NATION

PASSWORD

60% of Germans - Islam Does Not Belong In Germany.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Does Islam belong in germany?

No. Islam does not belong in germany.
619
60%
Yes. Islam does belong in germany.
410
40%
 
Total votes : 1029

User avatar
Kuruinulah
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Apr 11, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Kuruinulah » Fri May 06, 2016 2:28 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Kuruinulah wrote:Maybe Merkel needs to reopen Auschwitz and send the Wahhabis, Salafis, and leftist there.

*** Warned for trolling. ***


I forgot that NSMods protect Wahhabi scumbags.
Pro: Iran, Russia, Assad, Palestine, Libertarianism, Third Position, Jobbik, Sufism, Yugoslav Reunification, Traditionalism, 2nd Amendment, British people, Pan-Indoaryanism, Western Sahara, Hezbollah.
Mixed: India, UK government, Refugees, China, Socialism.
Anti: NATO, US government, Military-Industrial Complex, EU, Israel, Zionism, "Democratic Socialism", Progressivism, Kosovo, Fatah, Saudi Arabia,"Anti Border activists".
Countries under foreign command quickly forget their history, their past, their tradition, their national symbols, their way of living, often their own literary language- Slobodan Milosevic

“Ahmadis are Muslims, If They Say They are Muslims and No One, Not Even the Sovereign Legislature, has the Right to Say Otherwise.” – Jinnah

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17203
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Fri May 06, 2016 2:29 pm

Urmanian wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:This completely ignores one of the fundamental concepts of Christianity; with the coming of the Messiah, the Old Law and the Covenant of Moses are no longer applicable, being replaced by the New Law and the Covenant of Christ. There is no Biblical evidence to suggest that Christ ever intended for the Old Law to still be in effect; the only verse which could possibly be interpreted in a way which allows the Old Law to remain relevant has that interpretation totally contradicted by the fact that Christ explicitly states that violence is forbidden, making it impossible to follow the Old Law's commands.

Seriously, the Torah and the Old Law are completely irrelevant when talking about Christianity; unless you can actually cite evidence from the New Law, from the Gospel, then your claim that Christianity is inherently violent is total nonsense.

that's heretical regards, hereticfrogs

the catechism wrote:The Old Testament is an indispensable part of Sacred Scripture. Its books are divinely inspired and retain a permanent value, for the Old Covenant has never been revoked.
Indeed, "the economy of the Old Testament was deliberately so oriented that it should prepare for and declare in prophecy the coming of Christ, redeemer of all men." "Even though they contain matters imperfect and provisional," the books of the Old Testament bear witness to the whole divine pedagogy of God’s saving love: these writings "are a storehouse of sublime teaching on God and of sound wisdom on human life, as well as a wonderful treasury of prayers; in them, too, the mystery of our salvation is present in a hidden way."
Christians venerate the Old Testament as true Word of God. The Church has always vigorously opposed the idea of rejecting the Old Testament under the pretext that the New has rendered it void (Marcionism). (CCC 121-123)
how can ancap and catholic and the same time
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri May 06, 2016 2:29 pm

Vassenor wrote:So outdated European culture should be celebrated but outdated Middle Eastern culture must be exterminated. Got it.


If dutch black people complain that's one thing and it should be considered. But that isn't what's happening.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ralkovian Grand Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2124
Founded: Dec 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ralkovian Grand Island » Fri May 06, 2016 2:29 pm

Great Feng wrote:
Netherlands Mualenia wrote:Nationalism is our only option here. The communists of today are a bunch of hippies that accept these muslims as fellow men, going against Karl Marx's atheist beliefs.

I feel bad for Karl Marx, his once pretty alright ideology (before Lenin, of course) has now devolved into a collection of garbage for the weakminded.

I despise nationalism. It's a massive source of violence, and especially encourages it.
The difference between Nationalism and Religion is: Religion doesn't advocate killing people if they don't believe in it(At least in general it doesn't, some people and some passages in holy books though do), while nationalism is essentially: kill all people we don't want in our country, our country is the best, fuck you and the rest of you can get the fuck out and are below us.


Well that's not what nationalism is at all.

Nationalism is just the belief that what's good for the nation is what is morally good. And to be fair, nationalism solved a lot of problems. Uniting diverse groups of people under one banner.
Lyras:You know, you're a sick fuck, yes?
Ralk: I have stacks on stacks and racks on racks of slaves.
BlueHorizons: It sounds like you're doing a commercial for the most morbid children's board game ever, Ralk.

Estainia: The countless genocides...So many countless genocides.


Old Tyrannia wrote:You've never met Ralk before, have you? Ralk doesn't have friends.
He only respects the strong, and preys on the weak.
He might act polite and smile all the time, but always remember...
The day will come when you'll wake up to find him looming over your bed,
knife in hand, and he'll still be smiling.

Constaniana wrote:Ralk is evil incarnate, shouldn't you know this by now?

Seriong wrote:Ralk isn't a troll, he's just despicable.

User avatar
Netherlands Mualenia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 121
Founded: Jan 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Netherlands Mualenia » Fri May 06, 2016 2:30 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Netherlands Mualenia wrote:I'm not saying it should be exterminated, but kept in their fucking states, not in mine.

You wouldn't like it if Mexicans start forcing their catholic beliefs on your country, would you? Now, given, the Mexicans are far more developed than you in any aspect, but still.

You are an imperialist dog.


Let's not use Mexico as an example.

Also, Catholicism is already a major religion in many countries in the West. Protestants are more problematic than Catholics.

Luckily the Netherlands is a majority atheist and agnostic state.

User avatar
Urmanian
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8984
Founded: Oct 13, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Urmanian » Fri May 06, 2016 2:30 pm

Kubra wrote: how can ancap and catholic and the same time

I am the opposite of a catholic.
✮ The Vermillion Republic of Sorrelia ✮
Commie ponies with guns and such. One of the OG MLP nations, funnily enough I don't care for EaW pretty much at all.

This nation represents the voices in my head.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17203
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Fri May 06, 2016 2:32 pm

Urmanian wrote:
Kubra wrote: how can ancap and catholic and the same time

I am the opposite of a catholic.
then why are you putting the catechism on an obviously orthodox guy
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
American Great Empire
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Jan 24, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby American Great Empire » Fri May 06, 2016 2:32 pm

Great Feng wrote:
Netherlands Mualenia wrote:Nationalism is our only option here. The communists of today are a bunch of hippies that accept these muslims as fellow men, going against Karl Marx's atheist beliefs.

I feel bad for Karl Marx, his once pretty alright ideology (before Lenin, of course) has now devolved into a collection of garbage for the weakminded.

I despise nationalism. It's a massive source of violence, and especially encourages it.
The difference between Nationalism and Religion is: Religion doesn't advocate killing people if they don't believe in it(At least in general it doesn't, some people and some passages in holy books though do), while nationalism is essentially: kill all people we don't want in our country, our country is the best, fuck you and the rest of you can get the fuck out and are below us.

Nationalism- The strong belief that the interests of a particular nation-state are of primary importance. Also, the belief that a people who share a common language, history, and culture should constitute an independent nation, free of foreign domination. Yes, very violent.

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Fri May 06, 2016 2:33 pm

Ralkovian Grand Island wrote:
Great Feng wrote:I despise nationalism. It's a massive source of violence, and especially encourages it.
The difference between Nationalism and Religion is: Religion doesn't advocate killing people if they don't believe in it(At least in general it doesn't, some people and some passages in holy books though do), while nationalism is essentially: kill all people we don't want in our country, our country is the best, fuck you and the rest of you can get the fuck out and are below us.


Well that's not what nationalism is at all.

Nationalism is just the belief that what's good for the nation is what is morally good. And to be fair, nationalism solved a lot of problems. Uniting diverse groups of people under one banner.

I have seen many nationalists and they all advocate violence, many are conservative and traditionalists(Which I dislike), xenophobic(Which I also hate), and hate minorities(which I despise), and also would impose their nation upon others if they believed the land and/or people belonged to them(Which I despise). See why I hate them? I hate most Nationalists.

User avatar
PaNTuXIa
Senator
 
Posts: 3538
Founded: Feb 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby PaNTuXIa » Fri May 06, 2016 2:34 pm

American Great Empire wrote:
Great Feng wrote:I despise nationalism. It's a massive source of violence, and especially encourages it.
The difference between Nationalism and Religion is: Religion doesn't advocate killing people if they don't believe in it(At least in general it doesn't, some people and some passages in holy books though do), while nationalism is essentially: kill all people we don't want in our country, our country is the best, fuck you and the rest of you can get the fuck out and are below us.

Nationalism- The strong belief that the interests of a particular nation-state are of primary importance. Also, the belief that a people who share a common language, history, and culture should constitute an independent nation, free of foreign domination. Yes, very violent.

Nationalism isn't violent, Nationalists are violent.
I support Open Borders for Israel.
United Marxist Nations wrote:Anime has ruined my life.

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
PaNTuXIa wrote:>swedish
>conservatism

Islamic nations tend to be right wing.

User avatar
Netherlands Mualenia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 121
Founded: Jan 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Netherlands Mualenia » Fri May 06, 2016 2:34 pm

Great Feng wrote:
Ralkovian Grand Island wrote:
Well that's not what nationalism is at all.

Nationalism is just the belief that what's good for the nation is what is morally good. And to be fair, nationalism solved a lot of problems. Uniting diverse groups of people under one banner.

I have seen many nationalists and they all advocate violence, many are conservative and traditionalists(Which I dislike), xenophobic(Which I also hate), and hate minorities(which I despise), and also would impose their nation upon others if they believed the land and/or people belonged to them(Which I despise). See why I hate them? I hate most Nationalists.

Yes, of course, you Islamists believe the world is all yours to enslave.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri May 06, 2016 2:35 pm

Urmanian wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:This completely ignores one of the fundamental concepts of Christianity; with the coming of the Messiah, the Old Law and the Covenant of Moses are no longer applicable, being replaced by the New Law and the Covenant of Christ. There is no Biblical evidence to suggest that Christ ever intended for the Old Law to still be in effect; the only verse which could possibly be interpreted in a way which allows the Old Law to remain relevant has that interpretation totally contradicted by the fact that Christ explicitly states that violence is forbidden, making it impossible to follow the Old Law's commands.

Seriously, the Torah and the Old Law are completely irrelevant when talking about Christianity; unless you can actually cite evidence from the New Law, from the Gospel, then your claim that Christianity is inherently violent is total nonsense.

that's heretical regards, hereticfrogs

the catechism wrote:The Old Testament is an indispensable part of Sacred Scripture. Its books are divinely inspired and retain a permanent value, for the Old Covenant has never been revoked.
Indeed, "the economy of the Old Testament was deliberately so oriented that it should prepare for and declare in prophecy the coming of Christ, redeemer of all men." "Even though they contain matters imperfect and provisional," the books of the Old Testament bear witness to the whole divine pedagogy of God’s saving love: these writings "are a storehouse of sublime teaching on God and of sound wisdom on human life, as well as a wonderful treasury of prayers; in them, too, the mystery of our salvation is present in a hidden way."
Christians venerate the Old Testament as true Word of God. The Church has always vigorously opposed the idea of rejecting the Old Testament under the pretext that the New has rendered it void (Marcionism). (CCC 121-123)


Well, notice how it is presented though.

The Old testament bears as a witness of God's grace. It doesn't stand as a law. Because otherwise it'd be judaization, which was one of the first heresies in the Church since the apostles decided in their council that since salvation was achieved through faith in Christ, that there was no need for Gentiles nor for Jewish Christians to follow the Law to be members of the Church.

To say we must follow the Law of Moses would be heresy.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ralkovian Grand Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2124
Founded: Dec 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ralkovian Grand Island » Fri May 06, 2016 2:35 pm

Great Feng wrote:
Ralkovian Grand Island wrote:
Well that's not what nationalism is at all.

Nationalism is just the belief that what's good for the nation is what is morally good. And to be fair, nationalism solved a lot of problems. Uniting diverse groups of people under one banner.

I have seen many nationalists and they all advocate violence, many are conservative and traditionalists(Which I dislike), xenophobic(Which I also hate), and hate minorities(which I despise), and also would impose their nation upon others if they believed the land and/or people belonged to them(Which I despise). See why I hate them? I hate most Nationalists.


To be fair, that's pretty much a good portion of Muslims too according to Pew Global Research.
Lyras:You know, you're a sick fuck, yes?
Ralk: I have stacks on stacks and racks on racks of slaves.
BlueHorizons: It sounds like you're doing a commercial for the most morbid children's board game ever, Ralk.

Estainia: The countless genocides...So many countless genocides.


Old Tyrannia wrote:You've never met Ralk before, have you? Ralk doesn't have friends.
He only respects the strong, and preys on the weak.
He might act polite and smile all the time, but always remember...
The day will come when you'll wake up to find him looming over your bed,
knife in hand, and he'll still be smiling.

Constaniana wrote:Ralk is evil incarnate, shouldn't you know this by now?

Seriong wrote:Ralk isn't a troll, he's just despicable.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri May 06, 2016 2:35 pm

Great Feng wrote:
Ralkovian Grand Island wrote:
Well that's not what nationalism is at all.

Nationalism is just the belief that what's good for the nation is what is morally good. And to be fair, nationalism solved a lot of problems. Uniting diverse groups of people under one banner.

I have seen many nationalists and they all advocate violence, many are conservative and traditionalists(Which I dislike), xenophobic(Which I also hate), and hate minorities(which I despise), and also would impose their nation upon others if they believed the land and/or people belonged to them(Which I despise). See why I hate them? I hate most Nationalists.


That's largely changed since the modern wave of nationalism.
In order to more broadly appeal to the public, the far-right has ammended its views and shifted toward socially liberal, egalitarian policies, centrist economics, and nationalist border control, tariffs, and foreign relations. This is how they have managed to capitalize so hard on the current events and have a surge. A central part of the far-rights rhetoric is now defending secularism, gay people, and womens rights.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri May 06, 2016 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Fri May 06, 2016 2:36 pm

American Great Empire wrote:
Great Feng wrote:I despise nationalism. It's a massive source of violence, and especially encourages it.
The difference between Nationalism and Religion is: Religion doesn't advocate killing people if they don't believe in it(At least in general it doesn't, some people and some passages in holy books though do), while nationalism is essentially: kill all people we don't want in our country, our country is the best, fuck you and the rest of you can get the fuck out and are below us.

Nationalism- The strong belief that the interests of a particular nation-state are of primary importance. Also, the belief that a people who share a common language, history, and culture should constitute an independent nation, free of foreign domination. Yes, very violent.

Sorry, I believe in one world government.
Prime examples of bad Nationalists(At least most of these examples highlight bad people):
Nazis, Yugoslav nationalists, Russian Nationalists(Who want to restore the USSR's land and/or claim many former USSR countries rightfully belong to Russia), Turkish Nationalists, American Nationalists, etc.

User avatar
Vallermoore
Senator
 
Posts: 4791
Founded: Mar 27, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Vallermoore » Fri May 06, 2016 2:36 pm

How about banning Islam but...

making clear that it will not be enforced on any law abiding Muslim or mosque? But any Muslims who do break the law can be rounded up, and if there is not enough evidence for their crimes, they could still deport them for being Muslim.

User avatar
Kryozerkia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 11096
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Kryozerkia » Fri May 06, 2016 2:36 pm

Kuruinulah wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:*** Warned for trolling. ***


I forgot that NSMods protect Wahhabi scumbags.

I guess that you also forgot that we can ban players for breaking site rules. *** 1 day ban for continuing to troll. ***
Problem to Report?
Game-side: Getting Help
Forum-side: Moderation
Technical issue/suggestion: Technical
A-well-a, don't you know about the bird
♦ Well, everybody knows that the bird is the word ♦
♦ A-well-a, bird, bird, b-bird's the word

Get the cheese to Sickbay

"Ok folks, show's over... Nothing to see here... Show's OH MY GOD! A horrible plane crash! Hey everybody, get a load of this flaming wreckage! Come on, crowd around, crowd around, don't be shy, crowd around!" -- Chief Wiggum

User avatar
Kriga
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 441
Founded: Feb 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kriga » Fri May 06, 2016 2:37 pm

Netherlands Mualenia wrote:
Pantuxia wrote:You're actually advocating for National Socialism. That is literally the definition of NatSoc. Regardless of whether it's democratic or not, it's a bigoted system that breeds ignorance. I would pick a society of intelligent capitalists over mindless nationalists. any day.

You mean those 'intelligent' white knights that let our continents be invaded by the Islamic plague and drive us from our homes?

I'd take Hitler over you traitors any day. I'd rather be under a nationalist dictatorship than an Islamic dictatorship.


So, you would curb your own civil liberties, because you don't like Muslims?

User avatar
Ralkovian Grand Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2124
Founded: Dec 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ralkovian Grand Island » Fri May 06, 2016 2:37 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Great Feng wrote:I have seen many nationalists and they all advocate violence, many are conservative and traditionalists(Which I dislike), xenophobic(Which I also hate), and hate minorities(which I despise), and also would impose their nation upon others if they believed the land and/or people belonged to them(Which I despise). See why I hate them? I hate most Nationalists.


That's largely changed since the modern wave of nationalism.
In order to more broadly appeal to the public, the far-right has ammended its views and shifted toward socially liberal, egalitarian policies, centrist economics, and nationalist border control, tariffs, and foreign relations. This is how they have managed to capitalize so hard on the current events and have a surge. A central part of the far-rights rhetoric is now defending secularism, gay people, and womens rights.


Though, I'm now in favor of collapsing Western Society, replacing it with roaming Death Squads that enforce Shariah would be a really fun change. I personally would join and proliferate Muhammed and Potatoes.
Lyras:You know, you're a sick fuck, yes?
Ralk: I have stacks on stacks and racks on racks of slaves.
BlueHorizons: It sounds like you're doing a commercial for the most morbid children's board game ever, Ralk.

Estainia: The countless genocides...So many countless genocides.


Old Tyrannia wrote:You've never met Ralk before, have you? Ralk doesn't have friends.
He only respects the strong, and preys on the weak.
He might act polite and smile all the time, but always remember...
The day will come when you'll wake up to find him looming over your bed,
knife in hand, and he'll still be smiling.

Constaniana wrote:Ralk is evil incarnate, shouldn't you know this by now?

Seriong wrote:Ralk isn't a troll, he's just despicable.

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Fri May 06, 2016 2:37 pm

Netherlands Mualenia wrote:
Great Feng wrote:I have seen many nationalists and they all advocate violence, many are conservative and traditionalists(Which I dislike), xenophobic(Which I also hate), and hate minorities(which I despise), and also would impose their nation upon others if they believed the land and/or people belonged to them(Which I despise). See why I hate them? I hate most Nationalists.

Yes, of course, you Islamists believe the world is all yours to enslave.

Me? Islamist? Please, I believe in the possibility of a Muslim Antichrist(Though also a Jewish and/or Atheist antichrist).

User avatar
Fascist Russian Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9267
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fascist Russian Empire » Fri May 06, 2016 2:37 pm

Urmanian wrote:that's heretical regards, hereticfrogs

the catechism wrote:The Old Testament is an indispensable part of Sacred Scripture. Its books are divinely inspired and retain a permanent value, for the Old Covenant has never been revoked.
Indeed, "the economy of the Old Testament was deliberately so oriented that it should prepare for and declare in prophecy the coming of Christ, redeemer of all men." "Even though they contain matters imperfect and provisional," the books of the Old Testament bear witness to the whole divine pedagogy of God’s saving love: these writings "are a storehouse of sublime teaching on God and of sound wisdom on human life, as well as a wonderful treasury of prayers; in them, too, the mystery of our salvation is present in a hidden way."
Christians venerate the Old Testament as true Word of God. The Church has always vigorously opposed the idea of rejecting the Old Testament under the pretext that the New has rendered it void (Marcionism). (CCC 121-123)

First of all, which catechism are you citing? Catholic doctrine, Eastern Orthodox doctrine, Coptic Orthodox doctrine, Methodist doctrine, Presbyterian doctrine, or what? Just quoting some random paragraph that states the Old Testament remains part of the scripture is not any kind of proof that Christians are still beholden to the Old Law.

And, no, the Old Testament wasn't removed from the scripture with the coming of the Messiah. The story of creation and the historical accounts found within the OT always have been true and always will be true; that is not being questioned. However, it is abundantly clear to anyone who has read the Gospel that the Old Law is no longer something that people must adhere to. And, whatever church's doctrine you found this paragraph from, they're blatantly wrong about the Old Covenant not being revoked.

First Corinthians, chapter eleven, is abundantly clear on the creation of a new covenant in the blood of Christ. Matthew, chapter twenty six, is equally clear on the creation of a new covenant. To claim that the Covenant of Moses is still relevant is ridiculous, and has no grounding in the Gospel whatsoever. The creation of a new covenant inherently involves the repudiation of the old one.

User avatar
Netherlands Mualenia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 121
Founded: Jan 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Netherlands Mualenia » Fri May 06, 2016 2:38 pm

Kriga wrote:
Netherlands Mualenia wrote:You mean those 'intelligent' white knights that let our continents be invaded by the Islamic plague and drive us from our homes?

I'd take Hitler over you traitors any day. I'd rather be under a nationalist dictatorship than an Islamic dictatorship.


So, you would curb your own civil liberties, because you don't like Muslims?

If I need to choose between two evils, I choose the evil that doesn't kill me or oppress me as much as the other.

User avatar
Urmanian
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8984
Founded: Oct 13, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Urmanian » Fri May 06, 2016 2:39 pm

Kubra wrote:
Urmanian wrote:I am the opposite of a catholic.
then why are you putting the catechism on an obviously orthodox guy

Well, his statement was "christianity considers the old testament fulfilled and irrelevant." For 1,2 billion Christians, that's sort of not the case.

I admittedly don't know what is the Eastern Orthodox stance on this, but I'd like to learn.
✮ The Vermillion Republic of Sorrelia ✮
Commie ponies with guns and such. One of the OG MLP nations, funnily enough I don't care for EaW pretty much at all.

This nation represents the voices in my head.

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Fri May 06, 2016 2:39 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Great Feng wrote:I have seen many nationalists and they all advocate violence, many are conservative and traditionalists(Which I dislike), xenophobic(Which I also hate), and hate minorities(which I despise), and also would impose their nation upon others if they believed the land and/or people belonged to them(Which I despise). See why I hate them? I hate most Nationalists.


That's largely changed since the modern wave of nationalism.
In order to more broadly appeal to the public, the far-right has ammended its views and shifted toward socially liberal, egalitarian policies, centrist economics, and nationalist border control, tariffs, and foreign relations. This is how they have managed to capitalize so hard on the current events and have a surge. A central part of the far-rights rhetoric is now defending secularism, gay people, and womens rights.

Huh...Guess it's just the USA and Internet then.
Still hate them Nazis, Ottoman nationalists, Serbian ones(For advocating the slaughter of muslims, and minorities, as well as people not of slavic/serb ethnicity), USA ones, and USSRussian ones.

User avatar
Ralkovian Grand Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2124
Founded: Dec 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ralkovian Grand Island » Fri May 06, 2016 2:40 pm

Netherlands Mualenia wrote:
Kriga wrote:
So, you would curb your own civil liberties, because you don't like Muslims?

If I need to choose between two evils, I choose the evil that doesn't kill me or oppress me as much as the other.


See that's unfair. If you convert to Islam, you can join the roaming Death Squads. How fun will it be when the Muslim Pope commands us to pull Order 66, and we all turn on the Leftists, or however I presume Islam works.
Lyras:You know, you're a sick fuck, yes?
Ralk: I have stacks on stacks and racks on racks of slaves.
BlueHorizons: It sounds like you're doing a commercial for the most morbid children's board game ever, Ralk.

Estainia: The countless genocides...So many countless genocides.


Old Tyrannia wrote:You've never met Ralk before, have you? Ralk doesn't have friends.
He only respects the strong, and preys on the weak.
He might act polite and smile all the time, but always remember...
The day will come when you'll wake up to find him looming over your bed,
knife in hand, and he'll still be smiling.

Constaniana wrote:Ralk is evil incarnate, shouldn't you know this by now?

Seriong wrote:Ralk isn't a troll, he's just despicable.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aadhiris, Ameriganastan, Big Eyed Animation, El Lazaro, Ifreann, Ineva, Kostane, La Xinga, M-x B-rry, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Sarolandia, Senkaku, TETeer, The Astral Mandate, The Black Forrest, The Imagination Animals, The Terren Dominion, Tiami, Zantalio

Advertisement

Remove ads