Dejanic wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:
A much better "anarchy" would be closer to medieval Iceland, which had competing executives and you were able to pick and choose which chief to follow, or become one yourself if you thought they were all asses. Also you could bring them to court.
Mises.org article on Somalia is basically what Ark said - it's not actually viewed as anarchy - but even though it's not, the decentralized nature of Somalia actually made conditions improve among the populace.
I'm just doing what the right do when they insist that North Korea is Communist, somehow.
Is what these people do good? Defensible? Proper? Correct?
So why do you do it?