Advertisement
by Macedonian Grand Empire » Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:40 pm
by New Zepuha » Sat Mar 01, 2014 3:02 pm
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:Private fire departments? What the hell pretty sure we do not have anything as stupid as that.
Also under ETC you are making it easy for us to classify just about everything as part of restrictions.
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Mar 01, 2014 4:09 pm
New Zepuha wrote:Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:Private fire departments? What the hell pretty sure we do not have anything as stupid as that.
Also under ETC you are making it easy for us to classify just about everything as part of restrictions.
Private fire departments? No. That's an awful idea, private ambulances yes.
by Macedonian Grand Empire » Sat Mar 01, 2014 4:48 pm
by Ainin » Sat Mar 01, 2014 5:37 pm
A Ban on Coronation Street
The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,
Affirming that the British television programme Coronation Street is boring as shit,
Noting that the slow-paced action in the series is more boring than watching paint dry in a tropical rainforest,
Declaring that no one should have to endure the pain of watching bad soap operas,
Hereby outlaws the series Coronation Street.
by Unicario » Sat Mar 01, 2014 5:41 pm
Ainin wrote:This is a joke bill that's not going to be tabled.A Ban on Coronation Street
The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,
Affirming that the British television programme Coronation Street is boring as shit,
Noting that the slow-paced action in the series is more boring than watching paint dry in a tropical rainforest,
Declaring that no one should have to endure the pain of watching bad soap operas,
Hereby outlaws the series Coronation Street.
by Phocidaea » Sat Mar 01, 2014 5:46 pm
Ainin wrote:This is a joke bill that's not going to be tabled.A Ban on Coronation Street
The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,
Affirming that the British television programme Coronation Street is boring as shit,
Noting that the slow-paced action in the series is more boring than watching paint dry in a tropical rainforest,
Declaring that no one should have to endure the pain of watching bad soap operas,
Hereby outlaws the series Coronation Street.
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:01 pm
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:
Well voting against such nonsense that only the libertarians can think of...
Same goes with this. Eminent domain always grants the people that have their property taken from them full market value. In case you do not know.
by Macedonian Grand Empire » Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:10 pm
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:11 pm
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:
just compensation" is "fair market value," i.e., the price that a willing but unpressured buyer would pay a willing but unpressured seller in a voluntary transaction
You value it one way. The market values it other way. Or you want the price of the person to be paid?
by Oneracon » Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:12 pm
..."just compensation" is "fair market value," i.e., the price that a willing but unpressured buyer would pay a willing but unpressured seller in a voluntary transaction, with both parties fully informed of the property's good and bad features. Also, this approach takes into account the property's highest and best use (i.e., its most profitable use) which is not necessarily its current use or the use mandated by current zoning if there is a reasonable probability of zone change.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:17 pm
Oneracon wrote:
From your own source:..."just compensation" is "fair market value," i.e., the price that a willing but unpressured buyer would pay a willing but unpressured seller in a voluntary transaction, with both parties fully informed of the property's good and bad features. Also, this approach takes into account the property's highest and best use (i.e., its most profitable use) which is not necessarily its current use or the use mandated by current zoning if there is a reasonable probability of zone change.
This measure of compensation has been severely criticized because it omits from consideration a variety of incidental economic losses that a taking of land inflicts on its owners when they are evicted from their homes and businesses. The most egregious example of such uncompensated losses is provided by the American law that denies any compensation to owners of businesses that are destroyed when land on which they are located is taken, and the business cannot relocate. A small minority of states have provided by statute that at least some business losses are compensable.
by New Zepuha » Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:18 pm
Criminal Negligence Act
| Author: New Zepuha [ALM] | Sponsors: The Neo-Confederate States of America [ANL], Oneracon [RG]| Category: Order | Urgency: Low |
Section 0. Preamble -
Believing that fleeing an area in which a crime or accident has occurred is a great danger to public order. Those who knowingly are involved in a vehicular accident and flee without consulting officials or refusing aide to people they have purposefully ignored, should be punished accordingly. This bill is with intent to ensure the broad safety of motorists.
Section 1. Fleeing the Scene of an Accident -
When a motor vehicle accident has occurred, by any number of vehicles people involved in this crash may not flee the scene without a relevant medical issue that would justify their fleeing. Otherwise, those who know they have been involved in an accident must remain, check the safety of the other motorists [if possible], and contact the relevant authorities. Anyone witnessing said accident and are able to safely pull to the side of the road must stop to aide or contact relevant authorities [chiefly the police and fire department]. Prosecution must be able to prove that someone knowingly fled the scene of an accident.
Section 2. Criminal Offences Relating to Criminal Negligence -
Fleeing The Scene of an Accident - Anyone who knowingly flees the scene of an accident without a pressing need for medical attention, is held liable for the crime of negligence. Such as if car A crashes into the rear of B and the driver of A or B flees the scene. This can be a Delict or Contravention depending on the severity, to be determined by the judges.
This includes complicity in said crime.
Hereby signs into law and passes the Criminal Negligence Act
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.
by Geilinor » Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:19 pm
by Geilinor » Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:21 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Oneracon wrote:From your own source:..."just compensation" is "fair market value," i.e., the price that a willing but unpressured buyer would pay a willing but unpressured seller in a voluntary transaction, with both parties fully informed of the property's good and bad features. Also, this approach takes into account the property's highest and best use (i.e., its most profitable use) which is not necessarily its current use or the use mandated by current zoning if there is a reasonable probability of zone change.
It's not a voluntary interaction, first of all.
by Macedonian Grand Empire » Sat Mar 01, 2014 10:03 pm
by Oneracon » Sat Mar 01, 2014 10:06 pm
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Oneracon » Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:22 pm
Partisan Politics Act
An Act to apply standards with the goal of ensuring proper recognition of political affiliation
Urgency: Moderate | Author: Oneracon [RG] | Category: Senate Procedures
Sponsors: Macedonian Grand Empire [RefP], Geilinor [NDP], Yanalia [RG], Malgrave [MSP]
The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,
APPLAUDING the wide variety of political parties, official and unofficial, that represent the diversity of the Aurentine political spectrum in the Senate;
CONCERNED that the current lack of regulation has led to situations where Senators are members of opposing parties and coalitions, as well as the creation of parties that are entirely made up of Senators with an existing affiliation;
NONETHELESS AFFIRMING the freedom to create and join political parties;
SEEKING to develop a compromise to improve upon the current system while maintaining a Senator's freedom to support as many parties of their choice;
HEREBY ENACTS the following:Definitions
- For the purposes of this Act, "political party" shall be defined as a group of Senators who voluntarily join together as an organization that espouses a specific political ideology or ideologies.
- For the purposes of this Act, "Senate" shall be defined as the Senate of Aurentina.
- For the purposes of this Act, "Senator" shall be defined as a member of the Senate.
- For the purposes of this Act, "official political party" shall be defined as a political party recognized as having sufficient support to be accorded recognition by the Senate.
Membership Classes- All political parties shall create two classes of membership: "Official" and "Honorary".
On the Holding of Different Membership Classes
- Official memberships shall used to recognize a Senator's primary political party; and
- Honorary memberships shall be used to recognize symbolic support for additional political parties.
- Each Senator may hold Official membership in one (1) political party in the Senate.
- There shall be no limit to the number of Honorary memberships a Senator may hold.
Party Leadership- The leader of a political party shall be required to be an Official member of said party.
Official Party Status- Political parties require ten (10) Official members to be declared an official political party.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Yanalia » Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:23 pm
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.
by Malgrave » Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:25 pm
Oneracon wrote:Bringing this back...Oneracon wrote:Repost because it got bottom-paged:
I present a compromise bill that would help to clarify political affiliations, while still allowing Senators to declare their support for as many political parties as they choose.Partisan Politics Act
An Act to apply standards with the goal of ensuring proper recognition of political affiliation
Urgency: Moderate | Author: Oneracon [RG] | Category: Senate Procedures
Sponsors: Macedonian Grand Empire [RefP], Geilinor [NDP]
The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,
APPLAUDING the wide variety of political parties, official and unofficial, that represent the diversity of the Aurentine political spectrum in the Senate;
CONCERNED that the current lack of regulation has led to situations where Senators are members of opposing parties and coalitions, as well as the creation of parties that are entirely made up of Senators with an existing affiliation;
NONETHELESS AFFIRMING the freedom to create and join political parties;
SEEKING to develop a compromise to improve upon the current system while maintaining a Senator's freedom to support as many parties of their choice;
HEREBY ENACTS the following:Definitions
- For the purposes of this Act, "political party" shall be defined as a group of Senators who voluntarily join together as an organization that espouses a specific political ideology or ideologies.
- For the purposes of this Act, "Senate" shall be defined as the Senate of Aurentina.
- For the purposes of this Act, "Senator" shall be defined as a member of the Senate.
- For the purposes of this Act, "official political party" shall be defined as a political party recognized as having sufficient support to be accorded recognition by the Senate.
Membership Classes- All political parties shall create two classes of membership: "Official" and "Honorary".
On the Holding of Different Membership Classes
- Official memberships shall used to recognize a Senator's primary political party; and
- Honorary memberships shall be used to recognize symbolic support for additional political parties.
- Each Senator may hold Official membership in one (1) political party in the Senate.
- There shall be no limit to the number of Honorary memberships a Senator may hold.
Party Leadership- The leader of a political party shall be required to be an Official member of said party.
Official Party Status- Political parties require ten (10) Official members to be declared an official political party.
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.
by New Zepuha » Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:50 pm
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.
by Oneracon » Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:57 pm
New Zepuha wrote:The only thing about that bill I support is the membership limit, otherwise all that stuff is useless fluff that parties already do. Parties should choose their own policies, not be mandated to go a certain way.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by New Zepuha » Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:58 pm
Oneracon wrote:New Zepuha wrote:The only thing about that bill I support is the membership limit, otherwise all that stuff is useless fluff that parties already do. Parties should choose their own policies, not be mandated to go a certain way.
The "useless fluff" is what backs up the membership limit.
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.
by Oneracon » Sun Mar 02, 2014 2:02 pm
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement