by Xkx » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:22 am
by Person012345 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:24 am
Xkx wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11071277
shocking. i hope some people decide to take the law in their own hands.
by Xkx » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:27 am
Person012345 wrote:Xkx wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11071277
shocking. i hope some people decide to take the law in their own hands.
You're not a very nice person are you? The woman needs mental help. She's not likely sociopathic, but more likely to have other mental issues that prevented her from thinking rationally. And you'd prefer "people to take the law into their own hands" rather than have her given treatment?
by Sdaeriji » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:28 am
Xkx wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11071277
shocking. i hope some people decide to take the law in their own hands.
by Person012345 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:31 am
Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:Xkx wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11071277
shocking. i hope some people decide to take the law in their own hands.
You're not a very nice person are you? The woman needs mental help. She's not likely sociopathic, but more likely to have other mental issues that prevented her from thinking rationally. And you'd prefer "people to take the law into their own hands" rather than have her given treatment?
she was rational enough to pick the cat up, put it in the bin and close the lid.
still if it turns out that she's got mental health problems then yes i would like her to seek treatment, sectioned in a secure facility until she's cured. otherwise i hope they find her hanging from a tree.
by Barringtonia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:33 am
by Xkx » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:34 am
Person012345 wrote:If she has no mental issues I'd like her to go through the legal system and be served with the appropriate punishment. The idea of death penalty for anyone who does something you disagree with is retarded, and I'm glad you don't run the country.
by Great Nepal » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:34 am
by Abdju » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:36 am
Person012345 wrote:Xkx wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11071277
shocking. i hope some people decide to take the law in their own hands.
You're not a very nice person are you? The woman needs mental help. She's not likely sociopathic, but more likely to have other mental issues that prevented her from thinking rationally. And you'd prefer "people to take the law into their own hands" rather than have her given treatment?
by Abdju » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:37 am
Great Nepal wrote:Oh comn,
Its a cat and she is the owner of that cat therefore she should be allowed to do what she wants with her property.
by Great Nepal » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:38 am
by Person012345 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:41 am
Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:If she has no mental issues I'd like her to go through the legal system and be served with the appropriate punishment. The idea of death penalty for anyone who does something you disagree with is retarded, and I'm glad you don't run the country.
yes, it's the disagreeing part i find most distateful.
by Person012345 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:43 am
Great Nepal wrote:
No, I didn't.
Then she should be asked to pay compensation of the cat to its owner.
by Abdju » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:44 am
Great Nepal wrote:No, I didn't.
Then she should be asked to pay compensation of the cat to its owner.
by Xkx » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:45 am
Person012345 wrote:Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:If she has no mental issues I'd like her to go through the legal system and be served with the appropriate punishment. The idea of death penalty for anyone who does something you disagree with is retarded, and I'm glad you don't run the country.
yes, it's the disagreeing part i find most distateful.
I didn't say that. I said doing something you disagree with.
by Great Nepal » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:47 am
Abdju wrote:Great Nepal wrote:No, I didn't.
Then she should be asked to pay compensation of the cat to its owner.
No, because the animal cruelty is committed against the animal, not the owner. Otherwise, crimes committed against wild animals (who have no owner) could not be brought before the court. This is the same with animal protection laws in all western countries.
by Panzerjaeger » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:47 am
Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:If she has no mental issues I'd like her to go through the legal system and be served with the appropriate punishment. The idea of death penalty for anyone who does something you disagree with is retarded, and I'm glad you don't run the country.
yes, it's the disagreeing part i find most distateful.
I didn't say that. I said doing something you disagree with.
i don't think the cat agreed with being put in the dustbin either! if you go around doing that then you shouldn't be surprised when something bad happens to one's self.
Caninope wrote:Toyota: Keep moving forward, even when you don't want to!
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Timothy McVeigh casts... Pyrotechnics!
Greater Americania wrote:lol "No Comrade Ivan! Don't stick your head in there! That's the wood chi...!"
New Kereptica wrote:Fascism: because people are too smart nowadays.
by Great Nepal » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:48 am
Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:If she has no mental issues I'd like her to go through the legal system and be served with the appropriate punishment. The idea of death penalty for anyone who does something you disagree with is retarded, and I'm glad you don't run the country.
yes, it's the disagreeing part i find most distateful.
I didn't say that. I said doing something you disagree with.
i don't think the cat agreed with being put in the dustbin either! if you go around doing that then you shouldn't be surprised when something bad happens to one's self.
by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:51 am
Great Nepal wrote:Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:If she has no mental issues I'd like her to go through the legal system and be served with the appropriate punishment. The idea of death penalty for anyone who does something you disagree with is retarded, and I'm glad you don't run the country.
yes, it's the disagreeing part i find most distateful.
I didn't say that. I said doing something you disagree with.
i don't think the cat agreed with being put in the dustbin either! if you go around doing that then you shouldn't be surprised when something bad happens to one's self.
Human =/= Cat.
by Inchland » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:51 am
Great Nepal wrote:Oh comn,
Its a cat and she is the owner of that cat therefore she should be allowed to do what she wants with her property.
by Xkx » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:51 am
Panzerjaeger wrote:Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:Xkx wrote:Person012345 wrote:If she has no mental issues I'd like her to go through the legal system and be served with the appropriate punishment. The idea of death penalty for anyone who does something you disagree with is retarded, and I'm glad you don't run the country.
yes, it's the disagreeing part i find most distateful.
I didn't say that. I said doing something you disagree with.
i don't think the cat agreed with being put in the dustbin either! if you go around doing that then you shouldn't be surprised when something bad happens to one's self.
I am beginning to think the sociopath is you. First you say killing Neo-Nazis is a civic virtue now you want to lynch this lady.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Emotional Support Crocodile, Greater Wincombe, Ifreann, Juristonia, New Benovia, Pale Dawn, Quasi-Stellar Star Civilizations, The Archregimancy, The Lone Alliance, Tungstan, Yamination
Advertisement