NSG Senate Chamber [NSG Senate]

by **The Nihilistic view** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:01 pm

Ainin wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
It actually needs to be a clause that repeals the whole bill.

No. See: FALLA.

What is falla.

by **The Nihilistic view** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:02 pm

Yanalia wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
It actually needs to be a clause that repeals the whole bill.

No it doesn't.

So you wan't two benefits running simultaneously?

by **Ainin** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:03 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Ainin wrote:No. See: FALLA.

What is falla.

First
Amendment to the
Limiting
Legislation
Act

Showing that individual parts of a bill may be repealed and the bill itself kept.

by **Kalmath** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:06 pm

New Zepuha wrote:I motion to omnibus 17 and 18 into the Anti-Crime Omnibus

Second (If am suppose to)

by **The Nihilistic view** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:08 pm

Ainin wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
What is falla.

First
Amendment to the
Limiting
Legislation
Act

Showing that individual parts of a bill may be repealed and the bill itself kept.

So that is totally irrelevant to the discussion.

by **Yanalia** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:10 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Yanalia wrote:
No it doesn't.

So you wan't two benefits running simultaneously?

Irrelevant. The bill is not illegal.

by **New Zepuha** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:11 pm

Kalmath wrote:
New Zepuha wrote:I motion to omnibus 17 and 18 into the Anti-Crime Omnibus

Second (If am suppose to)

Yes I think we need ten to omnibus?

by **The Nihilistic view** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:11 pm

Yanalia wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
So you wan't two benefits running simultaneously?

Irrelevant. The bill is not illegal.

It is in it current draft.

by **Wolfmanne** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:14 pm

Wolfmanne wrote:I'd like to bring the Senate to the attention of the contradictory nature of the National Security Act and the Commonwealth Armed Forces Act. Under the two acts, we technically have two militaries. I propose that a committee is established to formulate a bill to rectify the contradictions.

Again, I'l like to bring the Senate to the attention of this.

by **The Republic of Lanos** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:16 pm

I can take command of the committee.

by **Wolfmanne** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:16 pm

The Republic of Lanos wrote:I can take command of the committee.

I second this.

by **The Nihilistic view** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:23 pm

Wolfmanne wrote:
Wolfmanne wrote:I'd like to bring the Senate to the attention of the contradictory nature of the National Security Act and the Commonwealth Armed Forces Act. Under the two acts, we technically have two militaries. I propose that a committee is established to formulate a bill to rectify the contradictions.

Again, I'l like to bring the Senate to the attention of this.

I think they should have a unified high command but as I read it one is the professional army and one is the territorial army.

by **The Nihilistic view** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:23 pm

Wolfmanne wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:I can take command of the committee.

I second this.

As do I.

by **Kalmath** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:58 pm

The Republic of Lanos wrote:I can take command of the committee.

If I can help in anyway Lanos just TG me.

by **Britanno** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:59 am

I am lost as to what we're debating.

by **Fulflood** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:41 am

Kalmath wrote:
New Zepuha wrote:I motion to omnibus 17 and 18 into the Anti-Crime Omnibus

Second (If am suppose to)

I proposed it and it got through (or has now if you've seconded it), afaik.

by **Free South Califas** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 5:15 am

Fulflood wrote:
Kalmath wrote:Second (If am suppose to)

I proposed it and it got through (or has now if you've seconded it), afaik.

It needs a few more and the President. (This is not in support of the motion)

by **Old Tyrannia** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 5:21 am

Wolfmanne wrote:
Wolfmanne wrote:I'd like to bring the Senate to the attention of the contradictory nature of the National Security Act and the Commonwealth Armed Forces Act. Under the two acts, we technically have two militaries. I propose that a committee is established to formulate a bill to rectify the contradictions.

Again, I'l like to bring the Senate to the attention of this.

The CAFA was designed to supersede the NSA. Essentially it renders the latter obsolete.

by **Wolfmanne** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 5:55 am

Old Tyrannia wrote:
Wolfmanne wrote:Again, I'l like to bring the Senate to the attention of this.

The CAFA was designed to supersede the NSA. Essentially it renders the latter obsolete.

It didn't repeal the NDF aspect of the NSA, therefore it is contradictory.

by **Wolfmanne** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 5:55 am

Free South Califas wrote:
Fulflood wrote:I proposed it and it got through (or has now if you've seconded it), afaik.

It needs a few more and the President. (This is not in support of the motion)

It has my signature, once the required motions have been reached.

by **Regnum Dominae** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 6:02 am

Whatever this motion is, I second/third/whatever it.

by **Priory Academy USSR** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 6:37 am

National Extraterrestrial Act: Abstain
Research and Astronomy Improvement Act: Aye

Abstaining on the basis that I support the idea, but the bill is unrealistic and we should be trying work with other governments to further space exploration, rather than create an unnecessary financial burden and duplication o0f labour across the world.

by **Celritannia** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:26 am

National Extraterrestrial Act: Against
Research and Astronomy Improvement Act: Abstain

by **Byzantium Imperial** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 9:10 am

Why is voting sitl going on? It should of ended awhile ago

by **Yanalia** » Sun Jul 14, 2013 9:11 am

Byzantium Imperial wrote:Why is voting sitl going on? It should of ended awhile ago

Everyone's distracted by the election.

NSG Senate Chamber [NSG Senate]

Who is online