You can know that by the distinct lack of libertarians and minarchists here.
Advertisement
by Arglorand » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:56 pm
by Glasgia » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:57 pm
by Arglorand » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:58 pm
by San Jose Guayabal » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:59 pm
by Glasgia » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:59 pm
by The Liberated Territories » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:02 pm
by Dejanic » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:03 pm
by Arkolon » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:08 pm
by Arkolon » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:09 pm
by San Jose Guayabal » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:12 pm
by Arkolon » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:20 pm
by Dejanic » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:23 pm
Arkolon wrote:Dejanic wrote:It's Anarcho-Capitalist to be more specific, which comes under the umbrella of "Libertarianism".
No, until 2006 Somalia had many competing warlords all vying for power over the, or parts of the, country, and no institution recognised property rights, and the descent into this large-scale civil unrest was mostly due to foreign involvement in the country. It's funny you mention Somalia, and I pointed it out to you by asking you about it, because in many circles "Somalia is anarchy!" is actually taken as a joke argument, poking fun at people who actually believe it.
I've never come across someone who believed it, though. Well, until now.
by Arglorand » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:25 pm
Planita wrote:Can someone add me in as a member?
by The Liberated Territories » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:25 pm
Arkolon wrote:Arglorand wrote:You can know that by the distinct lack of libertarians and minarchists here.
Macroeconomic focus on job creation... in the 21st century.
A living wage... in a business environment where a labour-intensive productive combination is the only selling point.
Breaking up banks and "strict banking regulations"... at all.
The German model... in a rural community.
Strong opposition to organised crime... in South America.
Welfare plans some developed countries don't even have... in a second world economy.
Parental leave... in a labour-intensive economy.
Car pooling... in a rural community.
Promoting alternative fuels... when there's a strong chance the petrol in the nation is what got us here at all.
Promoting electrical vehicles and charging stations... in a second world economy.
Nationalising important and vital markets... in a globalised economy.
Telling bosses and employees to play nice... in a labour-intensive economy.
Either update your platform to conform to a South American nation, as that's where we're headed, or seriously rethink all of your policy ideas from the top.
by The Democratic Left Central Committee » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:25 pm
by Dejanic » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:28 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Arkolon wrote:Macroeconomic focus on job creation... in the 21st century.
A living wage... in a business environment where a labour-intensive productive combination is the only selling point.
Breaking up banks and "strict banking regulations"... at all.
The German model... in a rural community.
Strong opposition to organised crime... in South America.
Welfare plans some developed countries don't even have... in a second world economy.
Parental leave... in a labour-intensive economy.
Car pooling... in a rural community.
Promoting alternative fuels... when there's a strong chance the petrol in the nation is what got us here at all.
Promoting electrical vehicles and charging stations... in a second world economy.
Nationalising important and vital markets... in a globalised economy.
Telling bosses and employees to play nice... in a labour-intensive economy.
Either update your platform to conform to a South American nation, as that's where we're headed, or seriously rethink all of your policy ideas from the top.
If I were in this party, I'd being having second thoughts about supporting a Latin American country. Realism what's that?
by The Liberated Territories » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:30 pm
Dejanic wrote:Arkolon wrote:No, until 2006 Somalia had many competing warlords all vying for power over the, or parts of the, country, and no institution recognised property rights, and the descent into this large-scale civil unrest was mostly due to foreign involvement in the country. It's funny you mention Somalia, and I pointed it out to you by asking you about it, because in many circles "Somalia is anarchy!" is actually taken as a joke argument, poking fun at people who actually believe it.
I've never come across someone who believed it, though. Well, until now.
Try Mises.Org, they've done many articles promoting the Anarcho-Capitalist system of Somalia and defending the continuous development of this system. And personally I trust reputable Anarcho-Capitalists on this issue over you.
A lot of An-Caps accept this, infact they use Somalia as an argument in favour of Anarcho-Capitalism, pointing out the fact that life expectancy rates and living standards have actually increased ever since Somalia turned towards stateless Capitalism.
Read this, I hope it will open your eyes up, my little Liberal-Conservative. http://mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia
by Arkolon » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:30 pm
Dejanic wrote:Arkolon wrote:No, until 2006 Somalia had many competing warlords all vying for power over the, or parts of the, country, and no institution recognised property rights, and the descent into this large-scale civil unrest was mostly due to foreign involvement in the country. It's funny you mention Somalia, and I pointed it out to you by asking you about it, because in many circles "Somalia is anarchy!" is actually taken as a joke argument, poking fun at people who actually believe it.
I've never come across someone who believed it, though. Well, until now.
Try Mises.Org, they've done many articles promoting the Anarcho-Capitalist system of Somalia and defending the continuous development of this system. And personally I trust reputable Anarcho-Capitalists on this issue over you.
A lot of An-Caps accept this, infact they use Somalia as an argument in favour of Anarcho-Capitalism, pointing out the fact that life expectancy rates and living standards have actually increased ever since Somalia turned towards stateless Capitalism.
Read this, I hope it will open your eyes up, my little Liberal-Conservative. http://mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia
by Dejanic » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:32 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Dejanic wrote:[/b]
Try Mises.Org, they've done many articles promoting the Anarcho-Capitalist system of Somalia and defending the continuous development of this system. And personally I trust reputable Anarcho-Capitalists on this issue over you.
A lot of An-Caps accept this, infact they use Somalia as an argument in favour of Anarcho-Capitalism, pointing out the fact that life expectancy rates and living standards have actually increased ever since Somalia turned towards stateless Capitalism.
Read this, I hope it will open your eyes up, my little Liberal-Conservative. http://mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia
A much better "anarchy" would be closer to medieval Iceland, which had competing executives and you were able to pick and choose which chief to follow, or become one yourself if you thought they were all asses. Also you could bring them to court.
Mises.org article on Somalia is basically what Ark said - it's not actually viewed as anarchy - but even though it's not, the decentralized nature of Somalia actually made conditions improve among the populace.
by Arkolon » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:32 pm
by The Liberated Territories » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:32 pm
Dejanic wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:
If I were in this party, I'd being having second thoughts about supporting a Latin American country. Realism what's that?
Ignoring the fact ofc that Social Democratic parties dominate Latin American politics.
Aren't you in a National Bolshevik/Strasserist party anyway? This of course occurring after you had a breakdown and your own 1 man party imploded.
by Dejanic » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:33 pm
Arkolon wrote:Dejanic wrote:[/b]
Try Mises.Org, they've done many articles promoting the Anarcho-Capitalist system of Somalia and defending the continuous development of this system. And personally I trust reputable Anarcho-Capitalists on this issue over you.
A lot of An-Caps accept this, infact they use Somalia as an argument in favour of Anarcho-Capitalism, pointing out the fact that life expectancy rates and living standards have actually increased ever since Somalia turned towards stateless Capitalism.
Read this, I hope it will open your eyes up, my little Liberal-Conservative. http://mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia
Source on any ancaps suggesting Somalia is an argument for anarcho-capitalism? Not the telecoms boom, or any market booms, but the actual handling of society and civility. Anarchism is a much bigger philosophy and ideology than just statelessness. Somalia is just statelessness, not anarchism. Anarchism is a serious, old cultural and political movement.
I also hoped you were above appeals to authority, as well as confusing mises.org as an anarchocapitalistic site, or even suggesting that the daily blog you linked me to, which states that it has nothing to do with the Mises Institute, has anything to do with the Mises Institue.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement