The Red-Greens Headquarters [NSG Senate]

[Malgrave]

So I assume we should be preparing our contingency plans for the reboot?

Indeed. I've been thinking of, if we go to the Baltic state, having this become one of those Socialist Democrat Parties.

Social Democratic Party for Defence of the Motherland (SDPDM)

Or something to that end, even "Socialist Party".

Social Democratic Party for Defence of the Motherland gives some potential for the formation of a political grouping of left-wing nationalists and hardline communists with links to the former regime.

[Pesda]

I'm a bit unsure who I'm going to join.

[Unicario]

viewtopic.php?f=25&t=298868

Ta-da

[The New Sea Territory]

Any left-libertarians who want to join the Free Socialists?

Come join us, here

Also, best of luck to anyone who is recreating this in the reboot.

[Yanalia]

Bump, you guys want to archive this?

[Mollary]

Fine

[Unicario]

Thank you

[Mollary]

The SDLP are open for any old members of this, we'd like to think it's a good fit.

Yeah, sounds like a plan.

...I'd invite you to look at who was the leader of the old party, and it's successor. Don't advertise here, and I'd ask you not to advertise in my topic.

In fairness, the topic belongs to all Red-Greens, not just their leader. And I was a member of the Red-Greens, from the start.

[Unicario]

...I'd invite you to look at who was the leader of the old party, and it's successor. Don't advertise here, and I'd ask you not to advertise in my topic.

In fairness, the topic belongs to all Red-Greens, not just their leader. And I was a member of the Red-Greens, from the start.

Yeah, but you left. History repeats itself. Besides, why advertise in a dead topic to a party that ended up with two active members at the end?

[Mollary]

In fairness, the topic belongs to all Red-Greens, not just their leader. And I was a member of the Red-Greens, from the start.

Yeah, but you left. History repeats itself. Besides, why advertise in a dead topic to a party that ended up with two active members at the end?

Well, last time a left to pursue a satirical party, this is different. Ah, who knows, all the cool kids were doing it, such as the FSP. Who are also, I'm assuming, not a successor?

[Unicario]

Yeah, but you left. History repeats itself. Besides, why advertise in a dead topic to a party that ended up with two active members at the end?

Well, last time a left to pursue a satirical party, this is different. Ah, who knows, all the cool kids were doing it, such as the FSP. Who are also, I'm assuming, not a successor?

The successor party to the RG is the SDP.

[The New Sea Territory]

Shouldn't we kill off these threads or archive them?

[Unicario]

Shouldn't we kill off these threads or archive them?

Archive them. >_>

[Mollary]

Well, last time a left to pursue a satirical party, this is different. Ah, who knows, all the cool kids were doing it, such as the FSP. Who are also, I'm assuming, not a successor?

The successor party to the RG is the SDP.

Indeed it may be, so surely you wouldn't be wanted the FSP advertising here either then?

[Unicario]

The successor party to the RG is the SDP.

Indeed it may be, so surely you wouldn't be wanted the FSP advertising here either then?

Oh, I didn't even realize they were advertising. No advertising!

[Pesda]

In fairness, the topic belongs to all Red-Greens, not just their leader. And I was a member of the Red-Greens, from the start.

Yeah, but you left. History repeats itself. Besides, why advertise in a dead topic to a party that ended up with two active members at the end?

Would I count as an active member?

[Unicario]

Yeah, but you left. History repeats itself. Besides, why advertise in a dead topic to a party that ended up with two active members at the end?

Would I count as an active member?

You were a loyal Whip.

[Unicario]

Shall we archive this?

[Pesda]

Shall we archive this?

We should. Could you? I'm rather busy but I could ask later on if needed.