by Of Danishes » Wed Mar 30, 2016 12:47 pm
by Ashworth-Attwater » Wed Mar 30, 2016 12:57 pm
by Of Danishes » Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:56 pm
Diopolis wrote:Brazil used to be a monarchy. Yall have a modern day monarchist party?
by Diopolis » Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:57 pm
by Ashworth-Attwater » Wed Mar 30, 2016 2:04 pm
by Geilinor » Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:21 pm
by Major-Tom » Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:24 pm
by Geilinor » Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:26 pm
Major-Tom wrote:Ok, so first thing on the agenda, someone should probably remove Dilma from office in a democratic fashion. Secondly, Brazil needs to elect a leader who can deliver neoliberal reforms, as opposed to the same old corrupt bullshit.
Thirdly, someone should probably exile Dilma to the worst favelas of Rio, because, srsly, fuck Dilma Rouseff.
by Of Danishes » Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:32 pm
by Of Danishes » Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:36 pm
Major-Tom wrote:Ok, so first thing on the agenda, someone should probably remove Dilma from office in a democratic fashion. Secondly, Brazil needs to elect a leader who can deliver neoliberal reforms, as opposed to the same old corrupt bullshit.
Thirdly, someone should probably exile Dilma to the worst favelas of Rio, because, srsly, fuck Dilma Rouseff.
by Of Danishes » Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:37 pm
Geilinor wrote:Major-Tom wrote:Ok, so first thing on the agenda, someone should probably remove Dilma from office in a democratic fashion. Secondly, Brazil needs to elect a leader who can deliver neoliberal reforms, as opposed to the same old corrupt bullshit.
Thirdly, someone should probably exile Dilma to the worst favelas of Rio, because, srsly, fuck Dilma Rouseff.
They should have elected Aecio Neves.
by Calimera II » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:14 pm
Major-Tom wrote:Thirdly, someone should probably exile Dilma to the worst favelas of Rio, because, srsly, fuck Dilma Rouseff.
by Ashworth-Attwater » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:16 pm
Major-Tom wrote:Ok, so first thing on the agenda, someone should probably remove Dilma from office in a democratic fashion.
Major-Tom wrote:Secondly, Brazil needs to elect a leader who can deliver neoliberal reforms, as opposed to the same old corrupt bullshit.
Geilinor wrote:They should have elected Aecio Neves.
by Geilinor » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:17 pm
by Ashworth-Attwater » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:18 pm
by Calimera II » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:18 pm
by Geilinor » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:19 pm
by Ashworth-Attwater » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:19 pm
by The United Colonies of Earth » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:22 pm
by Of Danishes » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:22 pm
by Of Danishes » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:24 pm
by Of Danishes » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:26 pm
by Of Danishes » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:28 pm
Calimera II wrote:Major-Tom wrote:Thirdly, someone should probably exile Dilma to the worst favelas of Rio, because, srsly, fuck Dilma Rouseff.
The PT did actually achieve something for Brazil. I liked Lula's administration and Dilma is the continuation of Lula's political project. Broadening the rights of the workers, making Brazil a more equal place and promote inter-South American relationships is not bad at all. Moreover, I like Dilma's brave fight against the dicatorship in Brazil. Dilma Coração Valente.
However, the corruption scandal is an enormous problem. Her action of placing Lula in her government can be seen as an act of impunity. If Lula and Dilma are found guilty I will be extremely disappointed; and angered at them. Furthermore, Dilma, fix the damn economy.
Major Tom, Dilma appointed a neoliberal economist as Minister of Economy at the beginning of her second term.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Abrahamia-, Bovad, Elejamie, Great Juche, Infected Mushroom, Minoa, Port Carverton, Riviere Renard, Statesburg, The Eur-asian Federation, The Notorious Mad Jack, The Xenopolis Confederation, Tungstan, Zetaopalatopia, Zueratopia
Advertisement