They're not nearly as large, and are normally for less controversial purposes.
Advertisement
by Lemanrussland » Wed May 29, 2013 2:36 pm
by Ceannairceach » Wed May 29, 2013 2:39 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Because none of them, as far as we are aware, died in any manner that can be construed as "heroic." They were simply, though unfortunatly, caught in a blast. they did not attempt some act of vrave defiance to save bunnies or some such thing. Should evidence appear that one or more of the victims did attempt or achieve heroism, then we may idolize them. But not now.
Despite the threats of the terror attack, they were serving this nation after senate hours and they died while serving this nation. That deserves some recognition.
by Great Nepal » Wed May 29, 2013 2:42 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Despite the threats of the terror attack, they were serving this nation after senate hours and they died while serving this nation. That deserves some recognition.
Yes, as the tragic victims of a terror campaign. As the faces of innocence lost due to the evils of terror. Perhaps even as models of civic service in the face of threats not all know exist. But not as heroes.
by Byzantium Imperial » Wed May 29, 2013 2:42 pm
by Belmaria » Wed May 29, 2013 2:42 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 29, 2013 2:45 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 29, 2013 2:47 pm
by Belmaria » Wed May 29, 2013 2:49 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:For all those wondering, This is one of the two aims of the petition
Justice for the 18!
The signatories also call for compensation for the families of all those killed and injured by the tragedy. Also for an official and unreserved apology from the minister and the government admitting to serious failures within his department. Also for a monument to be put up outside the rebuilt senate to remind future generations of their sacrifice in serving this great nation. All persons involved from the bombers themselves to slack members of the ministry of the interior to be properly held to account in a court of law.
by Ainin » Wed May 29, 2013 2:54 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:For all those wondering, This is one of the two aims of the petition
Justice for the 18!
The signatories also call for compensation for the families of all those killed and injured by the tragedy. Also for an official and unreserved apology from the minister and the government admitting to serious failures within his department. Also for a monument to be put up outside the rebuilt senate to remind future generations of their sacrifice in serving this great nation. All persons involved from the bombers themselves to slack members of the ministry of the interior to be properly held to account in a court of law.
by Lemanrussland » Wed May 29, 2013 3:05 pm
by Great Nepal » Wed May 29, 2013 3:07 pm
Lemanrussland wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
I suppose you can get away with that sir.
Plus, joining NATO was supposed to be a cost saving measure at first, we'd be like Iceland, have US bases on our soil, but have no real standing army (or a quite small one). Eventually, some people began to punt around the idea that we should have a large army, be part of NATO, and be active in places like Afghanistan... no thanks!
by Belmaria » Wed May 29, 2013 3:09 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Lemanrussland wrote:Plus, joining NATO was supposed to be a cost saving measure at first, we'd be like Iceland, have US bases on our soil, but have no real standing army (or a quite small one). Eventually, some people began to punt around the idea that we should have a large army, be part of NATO, and be active in places like Afghanistan... no thanks!
We could join NATO, and then vote against budget authorization to have large army or be involved in places like Afghanistan.
by Byzantium Imperial » Wed May 29, 2013 3:09 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Lemanrussland wrote:Plus, joining NATO was supposed to be a cost saving measure at first, we'd be like Iceland, have US bases on our soil, but have no real standing army (or a quite small one). Eventually, some people began to punt around the idea that we should have a large army, be part of NATO, and be active in places like Afghanistan... no thanks!
We could join NATO, and then vote against budget authorization to have large army or be involved in places like Afghanistan.
by Lemanrussland » Wed May 29, 2013 3:10 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Lemanrussland wrote:Plus, joining NATO was supposed to be a cost saving measure at first, we'd be like Iceland, have US bases on our soil, but have no real standing army (or a quite small one). Eventually, some people began to punt around the idea that we should have a large army, be part of NATO, and be active in places like Afghanistan... no thanks!
We could join NATO, and then vote against budget authorization to have large army or be involved in places like Afghanistan.
by Great Nepal » Wed May 29, 2013 3:17 pm
by Belmaria » Wed May 29, 2013 3:22 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Lemanrussland wrote:I'd rather we not risk the chance. We'll have to work from that position if the NATO resolution passes, however.
We could have a bill that requires referendum to go to non defensive war. If we pass this and resumbit NATO proposal, will you support it?Belmaria wrote:I don't think they'll let us do that
They can not stop us voting, senator.
by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 29, 2013 3:23 pm
Ainin wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:For all those wondering, This is one of the two aims of the petition
Justice for the 18!
The signatories also call for compensation for the families of all those killed and injured by the tragedy. Also for an official and unreserved apology from the minister and the government admitting to serious failures within his department. Also for a monument to be put up outside the rebuilt senate to remind future generations of their sacrifice in serving this great nation. All persons involved from the bombers themselves to slack members of the ministry of the interior to be properly held to account in a court of law.
The Minister of Interior did nothing wrong. This systematic failure should not be blamed on the Minister, as he does not control law enforcement and does not have any mandate to prevent terrorism under current legislation. I urge my fellow senators to disregard this politically-motivated witch hunt.
by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 29, 2013 3:24 pm
by Lemanrussland » Wed May 29, 2013 3:24 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Lemanrussland wrote:I'd rather we not risk the chance. We'll have to work from that position if the NATO resolution passes, however.
We could have a bill that requires referendum to go to non defensive war. If we pass this and resumbit NATO proposal, will you support it?Belmaria wrote:I don't think they'll let us do that
They can not stop us voting, senator.
by Yanalia » Wed May 29, 2013 3:26 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Ainin wrote:The Minister of Interior did nothing wrong. This systematic failure should not be blamed on the Minister, as he does not control law enforcement and does not have any mandate to prevent terrorism under current legislation. I urge my fellow senators to disregard this politically-motivated witch hunt.
I think you need to have a look at the responsibilities for the ministry for the interior. It is responsible for internal security of this nation, that would include the prevention of terrorism. To claim otherwise is perverse.
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.
by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 29, 2013 3:32 pm
Yanalia wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
I think you need to have a look at the responsibilities for the ministry for the interior. It is responsible for internal security of this nation, that would include the prevention of terrorism. To claim otherwise is perverse.
No legislation has been passed giving the Minister of the Interiors any executive authority whatsoever. As I have already shown, the Republican Executive Act mandates that all executive authority for the Ministers be created by law. No such laws have been passed.
by Yanalia » Wed May 29, 2013 3:34 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Yanalia wrote:
No legislation has been passed giving the Minister of the Interiors any executive authority whatsoever. As I have already shown, the Republican Executive Act mandates that all executive authority for the Ministers be created by law. No such laws have been passed.
It's called the ministry foundation act. Its sets out the duty and responsibilities of each ministry.
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.
by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 29, 2013 3:35 pm
Yanalia wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
It's called the ministry foundation act. Its sets out the duty and responsibilities of each ministry.
Show me where that Act gives the Minister control over the police or any other direct authority. It only specifies duties, but not abilities. And according to the Republican Executive Act, all abilities must be explicitly defined by law.
by Yanalia » Wed May 29, 2013 3:36 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Yanalia wrote:
Show me where that Act gives the Minister control over the police or any other direct authority. It only specifies duties, but not abilities. And according to the Republican Executive Act, all abilities must be explicitly defined by law.
"The Ministry of Interiors, with the duty of policing the nation, ensuring national security, supervise local governments, elections and immigration."
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.
by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 29, 2013 3:37 pm
Yanalia wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
"The Ministry of Interiors, with the duty of policing the nation, ensuring national security, supervise local governments, elections and immigration."
That is the duty. But it does not give the Minister any powers. The Minister can only accomplish that duty using legal methods. At the moment, the Minister has no available legal methods.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement