The NFL Thread: 2018 Preseason

by **Luminesa** » Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:29 pm

Kractero wrote:I shit myself but at least we tied. Thank god for Catanzaro.

Him and Stephen are gonna get drunk after this.

Gostkowski? Lol, that would be hilarious.

by **Idzequitch** » Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:35 pm

Well... that game was...... unique.

by **Arkinesia** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:22 am

Man. If we get more of the Tampa Bay team that played Carolina, Atlanta, and SF, they could—am I really saying this right now?—be playoff contenders.

I say that not just because those are the Bucs' three wins so far, but because they played strong games in two of them and a resilient one in the third.

by **Luminesa** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 4:30 am

Arkinesia wrote:Man. If we get more of the Tampa Bay team that played Carolina, Atlanta, and SF, they could—am I really saying this right now?—be playoff contenders.

I say that not just because those are the Bucs' three wins so far, but because they played strong games in two of them and a resilient one in the third.

This is also San Francisco we're talking about.

by **Nyj** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:01 am

I'm back!

by **Luminesa** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:40 am

Soooooooo...this means the Saints are still in 3rd place...but we need to win next week to stay or move up. Who we play...

SEAHAWKS.

Nope.

Last.FM · by **Corrian** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 7:44 am

Luminesa wrote:Soooooooo...this means the Saints are still in 3rd place...but we need to win next week to stay or move up. Who we play...

SEAHAWKS.

(Image)

Nope.

by **Trumpostan** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:12 am

Nyj wrote:I'm back!

Good day, and how are the New Jersey Green Beans doing?

by **Occupied Deutschland** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:14 am

Luminesa wrote:Soooooooo...this means the Saints are still in 3rd place...but we need to win next week to stay or move up. Who we play...

SEAHAWKS.

(Image)

Nope.

Don't be too concerned.
The Seahawks have a long and storied record of choking at the most opportune times for other teams.

Last.FM · by **Corrian** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:15 am

Yeah, Seahawks are a weird team. They can do really well, then kinda do really sloppy.

by **Luminesa** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:17 am

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Luminesa wrote:Soooooooo...this means the Saints are still in 3rd place...but we need to win next week to stay or move up. Who we play...

SEAHAWKS.

(Image)

Nope.

Don't be too concerned.
The Seahawks have a long and storied record of choking at the most opportune times for other teams.

We haven't beaten Seattle since 2011. We could do it, we're playing at home, but if we want to win, it's gonna be a long, dirty fight to pull it off.

Last.FM · by **Corrian** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:18 am

Luminesa wrote:We haven't beaten Seattle since 2011. We could do it, we're playing at home, but if we want to win, it's gonna be a long, dirty fight to pull it off.

Well....All I can say is, good luck

by **Luminesa** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:21 am

Corrian wrote:
Luminesa wrote:We haven't beaten Seattle since 2011. We could do it, we're playing at home, but if we want to win, it's gonna be a long, dirty fight to pull it off.

Well....All I can say is, good luck

Thank you. The upside is it seems your Offense has not been high-flying as of recently. The downside is our Defense couldn't hold a kitten from breaking past, and if they did they'd find aome way to get a PI call first, it seems. Though I still feel a few of the PI calls they call are bogus. >.<

by **Trumpostan** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:27 am

Would be sweet if the Broncos lost tonight. Not likely since the Texans ain't any good but ya never know.

We'd be two wins ahead of everyone in the AFC except Oakland and Houston.

by **Idzequitch** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:17 pm

I have to say, the Ben-less Steelers didn't look terrible against New England. Had Ben been in, we might have had a chance to win. So you know what? I realize moral victories don't get you to the playoffs, but I'm happy with how they performed. And the good thing is, we can't lose to the bye week. I'm hoping we only have to play one or two more games before Roethlisberger is back in there.

by **Luminesa** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:22 pm

Idzequitch wrote:I have to say, the Ben-less Steelers didn't look terrible against New England. Had Ben been in, we might have had a chance to win. So you know what? I realize moral victories don't get you to the playoffs, but I'm happy with how they performed. And the good thing is, we can't lose to the bye week. I'm hoping we only have to play one or two more games before Roethlisberger is back in there.

The game was a lot closer than I expected.

As for our game, KC opponents were averaging 13.5 points in Arrowhead, and we scored 21. So our Offense certainly broke through, just not quite enough to take the win.

by **Kractero** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 2:47 pm

Luminesa wrote:
Kractero wrote:I shit myself but at least we tied. Thank god for Catanzaro.

Him and Stephen are gonna get drunk after this.

Gostkowski? Lol, that would be hilarious.

Hauschka.

When Arizona produces 500 yards of offense and gets 6 points

by **Ameriganastan** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:01 pm

I hope Von Miller breaks Bitchweiler in half.

by **Outer Sparta** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:15 pm

Josh Brown gets only one game? No wonder the NFL is losing revenue. First goes primetime ratings, now it's the fact they don't care about domestic violence.

by **Luminesa** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:29 pm

Outer Sparta wrote:Josh Brown gets only one game? No wonder the NFL is losing revenue. First goes primetime ratings, now it's the fact they don't care about domestic violence.

This is news?

It seems more so of a mishandling by the Giants upper management. Or they themselves may not care, just as Goodell doesn't care. They should, it's their product to lose, but I mean, the problem is if things go downhill for them, they can basically just sell the team and leave the mess in someone else's hands. Ugh.

by **Outer Sparta** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:35 pm

Luminesa wrote:
Outer Sparta wrote:Josh Brown gets only one game? No wonder the NFL is losing revenue. First goes primetime ratings, now it's the fact they don't care about domestic violence.

This is news?

It seems more so of a mishandling by the Giants upper management. Or they themselves may not care, just as Goodell doesn't care. They should, it's their product to lose, but I mean, the problem is if things go downhill for them, they can basically just sell the team and leave the mess in someone else's hands. Ugh.

It's not recent, so they should've reported it when it surfaced inside of the organization. Goodell's also at fault for the lenient punishment, since domestic violence is domestic violence no matter how you slice it.

by **Nyj** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:37 pm

Trumpostan wrote:
Nyj wrote:I'm back!

Good day, and how are the New Jersey Green Beans doing?

Trumpostan , you're wish came true were 2-5 but we play the clowns on week 8!

Last.FM · by **Corrian** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 4:10 pm

Luminesa wrote:Thank you. The upside is it seems your Offense has not been high-flying as of recently. The downside is our Defense couldn't hold a kitten from breaking past, and if they did they'd find aome way to get a PI call first, it seems. Though I still feel a few of the PI calls they call are bogus. >.<

Yeah, offense hasn't been great. Defense clearly was if the low scoring game last night is anything to go off of.

by **Ameriganastan** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 8:35 pm

Gary Kubiak is not dead to me anymore.

Suck it, Bitchweiler.

by **The Royal Kingdom of Quebec** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 8:38 pm

OZweiler with way more passing attempts, still loses to Siemian.

Good job defence, for bouncing back from a funk two weeks ago and absence of Kubiak last week.

The NFL Thread: 2018 Preseason

Here you go. Last poll of the 2018 season boys.

Who is online