NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread III: Thready McThreadface (+ Jo Cox)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which of the following would you prefer to be the next leader of the Conservative Party?

Andrea Leadsom
27
18%
Liam Fox
7
5%
Michael Gove
17
11%
Stephen Crabb
6
4%
Theresa May
38
25%
Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz
57
38%
 
Total votes : 152

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Sun May 29, 2016 5:46 pm

More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Sun May 29, 2016 5:50 pm

Hydesland wrote:More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?

Oh wow. I thought the UK was lagging behind the US in meaningless identity politicking. I see that, at least student politics in the UK, are certainly giving America a run for its money.
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Sun May 29, 2016 5:53 pm

Hydesland wrote:More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?

So how do you establish if one is 'Politically Black' whatever the fuck that means.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Sun May 29, 2016 5:55 pm

Prisons are obsolete and ban them...wut.

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Sun May 29, 2016 5:59 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Hydesland wrote:More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?

So how do you establish if one is 'Politically Black' whatever the fuck that means.

Do you, non-white person (that's obligatory) identify with an identity that is "oppressed" or "discriminated against"? Then congrats! You too qualify to be a "politically black" person.
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun May 29, 2016 6:01 pm

Olerand wrote:
Hydesland wrote:More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?

Oh wow. I thought the UK was lagging behind the US in meaningless identity politicking. I see that, at least student politics in the UK, are certainly giving America a run for its money.

Student politics is insane in most places, I think.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Sun May 29, 2016 6:05 pm

Olerand wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:So how do you establish if one is 'Politically Black' whatever the fuck that means.

Do you, non-white person (that's obligatory) identify with an identity that is "oppressed" or "discriminated against"? Then congrats! You too qualify to be a "politically black" person.

But what if you're half non-white?

This is fucking stupid. I give up on student politics. I'd be perfectly fine with Cameron sending the popo in with the truncheons on the next NUS meeting.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Sun May 29, 2016 6:06 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Olerand wrote:Oh wow. I thought the UK was lagging behind the US in meaningless identity politicking. I see that, at least student politics in the UK, are certainly giving America a run for its money.

Student politics is insane in most places, I think.

I learned that UCLU recently tried to make things less democratic. It failed, but they were trying.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Sun May 29, 2016 6:48 pm

Hydesland wrote:More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?


What nigger? How do you mean use?
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Sun May 29, 2016 9:12 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:Then what happened before 1979?
Mmm. I meant to say post 1991 leftists.

Or really, post 1994.

Privatisation began with British Aerospace, Cable & Wireless, and the British Transport Docks Board in 1981; following that, British Telecoms in 1984, British Airport Authority & British Gas in 1986, Rolls Royce & British Airways in 1987. British Steel followed in 1988. Don't forget the British car manufacturers and the shipyards and the aviation firms.

And yes, it's easy to say -- well, do we really need these things in state ownership? Do we—by which I mean you and I, boris johnson and lamadia, nick clegg and nick griffin and everyone else inbetween who has a British passport—do we really need to own these things?

Perhaps not. Maybe selling them was good, you think, since it raised so much for the Treasury (remembering they were all sold under-price.)

From 1988 British Water was privatised. A bit much, you might say; there's a good reason that we'd want to control our own water.

Nothing more for a while; remember the selling of these firms was gradual, not all at once. It took something like 4 years to sell Cable & Wireless.

In 1994, British Rail was privatised. Ey up! A bit far, maybe. There is another thing we have a good reason to want to keep in our pocket.

Followed by British Coal. So there was gas, coal, and over the course of the late 70s and 80s, petroleum, all our critical energy resources, out of the hands of the British people and sold on the open market for anyone who wanted at all to buy them. The lights, the gas, the water.

But I am of course ignoring those beautiful Magnox reactors: those too were sold, in 1996, with the privatisation of British Energy. Thus another magnificent British technological contribution to world history was passed out of the hands of the British people.

And there we are. But it doesn't stop there. These are just large and famous sell-offs. The Tories also sold the central electricity generating board and with it the national grid. Chessington computer centre, which was the computer admin base for the government, was sold. The National Engineering Laboratory. The Building Research Establishment: huge swathes of government R&D.

It's difficult to recall, sometimes, that we owned these things. They were owned by the Crown and operated in trust by and for the benefit of the British people. They were sold to recover from a crisis caused by Arab oil and the collapse of Bretton Woods, and to accommodate and ameliorate the growing demand for more and more and more private wealth, coming from the financial sector after its 1986 deregulation.

The left has had no answer, because the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. We were right, and you were wrong: command economics doesn't work!!! said all the Alan B'stards of the world. (Except that Britain never had a command economy, or a planned economy. This is a ridiculous use of these words to describe state ownership.) In 1994 it abandoned its pledge to return to the British people their lost heritage. Nothing has been the same ever since. And all the problems that neoliberalism brings are still here and still growing and the Labour Party still hasn't quite grasped them. Income inequality is up. Ecological problems are up. Crime is up. Political apathy is up.

But GDP—no, that is a more complicated story. Everything is tolerable because we're apparently better off. This is a bold-faced lie. Gross domestic product grew at a faster rate during the social contract years than it has done since 1979. There have been fewer recessions (partly because Bretton Woods was good at preventing them), and not a consequence of world gdp growth—on average Britain has been below world gdp growth for the whole period 45-today. There is some evidence to say everyone benefited from a huge Bretton-Woods backed boom which then duly collapsed in the 1970s, but speak positively of neoliberal capitalism this does not: boom and bust returned after bretton woods with the British economy spending five full years of the period 79-2012 in recession; 15% of the time, in other words.

The Labour Party needs an alternative. Nationalising everything will no longer work, because of the global environment; but neoliberalism has failed us. It has made us as a people, and as an average man on the clapham bus, less wealthy, less equal, less safe, and less interested in democracy.
Last edited by Questers on Sun May 29, 2016 11:02 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
New Benian Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1930
Founded: Aug 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Benian Republic » Mon May 30, 2016 12:07 am

Hydesland wrote:More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?

I feel as if the essence of Tumblr has somehow become airborne. This is why we must make Tumblr illegal to access or talk about.
~~~Support Sinn Féinn I guess~~~

~Like all true Irishmen I have no ancestors. I was birthed from Ireland's soil itself, fully formed, like a potato.~
Pro: United Ireland, IRA, Allan Ryan, Palestine, Malvinas, Ukraine, Hamas-Fatah cooperation, legalized Gay marriage, Tibetan Resistance, Basque Separatists, OPM.
Neutral: Bathroom segregation.

Anti: English Imperialism, Nazism, communism, Israel, Zionism, Margret thatcher, Martin McGuinness, good Friday agreement.
I am an Irish Atheist and Republican, Not a Dissident stop saying I am.
RIP Óglach Alan Ryan

~~Proud Gaelige Speaker~~

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11843
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Philjia » Mon May 30, 2016 1:12 am

Hydesland wrote:More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?


They're all mad. No wonder loads of unions are jumping ship.
Nemesis the Warlock wrote:I am the Nemesis, I am the Warlock, I am the shape of things to come, the Lord of the Flies, holder of the Sword Sinister, the Death Bringer, I am the one who waits on the edge of your dreams, I am all these things and many more

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Mon May 30, 2016 1:13 am

New Benian Republic wrote:
Hydesland wrote:More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?

I feel as if the essence of Tumblr has somehow become airborne. This is why we must make Tumblr illegal to access or talk about.
always a weird day when we're agreeing
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 30, 2016 1:18 am

Olerand wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:So how do you establish if one is 'Politically Black' whatever the fuck that means.

Do you, non-white person (that's obligatory) identify with an identity that is "oppressed" or "discriminated against"? Then congrats! You too qualify to be a "politically black" person.

I identify as goth, do I qualify as politically black?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11843
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Philjia » Mon May 30, 2016 1:22 am

Cambridge has voted to remain in the NUS, with 51.5% of students voting to remain. However, only 28.28% of all students actually voted. According to the BBC the head of the remain campaign said "the high levels of engagement in the referendum meant the vote was "definitive"." This is what I would describe as total bollocks.
Nemesis the Warlock wrote:I am the Nemesis, I am the Warlock, I am the shape of things to come, the Lord of the Flies, holder of the Sword Sinister, the Death Bringer, I am the one who waits on the edge of your dreams, I am all these things and many more

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 30, 2016 1:30 am

Philjia wrote:Cambridge has voted to remain in the NUS, with 51.5% of students voting to remain. However, only 28.28% of all students actually voted. According to the BBC the head of the remain campaign said "the high levels of engagement in the referendum meant the vote was "definitive"." This is what I would describe as total bollocks.

Of course, they're going by the standards of the 2015 General Election.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10029
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Mon May 30, 2016 1:36 am

Philjia wrote:Cambridge has voted to remain in the NUS, with 51.5% of students voting to remain. However, only 28.28% of all students actually voted. According to the BBC the head of the remain campaign said "the high levels of engagement in the referendum meant the vote was "definitive"." This is what I would describe as total bollocks.

You think that's bad, Hull's referendum only needed a 5% full-time student turnout to be binding.
Having conducted a referendum, HUU said it will officially disaffiliate from the NUS after 811 students chose to leave the national student campaigner, while just 476 chose affiliation. Overall, 1,306 students took part in the voting process, around 9.5 per cent of the full-time student population.

http://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/hull-university-union-becomes-latest-to-disaffiliate-from-national-union-of-students-a7046696.html
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11843
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Philjia » Mon May 30, 2016 1:41 am

Eastfield Lodge wrote:
Philjia wrote:Cambridge has voted to remain in the NUS, with 51.5% of students voting to remain. However, only 28.28% of all students actually voted. According to the BBC the head of the remain campaign said "the high levels of engagement in the referendum meant the vote was "definitive"." This is what I would describe as total bollocks.

You think that's bad, Hull's referendum only needed a 5% full-time student turnout to be binding.
Having conducted a referendum, HUU said it will officially disaffiliate from the NUS after 811 students chose to leave the national student campaigner, while just 476 chose affiliation. Overall, 1,306 students took part in the voting process, around 9.5 per cent of the full-time student population.

http://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/hull-university-union-becomes-latest-to-disaffiliate-from-national-union-of-students-a7046696.html


The NUS situation is odd and rather concerning, but this is just plain silly.
Nemesis the Warlock wrote:I am the Nemesis, I am the Warlock, I am the shape of things to come, the Lord of the Flies, holder of the Sword Sinister, the Death Bringer, I am the one who waits on the edge of your dreams, I am all these things and many more

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Mon May 30, 2016 1:47 am

The people in the NUS today are likely to be your Mp's and civil servants tomorrow.

Politics is fucked. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't actually some kind of weird working class revolution in the next 100 years where middle class people like MP's or nuclear physicists or whatever were thrown out.


*edit*
I don't even know who I'd want to be PM or what party I'd like in charge. I'm just so tired of it all.
Last edited by The Matthew Islands on Mon May 30, 2016 1:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 30, 2016 1:47 am

Philjia wrote:
Eastfield Lodge wrote:You think that's bad, Hull's referendum only needed a 5% full-time student turnout to be binding.

http://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/hull-university-union-becomes-latest-to-disaffiliate-from-national-union-of-students-a7046696.html


The NUS situation is odd and rather concerning, but this is just plain silly.

Students don't care about their unions since no-one's union platform is "I will make drinks cheaper and get better acts", if you needed a meaningful student body representation then nothing would ever get done.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 30, 2016 1:48 am

The Matthew Islands wrote:The people in the NUS today are likely to be your Mp's and civil servants tomorrow.

Politics is fucked. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't actually some kind of weird working class revolution in the next 100 years where middle class people like MP's or nuclear physicists or whatever were thrown out.

They can try and see how they do without our UNLIMITED POWER
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Mon May 30, 2016 1:51 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Matthew Islands wrote:The people in the NUS today are likely to be your Mp's and civil servants tomorrow.

Politics is fucked. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't actually some kind of weird working class revolution in the next 100 years where middle class people like MP's or nuclear physicists or whatever were thrown out.

They can try and see how they do without our UNLIMITED POWER

I think that when the proletariat armies storm the power plants to drive them out, they should blow up the nuclear reactors and then reign supreme over a new mutated race of super humans or something.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 30, 2016 1:52 am

UNLEASH THE POWER OF THE ATOM
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Mon May 30, 2016 1:54 am

Students shouldn't have unions.

Being a student is not a job, for a start.

I think the Government should severely cut the number of places available for non-STEM/computing/vocational/administration degrees. Having a lot of engineers, doctors and computer scientists is good. Having a surplus of psychologists, sociologists and tourism experts is not.
Last edited by Questers on Mon May 30, 2016 2:00 am, edited 2 times in total.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon May 30, 2016 1:57 am

Hydesland wrote:More bizarre news from the increasingly fringe NUS: http://heatst.com/uk/nus-at-war-over-po ... l-dolezal/

"NUS At War Over ‘Politically Black’: ‘Antisemitic’ President a ‘Rachel Dolezal’

"The National Union of Students Black Conference in Bradford erupted into a civil war after the conference proposed to amend the term “Black” – for the sake of inclusivity – and include “Politically Black” people into the movement."

Question: if one is politically black, are they allowed to use the N word?



Christ.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bronzite, Dazchan, Of Memers, Sarduri, Transitional Global Authority

Advertisement

Remove ads