NATION

PASSWORD

Disney Pulls Costume - "Cultural Misappropriation"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
FelrikTheDeleted
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8949
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby FelrikTheDeleted » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:40 pm

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:There is purposeful misuse of the language, for example when someone reduces a sentence to a word, an example being "YOLO", some might consider that disrespectful.


Why is turning something into an acronym a sign of disrespect?

Killdash wrote:This also brings another concern to the table, what people see as disrespectful is subjective, one person of that culture may see it as offensive, while another may see it as OK to do.


Like what?


I wouldn't know, you'd have to ask the people who consider it offensive.
Nonetheless, I'd like to ask, who decides what is and what isn't offensive.

User avatar
Killdash
Minister
 
Posts: 3249
Founded: Feb 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Killdash » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:41 pm

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:
Misusing the language could be considered cultural appropriation because ultimately they're not using it correctly.


Earnest mistakes are not disrespect.

Killdash wrote:But define frivolous? There was a case in the US, I believe, about dreadlocks on white girls, and I believe their motive was that they looked "cool". Arguably, that's a pretty frivolous reason.


Yeah, that's disrespectful use.



What about black girls who straighten their hair then? Is that frivolous?
How do you take your tea?: Seriously, very seriously.
Who the hell do you think you are?: I see myself as a mix of Don Quixote, Stephen Fry and 12 year old boy mixed into one very strange mind.
Are you always so modest?: Yes, though it takes a man of some character to pull it off.
Hey, your insensitive remark/insult/racial slur has me in a tizzy: Well, if you wish to cyber insult me, then do your worst.
Auremenas bitch
Roguishly good looking gentleman
Nationstates premier assassin for hire
For a small fee, of course.
5th spouse of Kannap (for 48 hours, but still counts)

User avatar
Bogdanov Vishniac
Minister
 
Posts: 2065
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bogdanov Vishniac » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:42 pm

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:I wouldn't know, you'd have to ask the people who consider it offensive.


So it's a meaningless hypothetical then. OK.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Nonetheless, I'd like to ask, who decides what is and what isn't offensive.


The people who are part of the cultures in question.

User avatar
Bogdanov Vishniac
Minister
 
Posts: 2065
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bogdanov Vishniac » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:42 pm

Killdash wrote:
Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
Earnest mistakes are not disrespect.



Yeah, that's disrespectful use.



What about black girls who straighten their hair then? Is that frivolous?


Which culture are they appropriating by straightening their hair?

User avatar
Esternial
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54394
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:43 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
So you're saying that you think that someone who was born in England, raised in 'English' culture and who speaks English as their primary mode of communication but who happened to have ancestors who were born elsewhere isn't and cannot be English?


I'm saying they're performing "cultural misappropriation" by mocking people with true English heritage.
That's the logic behind "cultural misappropriation".

It leads to minorities being isolated, and being perceived as "annoying" by the powerful majority.

I foresee a tragedy if such trend continues and expand.

I'm almost sure that this is sarcastic.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:44 pm

Esternial wrote:Sure, but what about indian (native American) costumes?

Excempt because they're such a staple in our society?

No those are pretty fucking racist too

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:45 pm

I can see why Pacific Islanders might not like this.

They depict Maui in a way that for them is offensive.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
FelrikTheDeleted
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8949
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby FelrikTheDeleted » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:47 pm

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:I wouldn't know, you'd have to ask the people who consider it offensive.


So it's a meaningless hypothetical then. OK.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Nonetheless, I'd like to ask, who decides what is and what isn't offensive.


The people who are part of the cultures in question.


Some may think it ok, some think it isn't.
Some white people may think a black girl using the English language as cultural appropriation, after all it's not her ethnic back ground.

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:47 pm

New Edom wrote:
I think that for a season people should never wear non-European styles of clothing at all, or perhaps just dress generically all the time. I think that people should not eat foreign foods, wear foreign clothes or buy foreign goods for a while. Let's see how they like that. Keep it simple. I also think that it would be a good idea not to show much interest either. If they want segregation, let them have it.


Sounds logical.
Most foreign clothes have deeper meanings and symbolisms that we don't know: therefore wearing it is very likely to be "disrespectful".
Same for many dishes.
Worth mentioning that foreign dishes are often eat in a way that's wrong and it's perceived as "unpolite" and/or "rude" and/or "disgusting" by the foreigners who created such dishes.
The same logic also should applies even to local productions based on foreign models.

The main problem would arise if the powerful majority would then start asking the minorities to do the same, but opposite, renounces.
Last edited by Chessmistress on Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:48 pm

Chessmistress wrote:Technically speaking, even the whole movie would be "cultural misappropriation", since the writers of the plot, and most the cast, aren't polynesians.
Technically speaking, all people with non-English heritage in USA, speaking English, are performing "cultural misappropriation" on a daily basis by simply speaking English.
Also all the people who speak foreign languages are perfoming "cultural misappropriation".

That's why I think that the idea of "cultural misappropriation" should be totally rejected.

I think that Disney, acting in a very stupid way in such case, deserve to lose the earnings from such merchandise.

Just my two cents, as they say in USA: even that's "cultural misappropriation", of course ;) just like the fact that I'm actually writing in English...


I'm of a very restrictive view of cultural misappropriation, although what I feel I am more aware of is people being ignorant of something that's not of their culture.

I mean, there is a very palpable difference between just talking in English and mocking people for speaking English with an British accent.

One is fine, the other one is insulting.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Prusselanden
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7998
Founded: Oct 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Prusselanden » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:49 pm

Impireacht wrote:http://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/disney-pulls-boys-costume-critics-lambasted-as-polyface/ar-BBwstd1?OCID=ansmsnnews11


In recent news, Disney has pulled a children's costume from the upcoming film "Moana" over complaints of "cultural misappropriation".

In my opinion, it's ridiculous that child cannot even wear a costume depicting someone of another ethnicity, lest someone find it mildly offensive. If they had made the costume white, there would have been cries of racism. If they didn't make movies about other cultures, they'd be racist. What is Disney supposed to do?


Anyways, what does NSG think? Was Disney right in pulling the costume? Were the ones making the complainants justified? Does cultural misappropriation even exist?

That boy needs to earn his tattoos. Get rid of the Tattoos. Shark teeth have meaning in cultures of the Meditteranean though, but still not in Polynesia, I don't think(I don't know anything about Shark teeth symbolism in Polynesian cultures...)
The Grass skirt...eh. I guess it could stay.
"It is a joke, the belief that humans are superior to our animal brethren. We are slower, weaker, less beautiful and intelligent than our counterparts yet we rule the world. Or do we?"-Prusselanden
Donald Trump want to destroy nature? No worries, we have Theodore Fucking Roosevelt!
Pro-life, Pro-choice: I'm nuetral.
Save our Swamps! Save our Bees!
I care about the environment because I want to let my children see this beautiful planet

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:50 pm

Esternial wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
I'm saying they're performing "cultural misappropriation" by mocking people with true English heritage.
That's the logic behind "cultural misappropriation".

It leads to minorities being isolated, and being perceived as "annoying" by the powerful majority.

I foresee a tragedy if such trend continues and expand.

I'm almost sure that this is sarcastic.


Nope.
I'm terribly serious.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Balkenreich
Senator
 
Posts: 3564
Founded: Sep 04, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Balkenreich » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:52 pm

Merizoc wrote:
Esternial wrote:Sure, but what about indian (native American) costumes?

Excempt because they're such a staple in our society?

No those are pretty fucking racist too


Meh.
Mattis/Puller 2020
I don't gotta prove shit
American, full of vinegar and out of fucks to give.

User avatar
Esternial
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54394
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:52 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Esternial wrote:I'm almost sure that this is sarcastic.


Nope.
I'm terribly serious.

So an English citizen with non-English parental roots is performing cultural misappropriation by being English?

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:53 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
New Edom wrote:
I think that for a season people should never wear non-European styles of clothing at all, or perhaps just dress generically all the time. I think that people should not eat foreign foods, wear foreign clothes or buy foreign goods for a while. Let's see how they like that. Keep it simple. I also think that it would be a good idea not to show much interest either. If they want segregation, let them have it.


Sounds logical.
Most foreign clothes have deeper meanings and symbolisms that we don't know: therefore wearing it is very likely to be "disrespectful".
Same for many dishes.
Worth mentioning that foreign dishes are often eat in a way that's wrong and it's perceived as "unpolite" and/or "rude" and/or "disgusting" by the foreigners who created such dishes.
The same logic also should applies even to local productions based on foreign models.

The main problem would arise if the powerful majority would then start asking the minorities to do the same, but opposite, renounces.


As a Latin American I tend to disagree with this broad view of what constitutes respect and what doesn't.

Wearing something is not disrespectful. I mean, if you like to dress in traditional garb from mezoamerica I don't necessarily think anyone would object as long as it is for the appropriate occasion.

I had an issue with people talking on a similar thread about the "sombrero mariachi". There's nothing wrong in wearing one, but there is a time and a place for it. I'd be hard pressed to find fault with someone who knows where and when to use a hat like that one. And so would most people.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Bogdanov Vishniac
Minister
 
Posts: 2065
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bogdanov Vishniac » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:54 pm

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Some may think it ok, some think it isn't.


Again, who are these 'some people' and why do they think that?

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Some white people may think a black girl using the English language as cultural appropriation, after all it's not her ethnic back ground.


If she grew up speaking it or learned it earnestly then it's not appropriation.

User avatar
Killdash
Minister
 
Posts: 3249
Founded: Feb 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Killdash » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:55 pm

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
Killdash wrote:

What about black girls who straighten their hair then? Is that frivolous?


Which culture are they appropriating by straightening their hair?



What culture does Brittany appropriate when she puts in dreads? Obviously there's no biological reason not to, because it can happen. Same with straightening. There's no obvious reason why one can't do it, and no reason to suspect it wasn't done at some stage. So why make a thing of it?

I'll give a better example, it stems from personal life in SA, which gives a very good view on culture clashes. I know some Zulu girls. And they are Zulu girls. Full on Zulu, they speak the language, do the traditions, own the traditional costumes and some would probably even identify as Zulu before South African. Yet, when I run into them, they're wearing American or European designed clothes. What does this mean? Is it frivolous to wear them? After all, they do own traditional costumes, and they love their culture. One could hardly call them "assimilators". So what's the deal?
How do you take your tea?: Seriously, very seriously.
Who the hell do you think you are?: I see myself as a mix of Don Quixote, Stephen Fry and 12 year old boy mixed into one very strange mind.
Are you always so modest?: Yes, though it takes a man of some character to pull it off.
Hey, your insensitive remark/insult/racial slur has me in a tizzy: Well, if you wish to cyber insult me, then do your worst.
Auremenas bitch
Roguishly good looking gentleman
Nationstates premier assassin for hire
For a small fee, of course.
5th spouse of Kannap (for 48 hours, but still counts)

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:57 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
I mean, there is a very palpable difference between just talking in English and mocking people for speaking English with an British accent.

One is fine, the other one is insulting.


Have you ever heard expressions like "you're torturing the English language?" (or something similar)
That is sometimes applied to foreigners learning a new language, by the locals.
As long as the society isn't hypersensible about such matters, it'll remain a joke.
But if society will become hypersensible to such matters, then some people could begin getting offensed by people "abusing/torturing our language".

It's just a little example.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
FelrikTheDeleted
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8949
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby FelrikTheDeleted » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:57 pm

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Some may think it ok, some think it isn't.


Again, who are these 'some people' and why do they think that?

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Some white people may think a black girl using the English language as cultural appropriation, after all it's not her ethnic back ground.


If she grew up speaking it or learned it earnestly then it's not appropriation.


Well, "who are the people and why do they think like that", I can apply that too your argument, what is and isn't offensive is subjective.

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:59 pm

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Some may think it ok, some think it isn't.


Again, who are these 'some people' and why do they think that?

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Some white people may think a black girl using the English language as cultural appropriation, after all it's not her ethnic back ground.


If she grew up speaking it or learned it earnestly then it's not appropriation.

Why isn't it?
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Sep 22, 2016 6:01 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
I mean, there is a very palpable difference between just talking in English and mocking people for speaking English with an British accent.

One is fine, the other one is insulting.


Have you ever heard expressions like "you're torturing the English language?" (or something similar)
That is sometimes applied to foreigners learning a new language, by the locals.
As long as the society isn't hypersensible about such matters, it'll remain a joke.
But if society will become hypersensible to such matters, then some people could begin getting offensed by people "abusing/torturing our language".

It's just a little example.


Let's just say I've heard worse stuff directed at me, and not as a joke.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Killdash
Minister
 
Posts: 3249
Founded: Feb 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Killdash » Thu Sep 22, 2016 6:01 pm

A more serious example. King Goodwill Zwelithini of the Zulu recently accused the government of axing Zulu culture when the government ruled that "virgin testing" or "hymen testing" actually, is not a medically sound way to do things, and therefore, it's wrong to use it as qualification into school bursaries for the area.

That's the attack, and you can easily see how it looks like an "attack on culture". But it isn't. Because virgin testing doesn't work, and denying people bursaries because of it is wrong.
How do you take your tea?: Seriously, very seriously.
Who the hell do you think you are?: I see myself as a mix of Don Quixote, Stephen Fry and 12 year old boy mixed into one very strange mind.
Are you always so modest?: Yes, though it takes a man of some character to pull it off.
Hey, your insensitive remark/insult/racial slur has me in a tizzy: Well, if you wish to cyber insult me, then do your worst.
Auremenas bitch
Roguishly good looking gentleman
Nationstates premier assassin for hire
For a small fee, of course.
5th spouse of Kannap (for 48 hours, but still counts)

User avatar
Bogdanov Vishniac
Minister
 
Posts: 2065
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bogdanov Vishniac » Thu Sep 22, 2016 6:07 pm

Killdash wrote:What culture does Brittany appropriate when she puts in dreads? Obviously there's no biological reason not to, because it can happen. Same with straightening. There's no obvious reason why one can't do it, and no reason to suspect it wasn't done at some stage. So why make a thing of it?


Dreadlocks are cultural symbols associated with the Rastafari and other African cultures, for example.

Killdash wrote:I'll give a better example, it stems from personal life in SA, which gives a very good view on culture clashes. I know some Zulu girls. And they are Zulu girls. Full on Zulu, they speak the language, do the traditions, own the traditional costumes and some would probably even identify as Zulu before South African. Yet, when I run into them, they're wearing American or European designed clothes. What does this mean? Is it frivolous to wear them? After all, they do own traditional costumes, and they love their culture. One could hardly call them "assimilators". So what's the deal?


It's not frivolous because they like the clothes and wear them as a symbol of their own engagement with Western culture. That's respectful.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Well, "who are the people and why do they think like that", I can apply that too your argument,


No, because I can go and point to actual Polynesian people who think it's offensive, and your English people live only in your head.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote: what is and isn't offensive is subjective.


Yep. And that's for people of that culture to decide amongst themselves.

Minzerland II wrote:Why isn't it?


Because it has everything to do with the way you approach interacting with the culture. If you do it with respect and an earnest intention of engaging with it it's not appropriative.

User avatar
FelrikTheDeleted
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8949
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby FelrikTheDeleted » Thu Sep 22, 2016 6:09 pm

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
Killdash wrote:What culture does Brittany appropriate when she puts in dreads? Obviously there's no biological reason not to, because it can happen. Same with straightening. There's no obvious reason why one can't do it, and no reason to suspect it wasn't done at some stage. So why make a thing of it?


Dreadlocks are cultural symbols associated with the Rastafari and other African cultures, for example.

Killdash wrote:I'll give a better example, it stems from personal life in SA, which gives a very good view on culture clashes. I know some Zulu girls. And they are Zulu girls. Full on Zulu, they speak the language, do the traditions, own the traditional costumes and some would probably even identify as Zulu before South African. Yet, when I run into them, they're wearing American or European designed clothes. What does this mean? Is it frivolous to wear them? After all, they do own traditional costumes, and they love their culture. One could hardly call them "assimilators". So what's the deal?


It's not frivolous because they like the clothes and wear them as a symbol of their own engagement with Western culture. That's respectful.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Well, "who are the people and why do they think like that", I can apply that too your argument,


No, because I can go and point to actual Polynesian people who think it's offensive, and your English people live only in your head.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote: what is and isn't offensive is subjective.


Yep. And that's for people of that culture to decide amongst themselves.

Minzerland II wrote:Why isn't it?


Because it has everything to do with the way you approach interacting with the culture. If you do it with respect and an earnest intention of engaging with it it's not appropriative.


I could point out numeral people that think a black woman using English as cultural appropriation.
Last edited by FelrikTheDeleted on Thu Sep 22, 2016 6:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu Sep 22, 2016 6:10 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Let's just say I've heard worse stuff directed at me, and not as a joke.


I'm sorry, I hope such things have ceased now.
Something similar happened even to me, but it was more or less a joke.
Funny thing: it happened in a country with less HDI (Human Development Index) than mine country of origin.
Way less.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Corporate Collective Salvation, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hidrandia, Ifreann, New Temecula, The Lone Alliance, Three Galaxies

Advertisement

Remove ads