But it's demeaning to women, SJWs won't stand for that!
Advertisement
by The Nihilistic view » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:18 pm
by The Two Jerseys » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:21 pm
by Nocturnalis » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:44 pm
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:"We were on the thief's tail, but we lost one."
"Whoever one was, one won't be coming back for one's umbrella."
by The Lone Alliance » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:59 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:But it's demeaning to women, SJWs won't stand for that!
by Dumb Ideologies » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:12 am
by Ifreann » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:41 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Chill your tits, OP. "They" works fine for these purposes.
by Hladgos » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:50 am
by Australian rePublic » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:19 am
by New Benian Republic » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:27 am
by Frenline Delpha » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:46 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Which is why I think we need to push back harder. Rather than just playing by their rules and using ''they,'' we should introduce a new pronoun and reinforce it upon the population.
by Hladgos » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:49 am
Frenline Delpha wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
Which is why I think we need to push back harder. Rather than just playing by their rules and using ''they,'' we should introduce a new pronoun and reinforce it upon the population.
This is where you lose me. I mean, I'm not on your side in the first place, but when you talk about forcing a cerain way of mind onto everybody, no matter what they believe, then you are falling down a slippery ice slope.
by Frenline Delpha » Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:58 am
Nerotysia wrote:Man Infected Mushroom's been infected by Chessmistress. What were the odds?
by Charmera » Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:01 am
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:And here, we see a wild Shittonicus Charactericus, coloquially known as Charmera, in its natural habitat. It seems to be displaying behavior expected from one of its kind, producing numerous characters and juggling them with its front paws.
by Frenline Delpha » Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:02 am
Charmera wrote:Frenline Delpha wrote:I'd say they were pretty good. Personally, I will continue to use he as a gender nuetral term. To me, when used towards an anonymous person, he means human in genral.
You could always alternate too.
By which I mean, use he for one nonspecific person and then she for the next you happen to talk about. If anyone calls you out on not representing the other gender, simply cite the example you used he instead of she or vise versa.
by Charmera » Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:07 am
Frenline Delpha wrote:Charmera wrote:You could always alternate too.
By which I mean, use he for one nonspecific person and then she for the next you happen to talk about. If anyone calls you out on not representing the other gender, simply cite the example you used he instead of she or vise versa.
That actually makes sense. I might just do that.
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:And here, we see a wild Shittonicus Charactericus, coloquially known as Charmera, in its natural habitat. It seems to be displaying behavior expected from one of its kind, producing numerous characters and juggling them with its front paws.
by Hirota » Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:17 am
by Kar-Esseria » Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:19 am
by Ifreann » Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:22 am
Kar-Esseria wrote:For a minute I thought this was a Chessmistress thread.
by Frenline Delpha » Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:22 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies, Port Carverton, Shrillland, The Matthew Islands, Umeria
Advertisement