Oh. That's the way they pulled out my Baby teeth too.
I guess this here means Texit now. Texit charges may apply.
Advertisement
by New Jerzylvania » Mon Jun 27, 2016 6:15 pm
by Kernen » Mon Jun 27, 2016 6:35 pm
New Jerzylvania wrote:Gauthier wrote:
That's where a lynching party ties one end of a rope to the fetus and hangs it over a tree branch, ties the other end to a horse and then spur the horse on.
Oh. That's the way they pulled out my Baby teeth too.
I guess this here means Texit now. Texit charges may apply.
by Pol Lunar » Mon Jun 27, 2016 6:36 pm
Republic of the Cristo wrote:Pol Lunar wrote:
Nope. A person wishing to control their own body needs only their own consent.
This issue at hand is whether someone's control over their own body should be taken away without consent (the anti-choice position) or whether that right should be respected (the pro-choice position)
Again,
No. You seem to have completely forgotten the Child whom is the center of all these debates. Its not weather or not someone should have control over their own body, it's whether or not they have should have the right to kill someone who has come about of no fault of their own. Also, I love how you call Pro-life anti-choice. I think that bit of propaganda is priceless. Although, not as good as calling Pro-Choice Pro-Death.
If we were dealing strictly and only with one and only person, then their would be no debate, but we are not. There are two persons in the mix, and the Pro-Death supporters wish for the more helpless person to be killed on principle.
by Tekeristan » Mon Jun 27, 2016 6:43 pm
by Hirota » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:47 am
Indeed, it is great news. Although for some reason I have this mental picture of mommy and daddy SCOTUS spanking baby state government for being naughty ickle legislators.Gauthier wrote:This is great news, as the Supreme Court decision shuts down future attempts in red states to engineer back door bans on abortions. Legalizing gay marriage and now this, all that's needed for a hat trick is for them to strike down bathroom bills as unconstitutional.
by Galloism » Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:34 am
by New Jerzylvania » Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:39 am
by Godular » Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:43 am
by New Jerzylvania » Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:48 am
by Gauthier » Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:43 am
by Godular » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:14 pm
by Stagnant Axon Terminal » Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:43 pm
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it
Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.
by Stagnant Axon Terminal » Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:45 pm
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it
Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.
by Galloism » Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:49 pm
by The Great Devourer of All » Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:51 pm
Yymea wrote:We would definitely be scared of what is probably the most scary nation on NS :p
Multiversal Venn-Copard wrote:Actually fairly threatening by our standards. And this time we really mean "threatening". As in, "we'll actually need to escalate significantly to match their fleets."
Valkalan wrote:10/10 Profoundly evil. Some nations conqueror others for wealth and prestige, but the Devourer consumes civilization like a cancer consuming an unfortunate host.
The Speaker wrote:Intemperate in the sea from the roof, and leg All night, and he knows lots of reads from the unseen good old man of the mountain-DESTRUCTION
by Stagnant Axon Terminal » Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:00 pm
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it
Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.
by Ceolophysia » Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:04 pm
Chancellor Van Der Spul implies that people are "Isekai'd" when they die, rather than going to an afterlife.A Level 12 civilization, according to this index.
by Stagnant Axon Terminal » Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:05 pm
Ceolophysia wrote:Gauthier wrote:BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Texas Anti-Abortion Law HB 2
Striking a decisive blow against back door abortion bans in the State of Texas, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that House Bill 2- which required abortion providers to have admitting privileges to a hospital within 30 miles and required abortion clinics to meet surgical center standards- placed unfair burden on women and struck the bill down.
This is great news, as the Supreme Court decision shuts down future attempts in red states to engineer back door bans on abortions. Legalizing gay marriage and now this, all that's needed for a hat trick is for them to strike down bathroom bills as unconstitutional.
This is horrible! If you don't want a child, then don't do 'it' in the first place!
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it
Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.
by Galloism » Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:06 pm
Ceolophysia wrote:This is horrible! If you don't want a child, then don't do 'it' in the first place!
by Gauthier » Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:07 pm
Galloism wrote:Ceolophysia wrote:This is horrible! If you don't want a child, then don't do 'it' in the first place!
Why do you want people to die sooner?
by Stagnant Axon Terminal » Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:09 pm
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it
Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Oceasia, Partybus, Shrillland
Advertisement