Costa Alegria wrote:What are we voting for in three days? And why is it taking so long?
The above was in reference to a previous inquiry about the president of the senate making a speech about the PM vote.
Advertisement
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:45 pm
Costa Alegria wrote:What are we voting for in three days? And why is it taking so long?
by Costa Alegria » Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:46 pm
President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:Calling a fellow senator a prostitute is something I don't believe has a place in the chamber. I believe this may be a personal attack on said senator "
by Ainin » Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:47 pm
Corenea wrote:and no need to to act like a baby
by Maklohi Vai » Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:48 pm
by Corenea » Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:50 pm
Ainin wrote:Corenea wrote:and no need to to act like a baby
I am going to invoke Sections 3.1 and 3.4 of the Proper Procedure and Unacceptable Behavior Act of 2013 to request you withdraw this statement for questioning another member's character/integrity (PPUBA 1.1).
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:50 pm
by Ainin » Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:53 pm
Corenea wrote:Ainin wrote:I am going to invoke Sections 3.1 and 3.4 of the Proper Procedure and Unacceptable Behavior Act of 2013 to request you withdraw this statement for questioning another member's character/integrity (PPUBA 1.1).
You should also chastise Geillinor for keep generalizing the NFC as Fascists because we made an agreement with them the same way the ProgCoa did with SAP
And isntead of "and no need to act like a baby" can I just replace it with "just accept it"
by Corenea » Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:55 pm
Ainin wrote:Corenea wrote:You should also chastise Geillinor for keep generalizing the NFC as Fascists because we made an agreement with them the same way the ProgCoa did with SAP
And isntead of "and no need to act like a baby" can I just replace it with "just accept it"
That is not covered by the PPUBA, so no disciplinary action can or will be taken against John Geil/Geilinor.
You are given one final chance to withdraw your statement.
by Inspector Walter deGroot » Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:56 pm
Yes, that is sufficient.
Tell that to Geilinor, I'm just enforcing the rules as they are written.and generalization is bad m'kay?
by Libertechie » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:02 pm
by Macedonian Grand Empire » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:04 pm
by Costa Alegria » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:14 pm
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:Costa ban was due to a huge amount of flaming in another tread that took place in around 3 pages. He earned a 7 days ban due to that.
by Maklohi Vai » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:15 pm
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:18 pm
by Maklohi Vai » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:19 pm
President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:Maklohi Vai wrote:The Ethics Act does not measure intent, it measures effect, which was naught to negligible.
Due to the the negative connotation attached to the word, saying "you prostituted yourself" either has both a slanderous intent or a slanderous effect. That is my feelings as a bystander.
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:25 pm
by Oneracon » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:48 pm
Libertechie wrote:The senator of Vëekendal and fellow member of the Libertarian Party, Andie Calvin, wishes we proceed the debate into the immigration reform, rather than firing nasty labels at our opposition(s), for the sake of progress and Aurentina, can we please please stop debating the rules of procedure and of slander, or at least have the nations accused apologize and withdraw their offensive comments. Thankyou all.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Minarchist States » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:04 pm
Libertechie wrote:Oneracon wrote:Say what you like.
Those mandatory citizenship cards that have to be scanned all the time just seem a little Orwellian to me.
Yeah surely as the LP we should do something, it feels like govt control and knowledge of its people's everyday moves all over. We risk our freedom at the expense of illegal immigrants maybe taking some jobs? I mean not sure the NAP would allow this
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:16 pm
Oneracon wrote:Libertechie wrote:The senator of Vëekendal and fellow member of the Libertarian Party, Andie Calvin, wishes we proceed the debate into the immigration reform, rather than firing nasty labels at our opposition(s), for the sake of progress and Aurentina, can we please please stop debating the rules of procedure and of slander, or at least have the nations accused apologize and withdraw their offensive comments. Thankyou all.
I agree with my colleague Sen. Calvin's intent, but I must point out that we are debating the current Domestic Development queue and not immigration at this time.
Minarchist States wrote:Libertechie wrote:
Yeah surely as the LP we should do something, it feels like govt control and knowledge of its people's everyday moves all over. We risk our freedom at the expense of illegal immigrants maybe taking some jobs? I mean not sure the NAP would allow this
Correct. The "illegal immigrants r taking my jerbz" charade is merely a distraction pushed by pompous politicians who like to manipulate nativism to keep themselves elected. For most right libertarians, supporting immigration control goes against their beliefs - but so does letting everybody in to overload the welfare system. Ideally there would be no welfare system or immigration controls, but unfortunately one leads to the other and some sacrifices have to be made in the name of liberty - that pushing society rightward and being in a coalition with other fiscal capitalists is the only way to achieve a truly voluntary society. It many ways it could be paralleled with democratic socialists - whom don't want to see involuntarily taxation or a large controlling state - if even for economic reasons - but do so because they believe it is the way to communism. However this does not mean that we should abandon our principles and become neocons. That is absurd, and the bill looks like it came from the most radical of Republicans.
Anyway back to the chamber. A few of the bills proposed are somewhat agreeable with me.
Despite I believe that some checks need to be in place, I will not support the immigration bill over it's authoritarian use of compulsory coding and harsh restrictions, and I will urge the LPA to vote against it. I fully agree with Senator Calvin against the bill.
by Unicario » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:17 pm
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:24 pm
Unicario wrote:Shame that National Socialism's petty poisons even the left so much as to let men like Michael be unjustly censured for speaking the truths of National Socialists.
I fear for the future of our nation.
by Minarchist States » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:26 pm
by President Pro-Tempore of the Senate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:17 pm
by Geilinor » Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:35 pm
by Unicario » Fri Nov 22, 2013 11:00 pm
President Pro-Tempore of the Senate wrote:Due to the escalating situation outside the Senate, debate is suspended until mentioned otherwise and all senators are asked to report to the security with their ID pass to sign in as accounted for. As per order from the President of the senate, the Vice-President Mr Wenthal.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement