NATION

PASSWORD

Elephant kills 7 year old girl by throwing rock

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Nariterrr
Minister
 
Posts: 2435
Founded: Jan 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Nariterrr » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:16 pm

Muslims must have influenced that Elephant to kill the western girl right?
Honestly who knows what about anything anymore.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55276
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:20 pm

The first Galactic Republic wrote:They're learning!

The Xenoi must be eradicated so that nothing threatens the Imperium of Man.
And the PETA heretics shall follow them into oblivion.
THE EMPEROR PROTECTS.

More seriously: zoos are a bad idea. It's not like the biggest land-dwelling animal is a nice and tame pet you can keep confined in a space for kid to be stared at by kids.
Last edited by Risottia on Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:30 pm

Paragania wrote:Personally, I feel like the zoo should have had at least a thin sheet of glass between the people, especially considering the people could probably go over the fence or toss things into the enclosure.


We're making an assumption that the zoo could afford it and that said events happen with enough frequency to warrant said measures.

What do you think NSG? How could this have been prevented?


It couldn't have, because it was a rare and unusual accident. That's all it is.

Case closed.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:39 pm

Nariterrr wrote:Muslims must have influenced that Elephant to kill the western girl right?


No, CBS and James Patterson did.
Last edited by Gauthier on Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:42 pm

Not good for the republicans...why couldn't it have been a donkey :(

Also #greylivesmatter #7yearoldlivesmatter

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:44 pm

Llamalandia wrote:Not good for the republicans...why couldn't it have been a donkey :(

Also #greylivesmatter #7yearoldlivesmatter


Maybe the elephant heard the girl praising Hillary.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:44 pm

Xadufell wrote:I guess a lot of people take for granite safety windows.

That elephant really rocked her world.

*lists more distasteful rock puns*


Well this obviously something that the elephant will have to live. It will never forget the guilt. Ultimately though I bet the zoo settles with the family for peanuts.

User avatar
Cetacea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6539
Founded: Apr 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cetacea » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:54 pm

Nariterrr wrote:Muslims must have influenced that Elephant to kill the western girl right?


was the elephant Indian or Pakistani?

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:55 pm

Well that's depressing.

User avatar
Xeng He
Minister
 
Posts: 2905
Founded: Nov 14, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Xeng He » Thu Jul 28, 2016 7:09 pm

The Huskar Social Union wrote:That's some way to die, bloody hell.

I would say raise the fence a bit higher now, maybe get rid of some of the larger rocks from the enclosure too.



My first thought was buying up more land for the zoo so the rock would have farther to travel, but that'd require massive renovations and probably kill a lot of animals in the renovation process.

Maybe this'll bounce off someone in the right way.
Blazedtown wrote:[an ism is] A term used by people who won't admit their true beliefs, or don't have any.
[spoiler=Quotes]
Galloism: ...social media is basically cancer. I’d like to reiterate that social media is bringing the downfall of society in a lot of ways.
I'm Not Telling You It's Going to Be Easy, I'm Telling You It's Going to be Worth It.
Oh my god this comic

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:29 pm

Maybe the elephant was following the mandate at the end of Psalm 139.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:48 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:I wouldn't call this a freak accident. The elephant probably knew it was trying to injure or kill the girl.


EDIT: So apparently, the OPs articles indicate that the incident is considered a freak accident, rather than an intentional attack. So...

If it was an intentional attack, the elephant probably knew might have simply known they (yes, they) where attacking humans. If so, that an innocent got caught in the crossfire is just more of the same sad and tragic narrative of history.
Last edited by A Humanist Science on Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:49 pm

United Marxist Nations wrote:
Merizoc wrote:Why? On what inherent truth do you base that?

No one wants to go into an argument on ethics with the guy who has the flag of a group of eco-terrorists.


How about a guy with a happy human on his flag?
Last edited by A Humanist Science on Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:49 pm

A Humanist Science wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:I wouldn't call this a freak accident. The elephant probably knew it was trying to injure or kill the girl.


The elephant probably knew they (yes, they) where attacking humans. That an innocent got caught in the crossfire is just more of the same sad and tragic narrative of history.

But there was only one....

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:51 pm

Merizoc wrote:
A Humanist Science wrote:
The elephant probably knew they (yes, they) where attacking humans. That an innocent got caught in the crossfire is just more of the same sad and tragic narrative of history.

But there was only one....


Gender-neutral singular, etc. Trying to acknowledge the value of a sentient individual here. :p
Last edited by A Humanist Science on Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Grand Britannia » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:53 pm

I think animals are getting tired of our shit.
ଘ( ˘ ᵕ˘)つ----x .*・。゚・ᵕ

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:54 pm

A Humanist Science wrote:
Merizoc wrote:But there was only one....


Gender-neutral singular, etc. Trying to acknowledge the value of a sentient individual here. :p

Erm...what.

There's no need to be gender neutral when the gender is clearly described in the OP.

User avatar
Izweababa
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Mar 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Izweababa » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:54 pm

oh my goodness...
Mure Kwe'e Nta Odi!

A West African nation ruled by King Dominque Kiche.

User avatar
Yodle
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 370
Founded: Mar 11, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Yodle » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:01 pm

Wow... Honestly there's nothing they could've done aside from take out the large rocks and put some type of barrier up, perhaps a net or taller fence. Anyone who says the elephant should have been shot in retribution is just wrong and is in favor of animal cruelty. Don't get me wrong, if the elephant picked up the girl they should have shot it, but it wasn't even a direct threat to anyone. It's not like the elephant was like "hehehe time to kill that little girl up there cause fuck humans." That elephant had no hidden motive or agenda, it was not trying to kill anyone. Shooting it because its actions indirectly led to a death is just sick and won't do anything to help the situation.

Anyways, condolences to the family, this is a true tragedy.
SC #201
GAR #380
SC #218
Left Social Libertarian
Economic Left/Right: -5.68 (Mid 2016) to -6.30 (Jan. 2017) to -7.33 (May 2017) to -6.84 (August 2017)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69 (Mid 2016) to -4.32 (Jan. 2017) to -4.48 (May 2017) to -4.93 (August 2017)
Foreign Policy Stance: -4.99 (Mid 2016) to -6.13 (Jan. 2017) to -5.18 (May 2017) to -5.38 (August 2017) (Non-Interventionist)
Culture War Stance: -8.18 (Mid 2016) to -7.65 (Jan. 2017) to -6.95 (May 2017) to -8.22 (August 2017) (Cultural Liberal)
I am a millennial from New England, a supporter of Bernie Sanders, a self-described liberal and Democratic Socialist and currently a student attending college (with a major in Political Science).

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:04 pm

Llamalandia wrote:Umm...do elephants normally behave like this? I mean I have to wonder if the girl or perhaps more likely others were doi something to piss off the elephant. Tragic but it seems weird that if this elephant normally believes this way no one at the zoo thought to do something to protect the public. If it didn't normally behave this way, then it seems weird it would just start chucking rocks one day.


According to one of OPs articles, it looks like authorities and bystanders are calling it a freak accident. The elephant may have just been playing, and happened to throw the rock in a bad direction. Why throw a rock? Why do humans throw rocks, or Frisbees, or various sports balls? Probably same reason.

I guess I'd assumed it was some sort of intentional attack, since the description initially brought to mind stories of zookeepers and the like getting foot stomped by captive elephants. This might not be the case here, however.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:07 pm

A Humanist Science wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:Umm...do elephants normally behave like this? I mean I have to wonder if the girl or perhaps more likely others were doi something to piss off the elephant. Tragic but it seems weird that if this elephant normally believes this way no one at the zoo thought to do something to protect the public. If it didn't normally behave this way, then it seems weird it would just start chucking rocks one day.


According to one of OPs articles, it looks like authorities and bystanders are calling it a freak accident. The elephant may have just been playing, and happened to throw the rock in a bad direction. Why throw a rock? Why do humans throw rocks, or Frisbees, or various sports balls? Probably same reason.

I guess I'd assumed it was some sort of intentional attack, since the description initially brought to mind stories of zookeepers and the like getting foot stomped by captive elephants. This might not be the case here, however.


Hitting a girl who had nothing to do with abuse and wasn't stupidly crawling inside the habitat is either a freak accident or proof that James Patterson is a prophet.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Dagashi Shojo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1919
Founded: Jun 20, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Dagashi Shojo » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:09 pm

You can always count on people on the internet to use tragic accidents as an opportunity to try and be witty.
The hime cut will always be the best hair cut.
Corporatist, Voluntarist, and Idealist.
Eternal Corporatist, she who is always mistaken for corporatocracy.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:11 pm

Dagashi Shojo wrote:You can always count on people on the internet to use tragic accidents as an opportunity to try and be witty.


Welcome to the internet.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Tsaraine
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 4033
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsaraine » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:31 pm

Elephants have very poor eyesight and (unlike humans) don't have an evolutionary history of throwing rocks or catching branches, so I don't think their trunk-eye coordination is good enough to throw rocks precisely. I'd call this accidental.

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:31 pm

Nariterrr wrote:Muslims must have influenced that Elephant to kill the western girl right?


Is it not an Asian elephant killing a muslim girl ;) ?
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Lysset, Nu Elysium, Shrillland, Tungstan, Uiiop, Umeria, Washington-Columbia

Advertisement

Remove ads