NATION

PASSWORD

Mod-Sanctioned LGBT Rights & Issues Thread

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Traditional Catholic Papal States
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 468
Founded: Sep 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Traditional Catholic Papal States » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:16 pm

Fascist Russian Empire wrote:
The Traditional Catholic Papal States wrote:
1: Yes, you said gender "means nothing". 2: And people don't have "sex change" surgery? :eyebrow:

1: In reality, it doesn't. Masculinity and femininity are meaningless and created by society.
2: Some might, I suppose, but not all transsexual people do/will.


I disagree on both counts but I will focus on the second one. In most first world nations, where this idea that someone can "transgender" is accepted by the majority and if they have the funds for the surgery, they will most likely do so.
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.08

About me:
Yes, I am Catholic. Yes, I believe in 100% in what The Church teaches and believes. This includes Abortion and "gay marriage" Don't like it? Don't care.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:16 pm

New Molsona wrote:
Luveria wrote:
I'm okay with that as long as they have a list of available options like

N/A
Genderless
Bigender
Trigender
Quadgender
Transgender
Pangender
Genderqueer
etc.

How can someone possibly be 3 or 4 genders. I'm not criticizing, I'm just asking


I've known one bigender person. She's on HRT and said some days she feels like a feminine male and other days like a masculine female, and living as a female was the closest thing to resolving that so she went on HRT.

With that said, I can guess a trigender person might feel genderless some days, female the other, or male others. Or androgynous, genderqueer, or feminine male. Gender identity can be a complex thing.
Last edited by Luveria on Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fascist Russian Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9267
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fascist Russian Empire » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:16 pm

Kantanska wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
They changed that definition, because they figured out that it wasn't a mental illness.


It can't be wrong for 2,000 years and then be arbitrarily changed by some liberal hippies in the '70's.

Yes, because science was so advanced back in the B.Cs. Yes, society was prosperous and science flourished before them fags came 'round and destroyed our beautifully theocratic society! #Bigotry

User avatar
The Scientific States
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18643
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Scientific States » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:16 pm

New Molsona wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
:palm:

As we've said before, it's a free enterprise who can fire who they please. It's hypocritical of you to be pro free market, while thinking this is an outrage.

Also, who the hell links to Facebook? Make your own argument, don't misuse a meme.

I'm just saying, what they did is class A hypocrisy.


How so?
Centrist, Ordoliberal, Bisexual, Agnostic, Pro Social Market Economy, Pro Labour Union, Secular Humanist, Cautious Optimist, Pro LGBT, Pro Marijuana Legalization, Pro Humanitarian Intervention etc etc.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Liberal/Authoritarian: -6.62
Political Stuff I Wrote
Why Pinochet and Allende were both terrible
The UKIP: A Bad Choice for Britain
Why South Africa is in a sorry state, and how it can be fixed.
Massive List of My OOC Pros and Cons
Hey, Putin! Leave Ukraine Alone!

User avatar
New Molsona
Diplomat
 
Posts: 969
Founded: Sep 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Molsona » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:16 pm

Liriena wrote:
New Molsona wrote:I'm just saying, what they did is class A hypocrisy.

How so?

They talk about being tolerant, and yet, they refuse to tolerate Robertson's religious beliefs
Pro: Republican Party (US), Roman Catholic Church, United States, Tea Party, Constitution Party, conservatism, democracy, Pro-life, capitalism, militarism, gun rights.
Anti: Abortion, gay "marriage", liberals, Barack Obama, racism, Democratic Party, communism, socialism, Obamacare, secularism, "War on Christmas", Islam, atheism, paganism, North Korea, Iran.
"The American dream is not that every man must be level with every other man. The American dream is that every man must be free to become whatever God intends he should become."
"The Constitution was never meant to prevent people from praying; its declared purpose was to protect their freedom to pray."

-Both quotes are from Ronald Reagan

User avatar
The Scientific States
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18643
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Scientific States » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:17 pm

New Molsona wrote:
Liriena wrote:How so?

They talk about being tolerant, and yet, they refuse to tolerate Robertson's religious beliefs


That's not what it's about, it's all about ratings. They don't want their company to lose money or lose ratings because of the remark.
Centrist, Ordoliberal, Bisexual, Agnostic, Pro Social Market Economy, Pro Labour Union, Secular Humanist, Cautious Optimist, Pro LGBT, Pro Marijuana Legalization, Pro Humanitarian Intervention etc etc.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Liberal/Authoritarian: -6.62
Political Stuff I Wrote
Why Pinochet and Allende were both terrible
The UKIP: A Bad Choice for Britain
Why South Africa is in a sorry state, and how it can be fixed.
Massive List of My OOC Pros and Cons
Hey, Putin! Leave Ukraine Alone!

User avatar
Alyekra
Minister
 
Posts: 2828
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alyekra » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:17 pm

New Molsona wrote:
Liriena wrote:How so?

They talk about being tolerant, and yet, they refuse to tolerate Robertson's religious beliefs


Where did they do that?
(FOR LEGAL REASONS, THAT'S A JOKE)

65 dkp

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:17 pm

New Molsona wrote:
Luveria wrote:
I'm okay with that as long as they have a list of available options like

N/A
Genderless
Bigender
Trigender
Quadgender
Transgender
Pangender
Genderqueer
etc.

How can someone possibly be 3 or 4 genders. I'm not criticizing, I'm just asking

Trigender.
Trigenderism is a non-binary gender identity in which one shifts between or among the stereotypical behaviors of male, female, and a third gender (genderless, a mix of male and female, or any other variety of genderqueer identities)
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Fascist Russian Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9267
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fascist Russian Empire » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:17 pm

New Molsona wrote:
Liriena wrote:How so?

They talk about being tolerant, and yet, they refuse to tolerate Robertson's religious beliefs

Because homophobic beliefs are harmful to society. Homosexuality ain't. In other words, don't condone the harmful and bigoted beliefs, tolerate the ones that harm nobody.

User avatar
Resawa
Diplomat
 
Posts: 538
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Resawa » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:18 pm

Norstal wrote:
Alyekra wrote:
Why?

For things like maternity leave? Divorce proceedings? Identity verification?

Naaah divorce worked way better without the government

User avatar
Fascist Russian Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9267
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fascist Russian Empire » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:18 pm

The Traditional Catholic Papal States wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:1: In reality, it doesn't. Masculinity and femininity are meaningless and created by society.
2: Some might, I suppose, but not all transsexual people do/will.


I disagree on both counts but I will focus on the second one. In most first world nations, where this idea that someone can "transgender" is accepted by the majority and if they have the funds for the surgery, they will most likely do so.

Source? :eyebrow:

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:18 pm

The Traditional Catholic Papal States wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:1: In reality, it doesn't. Masculinity and femininity are meaningless and created by society.
2: Some might, I suppose, but not all transsexual people do/will.


I disagree on both counts but I will focus on the second one. In most first world nations, where this idea that someone can "transgender" is accepted by the majority and if they have the funds for the surgery, they will most likely do so.

You're acting like being transgender isn't genuine.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:19 pm

New Molsona wrote:
Luveria wrote:
I'm okay with that as long as they have a list of available options like

N/A
Genderless
Bigender
Trigender
Quadgender
Transgender
Pangender
Genderqueer
etc.

How can someone possibly be 3 or 4 genders. I'm not criticizing, I'm just asking

I can see how it could happen. A person could possess traits commonly associated with both of the elements of the traditional man/woman binary, as well as traits belonging to gender identities not belonging to that binary.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:19 pm

New Molsona wrote:
Liriena wrote:How so?

They talk about being tolerant, and yet, they refuse to tolerate Robertson's religious beliefs

Othelos wrote:
New Molsona wrote:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=244160515745914&set=a.240851522743480.1073741828.240840962744536&type=1&theater

You do realize that A&E put him on leave because his comments were bad for ad revenue, right? Not because of The Liberal Agenda™.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:19 pm

Resawa wrote:
Norstal wrote:For things like maternity leave? Divorce proceedings? Identity verification?

Naaah divorce worked way better without the government

You don't want civil marriage to exist at all? Governments have recognized marriage since at least Roman times.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Fascist Russian Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9267
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fascist Russian Empire » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:19 pm

Othelos wrote:
The Traditional Catholic Papal States wrote:
I disagree on both counts but I will focus on the second one. In most first world nations, where this idea that someone can "transgender" is accepted by the majority and if they have the funds for the surgery, they will most likely do so.

You're acting like being transgender isn't genuine.

He also says that love between two men ain't genuine. So, really, it ain't a surprise.

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:20 pm

Fascist Russian Empire wrote:
Othelos wrote:You're acting like being transgender isn't genuine.

He also says that love between two men ain't genuine. So, really, it ain't a surprise.

I'd like to see what he says after meeting a gay/transgender person.

User avatar
The Scientific States
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18643
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Scientific States » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:21 pm

Othelos wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:He also says that love between two men ain't genuine. So, really, it ain't a surprise.

I'd like to see what he says after meeting a gay/transgender person.


He's already met some on this site, if that counts.
Centrist, Ordoliberal, Bisexual, Agnostic, Pro Social Market Economy, Pro Labour Union, Secular Humanist, Cautious Optimist, Pro LGBT, Pro Marijuana Legalization, Pro Humanitarian Intervention etc etc.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Liberal/Authoritarian: -6.62
Political Stuff I Wrote
Why Pinochet and Allende were both terrible
The UKIP: A Bad Choice for Britain
Why South Africa is in a sorry state, and how it can be fixed.
Massive List of My OOC Pros and Cons
Hey, Putin! Leave Ukraine Alone!

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:21 pm

The Scientific States wrote:
Kantanska wrote:
It can't be wrong for 2,000 years and then be arbitrarily changed by some liberal hippies in the '70's.


:palm:

This post lacks a shred of logic. They said it was wrong for many years because no scientific studies had been done on the matter. They finally conducted several peer reviewed scientific studies on the matter, which lead them to a conclusion that being transgender doesn't make you mentally ill.

You're logic is like "slavery can't be right for thousands of years, then all of a sudden be wrong."

Actually, there were some 'studies', but Evelyn Hooker exposed their shitty sampling methods and religious bias. Namely, she exposed the fact that previous 'studies' exclusively used homosexual individuals already undergoing psychiatric treatment for serious disorders.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:21 pm

Fascist Russian Empire wrote:
The Traditional Catholic Papal States wrote:
1: If it means nothing, why is on nearly every government form in nearly ever nation of the world? 2: Gender does mean something to many people. 3: If it did not, people would not have "sex change" surgery to "change" their sex so it matches their gender.

1: It might be in case in a few backward nations, but it ain't the case in most European nations.
2: I didn't say it didn't. I said that it's a societal construct.
3: They don't, depending on the nation.

1. I wouldn't call the US backwards, for one...
2. You did say it means nothing.
3. Well, some countries forbid it, and it's not necessarily involved in all transitions.

User avatar
Kantanska
Attaché
 
Posts: 84
Founded: Jun 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kantanska » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:21 pm

Fascist Russian Empire wrote:
Kantanska wrote:
It can't be wrong for 2,000 years and then be arbitrarily changed by some liberal hippies in the '70's.

Yes, because science was so advanced back in the B.Cs. Yes, society was prosperous and science flourished before them fags came 'round and destroyed our beautifully theocratic society! #Bigotry


The Church guided and preserved relevant knowledge throughout the Middle Ages, the[y] also are directly responsible for the creation of virtually all the Middle Ages art and "culture" however you so designate it. After the Middle Ages time of discovery and great advances. Industrial nations were built wars were fought and won. All with gayness being a Mental Illness. So yes. I'd say some things got done.
Last edited by Kantanska on Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:21 pm

Kantanska wrote:Liriena,
I was referring to the legal document of a Certificate of Live Birth and you can not change it because you want to. You have to prove that you've had reassignment surgery first. aka not on a whim.

That's only true in some countries, not all.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:22 pm

The Scientific States wrote:
Othelos wrote:I'd like to see what he says after meeting a gay/transgender person.


He's already met some on this site, if that counts.

In person. You can still live in your own world online, but RL forces you to accept reality.

User avatar
People Who Say Ni
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 195
Founded: Nov 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby People Who Say Ni » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:22 pm

I'd like to talk about marriage over here, in Australia.
Our previous Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, was from the Labor party, which is the equivalent of the Democrats in America, but sort of center-left. He was pro marriage equality, however, we had an election in September where his party was voted out of office by a landslide. The new Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, is blatantly opposed to marriage equality, even stating that he is threatened by homosexuality. Tony is perhaps the most conservative PM in recent years, leading the ironically titled Liberal Party which prohibits members from voting for marriage equality.
Last edited by People Who Say Ni on Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic -8.71
Social -6.54
Progressivism 100
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 50
(Australia)
Greens 95%
Labor 72%
Liberal 5%

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:22 pm

Luveria wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
Because governments want to no what gender their citizens are.


I'm okay with that as long as they have a list of available options like

N/A
Genderless
Bigender
Trigender
Quadgender
Transgender
Pangender
Genderqueer
etc.

I'd be fine with that.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads