Advertisement
by Liriena » Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:11 am
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by United Marxist Nations » Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:31 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Costa Fierro » Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:08 am
by Des-Bal » Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:58 am
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Novorobo » Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:58 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Novorobo wrote:Even if you grant the premise that it's about apathy, I think what this ultimately boils down to is whether or not the vote of those currently apathetic is necessarily worse than everyone else's, which boils down to at least two further questions:
1. Will those presently apathetic continue to be if encouraged to make a decision on this matter?
2. If encouraged to make a decision on this matter, will that decision necessarily be worse than one motivated by being steeped in an ideological echo chamber?
1. I hope not.
2. No, but that's a different issue entirely.
Socialist Nordia wrote:Oh shit, let's hope we don't have to take in any /pol/ refugees.
by The Romulan Republic » Thu Sep 01, 2016 8:06 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:No. Some people are too apathetic, jaded or uneducated to be able to vote. They should be kept as far away from polling booths as possible.
by Infected Mushroom » Thu Sep 01, 2016 8:16 pm
by The Princes of the Universe » Thu Sep 01, 2016 8:22 pm
by PaNTuXIa » Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:48 am
by Even Less of Mackonia » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:02 am
by CarsonBuck » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:14 am
by Pirelin » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:15 am
CarsonBuck wrote:You shouldn't be allowed to vote under 30. All these kids lack experience and don't know what they're doing.
by FelrikTheDeleted » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:19 am
by FelrikTheDeleted » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:20 am
by The balkens » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:21 am
by Pirelin » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:21 am
by Nariterrr » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:23 am
by Valaran » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:24 am
Pirelin wrote:No, I just think young people, who are largely degenerate, do not have enough experience or knowledge to be entrusted with electing a leader.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire
by FelrikTheDeleted » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:25 am
Pirelin wrote:FelrikTheDeleted wrote:
1984.... I can see it now.
You mean 2016? Where liberalism and absolute submission to the state is demanded? Where daring to challenge the liberal status quo will ostracize you from your peers?Nariterrr wrote:
Your going to silence the right of people to vote because they don't agree with you. Are you triggered? Do you need a safe space?
No, I just think young people, who are largely degenerate, do not have enough experience or knowledge to be entrusted with electing a leader.
by Pirelin » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:26 am
Nariterrr wrote:Pirelin wrote:You mean 2016? Where liberalism and absolute submission to the state is demanded? Where daring to challenge the liberal status quo will ostracize you from your peers?
Quite the opposite. We believe submission to the government is wrong. We are against government reaching into social issues. That's why we support LGBT rights, choice, etc. Its republicans who believe the government should meddle with a woman's vagina.Nariterrr wrote:
Your going to silence the right of people to vote because they don't agree with you. Are you triggered? Do you need a safe space?
No, I just think young people, who are largely degenerate, do not have enough experience or knowledge to be entrusted with electing a leader.
by Pirelin » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:27 am
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Pirelin wrote:You mean 2016? Where liberalism and absolute submission to the state is demanded? Where daring to challenge the liberal status quo will ostracize you from your peers?
No, I just think young people, who are largely degenerate, do not have enough experience or knowledge to be entrusted with electing a leader.
While I agree to an extreme extent when it comes to your first statement, the second one is absolutely absurd, I am almost certain that you are missing the studies to declare the younger generation degenerate, also I wasn't aware that you know what kind of knowledge these kids possesses.
by The balkens » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:28 am
Pirelin wrote:Nariterrr wrote:Quite the opposite. We believe submission to the government is wrong. We are against government reaching into social issues. That's why we support LGBT rights, choice, etc. Its republicans who believe the government should meddle with a woman's vagina.
No, I just think young people, who are largely degenerate, do not have enough experience or knowledge to be entrusted with electing a leader.
Really? Should we ban old people from voting?
by Nariterrr » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:28 am
Pirelin wrote:Nariterrr wrote:Quite the opposite. We believe submission to the government is wrong. We are against government reaching into social issues. That's why we support LGBT rights, choice, etc. Its republicans who believe the government should meddle with a woman's vagina.
No, I just think young people, who are largely degenerate, do not have enough experience or knowledge to be entrusted with electing a leader.
Really? Should we ban old people from voting?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Big Eyed Animation, Brendano, Hurdergaryp, Ohnoh, Port Carverton, Soviet Haaregrad, Statesburg, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, Theodorable, Turenia
Advertisement