[NSGS] Democratic Left [Official HQ]

[Arglorand]

This isn't a Socialist party.

i dunno...how do I know this party won't attempt to run the economy to the ground?

You can know that by the distinct lack of libertarians and minarchists here.

[Glasgia]

Nooooooooo....... We're the proper Socialists, that's our anthem!

Fine. Then we're taking Red Flag.

Actually, you can keep Internationale

[Arglorand]

Fine. Then we're taking Red Flag.

Actually, you can keep Internationale

And there you have it. Compromise reached.

[San Jose Guayabal]

The Internationale. That's great.

[Glasgia]

Actually, you can keep Internationale

And there you have it. Compromise reached.

Seriously though, I forgot about Red Flag - That's definitely going to be the WA's anthem if I can get my way

i dunno...how do I know this party won't attempt to run the economy to the ground?

You can know that by the distinct lack of libertarians and minarchists here.

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[The Liberated Territories]

i dunno...how do I know this party won't attempt to run the economy to the ground?

You can know that by the distinct lack of libertarians and minarchists here.

Well tell me how the five year plans go, comrade, when you gain power and nationalize the food industry.

[Dejanic]

You can know that by the distinct lack of libertarians and minarchists here.

Well tell me how the five year plans go, comrade, when you gain power and nationalize the food industry.

And there's a bounty of food in Libertarian Somalia?

And anyway, I'd rather have the food industry ran by co-ops, or simply privately run as it is now, not nationalised.

[Arkolon]

i dunno...how do I know this party won't attempt to run the economy to the ground?

You can know that by the distinct lack of libertarians and minarchists here.

Macroeconomic focus on job creation... in the 21st century.
A living wage... in a business environment where a labour-intensive productive combination is the only selling point.
Breaking up banks and "strict banking regulations"... at all.
The German model... in a rural community.
Strong opposition to organised crime... in South America.
Welfare plans some developed countries don't even have... in a second world economy.
Parental leave... in a labour-intensive economy.
Car pooling... in a rural community.
Promoting alternative fuels... when there's a strong chance the petrol in the nation is what got us here at all.
Promoting electrical vehicles and charging stations... in a second world economy.
Nationalising important and vital markets... in a globalised economy.
Telling bosses and employees to play nice... in a labour-intensive economy.

Either update your platform to conform to a South American nation, as that's where we're headed, or seriously rethink all of your policy ideas from the top.

[Arkolon]

Well tell me how the five year plans go, comrade, when you gain power and nationalize the food industry.

Libertarian Somalia

Since when was Somalia libertarian?

[San Jose Guayabal]

Are we going to a South American nation?

[Dejanic]

Libertarian Somalia

Since when was Somalia libertarian?

It's Anarcho-Capitalist to be more specific, which comes under the umbrella of "Libertarianism".

[Planita]

Can someone add me in as a member?

[Arkolon]

Since when was Somalia libertarian?

It's Anarcho-Capitalist to be more specific, which comes under the umbrella of "Libertarianism".

No, until 2006 Somalia had many competing warlords all vying for power over the, or parts of the, country, and no institution recognised property rights, and the descent into this large-scale civil unrest was mostly due to foreign involvement in the country. It's funny you mention Somalia, and I pointed it out to you by asking you about it, because in many circles "Somalia is anarchy!" is actually taken as a joke argument, poking fun at people who actually believe it.

I've never come across someone who believed it, though. Well, until now.

[Dejanic]

It's Anarcho-Capitalist to be more specific, which comes under the umbrella of "Libertarianism".

No, until 2006 Somalia had many competing warlords all vying for power over the, or parts of the, country, and no institution recognised property rights, and the descent into this large-scale civil unrest was mostly due to foreign involvement in the country. It's funny you mention Somalia, and I pointed it out to you by asking you about it, because in many circles "Somalia is anarchy!" is actually taken as a joke argument, poking fun at people who actually believe it.

I've never come across someone who believed it, though. Well, until now.

Try Mises.Org, they've done many articles promoting the Anarcho-Capitalist system of Somalia and defending the continuous development of this system. And personally I trust reputable Anarcho-Capitalists on this issue over you.

A lot of An-Caps accept this, infact they use Somalia as an argument in favour of Anarcho-Capitalism, pointing out the fact that life expectancy rates and living standards have actually increased ever since Somalia turned towards stateless Capitalism.

Read this, I hope it will open your eyes up, my little Liberal-Conservative. http://mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia

[Arglorand]

Can someone add me in as a member?

Don't worry; Aden will add you to the list next time he comes around.

[The Liberated Territories]

You can know that by the distinct lack of libertarians and minarchists here.

Macroeconomic focus on job creation... in the 21st century.
A living wage... in a business environment where a labour-intensive productive combination is the only selling point.
Breaking up banks and "strict banking regulations"... at all.
The German model... in a rural community.
Strong opposition to organised crime... in South America.
Welfare plans some developed countries don't even have... in a second world economy.
Parental leave... in a labour-intensive economy.
Car pooling... in a rural community.
Promoting alternative fuels... when there's a strong chance the petrol in the nation is what got us here at all.
Promoting electrical vehicles and charging stations... in a second world economy.
Nationalising important and vital markets... in a globalised economy.
Telling bosses and employees to play nice... in a labour-intensive economy.

Either update your platform to conform to a South American nation, as that's where we're headed, or seriously rethink all of your policy ideas from the top.

If I were in this party, I'd being having second thoughts about supporting a Latin American country. Realism what's that?

[The Democratic Left Central Committee]

Can someone add me in as a member?

Don't worry; Aden will add you to the list next time he comes around.

Or I will.

- Malgrave

[Dejanic]

Macroeconomic focus on job creation... in the 21st century.
A living wage... in a business environment where a labour-intensive productive combination is the only selling point.
Breaking up banks and "strict banking regulations"... at all.
The German model... in a rural community.
Strong opposition to organised crime... in South America.
Welfare plans some developed countries don't even have... in a second world economy.
Parental leave... in a labour-intensive economy.
Car pooling... in a rural community.
Promoting alternative fuels... when there's a strong chance the petrol in the nation is what got us here at all.
Promoting electrical vehicles and charging stations... in a second world economy.
Nationalising important and vital markets... in a globalised economy.
Telling bosses and employees to play nice... in a labour-intensive economy.

Either update your platform to conform to a South American nation, as that's where we're headed, or seriously rethink all of your policy ideas from the top.

If I were in this party, I'd being having second thoughts about supporting a Latin American country. Realism what's that?

Ignoring the fact ofc that Social Democratic parties dominate Latin American politics.

Aren't you in a National Bolshevik/Strasserist party anyway? This of course occurring after you had a breakdown and your own 1 man party imploded.

[The Liberated Territories]

No, until 2006 Somalia had many competing warlords all vying for power over the, or parts of the, country, and no institution recognised property rights, and the descent into this large-scale civil unrest was mostly due to foreign involvement in the country. It's funny you mention Somalia, and I pointed it out to you by asking you about it, because in many circles "Somalia is anarchy!" is actually taken as a joke argument, poking fun at people who actually believe it.

I've never come across someone who believed it, though. Well, until now.

Try Mises.Org, they've done many articles promoting the Anarcho-Capitalist system of Somalia and defending the continuous development of this system. And personally I trust reputable Anarcho-Capitalists on this issue over you.

A lot of An-Caps accept this, infact they use Somalia as an argument in favour of Anarcho-Capitalism, pointing out the fact that life expectancy rates and living standards have actually increased ever since Somalia turned towards stateless Capitalism.

Read this, I hope it will open your eyes up, my little Liberal-Conservative. http://mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia

A much better "anarchy" would be closer to medieval Iceland, which had competing executives and you were able to pick and choose which chief to follow, or become one yourself if you thought they were all asses. Also you could bring them to court.

Mises.org article on Somalia is basically what Ark said - it's not actually viewed as anarchy - but even though it's not, the decentralized nature of Somalia actually made conditions improve among the populace.

[Arkolon]

No, until 2006 Somalia had many competing warlords all vying for power over the, or parts of the, country, and no institution recognised property rights, and the descent into this large-scale civil unrest was mostly due to foreign involvement in the country. It's funny you mention Somalia, and I pointed it out to you by asking you about it, because in many circles "Somalia is anarchy!" is actually taken as a joke argument, poking fun at people who actually believe it.

I've never come across someone who believed it, though. Well, until now.

Try Mises.Org, they've done many articles promoting the Anarcho-Capitalist system of Somalia and defending the continuous development of this system. And personally I trust reputable Anarcho-Capitalists on this issue over you.

A lot of An-Caps accept this, infact they use Somalia as an argument in favour of Anarcho-Capitalism, pointing out the fact that life expectancy rates and living standards have actually increased ever since Somalia turned towards stateless Capitalism.

Read this, I hope it will open your eyes up, my little Liberal-Conservative. http://mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia

Source on any ancaps suggesting Somalia is an argument for anarcho-capitalism? Not the telecoms boom, or any market booms, but the actual handling of society and civility. Anarchism is a much bigger philosophy and ideology than just statelessness. Somalia is just statelessness, not anarchism. Anarchism is a serious, old cultural and political movement.

I also hoped you were above appeals to authority, as well as confusing mises.org as an anarchocapitalistic site, or even suggesting that the daily blog you linked me to, which states that it has nothing to do with the Mises Institute, has anything to do with the Mises Institue.

[Dejanic]

[/b]
Try Mises.Org, they've done many articles promoting the Anarcho-Capitalist system of Somalia and defending the continuous development of this system. And personally I trust reputable Anarcho-Capitalists on this issue over you.

A lot of An-Caps accept this, infact they use Somalia as an argument in favour of Anarcho-Capitalism, pointing out the fact that life expectancy rates and living standards have actually increased ever since Somalia turned towards stateless Capitalism.

Read this, I hope it will open your eyes up, my little Liberal-Conservative. http://mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia

A much better "anarchy" would be closer to medieval Iceland, which had competing executives and you were able to pick and choose which chief to follow, or become one yourself if you thought they were all asses. Also you could bring them to court.

Mises.org article on Somalia is basically what Ark said - it's not actually viewed as anarchy - but even though it's not, the decentralized nature of Somalia actually made conditions improve among the populace.

Don't try and turn this into a serious debate, I'm just doing what the right do when they insist that North Korea is Communist, somehow.

Though it doesn't help that there is a multitude of An-Caps that generally do call Somalia Anarcho-Capitalist, just like how some Juchests call NK Communist.

[Arkolon]

If I were in this party, I'd being having second thoughts about supporting a Latin American country. Realism what's that?

Ignoring the fact ofc that Social Democratic parties dominate Latin American politics.

A social democratic party in Latin America and a social democratic party in Western Europe are two, very different things. You seem to have confused the two.

[The Liberated Territories]

If I were in this party, I'd being having second thoughts about supporting a Latin American country. Realism what's that?

Ignoring the fact ofc that Social Democratic parties dominate Latin American politics.

Aren't you in a National Bolshevik/Strasserist party anyway? This of course occurring after you had a breakdown and your own 1 man party imploded.

Please do NOT bring that up again.

[Planita]

Don't worry; Aden will add you to the list next time he comes around.

Or I will.

- Malgrave

Thanks!

[Dejanic]

[/b]
Try Mises.Org, they've done many articles promoting the Anarcho-Capitalist system of Somalia and defending the continuous development of this system. And personally I trust reputable Anarcho-Capitalists on this issue over you.

A lot of An-Caps accept this, infact they use Somalia as an argument in favour of Anarcho-Capitalism, pointing out the fact that life expectancy rates and living standards have actually increased ever since Somalia turned towards stateless Capitalism.

Read this, I hope it will open your eyes up, my little Liberal-Conservative. http://mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia

Source on any ancaps suggesting Somalia is an argument for anarcho-capitalism? Not the telecoms boom, or any market booms, but the actual handling of society and civility. Anarchism is a much bigger philosophy and ideology than just statelessness. Somalia is just statelessness, not anarchism. Anarchism is a serious, old cultural and political movement.

I also hoped you were above appeals to authority, as well as confusing mises.org as an anarchocapitalistic site, or even suggesting that the daily blog you linked me to, which states that it has nothing to do with the Mises Institute, has anything to do with the Mises Institue.

LOL, this is what Social-Anarchists have been saying to An-Caps ever since the god forsaken ideology was formulated, just sayin.