NATION

PASSWORD

Libertarian Discussion Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What should be the next title of the Libertarian Discussion Thread?

Poll ended at Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:05 pm

Libertarian Discussion Thread II: Atlas Hugged
4
14%
Libertarian Discussion Thread II: Would You Kindly?
7
25%
Libertarian Discussion Thread II: Recreational Nukes
13
46%
Libertarian Discussion Thread II: A Man Chooses, A Slave Obeys
4
14%
Other option (say in thread)
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 28

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:00 pm

Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:08 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:From the General Election thread...

IMO Johnson could of picked a worst principle to stick too. In an election where everything counts, he could of least thrown the religious right a bone and defended the freedom of association (e.g. the right of Christian bakers to discriminate against gays, muslims, nazis, whatever.) This would of been great for getting the votes of Mormons and other western Christians while still being consistent with the party platform.

Thoughts?

If Johnson was interested in pandering to the religious right, he would have stayed a Republican.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:09 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/top-central-bankers-clinton-donation-puts-fed-in-political-crosshairs/ar-BBwNrhd?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

If I had a reason to dislike Clinton before, I really loath her now.

Remember kids, this is the same backstabbing, double-crossing, lying Clinton that told us the Fed shouldn't be politicized. and needs to be "left alone." (Left column.)

This is a world were the rich are demonized for even denoting a four figure while the government can get away with anything.

Central bankers as individuals are not banned from making donations. What matters is that they don't bring their politics with them to work.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:47 pm

Geilinor wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/top-central-bankers-clinton-donation-puts-fed-in-political-crosshairs/ar-BBwNrhd?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

If I had a reason to dislike Clinton before, I really loath her now.

Remember kids, this is the same backstabbing, double-crossing, lying Clinton that told us the Fed shouldn't be politicized. and needs to be "left alone." (Left column.)

This is a world were the rich are demonized for even denoting a four figure while the government can get away with anything.

Central bankers as individuals are not banned from making donations. What matters is that they don't bring their politics with them to work.


This is impossible. Central bankers are essentially politicians in bankers clothes. Would you not be concerned if the other major banks and other corporations gave money to Hillary? (As they had.)
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
Free People of the World
Secretary
 
Posts: 40
Founded: Aug 06, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Free People of the World » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:54 pm

Darjihad wrote:Libertarians want to fat-shame the government.


This is Sooo sig-worthy. :bow:
Libertarian

Pro: Libertarianism, Capitalism, Free Market, Small Government, Business, Bill of Rights, Fiscal Conservatism, Social Liberalism

Neutral: Abortion (I would prefer a compromise), Open Borders (Again, moderation seems like the best way to go)

Con: Crony Capitalism, Large Unions, Socialism, Communism, Big Government, Political Parties, Regulation, State-Planned Economy, Social Conservatism, Fiscal Liberalism

Darjihad wrote:Libertarians want to fat-shame the government.


Note: When I say "Liberal" and "Conservative," I generally mean the Left and Right respectively, as I'm basing their definitions off of American politics.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:59 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:This is a world were the rich are demonized for even denoting a four figure while the government can get away with anything.

I don't remember demonizing anyone for donating so this doesn't apply to me.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 1:01 pm

Geilinor wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:This is a world were the rich are demonized for even denoting a four figure while the government can get away with anything.

I don't remember demonizing anyone for donating so this doesn't apply to me.


I wasn't addressing you in that sentence, either. *Hint: "this is a world"
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
Huswyae
Diplomat
 
Posts: 736
Founded: May 06, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Huswyae » Sat Oct 01, 2016 1:21 pm

New confederate ramenia wrote:
Huswyae wrote:I believe in Right Libertarianism, so yes, I am right wing, but I want to raise an issue with Libertarianism.

It doesn't get its separate voice in UK politics. There is no Libertarian Party, and if there is, then it probably isn't that big. When explaining libertarianism, I often get told "So you're lib Dems then". Which isn't the case. I support no party, but I vote for the Tories because they are right wing.

I don't understand British politics that well, so forgive me for asking. What's the lib dems platform or ideology? Also what about the Conservative Party? Also, just wondering, what's your opinion on Brexit and EU membership?

I am a reactionary, I believe that we have progressed enough in society since most of the social issues that we need to progress on are progressing by themselves without intervention, however I believe Brexit was regressive. It is a step in a wrong direction.
The Libertarian Provinces of Huswyae
We are Huswyae. We are an advanced nation and one of the most developed an successful in existence. But don't let this fool you, we are dodgier than we look. Corporations are allowed to veto laws they do not support. Half of our politicians are members of anonymous. Tell us we aren't corrupt!
We are libertarian, right-wing, Fiscally conservative, and capitalist. The current ruling party is Libertarian Capita, therefore Huswyae does represent my political beliefs! Proud Right-Libertarian nation!
It is pronounced Huss-wye.
Pro & Anti, as well as some OOC info!

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 1:32 pm

Huswyae wrote:I believe in Right Libertarianism, so yes, I am right wing, but I want to raise an issue with Libertarianism.

It doesn't get its separate voice in UK politics. There is no Libertarian Party, and if there is, then it probably isn't that big. When explaining libertarianism, I often get told "So you're lib Dems then". Which isn't the case. I support no party, but I vote for the Tories because they are right wing.


There is a Libertarian Party in the UK, AFAIK, however I do know that it's a corrupt party ridden by bad decisions and the chairman is essentially milking it of money. It's also AFAIK rejected by most libertarians in the UK.

Personally I am beginning to think of party politics as a dead end.
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
Intermountain States
Minister
 
Posts: 2345
Founded: Oct 12, 2014
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Intermountain States » Sat Oct 01, 2016 1:58 pm

Geilinor wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:From the General Election thread...

IMO Johnson could of picked a worst principle to stick too. In an election where everything counts, he could of least thrown the religious right a bone and defended the freedom of association (e.g. the right of Christian bakers to discriminate against gays, muslims, nazis, whatever.) This would of been great for getting the votes of Mormons and other western Christians while still being consistent with the party platform.

Thoughts?

If Johnson was interested in pandering to the religious right, he would have stayed a Republican.

Freedom of association has always been a talking point among libertarians.If Johnson came out and said that he supports freedom of association, it will probably be the most moderate plank he would do to pander to the Religious Right
I find my grammatical mistakes after I finish posting
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm a third party voter. Trust me when I say this: Not even a lifetime supply of tacos could convince me to vote for either Hillary or Trump. I suspect I'm not the only third party voter who feels that way. I cost Hillary nothing. I cost Trump nothing. If I didn't vote for third party, I would have written in 'Batman'.

If you try to blame me, I will laugh in your face. I'm glad she lost. I got half my wish. :)
Search boxes are your friends

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:15 pm

Geilinor wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:From the General Election thread...

IMO Johnson could of picked a worst principle to stick too. In an election where everything counts, he could of least thrown the religious right a bone and defended the freedom of association (e.g. the right of Christian bakers to discriminate against gays, muslims, nazis, whatever.) This would of been great for getting the votes of Mormons and other western Christians while still being consistent with the party platform.

Thoughts?

If Johnson was interested in pandering to the religious right, he would have stayed a Republican.


He's more comfortable being a Democrat, it seems. Though it is the most worthwhile lazy bone you can give them.
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
Darjihad
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Jul 13, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Darjihad » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:27 pm

Free People of the World wrote:
Darjihad wrote:Libertarians want to fat-shame the government.


This is Sooo sig-worthy. :bow:


I give and give ;)
Feel the Harding, Feel the Coolidge, Feel the Johnson
"If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers." - Calvin Coolidge, July 4,1926

User avatar
Darjihad
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Jul 13, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Darjihad » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:31 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Geilinor wrote:If Johnson was interested in pandering to the religious right, he would have stayed a Republican.


He's more comfortable being a Democrat, it seems. Though it is the most worthwhile lazy bone you can give them.


Bill Weld declared Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate for President. :blink:

I wonder if Gary Johnson will give me my $1500 back and let Austin Petersen represent libertarians.
Feel the Harding, Feel the Coolidge, Feel the Johnson
"If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers." - Calvin Coolidge, July 4,1926

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:15 pm

http://rare.us/story/if-you-dont-vote-y ... vote-away/

Remember, after all the shit slinging, your vote still doesn't matter.
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:16 pm

Darjihad wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:
He's more comfortable being a Democrat, it seems. Though it is the most worthwhile lazy bone you can give them.


Bill Weld declared Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate for President. :blink:

I wonder if Gary Johnson will give me my $1500 back and let Austin Petersen represent libertarians.


No one would take him seriously though, although he'd probably be similar to Trump in the experience department at least.
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59292
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:31 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Darjihad wrote:
Bill Weld declared Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate for President. :blink:

I wonder if Gary Johnson will give me my $1500 back and let Austin Petersen represent libertarians.


No one would take him seriously though, although he'd probably be similar to Trump in the experience department at least.


Indeed. Has he started yabbering about returning to the Gold Standard yet?
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:34 pm

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... ry-johnson

I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54807
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:39 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson

I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.


>Bill Maher
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:40 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson

I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.


And liberalism, for it's tendencies to start wars and ruin economies.

Actually, we are probably better off without government power dictating our lives.
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:47 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson

I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.


And liberalism, for it's tendencies to start wars and ruin economies.

Actually, we are probably better off without government power dictating our lives.

What a simplistic analysis.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Darjihad
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Jul 13, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Darjihad » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:49 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson

I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.


Johnson showed libertarianism? When?
Feel the Harding, Feel the Coolidge, Feel the Johnson
"If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers." - Calvin Coolidge, July 4,1926

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:51 pm

Darjihad wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson

I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.


Johnson showed libertarianism? When?

Horseshoe theory. There's no difference between this and something like 'Ed Miliband wasn't a true socialist' from a Jeremy Corbyn supporter. Clearly the American people will vote for a 'propa libertarian'.
Last edited by Wolfmanne2 on Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Darjihad
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Jul 13, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Darjihad » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:52 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Darjihad wrote:
Bill Weld declared Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate for President. :blink:

I wonder if Gary Johnson will give me my $1500 back and let Austin Petersen represent libertarians.


No one would take him seriously though, although he'd probably be similar to Trump in the experience department at least.


Could we at least get him to teach Gary Johnson about libertarianism?
Feel the Harding, Feel the Coolidge, Feel the Johnson
"If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers." - Calvin Coolidge, July 4,1926

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:56 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:
And liberalism, for it's tendencies to start wars and ruin economies.

Actually, we are probably better off without government power dictating our lives.

What a simplistic analysis.


Tis a mightily complex analysis for most people, whom believe that we can vote for the things we want, and that politicians are magical people with special powers that can make things right. Has the last two decades shown us a recession and several wars, all started by the neoliberal orthodoxy of moreness. More spending, more wars, more, more more, as if the eventual collapse of society can be prolonged without consequence, so as long as the fat cats get paid.
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:34 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Darjihad wrote:
I'm inclined to agree. Not just I believe business owners should have the right to refuse service and / or anyone for any reason (let boycotting be a two-way street) but also...

"When we're done, faith-based charities will replace Medicare."

Churches want their social services function back, right?


The Mormons have some interesting forms of community banks, I forget the exact nature of said banks, but that can serve also as a community oriented replacement for welfare if localized and universalized. It is right and just to promote these kind of alternative solutions to the mass theft done by the governments either through taxes or fractional reserve banking.


As I've started to come to terms with, You can't blame the person calling for small government, when the government fails said person. If anything most would agree if only because of said taxes seem to be fed more into ideology than policy.

I'm also inclined to sort of agree with decentralized/alternative solutions (even with my waryness of faith-based institutions but my relations with religion are complicated at best) in the defense of those looking to better the community outside of the system. One could even make arguments for sites like "go fund me" as an example of crowdfunding to help others through it in specific jams like medical expenses. Though I'd admit I'm more inclined to Gary Johnson's New Federalist approach to this if not for a pragmatic approach to move some taxation away from the federal level while the states can see what works with policy, at least be seen as a possible practical approach towards these alternatives being more widespread to those looking for that path.

Also can't help but feel the more I think of it that Gary Johnson is more of a Liberal Republican with libertarian leanings than just what most people think as a mainstream libertarian. Though I will say he was right on one thing for sure, "most people being socially liberal and fiscally conservative." Though that might just be observations from the people closest to me so... yeah.
Last edited by Fanosolia on Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Al-Haqiqah, Deblar, Dumb Ideologies, Eahland, Elejamie, Experina, Floofybit, HISPIDA, Juristonia, Maxifaer, Mr TM, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, Saarenmaa, Sarolandia, Southland, The Jamesian Republic, Theodorable, Welskerland

Advertisement

Remove ads