seconds, the honourable senator might have realised that."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement