Libertarian Discussion Thread

by **USS Monitor** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:31 am

Isyrannaea wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
If "based" is the latest slang for "like an asshole."

Are you going to call anybody even remotely right-wing an asshole?

No. Only ones that have irritating personalities or backward social views. If someone is just into right-wing economics without the social baggage, I don't think that makes them an asshole.

by **Isyrannaea** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:32 am

USS Monitor wrote:
Isyrannaea wrote:Are you going to call anybody even remotely right-wing an asshole?

No. Only ones that have irritating personalities or backward social views. If someone is just into right-wing economics without the social baggage, I don't think that makes them an asshole.

>backward social views
>Pretty much only anti-abortion

I'm dead :rofl:

by **Darjihad** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:02 am

Isyrannaea wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
No. Only ones that have irritating personalities or backward social views. If someone is just into right-wing economics without the social baggage, I don't think that makes them an asshole.

>backward social views
>Pretty much only anti-abortion

I'm dead

I believe abortion (and pretty much all the other wedge issues as well) should be the domain of state governments and never the concern of the federal government.

I don't care for and will not participate in an abortion debate, other than to say abortion violates my interpretation of the libertarian non-initiation of force doctrine.

by **Isyrannaea** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:08 am

Darjihad wrote:
Isyrannaea wrote:>backward social views
>Pretty much only anti-abortion

I'm dead

I believe abortion (and pretty much all the other wedge issues as well) should be the domain of state governments and never the concern of the federal government.

I don't care for and will not participate in an abortion debate, other than to say abortion violates my interpretation of the libertarian non-initiation of force doctrine.

Muh NAP.

by **USS Monitor** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:13 am

Isyrannaea wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
No. Only ones that have irritating personalities or backward social views. If someone is just into right-wing economics without the social baggage, I don't think that makes them an asshole.

>backward social views
>Pretty much only anti-abortion

I'm dead

Constitution Party. Nuff said.

by **Isyrannaea** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:15 am

USS Monitor wrote:
Isyrannaea wrote:>backward social views
>Pretty much only anti-abortion

I'm dead

Constitution Party. Nuff said.

What's your point?

by **USS Monitor** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:21 am

Isyrannaea wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
Constitution Party. Nuff said.

What's your point?

Bigoted party is bigoted.

by **Isyrannaea** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:22 am

USS Monitor wrote:
Isyrannaea wrote:What's your point?

Bigoted party is bigoted.

Kek.

by **Duchy of Sark** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 3:25 am

Since Libertarianism is against things that violate the Non Agression Principle (NAP), does it support the rightful Argentine claim to the Malvinas, which illegally sent in univited english pirates.

by **Isyrannaea** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:27 am

Duchy of Sark wrote:Since Libertarianism is against things that violate the Non Agression Principle (NAP), does it support the rightful Argentine claim to the Malvinas, which illegally sent in univited english pirates.

by **Duchy of Sark** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:29 am

Isyrannaea wrote:
Duchy of Sark wrote:Since Libertarianism is against things that violate the Non Agression Principle (NAP), does it support the rightful Argentine claim to the Malvinas, which illegally sent in univited english pirates.

by **Isyrannaea** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:02 am

USS Monitor wrote:
Isyrannaea wrote:What's your point?

Bigoted party is bigoted.

If you think that libertarianism is an ideology of tolerance and egalitarianism, you're very, very wrong.

by **Washington Resistance Army** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:03 am

Isyrannaea wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
Bigoted party is bigoted.

If you think that libertarianism is an ideology of tolerance and egalitarianism, you're very, very wrong.

I'm pretty tolerant, am I doing it wrong?

by **Isyrannaea** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:10 am

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Isyrannaea wrote:If you think that libertarianism is an ideology of tolerance and egalitarianism, you're very, very wrong.

I'm pretty tolerant, am I doing it wrong?

Depends on what people you tolerate.

by **Greater Beggnig** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:11 am

Duchy of Sark wrote:
Isyrannaea wrote:

by **Bakery Hill** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:12 am

Isyrannaea wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
Bigoted party is bigoted.

If you think that libertarianism is an ideology of tolerance and egalitarianism, you're very, very wrong.

Thank you.

by **Washington Resistance Army** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:12 am

Isyrannaea wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
I'm pretty tolerant, am I doing it wrong?

Depends on what people you tolerate.

Pretty much everyone as long as they leave me alone.

by **Bakery Hill** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:13 am

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Isyrannaea wrote:Depends on what people you tolerate.

Pretty much everyone as long as they leave me alone.

"Don't tread on me."

by **Greater Beggnig** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:14 am

Bakery Hill wrote:
Isyrannaea wrote:If you think that libertarianism is an ideology of tolerance and egalitarianism, you're very, very wrong.

Thank you.

[insert edgy meme about a particular aircraft and a certain General]

by **Washington Resistance Army** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:15 am

Bakery Hill wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Pretty much everyone as long as they leave me alone.

"Don't tread on me."

Or I'll blow us all to shit with my Form 1 grenade

by **Bakery Hill** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:15 am

USS Monitor wrote:
Bakery Hill wrote:What's Johnson think about economic issues? That's a bone of contention between him and most Sanders supporters I imagine?

Yeah, as a Sanders supporter, I would prefer if Johnson wasn't so enthusiastic about budget cuts and right-wing economics. I mean, I thought Sanders was a bit overambitious with the tax-and-spend social programs, but Johnson is too far the other way, and it took a real mental adjustment when I switched over to supporting him.

"mental adjustment"

That sounds sort of uncomfortable haha

Sanders supporters who thought he was perfect and agreed with all of his policies are probably not going to come over to Johnson, for the same reasons that Sanders himself is not going to endorse Johnson. But Sanders supporters aren't a hivemind. Some of us weren't quite as far left as Sanders himself. So you'll get different people going in different directions now that Sanders is out of the race, and Johnson can pick up a few votes by reaching out to Sanders people. Most will go to Clinton, though.

Johnson won't help poor people. In fact, if he'll probably make their lives worse. Do you know what he thinks of the TPP?

by **Bakery Hill** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:16 am

Greater Beggnig wrote:
Bakery Hill wrote:Thank you.

[insert edgy meme about a particular aircraft and a certain General]

Fuck so controversial.

by **Bakery Hill** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:16 am

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Bakery Hill wrote:"Don't tread on me."

Or I'll blow us all to shit with my Form 1 grenade

NAP or MAD?

by **Washington Resistance Army** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:17 am

Bakery Hill wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Or I'll blow us all to shit with my Form 1 grenade

NAP or MAD?

Why not both?

by **Bakery Hill** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:18 am

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Bakery Hill wrote:NAP or MAD?

Why not both?

I respect that comrade.

Libertarian Discussion Thread

What should be the next title of the Libertarian Discussion Thread?

Who is online