NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion: Pro-Choice or Pro-Life?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Where do you stand on this issue?

Her body, her choice - (pro-choice)
355
49%
Personally against, but I respect the decisions of others - (pro-choice)
79
11%
Ban certain procedures, but keep legal as a rule - (fluctuates)
36
5%
Only under certain conditions (rape/incest/etc) - (pro-life)
178
24%
Ban entirely - (pro-life)
79
11%
 
Total votes : 727

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:58 am

Ashmoria wrote:
The newfound islands wrote:so you did not watch the videos i'm guessing.

only a fool blindly watches videos posted in an abortion thread.

well why don't you watch them they may educate you on abortion.
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

User avatar
Ardavia
Senator
 
Posts: 4732
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardavia » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:58 am

The newfound islands wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:It's not murder, because it's legal.

it is murder and it should not be legal.


the thing is, unless it's illegal, it is by definition not murder

with that out of the way, if you think those youtube videos provide a good argument to argue for your position, you can summarize those arguments here
professional contrarian
for: whatever you are against
against: whatever you are for

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:58 am

The newfound islands wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:yeah she should because a woman has the same right as a man does to control her own body.

so you think that killing an unborn baby should be a right that's sick.

absolutely

a woman has the right to control her own body. it is the basic unit of freedom.
whatever

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:59 am

The newfound islands wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:only a fool blindly watches videos posted in an abortion thread.

well why don't you watch them they may educate you on abortion.

if you cant make your own arguments I'm not interested in guessing what you find compelling about abortion videos.
whatever

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:01 am

Ashmoria wrote:
The newfound islands wrote:so you think that killing an unborn baby should be a right that's sick.

absolutely

a woman has the right to control her own body. it is the basic unit of freedom.

wow then you are a very sick person if you think that just wow.
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:05 am

The newfound islands wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:absolutely

a woman has the right to control her own body. it is the basic unit of freedom.

wow then you are a very sick person if you think that just wow.

so you don't think women should be free

interesting
whatever

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:10 am

Ashmoria wrote:
The newfound islands wrote:wow then you are a very sick person if you think that just wow.

so you don't think women should be free

interesting

no I do think that a women should be free but I'm against killing an innocent life and you know Abortion also kills the mother a little bit inside as well but listen just because i'm against Abortion does not mean I don't want women to be free I mean most of my friends are women.
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:13 am

The newfound islands wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:so you don't think women should be free

interesting

no I do think that a women should be free but I'm against killing an innocent life and you know Abortion also kills the mother a little bit inside as well but listen just because i'm against Abortion does not mean I don't want women to be free I mean most of my friends are women.

It does mean that you think the life of the unborn is more important than the soverignty of the woman.
To use an oft cited analogy, If you think that the right to life supercedes bodily autonomy, do you think if a woman is going to be raped and the only way out of it is to kill in self defense, should she just let it happen?

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:14 am

The newfound islands wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:so you don't think women should be free

interesting

no I do think that a women should be free but I'm against killing an innocent life and you know Abortion also kills the mother a little bit inside as well but listen just because i'm against Abortion does not mean I don't want women to be free I mean most of my friends are women.

there is no freedom if you don't have control of your own body.
whatever

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:18 am

Alvecia wrote:
The newfound islands wrote:no I do think that a women should be free but I'm against killing an innocent life and you know Abortion also kills the mother a little bit inside as well but listen just because i'm against Abortion does not mean I don't want women to be free I mean most of my friends are women.

It does mean that you think the life of the unborn is more important than the soverignty of the woman.
To use an oft cited analogy, If you think that the right to life supercedes bodily autonomy, do you think if a woman is going to be raped and the only way out of it is to kill in self defense, should she just let it happen?

I think that both of their lives are important.
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:41 am

Newfound, let me put it simply: the woman's body, the woman's resources; she has control over them. The fetus is using up her body's space and her body's resources, on top of using her as a toilet. There are millions of health complications that could cause her health issues that she might not want to deal with; even in the most healthy of pregnancies.

If the woman does not consent to the fetus using up her body's space; nor her body's resources, it is immediately something similar to a parasite using her as a feeding mechanism and as a toilet, which threatens her health. Thus, she can remove the threat to her health and well being. Her bodily sovereignty overrides any right to life the fetus may have.

The fetus' rights end where the woman's rights begin.

User avatar
Equalaria
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 11, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Equalaria » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:44 am

Women have a right to thier bodies- men are panicky now that thier total domination of women has been slowly eroding. This is simply a last stand of men trying to hold onto one of the last vestiges of oppression they have in thier control

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:47 am

Equalaria wrote:Women have a right to thier bodies- men are panicky now that thier total domination of women has been slowly eroding. This is simply a last stand of men trying to hold onto one of the last vestiges of oppression they have in thier control


Um. No. We've been pro-choice since Roe v. Wade. And this isn't a women's rights discussion thread other than the pro-choice debate.

There are plenty of pro-life women who think other women are being stupid / irresponsible / murderous for getting abortions.

It isn't even just men... it's people in general. Usually, of the religious breed.

User avatar
Equalaria
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 11, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Equalaria » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:50 am

The V O I D wrote:
Equalaria wrote:Women have a right to thier bodies- men are panicky now that thier total domination of women has been slowly eroding. This is simply a last stand of men trying to hold onto one of the last vestiges of oppression they have in thier control


Um. No. We've been pro-choice since Roe v. Wade. And this isn't a women's rights discussion thread other than the pro-choice debate.

There are plenty of pro-life women who think other women are being stupid / irresponsible / murderous for getting abortions.

It isn't even just men... it's people in general. Usually, of the religious breed.



It's always men- this issue is just a microcosm of the larger societal constructions of oppression and subservience that have been forcibly imposed on women by white men. Pro-life nuts are typically men who are terrified at the thought of no longer controlling women, even down to thier natural processes, or complicit women who have been shamed and kowtowed to men.

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:53 am

The V O I D wrote:Newfound, let me put it simply: the woman's body, the woman's resources; she has control over them. The fetus is using up her body's space and her body's resources, on top of using her as a toilet. There are millions of health complications that could cause her health issues that she might not want to deal with; even in the most healthy of pregnancies.

If the woman does not consent to the fetus using up her body's space; nor her body's resources, it is immediately something similar to a parasite using her as a feeding mechanism and as a toilet, which threatens her health. Thus, she can remove the threat to her health and well being. Her bodily sovereignty overrides any right to life the fetus may have.

The fetus' rights end where the woman's rights begin.

that make no sense killing babies is not the answer.
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:54 am

Equalaria wrote:Women have a right to thier bodies- men are panicky now that thier total domination of women has been slowly eroding. This is simply a last stand of men trying to hold onto one of the last vestiges of oppression they have in thier control

hey listen there are women who are against Abortion ok but oh let me guess there not real women.
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:55 am

The newfound islands wrote:
The V O I D wrote:Newfound, let me put it simply: the woman's body, the woman's resources; she has control over them. The fetus is using up her body's space and her body's resources, on top of using her as a toilet. There are millions of health complications that could cause her health issues that she might not want to deal with; even in the most healthy of pregnancies.

If the woman does not consent to the fetus using up her body's space; nor her body's resources, it is immediately something similar to a parasite using her as a feeding mechanism and as a toilet, which threatens her health. Thus, she can remove the threat to her health and well being. Her bodily sovereignty overrides any right to life the fetus may have.

The fetus' rights end where the woman's rights begin.

that make no sense killing babies is not the answer.

it is quite often the answer.

90% are early abortions where it is no one else's business and the rest are out of dire need.
whatever

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22872
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:57 am

Equalaria wrote:Women have a right to thier bodies- men are panicky now that thier total domination of women has been slowly eroding. This is simply a last stand of men trying to hold onto one of the last vestiges of oppression they have in thier control

:eyebrow: I'm a guy, and I've supported abortion rights as long as I can remember. Please leave the radical feminist bullshit out of here. This is about abortion, not an imaginary gender war.
The newfound islands wrote:
The V O I D wrote:Newfound, let me put it simply: the woman's body, the woman's resources; she has control over them. The fetus is using up her body's space and her body's resources, on top of using her as a toilet. There are millions of health complications that could cause her health issues that she might not want to deal with; even in the most healthy of pregnancies.

If the woman does not consent to the fetus using up her body's space; nor her body's resources, it is immediately something similar to a parasite using her as a feeding mechanism and as a toilet, which threatens her health. Thus, she can remove the threat to her health and well being. Her bodily sovereignty overrides any right to life the fetus may have.

The fetus' rights end where the woman's rights begin.

that make no sense killing babiesfetuses is not the answer.

FTFY. Then what is the answer?
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:01 am

Equalaria wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
Um. No. We've been pro-choice since Roe v. Wade. And this isn't a women's rights discussion thread other than the pro-choice debate.

There are plenty of pro-life women who think other women are being stupid / irresponsible / murderous for getting abortions.

It isn't even just men... it's people in general. Usually, of the religious breed.



It's always men- this issue is just a microcosm of the larger societal constructions of oppression and subservience that have been forcibly imposed on women by white men. Pro-life nuts are typically men who are terrified at the thought of no longer controlling women, even down to thier natural processes, or complicit women who have been shamed and kowtowed to men.


That is actually untrue. Only about 50% of men are pro-life, while with women it's a roller-coaster jumping up and down between around 40% to 60%, never really staying consistent when censuses are taken. With men, it's usually 55% is the max in recent years for pro-life. The lowest its been is around 30%, better off than women.

Can't ignore statistics in favor of your worldview, friend. Men are only worse than women in this debate when they are at their highest pro-life numbers, and that's only if the pro-life women side of things isn't above 55% at that time. And when at their lowest numbers for pro-lifers, it seems men are far more pro-choice than women.

And most of them are usually very, very religious; it has to do with "religion" and being for theocracy and god's law, and obeying a 2,000 year old book.

As for the other 'oppressive' things - the wage gap? Once you take into account job requirements, job hours, what the job actually does, where the jobs are, and all the other really important factors to calculate this; the wage gap MAGICALLY DISAPPEARS. The wage gap only appears if you assume that all women have the same jobs as all men, and vice versa; when this is simply not the case, as not all women go for the same jobs as all men; and not even all men go for them.

The supposed "rape culture"? If a man is accused of rape, he can lose his job, never get a new job very easily, in college he can lose college education/degrees, he can end up being shamed and attacked, among other things. He need be only accused; doesn't matter if he's convicted or if it was a false accusation. While the woman who accused him gets treated like a queen, even if she falsely accused him.

The "sexualization" or objectification of women? Men are just as objectified and sexualized as women are in magazines and popular culture. Denying this is blatant and willful ignorance to the facts. Both are bad, in my opinion.

I could go on but I don't want to derail the thread, so let's please stay on topic.

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:02 am

The newfound islands wrote:
The V O I D wrote:Newfound, let me put it simply: the woman's body, the woman's resources; she has control over them. The fetus is using up her body's space and her body's resources, on top of using her as a toilet. There are millions of health complications that could cause her health issues that she might not want to deal with; even in the most healthy of pregnancies.

If the woman does not consent to the fetus using up her body's space; nor her body's resources, it is immediately something similar to a parasite using her as a feeding mechanism and as a toilet, which threatens her health. Thus, she can remove the threat to her health and well being. Her bodily sovereignty overrides any right to life the fetus may have.

The fetus' rights end where the woman's rights begin.

that make no sense killing babies is not the answer.


The only way to make it stop using her body's space or her body's resources, the FETUS (not baby, babies are already born) must be removed and/or cut off from her resources. This ends in the fetus' death, usually, but that cannot be helped.

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:16 am

The newfound islands wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
Videos are not good sources, as they can be biased. Abortion does kill, but that's an unfortunate side effect. It is not murder, and it doesn't kill babies; babies are born. Fetuses are what die. It is an unfortunate side effect of the woman saying no to giving the fetus her body's space and her body's resources, but you cannot force a woman to accept it.

so you're for the murdering of babies you are a very sick person then and i'll pray for you.


I'm not religious, and it isn't sick to let a woman control her body's space and resources. And they are not babies. Babies are already born. It's a fetus.

User avatar
Xadufell
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1179
Founded: Mar 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Xadufell » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:18 am

Equalaria wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
Um. No. We've been pro-choice since Roe v. Wade. And this isn't a women's rights discussion thread other than the pro-choice debate.

There are plenty of pro-life women who think other women are being stupid / irresponsible / murderous for getting abortions.

It isn't even just men... it's people in general. Usually, of the religious breed.



It's always men- this issue is just a microcosm of the larger societal constructions of oppression and subservience that have been forcibly imposed on women by white men. Pro-life nuts are typically men who are terrified at the thought of no longer controlling women, even down to thier natural processes, or complicit women who have been shamed and kowtowed to men.


The bloody hell are you on about?
28 Year old autistic twat.
!!!WE MADE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Pro: Right Wing, Israel, The Donald, Guns, Free Speech, Capitalism, Switzerland, Germany, Britain leaving the EU, TEMPORARY ban on Muslims until everything gets sorted out, Republicans, Russia.
Anti: Hillary, Sanders, Democrats, Radical Islam, ISIS, Illegal Immigration, BLM (Because they obviously do.), Obama, MSNBC, Left Wing, Radical Anything (Virtually), Turkey, Trump Protesters who have no valid points.

Grinning Dragon wrote:Why would anyone waste a good bullet on the likes of CNN anyway? I don't understand why anyone would get that worked up over a bunch of dipshits, christ if their shit show is getting you that worked up, just turn the damn thing off and go for a walk/run/ride.

User avatar
St Nevis And Kitts
Envoy
 
Posts: 261
Founded: Mar 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby St Nevis And Kitts » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:21 am

I am prolife and i think tht the unborn deserve every right to leave.
Sovereign King of the Constitutional Union and all the crown dominion

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:23 am

St nevis and kitts wrote:I am prolife and i think tht the unborn deserve every right to leave.


Yes, it does have the right to leave the woman's body if the woman doesn't want it. It does not, however, have the right to live inside her without consent.

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:24 am

Ashmoria wrote:
The newfound islands wrote:well how about you all watch these educational videos about Abortion oh and ABORTION KILLS LIVES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZt7QaBbCK0


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96TabiK-L2E




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiEt1Afltm0


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSiZfC6u160

do you really think we don't know what abortion is?

no I don't thnk you all know what Abortion is you all think that it's just fine to kill a baby but I grew up learning that people that are for the murder of babies are sickos and God does not want us killing innocent lives and yes I'm a PROUD CHRISTIAN and if y'all don't like it well too damn bad and you know why because we have FREEDOM OF RELIGION and my religion says that it's unmoral and wrong to kill an innocent baby and that's all I have to say so good day. :clap:
Last edited by The newfound islands on Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:26 am, edited 2 times in total.
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aadhiris, Hidrandia, Ineva, Keltionialang, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Sarolandia, Shrillland, Statesburg, Thal Dorthat, The Vooperian Union, Uiiop, Vanuzgard, Yanitza, Zantalio

Advertisement

Remove ads