Advertisement
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:00 pm
by Geilinor » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:08 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:From the General Election thread...
IMO Johnson could of picked a worst principle to stick too. In an election where everything counts, he could of least thrown the religious right a bone and defended the freedom of association (e.g. the right of Christian bakers to discriminate against gays, muslims, nazis, whatever.) This would of been great for getting the votes of Mormons and other western Christians while still being consistent with the party platform.
Thoughts?
by Geilinor » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:09 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/top-central-bankers-clinton-donation-puts-fed-in-political-crosshairs/ar-BBwNrhd?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
If I had a reason to dislike Clinton before, I really loath her now.
Remember kids, this is the same backstabbing, double-crossing, lying Clinton that told us the Fed shouldn't be politicized. and needs to be "left alone." (Left column.)
This is a world were the rich are demonized for even denoting a four figure while the government can get away with anything.
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:47 pm
Geilinor wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/top-central-bankers-clinton-donation-puts-fed-in-political-crosshairs/ar-BBwNrhd?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
If I had a reason to dislike Clinton before, I really loath her now.
Remember kids, this is the same backstabbing, double-crossing, lying Clinton that told us the Fed shouldn't be politicized. and needs to be "left alone." (Left column.)
This is a world were the rich are demonized for even denoting a four figure while the government can get away with anything.
Central bankers as individuals are not banned from making donations. What matters is that they don't bring their politics with them to work.
by Free People of the World » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:54 pm
Darjihad wrote:Libertarians want to fat-shame the government.
by Geilinor » Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:59 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:This is a world were the rich are demonized for even denoting a four figure while the government can get away with anything.
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 1:01 pm
by Huswyae » Sat Oct 01, 2016 1:21 pm
New confederate ramenia wrote:Huswyae wrote:I believe in Right Libertarianism, so yes, I am right wing, but I want to raise an issue with Libertarianism.
It doesn't get its separate voice in UK politics. There is no Libertarian Party, and if there is, then it probably isn't that big. When explaining libertarianism, I often get told "So you're lib Dems then". Which isn't the case. I support no party, but I vote for the Tories because they are right wing.
I don't understand British politics that well, so forgive me for asking. What's the lib dems platform or ideology? Also what about the Conservative Party? Also, just wondering, what's your opinion on Brexit and EU membership?
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 1:32 pm
Huswyae wrote:I believe in Right Libertarianism, so yes, I am right wing, but I want to raise an issue with Libertarianism.
It doesn't get its separate voice in UK politics. There is no Libertarian Party, and if there is, then it probably isn't that big. When explaining libertarianism, I often get told "So you're lib Dems then". Which isn't the case. I support no party, but I vote for the Tories because they are right wing.
by Intermountain States » Sat Oct 01, 2016 1:58 pm
Geilinor wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:From the General Election thread...
IMO Johnson could of picked a worst principle to stick too. In an election where everything counts, he could of least thrown the religious right a bone and defended the freedom of association (e.g. the right of Christian bakers to discriminate against gays, muslims, nazis, whatever.) This would of been great for getting the votes of Mormons and other western Christians while still being consistent with the party platform.
Thoughts?
If Johnson was interested in pandering to the religious right, he would have stayed a Republican.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm a third party voter. Trust me when I say this: Not even a lifetime supply of tacos could convince me to vote for either Hillary or Trump. I suspect I'm not the only third party voter who feels that way. I cost Hillary nothing. I cost Trump nothing. If I didn't vote for third party, I would have written in 'Batman'.
If you try to blame me, I will laugh in your face. I'm glad she lost. I got half my wish. :)
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:15 pm
Geilinor wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:From the General Election thread...
IMO Johnson could of picked a worst principle to stick too. In an election where everything counts, he could of least thrown the religious right a bone and defended the freedom of association (e.g. the right of Christian bakers to discriminate against gays, muslims, nazis, whatever.) This would of been great for getting the votes of Mormons and other western Christians while still being consistent with the party platform.
Thoughts?
If Johnson was interested in pandering to the religious right, he would have stayed a Republican.
by Darjihad » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:27 pm
by Darjihad » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:31 pm
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:15 pm
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:16 pm
Darjihad wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:
He's more comfortable being a Democrat, it seems. Though it is the most worthwhile lazy bone you can give them.
Bill Weld declared Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate for President.
I wonder if Gary Johnson will give me my $1500 back and let Austin Petersen represent libertarians.
by The Black Forrest » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:31 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Darjihad wrote:
Bill Weld declared Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate for President.
I wonder if Gary Johnson will give me my $1500 back and let Austin Petersen represent libertarians.
No one would take him seriously though, although he'd probably be similar to Trump in the experience department at least.
by Wolfmanne2 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:34 pm
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Washington Resistance Army » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:39 pm
Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson
I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:40 pm
Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson
I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.
by Wolfmanne2 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:47 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson
I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.
And liberalism, for it's tendencies to start wars and ruin economies.
Actually, we are probably better off without government power dictating our lives.
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Darjihad » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:49 pm
Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson
I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.
by Wolfmanne2 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:51 pm
Darjihad wrote:Wolfmanne2 wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/bernie-sanders-bill-maher-sarah-silverman-real-time-gary-johnson
I'm inclined to agree. Overall Johnson has showed why libertarianism along with communism, fascism and populism (left-wing and right-wing) should be no where near government.
Johnson showed libertarianism? When?
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Darjihad » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:52 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Darjihad wrote:
Bill Weld declared Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate for President.
I wonder if Gary Johnson will give me my $1500 back and let Austin Petersen represent libertarians.
No one would take him seriously though, although he'd probably be similar to Trump in the experience department at least.
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:56 pm
by Fanosolia » Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:34 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Darjihad wrote:
I'm inclined to agree. Not just I believe business owners should have the right to refuse service and / or anyone for any reason (let boycotting be a two-way street) but also...
"When we're done, faith-based charities will replace Medicare."
Churches want their social services function back, right?
The Mormons have some interesting forms of community banks, I forget the exact nature of said banks, but that can serve also as a community oriented replacement for welfare if localized and universalized. It is right and just to promote these kind of alternative solutions to the mass theft done by the governments either through taxes or fractional reserve banking.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Haqiqah, Deblar, Dumb Ideologies, Eahland, Elejamie, Experina, Floofybit, HISPIDA, Juristonia, Maxifaer, Mr TM, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, Saarenmaa, Sarolandia, Southland, The Jamesian Republic, Theodorable, Welskerland
Advertisement