NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate Chamber [NSG Senate]

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:16 pm

Darmen wrote:
Ainin wrote:Enough sponsors for queue.
Military Discipline and Structure Act
Author: Ainin • Urgency: Very High • Sponsors: Free South Califas (C), Mytannion (RG), Welsh Cowboy, Geilinor (LD), New Zepuha (CMP)

The Senate of Aurentina,

Noting that the Commonwealth Armed Forces Act left several points unclarified,

Resolving to remedy this problem though legislation,

Enacts the following section and clauses:


Section I - Ranks

Ranks are hereby modeled on the NATO system of codage, however this law affirms that Aurentina is not a member of said organization:
OR-1: Recruit (Rct)
OR-2: Cadet (Cdt)
OR-3: Private (Pvt)
OR-4: Corporal (Cpl)
OR-5: Master Corporal (M/Cpl)
OR-6: Sergeant (Sgt)
OR-7: Warrant Officer, Third Class (WO3)
OR-8: Warrant Officer, Second Class (WO2)
OR-9: Warrant Officer, First Class (WO1)
Student Officer: Officer Cadet (O/Cdt)
OF-1: Second Lieutenant (2Lt)
OF-1: Lieutenant (Lt)
OF-2: Captain (Capt)
OF-3: Major (Maj)
OF-4: Lieutenant-Colonel (L/Col)
OF-5: Colonel (Col)
OF-6: Brigadier-General (B/Gen)
OF-7: Major-General (M/Gen)
OF-8: Lieutenant-General (L/Gen)
OF-9: General, Second Class (2Gen)
OF-10: General, First Class (1Gen)
All ranks from OR-1 to OR-3 are to be known as soldiers, airmen or sailors, depending on branch of the Armed Forces.
All ranks from OR-4 to Student Officer are to be known as NCOs (non-commissioned officers).
All ranks from OF-1 and above are to be known as commissioned officers.
The President of Aurentina, or a representative acting in his or her official position with willful consent, is mandated to sign a file documenting the commissioning of an officer.


Section II - Symbols

The Commonwealth Armed Forces' motto is to be "Nunquam non paratus" (Never unprepared).
The Commonwealth Air Force's motto is to be "Per volar sunata" (Born to soar).
The Commonwealth Army's motto is to be "Faciam quodlibet quod necesse est" (I will do what it takes).
The Commonwealth Navy's motto is to be "Nil volentibus arduum" (All is possible for the willing).


Section III - Procedure

All on-duty uniformed members of the CAF rank OR-6 and below must salute commissioned officers at sight unless when marching or when the circumstance does not allow for a salute to be performed.
It is illegal to lean on a wall or other solid item, to cross arms and to display public signs of affection while in uniform on active duty without permission from the commanding officer.
A commanding officer is defined as the unit's highest-ranked officer.

Hereby passes the Military Discipline and Structure Act.
Could we get the ranks for the Navy and Air Force added as well. There are no Generals in the Navy, they call them Admirals.
I'll add navy ranks tomorrow. But there are generals in the Air Force. Some nations' air force have the same ranks as their army.
I also think that this:
It is illegal to lean on a wall or other solid item, to cross arms and to display public signs of affection while in uniform on active duty without permission from the commanding officer.

needs to be clarified, specifically the part about leaning on walls or other solid items. During combat, those walls and solid items are what is known as "cover" and are extremely important to the soldiers safety. They shouldn't need to ask their Lieutenant or Sarge to lean against a wall in order to not be shot at.

Emphasis on "in uniform". Combats aren't a uniform. It basically means no slacking on official ceremonies requiring the wearing of the formal uniform.
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Free South Califas
Senator
 
Posts: 4213
Founded: May 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free South Califas » Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:16 pm

To be clear, "uniform" is, I'm told, meant to imply its singleness. That is, combat dress is a special outfit, not "the uniform". However, Ainin might be better understood by those most familiar with American English and similar dialects if it were clarified, for sure.
Last edited by Free South Califas on Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
FSC Government
Senate: Saul Califas; First Deputy Leader of the Opposition
Senior Whip, Communist Party (Meiderup)

WA: Califan WA Detachment (CWAD).
Justice
On Autism/"R-word"
(Lir. apologized, so ignore that part.)
Anarchy Works/Open Borders
Flag
.
.
.
I'm autistic and (proud, but) thus not a "social detective", so be warned: I might misread or accidentally offend you.
'Obvious' implications, tones, cues etc. may also be missed.
SELF MANAGEMENT ✯ DIRECT ACTION ✯ WORKER SOLIDARITY
Libertarian Communist

.
COMINTERN/Stonewall/TRC

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:19 pm

Free South Califas wrote:To be clear, "uniform" is, I'm told, meant to imply its singleness. That is, combat dress is a special outfit, not "the uniform". However, Ainin might be better understood by those most familiar with American English and similar dialects if it were clarified, for sure.

Combat dress is a uniform. One of uniform's definitions is "A distinctive outfit intended to identify those who wear it as members of a specific group".
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:20 pm

Free South Califas wrote:To be clear, "uniform" is, I'm told, meant to imply its singleness. That is, combat dress is a special outfit, not "the uniform". However, Ainin might be better understood by those most familiar with American English and similar dialects if it were clarified, for sure.

Fine. I'll define uniform as the "ceremonial and/or formal dress worn by servicemen of the Commonwealth Armed Forces".
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
New Zepuha
Minister
 
Posts: 3077
Founded: Dec 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Zepuha » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:52 am

The US Military only has different ranks for the Navy and Coast Guard. Even they share the same ranks different emblems, and the Marine Corps, part of the navy, Shares the same emblems but army ranks. The air force has the same officer ranks but enlisted are all different.
Last edited by New Zepuha on Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
| Mallorea and Riva should resign | Sic Semper Tyrannis |
My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

  • Worth: $1372 ($337 with sales)
  • Games owned: 106
  • Games not played: 34 (32%)
  • Hours on record: 2,471h

Likes: Libertarians, Law Enforcement, NATO, Shinzo Abe, Taiwan, Angele Merkel, Ron Paul, Israel, Bernie Sanders
Dislikes: Russia, Palestine, Socialism, 'Feminism', Obama, Mitch Daniels, DHS, Mike Pence, UN

[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

User avatar
Fulflood
Diplomat
 
Posts: 645
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fulflood » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:54 am

Deleted after not reading above posts :palm:
Last edited by Fulflood on Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
I go under the name Vyvland now (IIWiki page). This account is used for the odd foray into the Senate or NSG.
Straight male British apatheist pacifist environmentalist social liberal

Admin, New Democrat member for Lüborg (504) and ambassador to the Red-Greens in the Aurentine Senate. Minister of Business Safety of Aurentina. Apparently that deserves a ministry, but I'm not complaining. I'm probably none of these things anymore. | The Aurentine Phrasebook, my magnum opus.

User avatar
Regnum Albion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 725
Founded: Jun 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Albion » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:03 am

Is such an act (the Military Discipline Act) really required to be passed by the senate? Surely mottos, how to conduct oneself while on duty, and ranks are the realms of the armed forces command or at least the executive rather than a legislative body. This is especially the case for how members of the armed forces conduct themselves.

Nothing in this proposed act needs a law to back it up, and in fact with the amount of changes that are seen in the operation of armed forces due to modernisation and reform processes, a law on such a mundane set of issues could hold back the armed forces command. This is mainly an issue regarding the conduct of members of the armed forces.

Regarding mottos and ranks, again those should be determined by the armed forces and come from the grassroots to ensure a sense of tradition and real pride in such symbols. Pushing them on an armed forces from above through a needless administrative act is entirely unnecessary in my opinion.

User avatar
Welsh Cowboy
Minister
 
Posts: 2340
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Welsh Cowboy » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:06 am

Regnum Albion wrote:Is such an act (the Military Discipline Act) really required to be passed by the senate? Surely mottos, how to conduct oneself while on duty, and ranks are the realms of the armed forces command or at least the executive rather than a legislative body. This is especially the case for how members of the armed forces conduct themselves.

Nothing in this proposed act needs a law to back it up, and in fact with the amount of changes that are seen in the operation of armed forces due to modernisation and reform processes, a law on such a mundane set of issues could hold back the armed forces command. This is mainly an issue regarding the conduct of members of the armed forces.

Regarding mottos and ranks, again those should be determined by the armed forces and come from the grassroots to ensure a sense of tradition and real pride in such symbols. Pushing them on an armed forces from above through a needless administrative act is entirely unnecessary in my opinion.

I must agree with my colleague, despite my initial cosponsorship. While I don't see a problem with setting ranks, or at least "pay grades", setting mottos seems to be micromanagement, and the conduct while on duty is better suited for a Military Code of Justice-esque law.

I'm not removing my cosponsor signature, but I don't think that most of this act is necessary, although not necessarily bad either.
Champions, 53rd Baptism of Fire

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:52 am

Ainin wrote:Enough sponsors for queue.
Military Discipline and Structure Act
Author: Ainin • Urgency: Very High • Sponsors: Free South Califas (C), Mytannion (RG), Welsh Cowboy, Geilinor (LD), New Zepuha (CMP)

The Senate of Aurentina,

Noting that the Commonwealth Armed Forces Act left several points unclarified,

Resolving to remedy this problem though legislation,

Enacts the following section and clauses:


Section I - Ranks

Ranks are hereby modeled on the NATO system of codage, however this law affirms that Aurentina is not a member of said organization:
OR-1: Recruit (Rct)
OR-2: Cadet (Cdt)
OR-3: Private (Pvt)
OR-4: Corporal (Cpl)
OR-5: Master Corporal (M/Cpl)
OR-6: Sergeant (Sgt)
OR-7: Warrant Officer, Third Class (WO3)
OR-8: Warrant Officer, Second Class (WO2)
OR-9: Warrant Officer, First Class (WO1)
Student Officer: Officer Cadet (O/Cdt)
OF-1: Second Lieutenant (2Lt)
OF-1: Lieutenant (Lt)
OF-2: Captain (Capt)
OF-3: Major (Maj)
OF-4: Lieutenant-Colonel (L/Col)
OF-5: Colonel (Col)
OF-6: Brigadier-General (B/Gen)
OF-7: Major-General (M/Gen)
OF-8: Lieutenant-General (L/Gen)
OF-9: General, Second Class (2Gen)
OF-10: General, First Class (1Gen)
All ranks from OR-1 to OR-3 are to be known as soldiers, airmen or sailors, depending on branch of the Armed Forces.
All ranks from OR-4 to Student Officer are to be known as NCOs (non-commissioned officers).
All ranks from OF-1 and above are to be known as commissioned officers.
The President of Aurentina, or a representative acting in his or her official position with willful consent, is mandated to sign a file documenting the commissioning of an officer.


Section II - Symbols

The Commonwealth Armed Forces' motto is to be "Nunquam non paratus" (Never unprepared).
The Commonwealth Air Force's motto is to be "Per volar sunata" (Born to soar).
The Commonwealth Army's motto is to be "Faciam quodlibet quod necesse est" (I will do what it takes).
The Commonwealth Navy's motto is to be "Nil volentibus arduum" (All is possible for the willing).


Section III - Procedure

All on-duty uniformed members of the CAF rank OR-6 and below must salute commissioned officers at sight unless when marching or when the circumstance does not allow for a salute to be performed.
It is illegal to lean on a wall or other solid item, to cross arms and to display public signs of affection while in uniform on active duty without permission from the commanding officer.
A commanding officer is defined as the unit's highest-ranked officer.

Hereby passes the Military Discipline and Structure Act.


What about the motto for the special forces? A couple of us in the defense committee came up with this.

In;
Latin: Impossibile est nisi quoddam verbum.

English: Impossible is nothing but a word.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:55 am

Regnum Albion wrote:Is such an act (the Military Discipline Act) really required to be passed by the senate? Surely mottos, how to conduct oneself while on duty, and ranks are the realms of the armed forces command or at least the executive rather than a legislative body. This is especially the case for how members of the armed forces conduct themselves.

Nothing in this proposed act needs a law to back it up, and in fact with the amount of changes that are seen in the operation of armed forces due to modernisation and reform processes, a law on such a mundane set of issues could hold back the armed forces command. This is mainly an issue regarding the conduct of members of the armed forces.

Regarding mottos and ranks, again those should be determined by the armed forces and come from the grassroots to ensure a sense of tradition and real pride in such symbols. Pushing them on an armed forces from above through a needless administrative act is entirely unnecessary in my opinion.

As someone has already stated before, ranks are set by law, not by executive decree.

As someone in the coffee shop said:
Oneracon wrote:Military ranks are always assigned in law, for example: 10 USC § 741 (US) or the National Defence Act (Canada).
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:56 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Ainin wrote:Enough sponsors for queue.
Military Discipline and Structure Act
Author: Ainin • Urgency: Very High • Sponsors: Free South Califas (C), Mytannion (RG), Welsh Cowboy, Geilinor (LD), New Zepuha (CMP)

The Senate of Aurentina,

Noting that the Commonwealth Armed Forces Act left several points unclarified,

Resolving to remedy this problem though legislation,

Enacts the following section and clauses:


Section I - Ranks

Ranks are hereby modeled on the NATO system of codage, however this law affirms that Aurentina is not a member of said organization:
OR-1: Recruit (Rct)
OR-2: Cadet (Cdt)
OR-3: Private (Pvt)
OR-4: Corporal (Cpl)
OR-5: Master Corporal (M/Cpl)
OR-6: Sergeant (Sgt)
OR-7: Warrant Officer, Third Class (WO3)
OR-8: Warrant Officer, Second Class (WO2)
OR-9: Warrant Officer, First Class (WO1)
Student Officer: Officer Cadet (O/Cdt)
OF-1: Second Lieutenant (2Lt)
OF-1: Lieutenant (Lt)
OF-2: Captain (Capt)
OF-3: Major (Maj)
OF-4: Lieutenant-Colonel (L/Col)
OF-5: Colonel (Col)
OF-6: Brigadier-General (B/Gen)
OF-7: Major-General (M/Gen)
OF-8: Lieutenant-General (L/Gen)
OF-9: General, Second Class (2Gen)
OF-10: General, First Class (1Gen)
All ranks from OR-1 to OR-3 are to be known as soldiers, airmen or sailors, depending on branch of the Armed Forces.
All ranks from OR-4 to Student Officer are to be known as NCOs (non-commissioned officers).
All ranks from OF-1 and above are to be known as commissioned officers.
The President of Aurentina, or a representative acting in his or her official position with willful consent, is mandated to sign a file documenting the commissioning of an officer.


Section II - Symbols

The Commonwealth Armed Forces' motto is to be "Nunquam non paratus" (Never unprepared).
The Commonwealth Air Force's motto is to be "Per volar sunata" (Born to soar).
The Commonwealth Army's motto is to be "Faciam quodlibet quod necesse est" (I will do what it takes).
The Commonwealth Navy's motto is to be "Nil volentibus arduum" (All is possible for the willing).


Section III - Procedure

All on-duty uniformed members of the CAF rank OR-6 and below must salute commissioned officers at sight unless when marching or when the circumstance does not allow for a salute to be performed.
It is illegal to lean on a wall or other solid item, to cross arms and to display public signs of affection while in uniform on active duty without permission from the commanding officer.
A commanding officer is defined as the unit's highest-ranked officer.

Hereby passes the Military Discipline and Structure Act.


What about the motto for the special forces? A couple of us in the defense committee came up with this.

In;
Latin: Impossibile est nisi quoddam verbum.

English: Impossible is nothing but a word.

We don't have special forces according to the CAFA...
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:03 am

Ainin wrote:Enough sponsors for queue.
Military Discipline and Structure Act
Author: Ainin • Urgency: Very High • Sponsors: Free South Califas (C), Mytannion (RG), Welsh Cowboy, Geilinor (LD), New Zepuha (CMP)

The Senate of Aurentina,

Noting that the Commonwealth Armed Forces Act left several points unclarified,

Resolving to remedy this problem though legislation,

Enacts the following section and clauses:


Section I - Ranks

Ranks are hereby modeled on the NATO system of codage, however this law affirms that Aurentina is not a member of said organization:
Note: These ranks apply to the Commonwealth Army and Commonwealth Air Force. The Commonwealth Navy ranks are in brackets.
OR-1: Recruit (Rct) [Recruit - Rct]
OR-2: Cadet (Cdt) [Seaman - Sa]
OR-3: Private (Pvt) [Able Seaman - A/Sa]
OR-4: Corporal (Cpl) [Leading Seaman - L/Sa]
OR-5: Master Corporal (M/Cpl) [Master Seaman - M/Sa]
OR-6: Sergeant (Sgt) [Petty Officer, Second Class - PO2]
OR-7: Warrant Officer, Third Class (WO3) [Petty Officer, First Class - PO1]
OR-8: Warrant Officer, Second Class (WO2) [Chief Petty Officer, Second Class - CPO2]
OR-9: Warrant Officer, First Class (WO1) [Chief Petty Officer, First Class - CPO1]
Student Officer: Officer Cadet (O/Cdt) [Sea Cadet - S/Cdt]
OF-1: Second Lieutenant (2Lt) [Sub-lieutenant - S/Lt]
OF-1: Lieutenant (Lt) [Lieutenant - Lt]
OF-2: Captain (Capt) [Lieutenant-Commander - Lt. Com]
OF-3: Major (Maj) [Commander - Com]
OF-4: Lieutenant-Colonel (L/Col) [Captain - Cpt]
OF-5: Colonel (Col) - [Commodore - Cmd]
OF-6: Brigadier-General (B/Gen) [Rear Admiral - R/Adm]
OF-7: Major-General (M/Gen) [Vice Admiral - V/Adm]
OF-8: Lieutenant-General (L/Gen) [Admiral - Adm]
OF-9: General, Second Class (2Gen) [Admiral of the Fleet - Adm/F]
OF-10: General, First Class (1Gen) [Commander-in-Chief - CIC]
All ranks from OR-1 to OR-3 are to be known as soldiers, airmen or sailors, depending on branch of the Armed Forces.
All ranks from OR-4 to Student Officer are to be known as NCOs (non-commissioned officers).
All ranks from OF-1 and above are to be known as commissioned officers.
The President of Aurentina, or a representative acting in his or her official position with willful consent, is mandated to sign a file documenting the commissioning of an officer.


Section II - Symbols

The Commonwealth Armed Forces' motto is to be "Nunquam non paratus" (Never unprepared).
The Commonwealth Air Force's motto is to be "Per volar sunata" (Born to soar).
The Commonwealth Army's motto is to be "Faciam quodlibet quod necesse est" (I will do what it takes).
The Commonwealth Navy's motto is to be "Nil volentibus arduum" (All is possible for the willing).


Section III - Procedure

All on-duty uniformed members of the CAF rank OR-6 and below must salute commissioned officers at sight unless when marching or when the circumstance does not allow for a salute to be performed.
It is illegal to lean on a wall or other solid item, to cross arms and to display public signs of affection while in uniform on active duty without permission from the commanding officer.
Uniform is defined as the ceremonial or formal dress of CAF servicemen.
A commanding officer is defined as the unit's highest-ranked officer.

Hereby passes the Military Discipline and Structure Act.

Added suggested amendments.
Last edited by Ainin on Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:07 am

Ainin wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
What about the motto for the special forces? A couple of us in the defense committee came up with this.

In;
Latin: Impossibile est nisi quoddam verbum.

English: Impossible is nothing but a word.

We don't have special forces according to the CAFA...


Special forces have never been something legislated on by governments. The Army creates them and as we have a military act the forces would create them. They are in most countries not a separate branch of the military, In the UK for example they are attached the the relevant command.
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Regnum Albion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 725
Founded: Jun 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Albion » Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:13 am

Ainin wrote:As someone has already stated before, ranks are set by law, not by executive decree.

As someone in the coffee shop said:
Oneracon wrote:Military ranks are always assigned in law, for example: 10 USC § 741 (US) or the National Defence Act (Canada).


Oh, so because other countries set ranks by law, we now have to? But anyway, my main qualms were about legislating for how members of the armed forces should act on duty, something which the armed forces themselves (the experts...) determine, rather than politicians. Likewise with the mottos.

This proposed act is entirely irrelevant and, once stripped down merely to assigning ranks, is too specific to be of any legislative importance.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:50 am

Regnum Albion wrote:
Ainin wrote:As someone has already stated before, ranks are set by law, not by executive decree.

As someone in the coffee shop said:


Oh, so because other countries set ranks by law, we now have to? But anyway, my main qualms were about legislating for how members of the armed forces should act on duty, something which the armed forces themselves (the experts...) determine, rather than politicians. Likewise with the mottos.

This proposed act is entirely irrelevant and, once stripped down merely to assigning ranks, is too specific to be of any legislative importance.


Yes the experts in other countries who seem to have ranks formalized by legislation. They have to be set by law to be able to legally give the rank holders power over lesser ranks. Without it the army would be some kind of french revolutionary type fuck up with everyone only having the legal rank of citizen. Secondly the military should be held accountable to people and that is why regulations are discussed by the top brass and the government as in the end the civil courts should have power over the army. We don't want a junta to take power.

I would say your ideas are entirely irrelevant and perhaps thinking through why it is necessary to legislate for ranks any why the rest of the world does it this way etc would have been a far more productive use of your time.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Regnum Albion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 725
Founded: Jun 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Albion » Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:02 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:Yes the experts in other countries who seem to have ranks formalized by legislation. They have to be set by law to be able to legally give the rank holders power over lesser ranks. Without it the army would be some kind of french revolutionary type fuck up with everyone only having the legal rank of citizen. Secondly the military should be held accountable to people and that is why regulations are discussed by the top brass and the government as in the end the civil courts should have power over the army. We don't want a junta to take power.

I would say your ideas are entirely irrelevant and perhaps thinking through why it is necessary to legislate for ranks any why the rest of the world does it this way etc would have been a far more productive use of your time.


OK, so there's a good point that I'll take on board. At least you actually told me why other nations all do it and presented a reasoned argument there, rather than just saying that we should do it because others do. Fair enough regarding the ranks, it does seem necessary now that I've heard your argument.

But though some aspects of the armed forces should be legislated (I never said the armed forces should be entirely out of the control of the legislature) others, specifically their conduct on duty, shouldn't be so specifically detailed here. It belongs in a training/SOP manual within the armed forces itself. And micromanagement like detailing mottos also seems to be an organisational/administrative concern of the armed forces themselves, not of the legislature (this one is my own view of administration vs. legislation etc.).

Oh, and I'm sorry if I somehow offended you by debating reasonably, but I don't think the kind of tone you used against me was called for at all. If we're going to RP a parliamentary institution then it would be nice if the conduct matched that.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:32 am

Admins, please update the OP. Also add the dates for when the bills passed.

User avatar
Free South Califas
Senator
 
Posts: 4213
Founded: May 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free South Califas » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:39 am

Regnum Albion wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:Yes the experts in other countries who seem to have ranks formalized by legislation. They have to be set by law to be able to legally give the rank holders power over lesser ranks. Without it the army would be some kind of french revolutionary type fuck up with everyone only having the legal rank of citizen. Secondly the military should be held accountable to people and that is why regulations are discussed by the top brass and the government as in the end the civil courts should have power over the army. We don't want a junta to take power.

I would say your ideas are entirely irrelevant and perhaps thinking through why it is necessary to legislate for ranks any why the rest of the world does it this way etc would have been a far more productive use of your time.


OK, so there's a good point that I'll take on board. At least you actually told me why other nations all do it and presented a reasoned argument there, rather than just saying that we should do it because others do. Fair enough regarding the ranks, it does seem necessary now that I've heard your argument.
...
Oh, and I'm sorry if I somehow offended you by debating reasonably, but I don't think the kind of tone you used against me was called for at all. If we're going to RP a parliamentary institution then it would be nice if the conduct matched that.

While your aggressive non-apology undercuts the rest of the post a bit, you have an excellent point that we need a positive justification in order to make law, not just looking like the other legislatures.
The Nihilistic view wrote:
Ainin wrote:We don't have special forces according to the CAFA...


Special forces have never been something legislated on by governments. The Army creates them and as we have a military act the forces would create them. They are in most countries not a separate branch of the military, In the UK for example they are attached the the relevant command.

Then what are you asking from the legislation?
Last edited by Free South Califas on Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
FSC Government
Senate: Saul Califas; First Deputy Leader of the Opposition
Senior Whip, Communist Party (Meiderup)

WA: Califan WA Detachment (CWAD).
Justice
On Autism/"R-word"
(Lir. apologized, so ignore that part.)
Anarchy Works/Open Borders
Flag
.
.
.
I'm autistic and (proud, but) thus not a "social detective", so be warned: I might misread or accidentally offend you.
'Obvious' implications, tones, cues etc. may also be missed.
SELF MANAGEMENT ✯ DIRECT ACTION ✯ WORKER SOLIDARITY
Libertarian Communist

.
COMINTERN/Stonewall/TRC

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:43 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Ainin wrote:We don't have special forces according to the CAFA...


Special forces have never been something legislated on by governments. The Army creates them and as we have a military act the forces would create them. They are in most countries not a separate branch of the military, In the UK for example they are attached the the relevant command.

You're asking me to legislate a motto for a division that is never legislated by the government?
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Mon Jun 17, 2013 12:26 pm

What has mah act become... ;_;
Ainin wrote:
Military Discipline and Structure Act
Author: Ainin and Kouralia • Urgency: Very High • Sponsors: Free South Califas (C), Mytannion (RG), Welsh Cowboy, Geilinor (LD), New Zepuha (CMP)

The Senate of Aurentina,

Noting that the Commonwealth Armed Forces Act left several points unclarified,

Resolving to remedy this problem though legislation,

Enacts the following section and clauses:


Section I - Ranks

Ranks are hereby modeled on the NATO system of codage, however this law affirms that Aurentina is not a member of said organization:


CODE:Army:Navy:Air Force:
OR1:Private (Pte)Seaman (Sm)Aircraft(wo)man (AC)
OR2:Able Seaman (AB)Leading Aircraft(wo)man (LAC)
Senior Aircraft(wo)man (SAC)
OR3:Lance Corporal (L/Cpl)
OR4:Corporal (Cpl)Leading Rate (LH)Corporal (Cpl)
OR5:
OR6:Sergeant (Sgt)Petty Officer (PO)Sergeant (Sgt)
Sergeant Aircrew (Sgt)
OR7:Colour Sergeant (CSgt)Chief Petty Officer (CPO)Flight Sergeant (FS)
Flight Sergeant Aircrew (FS)
Chief Technician (Chf Tech)
OR8:Warrant Officer Class 2 (WO2)Warrant Officer Class 2 (WO2)
OR9:Warrant Officer Class 1 (WO1)Warrant Officer Class 1 (WO1)Warrant Officer (WO)
Master Aircrew (MAcr)
OF(D):Officer Cadet (OCdt)Officer Cadet (OCdt)Officer Cadet (OCdt)
Acting Pilot Officer (APO)
OF1:Second Lieutenant (2Lt)
Lieutenant (Lt)
Midshipman (Mid)
Sub-Lieutenant (S/Lt)
Pilot Officer (PltOf)
Flying Officer (FgOf)
OF2:Captain (Capt)Lieutenant (Lt)Flight Lieutenant (Flt Lt)
OF3:Major (Maj)Lieutenant Commander (LtCdr)Squadron Leader (Sqn Ldr)
OF4:Lieutenant Colonel (LtCol)Commander (Cdr)Wing Commander (Wg Cdr)
OF5:Colonel (Col)Captain (Capt)Group Captain (Gp Capt)
OF6:Brigadier (Brig)Commodore (Cdre)Air Commodore (Air Cdre)
OF7:Major General (MajGen)Rear Admiral (RAdm)Air Vice Marshal (AVM)
OF8:Lieutenant General (LtGen)Vice Admiral(VAdm)Air Marshal (Air Mshl)
OF9:General (Gen)Admiral (Adm)Air Chief Marshal (Air Chf Mshl)
OF10:Field Marshal (FM)Admiral of the Fleet (Adm of the Fleet)Marshal of the Air Force (MAF)

All ranks from OR-1 to OR-3 are to be known as soldiers, airmen or rates, depending on branch of the Armed Forces.
All ranks from OR-4 to OR-7 are to be known as NCOs (non-commissioned officers).
All ranks from OR-8 to Student Officer are to be known as Warrant Officers.
All ranks from OF-1 and above are to be known as commissioned officers.
The President of Aurentina, or a representative acting in his or her official position with willful consent, is mandated to sign a file documenting the commissioning of an officer.


Section II - Symbols

The Commonwealth Armed Forces' motto is to be "Nunquam non paratus" (Never unprepared).
    The Commonwealth Air Force's motto is to be "Per volar sunata" (Born to soar).
    The Commonwealth Army's motto is to be "Faciam quodlibet quod necesse est" (I will do what it takes).
    The Commonwealth Navy's motto is to be "Nil volentibus arduum" (All is possible for the willing).

Hereby passes the Military Discipline and Structure Act.
Last edited by Ainin on Mon Jun 17, 2013 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:35 pm

Regnum Albion wrote:
Oh, and I'm sorry if I somehow offended you by debating reasonably, but I don't think the kind of tone you used against me was called for at all. If we're going to RP a parliamentary institution then it would be nice if the conduct matched that.


This is pretty tame compared to a lot of parliamentary institutions.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:36 pm

Oneracon wrote:
Regnum Albion wrote:
Oh, and I'm sorry if I somehow offended you by debating reasonably, but I don't think the kind of tone you used against me was called for at all. If we're going to RP a parliamentary institution then it would be nice if the conduct matched that.


This is pretty tame compared to a lot of parliamentary institutions.

I remember reading about a large fistfight in the Taiwanese legislature (tax money at work, folks).
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:57 pm

Ainin wrote:
Oneracon wrote:
This is pretty tame compared to a lot of parliamentary institutions.

I remember reading about a large fistfight in the Taiwanese legislature (tax money at work, folks).

https://www.youtube.com/results?q=parliamentary%20fistfights&um=1&hl=en&biw=1366&bih=667&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=i1 This stuff is quite entertaining. A cute little graphic for you(too large to post img tag): http://reaganpluscats.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Current-Event-Cat-Fistfight-in-Venezuelas-Parliament.png
Last edited by Geilinor on Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Jun 17, 2013 8:06 pm

I have just thought, we don't have any legal powers to gather taxes.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Jun 17, 2013 8:20 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:I have just thought, we don't have any legal powers to gather taxes.

We don't have a way to enforce it, if that's what you mean.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads