NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread V: Upon This Blasted Heath

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which of the following do you want to keep post-Brexit

Freedom of Movement
31
13%
Single Market Access
62
25%
Both of the Above
102
41%
Neither of the Above
53
21%
 
Total votes : 248

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:16 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:Why can't we just see how pissing omnishamblic the entire sodding thing has been and decide not to do it?

If 52% of the country voted to nuke Middlesborough, we'd refuse to do that because it was dumb.


Best thing since Alexander the Great thrashed the Persians at Gaugamela.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:23 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:Why can't we just see how pissing omnishamblic the entire sodding thing has been and decide not to do it?

If 52% of the country voted to nuke Middlesborough, we'd refuse to do that because it was dumb.


Which is why I've my fingers crossed.

At least I'm lucky in that I'm north of the border. There's always the chance that the SNP might decide to take a page out of Ian Smith's book to keep us in the EU.

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:24 am

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37508968

Good news, we're all going to be poor. But at least many of us will have degrees so we can be smart and poor.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:26 am

Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37508968

Good news, we're all going to be poor. But at least many of us will have degrees so we can be smart and poor.

"We love the Middle Class" Tories, eh?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163932
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:27 am

Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37508968

Good news, we're all going to be poor. But at least many of us will have degrees so we can be smart and poor.

Bit of dignified poverty never hurt anyone, as long as you don't go looking for benefits. That would be dangerous socialism.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:29 am

Ifreann wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37508968

Good news, we're all going to be poor. But at least many of us will have degrees so we can be smart and poor.

Bit of dignified poverty never hurt anyone, as long as you don't go looking for benefits. That would be dangerous socialism.

They do not accept the dangerous socialist argument, that the government knows what is better than the oppressed elite do. They don't want to Corbyn's promised land, which must surely rank as the most abhorrent of all the lands ever promised to the wealthy of a nation-state.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:29 am

Machtergreifung wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Why can't we just see how pissing omnishamblic the entire sodding thing has been and decide not to do it?

If 52% of the country voted to nuke Middlesborough, we'd refuse to do that because it was dumb.


Which is why I've my fingers crossed.

At least I'm lucky in that I'm north of the border. There's always the chance that the SNP might decide to take a page out of Ian Smith's book to keep us in the EU.


That turned out so well for them didn't it. :roll:
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:34 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
Which is why I've my fingers crossed.

At least I'm lucky in that I'm north of the border. There's always the chance that the SNP might decide to take a page out of Ian Smith's book to keep us in the EU.


That turned out so well for them didn't it. :roll:


I didn't say it would be a good idea now, did I?

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:40 am

Machtergreifung wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
That turned out so well for them didn't it. :roll:


I didn't say it would be a good idea now, did I?

Why would you suggest, whilst also announcing that one is 'lucky', the idea otherwise?
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:41 am

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Bit of dignified poverty never hurt anyone, as long as you don't go looking for benefits. That would be dangerous socialism.

They do not accept the dangerous socialist argument, that the government knows what is better than the oppressed elite do. They don't want to Corbyn's promised land, which must surely rank as the most abhorrent of all the lands ever promised to the wealthy of a nation-state.

Would you remind rephrasing this?

You lost me.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:41 am

Minzerland II wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
I didn't say it would be a good idea now, did I?

Why would you suggest, whilst also announcing that one is 'lucky', the idea otherwise?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:43 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:They do not accept the dangerous socialist argument, that the government knows what is better than the oppressed elite do. They don't want to Corbyn's promised land, which must surely rank as the most abhorrent of all the lands ever promised to the wealthy of a nation-state.

Would you remind rephrasing this?

You lost me.

Sure, here's me making my conference speech.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:45 am

Machtergreifung wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:Why would you suggest, whilst also announcing that one is 'lucky', the idea otherwise?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

A horrible use of English, serves no more than to deride, honestly.
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163932
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:47 am

Minzerland II wrote:

A horrible use of English, serves no more than to deride, honestly.

Maybe move the cursor away from the italics button when you post.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Mad hatters in jeans
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19119
Founded: Nov 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad hatters in jeans » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:50 am

Ifreann wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:A horrible use of English, serves no more than to deride, honestly.

Maybe move the cursor away from the italics button when you post.

It's a bold strategy cotton, lets see how it plays out.
Last edited by Mad hatters in jeans on Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:51 am

Ifreann wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:A horrible use of English, serves no more than to deride, honestly.

Maybe move the cursor away from the italics button when you post.

'Horrible' and 'of' are italicised for emphasis, this is how I've been taught to use them.
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:52 am

Am I weird for finding it much faster and easier to just type square brackets and the desired BBCode command than to take my hand off the keyboard, move my mouse cursor, click the BBCode button, and then move the type cursor to within it, continue typing, then move the cursor outside those brackets, and continue?

Even on mobile, even though it's eight keystrokes for [i­] and between 9 and 11 for [­/i] (because I always get confused and hit additional keys when putting in that slash), I prefer doing that than clicking on the button and messing with the type cursor.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:57 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:Am I weird for finding it much faster and easier to just type square brackets and the desired BBCode command than to take my hand off the keyboard, move my mouse cursor, click the BBCode button, and then move the type cursor to within it, continue typing, then move the cursor outside those brackets, and continue?

Even on mobile, even though it's eight keystrokes for [i­] and between 9 and 11 for [­/i] (because I always get confused and hit additional keys when putting in that slash), I prefer doing that than clicking on the button and messing with the type cursor.

Not at all. I've typed the BBCode ever since I memorised most, which was probably five months ago.
Last edited by Minzerland II on Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:58 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:Am I weird for finding it much faster and easier to just type square brackets and the desired BBCode command than to take my hand off the keyboard, move my mouse cursor, click the BBCode button, and then move the type cursor to within it, continue typing, then move the cursor outside those brackets, and continue?

Even on mobile, even though it's eight keystrokes for [i­] and between 9 and 11 for [­/i] (because I always get confused and hit additional keys when putting in that slash), I prefer doing that than clicking on the button and messing with the type cursor.

I do that for stuff like [quote], but for italics and bold, I usually type out the whole sentence and then retroactively apply them, so doubleclick select and buton click is usually faster.

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:04 am

Minzerland II wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Maybe move the cursor away from the italics button when you post.

'Horrible' and 'of' are italicised for emphasis, this is how I've been taught to use them.

Why would you emphasise the "of"?
Emphasis is typically used to bring attention to the word, to indicate that "it is this word not another" e.g. I'm taking it to the shop vs I'm taking it from the shop.
Either that, or to really put some force behind it. For example "This is horrible" is less impactful and indicates less feeling than "This is horrible"

Emphasising the "of" doesn't really fit either of these

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:06 am

Mad hatters in jeans wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Maybe move the cursor away from the italics button when you post.

It's a bold strategy cotton, lets see how it plays out.


Is Chuck Norris around?
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163932
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:13 am

Minzerland II wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Maybe move the cursor away from the italics button when you post.

'Horrible' and 'of' are italicised for emphasis, this is how I've been taught to use them.

You deliberately wanted to emphasise the word 'of' in that sentence?

O...kay...


Imperializt Russia wrote:Am I weird for finding it much faster and easier to just type square brackets and the desired BBCode command than to take my hand off the keyboard, move my mouse cursor, click the BBCode button, and then move the type cursor to within it, continue typing, then move the cursor outside those brackets, and continue?

Even on mobile, even though it's eight keystrokes for [i­] and between 9 and 11 for [­/i] (because I always get confused and hit additional keys when putting in that slash), I prefer doing that than clicking on the button and messing with the type cursor.

Place fist here [ ], typing comrade. I always type out tags. Well, unless I'm typing something in SMALL CAPS, SUCH AS ONE MIGHT DO TO SUGGEST THE VOICE OF THE BORG OR DEATH, then it's simpler to type it out and highlight the bits I want to tag.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:19 am

Alvecia wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:'Horrible' and 'of' are italicised for emphasis, this is how I've been taught to use them.

Why would you emphasise the "of"?
Emphasis is typically used to bring attention to the word, to indicate that "it is this word not another" e.g. I'm taking it to the shop vs I'm taking it from the shop.
Either that, or to really put some force behind it. For example "This is horrible" is less impactful and indicates less feeling than "This is horrible"

Emphasising the "of" doesn't really fit either of these

I've always been taught to italicise conjunction words to emphasis what is being described. Never thought about it till now.
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:21 am

Minzerland II wrote:
Alvecia wrote:Why would you emphasise the "of"?
Emphasis is typically used to bring attention to the word, to indicate that "it is this word not another" e.g. I'm taking it to the shop vs I'm taking it from the shop.
Either that, or to really put some force behind it. For example "This is horrible" is less impactful and indicates less feeling than "This is horrible"

Emphasising the "of" doesn't really fit either of these

I've always been taught to italicise conjunction words to emphasis what is being described. Never thought about it till now.

I think it's pretty situational tbh. Just don't think it works in this situation.

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:22 am

Ifreann wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:'Horrible' and 'of' are italicised for emphasis, this is how I've been taught to use them.

You deliberately wanted to emphasise the word 'of' in that sentence?

O...kay...

Is it taboo to be taught improperly?
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dino Charge, Ethel mermania, Philjia, SimoTETnia, Singaporen Empire, Turenia

Advertisement

Remove ads