NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread V: Upon This Blasted Heath

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which of the following do you want to keep post-Brexit

Freedom of Movement
31
13%
Single Market Access
62
25%
Both of the Above
102
41%
Neither of the Above
53
21%
 
Total votes : 248

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:59 am

Souseiseki wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
They said it was the best way of making sure Scotland was in the EU, which was probably true. The chance of Spain allowing Scotland into the EU is less than the chance of a leave vote at the time.

I can remember nobody saying that it was a absolute guarantee the UK would not vote to leave if the promised referendum was held.


oh well then. it's forseeable, there's a chance, the government will just tell you to bite it and ignore the referendum. it's unlikely, but the chance is there. would you accept "it was foreseeable!" an acceptable response to why you should shut up and deal with it?


It was also "foreseeable" that the SNP would call for a second indyref in the event of Brexit.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Elepis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8963
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Elepis » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:08 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:

Not that any banks have actually said they would do this.


well, the British Banker's Association did and while it may not be a bank, dose represent banks and presumably know what the bankers are thinking because it is made up of bankers and speaks to bankers
"Krugmar - Today at 10:00 PM
Not sure that'll work on Elepis considering he dislikes (from what I've observed):
A: Nationalism
B: Religion being taken seriously
C: The Irish"

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:16 am



BBA is largely making those statements to reframe the debate in light the push towards a hard Brexit. Also of note was their warning to the Europe not to 'cut off their nose to spite their face'.

Not to deny the fears the financial industry has - those are real. But these statements were made to ensure there is something of a public pushback against the path Britain may or may not be careening towards.

Hurdergaryp wrote:Combined with the gargantuan budget cuts that are to be expected in the coming years from the British government, especially if the Tories manage to keep control, poverty is probably going to increase rapidly in the UK.


It is actually expected that Hammond will be doing some minor fiscal expansion. Some additional cuts too, but the overall expectation is for spending to rise a bit.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Lamadia 2016
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 458
Founded: Sep 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamadia 2016 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:17 am

Elepis wrote:
Lamadia 2016 wrote:Not that any banks have actually said they would do this.


well, the British Banker's Association did and while it may not be a bank, dose represent banks and presumably know what the bankers are thinking because it is made up of bankers and speaks to bankers

Whilst they may very well be true, my dad's own experience with the BBA is that they listen to a select group of bankers/people in the financial industry, and that neither their statements nor often those made by staff of any particular bank are reliable.
' Respect the office of the presidency, if not the president himself '- Election 2016


From Surrey (the UK) | Social Conservative, economic libertarian
Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Spectator, the Times

PRO: conservatism, capitalism, monetarism, law & order, Thatcherism, interventionism
ANTI: socialism, communism, Russia, Iran, Jeremy Corbyn

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:21 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:
Elepis wrote:
well, the British Banker's Association did and while it may not be a bank, dose represent banks and presumably know what the bankers are thinking because it is made up of bankers and speaks to bankers

Whilst they may very well be true, my dad's own experience with the BBA is that they listen to a select group of bankers/people in the financial industry, and that neither their statements nor often those made by staff of any particular bank are reliable.


All the same, I've not met many bankers who would disagree with the sentiment's expressed by the BBA on this. The industry is pretty strongly against a hard Brexit.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Lamadia 2016
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 458
Founded: Sep 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamadia 2016 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:22 am

Valaran wrote:
Lamadia 2016 wrote:Whilst they may very well be true, my dad's own experience with the BBA is that they listen to a select group of bankers/people in the financial industry, and that neither their statements nor often those made by staff of any particular bank are reliable.


All the same, I've not met many bankers who would disagree with the sentiment's expressed by the BBA on this. The industry is pretty strongly against a hard Brexit.

Absolutely, my point was that it is not necessarily true that these banks will be leaving the U.K 'definitely'.
' Respect the office of the presidency, if not the president himself '- Election 2016


From Surrey (the UK) | Social Conservative, economic libertarian
Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Spectator, the Times

PRO: conservatism, capitalism, monetarism, law & order, Thatcherism, interventionism
ANTI: socialism, communism, Russia, Iran, Jeremy Corbyn

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:30 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:
Valaran wrote:
All the same, I've not met many bankers who would disagree with the sentiment's expressed by the BBA on this. The industry is pretty strongly against a hard Brexit.

Absolutely, my point was that it is not necessarily true that these banks will be leaving the U.K 'definitely'.


The BBA didn't say definitely anyway. Browne said they were preparing to possibly shift some operations, which is effectively common knowledge (or should be) and is in line with announcements by specific banks.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163932
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:09 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:In Calais, currently, that camp has to be destroyed. The residents should be rounded up by the army

I swear, you and the fucking army.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Lamadia 2016
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 458
Founded: Sep 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamadia 2016 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:10 am

The directors of these banks, these businesses, these big employers, should all be invited to a weekend trip at Chequeres. The Prime Minister can then speak with them strictly off-the record, and they can have a little discussion about what they really want, what it will take to keep them in the U.K. Obviously we need massive corporation tax cuts, and to pay for that we need to take a sledgehammer to the social budget; allowing more planning permission for construction, reducing regulations on services & infrastructure; nothing can be off the table. But these talks have to take place, to let business have a voice in how this country is run.
' Respect the office of the presidency, if not the president himself '- Election 2016


From Surrey (the UK) | Social Conservative, economic libertarian
Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Spectator, the Times

PRO: conservatism, capitalism, monetarism, law & order, Thatcherism, interventionism
ANTI: socialism, communism, Russia, Iran, Jeremy Corbyn

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:12 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:The directors of these banks, these businesses, these big employers, should all be invited to a weekend trip at Chequeres. The Prime Minister can then speak with them strictly off-the record, and they can have a little discussion about what they really want, what it will take to keep them in the U.K. Obviously we need massive corporation tax cuts, and to pay for that we need to take a sledgehammer to the social budget; allowing more planning permission for construction, reducing regulations on services & infrastructure; nothing can be off the table. But these talks have to take place, to let business have a voice in how this country is run.


No, what we need are massive defence cuts to avoid alienating the Labour voters the Conservatives are trying to poach.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11842
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Philjia » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:13 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:The directors of these banks, these businesses, these big employers, should all be invited to a weekend trip at Chequeres. The Prime Minister can then speak with them strictly off-the record, and they can have a little discussion about what they really want, what it will take to keep them in the U.K. Obviously we need massive corporation tax cuts, and to pay for that we need to take a sledgehammer to the social budget; allowing more planning permission for construction, reducing regulations on services & infrastructure; nothing can be off the table. But these talks have to take place, to let business have a voice in how this country is run.


Skirting dangerously close to bribery and corruption is a good start.
Nemesis the Warlock wrote:I am the Nemesis, I am the Warlock, I am the shape of things to come, the Lord of the Flies, holder of the Sword Sinister, the Death Bringer, I am the one who waits on the edge of your dreams, I am all these things and many more

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Frank Zipper
Senator
 
Posts: 4207
Founded: Nov 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frank Zipper » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:16 am

Ifreann wrote:
Lamadia 2016 wrote:In Calais, currently, that camp has to be destroyed. The residents should be rounded up by the army

I swear, you and the fucking army.


At least this time there is no mention of bombing people.
Put this in your signature if you are easily led.

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:18 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:The directors of these banks, these businesses, these big employers, should all be invited to a weekend trip at Chequeres. The Prime Minister can then speak with them strictly off-the record, and they can have a little discussion about what they really want, what it will take to keep them in the U.K. Obviously we need massive corporation tax cuts, and to pay for that we need to take a sledgehammer to the social budget; allowing more planning permission for construction, reducing regulations on services & infrastructure; nothing can be off the table. But these talks have to take place, to let business have a voice in how this country is run.


What it takes is likely free movement of labour, and access to the single market. Can May really provide those off the record?
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163932
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:18 am

Frank Zipper wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I swear, you and the fucking army.


At least this time there is no mention of bombing people.

Not yet, anyway.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Lamadia 2016
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 458
Founded: Sep 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamadia 2016 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:25 am

Ifreann wrote:
Frank Zipper wrote:
At least this time there is no mention of bombing people.

Not yet, anyway.

Wait, are you suggesting I would like to bomb refugees?
' Respect the office of the presidency, if not the president himself '- Election 2016


From Surrey (the UK) | Social Conservative, economic libertarian
Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Spectator, the Times

PRO: conservatism, capitalism, monetarism, law & order, Thatcherism, interventionism
ANTI: socialism, communism, Russia, Iran, Jeremy Corbyn

User avatar
Hurdergaryp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 49282
Founded: Jul 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hurdergaryp » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:26 am

Ifreann wrote:
Frank Zipper wrote:At least this time there is no mention of bombing people.

Not yet, anyway.

It's only a matter of time, because more than a few people in NationStates General firmly believe that you can make any problem go away by thoroughly bombing it.


“Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent.”
Mao Zedong

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163932
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:36 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Not yet, anyway.

Wait, are you suggesting I would like to bomb refugees?

Well you haven't said yet what you're planning to do with all the people you've rounded up into prison camps and you don't consider to be deserving enough of refuge in Europe. Maybe once you've let out the women and children you'll decide that everyone else must be terrorists and criminals.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Lamadia 2016
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 458
Founded: Sep 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamadia 2016 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:40 am

Ifreann wrote:
Lamadia 2016 wrote:Wait, are you suggesting I would like to bomb refugees?

Well you haven't said yet what you're planning to do with all the people you've rounded up into prison camps and you don't consider to be deserving enough of refuge in Europe. Maybe once you've let out the women and children you'll decide that everyone else must be terrorists and criminals.

I do hate reactionaries.
' Respect the office of the presidency, if not the president himself '- Election 2016


From Surrey (the UK) | Social Conservative, economic libertarian
Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Spectator, the Times

PRO: conservatism, capitalism, monetarism, law & order, Thatcherism, interventionism
ANTI: socialism, communism, Russia, Iran, Jeremy Corbyn

User avatar
Anywhere Else But Here
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5651
Founded: Mar 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Anywhere Else But Here » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:53 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:The directors of these banks, these businesses, these big employers, should all be invited to a weekend trip at Chequeres. The Prime Minister can then speak with them strictly off-the record, and they can have a little discussion about what they really want, what it will take to keep them in the U.K. Obviously we need massive corporation tax cuts, and to pay for that we need to take a sledgehammer to the social budget; allowing more planning permission for construction, reducing regulations on services & infrastructure; nothing can be off the table. But these talks have to take place, to let business have a voice in how this country is run.

Bribe the rich by offering them the money kids in poverty need to eat. That's a new low.

No, wait, it isn't. Not even close.

User avatar
Lamadia 2016
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 458
Founded: Sep 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamadia 2016 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:57 am

Anywhere Else But Here wrote:
Lamadia 2016 wrote:The directors of these banks, these businesses, these big employers, should all be invited to a weekend trip at Chequeres. The Prime Minister can then speak with them strictly off-the record, and they can have a little discussion about what they really want, what it will take to keep them in the U.K. Obviously we need massive corporation tax cuts, and to pay for that we need to take a sledgehammer to the social budget; allowing more planning permission for construction, reducing regulations on services & infrastructure; nothing can be off the table. But these talks have to take place, to let business have a voice in how this country is run.

Bribe the rich by offering them the money kids in poverty need to eat. That's a new low.

No, wait, it isn't. Not even close.

So you complain that banks & businesses may leave the U.K because of Brexit, but don't believe in keeping them here? :eyebrow:
' Respect the office of the presidency, if not the president himself '- Election 2016


From Surrey (the UK) | Social Conservative, economic libertarian
Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Spectator, the Times

PRO: conservatism, capitalism, monetarism, law & order, Thatcherism, interventionism
ANTI: socialism, communism, Russia, Iran, Jeremy Corbyn

User avatar
Anywhere Else But Here
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5651
Founded: Mar 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Anywhere Else But Here » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:06 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:
Anywhere Else But Here wrote:Bribe the rich by offering them the money kids in poverty need to eat. That's a new low.

No, wait, it isn't. Not even close.

So you complain that banks & businesses may leave the U.K because of Brexit, but don't believe in keeping them here? :eyebrow:

When did I complain about that?

User avatar
Lamadia 2016
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 458
Founded: Sep 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamadia 2016 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:10 am

Anywhere Else But Here wrote:
Lamadia 2016 wrote:So you complain that banks & businesses may leave the U.K because of Brexit, but don't believe in keeping them here? :eyebrow:

When did I complain about that?

Oh, so you support unemployment?
Sorry, I just assumed that you would want businesses to stay in this country with jobs. My mistake.
' Respect the office of the presidency, if not the president himself '- Election 2016


From Surrey (the UK) | Social Conservative, economic libertarian
Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Spectator, the Times

PRO: conservatism, capitalism, monetarism, law & order, Thatcherism, interventionism
ANTI: socialism, communism, Russia, Iran, Jeremy Corbyn

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:30 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:On the issue of antisemitism, criticising the Israeli Government is perfectly legitimate- criticisng the right of Israel to exist as a state, is not.


Again: states don't have rights. Actual people have rights.

Vassenor wrote:
Lamadia 2016 wrote:On the issue of antisemitism, criticising the Israeli Government is perfectly legitimate- criticisng the right of Israel to exist as a state, is not.


Which no-one in here has done, yet we have been accused as such anyway.


Actually, I did, but in the same sentence that I criticised the "right" of any other country in the world to exist. Inevitably, the conclusion that many in this thread drew was that rational humanism is inherently antisemitic.
Last edited by Salandriagado on Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Frank Zipper
Senator
 
Posts: 4207
Founded: Nov 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frank Zipper » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:30 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:
Anywhere Else But Here wrote:Bribe the rich by offering them the money kids in poverty need to eat. That's a new low.

No, wait, it isn't. Not even close.

So you complain that banks & businesses may leave the U.K because of Brexit, but don't believe in keeping them here? :eyebrow:


The issue is passporting; I doubt any level of cuts to corporate taxes could compensate for the amount of business Banks stand to lose because of Brexit.
Put this in your signature if you are easily led.

User avatar
Anywhere Else But Here
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5651
Founded: Mar 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Anywhere Else But Here » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:53 am

Lamadia 2016 wrote:
Anywhere Else But Here wrote:When did I complain about that?

Oh, so you support unemployment?
Sorry, I just assumed that you would want businesses to stay in this country with jobs. My mistake.

Rawr! Straw!
Image

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: General TM, Ifreann, Ineva, Infected Mushroom, Kostane, Likhinia, New Temecula, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, The Vooperian Union, Tiami, Urine Town, Verkhoyanska, Washington-Columbia

Advertisement

Remove ads

cron