Free South Califas wrote:No, it's not necessary to broadly legalize experimentation. That's for a separate bill, and would lose my support for this one BTW. If we want painful experimentation on animals to be legal (and I don't think you necessarily represent the whole Senate on this, as perhaps neither do I), we just need a clause that says:Byzantium Imperial wrote:Inserting a clause saying roughly: Expirimentation on animals, for medical and scientific purposes, is legal in this nation.I'd prefer the following:
- Code: Select all
Nothing in this bill shall be interpreted as criminalizing or prohibiting animal experimentation.
Ideally, I'd like the separate bill to ban (at least) animal experimentation which could cause pain and suffering, but that's a topic for another day.
- Code: Select all
Nothing in this bill shall be interpreted as criminalizing or prohibiting animal experimentation, although researchers are strongly urged to prevent needless pain and suffering through voluntary means.
For the fly problem:
- Code: Select all
Nothing in this bill shall be interpreted as criminalizing or punishing the act of protecting an individual or shared food supply by killing or attempting to kill bugs, or kill creatures or disable objects which appear similar and threaten the safety or integrity of such food.
Add the insect part, and add your preferred option for the experimentation clause.