Buddy, I'm not going to do your homework for you. Give me a reliable fucking statistic that backs your claim, or admit that you don't fucking have one.
Advertisement
by Sun Wukong » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:18 pm
by The Alexanderians » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:18 pm
New Granadeseret wrote:All this shows is non-Muslims are being a bit more varied in their choice of names then Muslims. Imagine for a moment if Christians used the name John in the same proportions...
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
by Kar-Esseria » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:19 pm
by Sun Wukong » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:19 pm
by Ararat Mountain » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:20 pm
Ասդված I Am An
Վէրէվի Armenian
Բոլորը American
by Kar-Esseria » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:21 pm
by Jochistan » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:21 pm
by Olthar » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:21 pm
by New Granadeseret » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:21 pm
by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:22 pm
by Juristonia » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:23 pm
Jumalariik wrote:Source:
http://www.babycentre.co.uk/a25011625/top-baby-boy-names-2014
So, in the UK, since 2014, (so this is old news, but I found this out recently), Muhammad is the most popular name. This is because the amount of Muslims in the UK has increased greatly in recent times. This also shows the traditionally Christian culture of the UK being put on the spot, being challenged by Islamic culture. In the world, Islam is also on the rise on a bigger scale.
So NSG, is it a good, bad or weird thing that Mohammad is now the most popular name in the UK? Is it a sign of Christian culture's demise in the UK?
My opinion:
In my mind, being a citizen of the UK, but not living there (so it has no bearing on me), this is odd. The UK has been one of the greatest Christian nations to have ever existed in terms of power and influence, and it has historically had a national church. While losing their colonial interests around the world, large amounts of immigration from Islamic countries mainly have been going into the UK, changing the demographics greatly. This is something that is in my mind not a good thing. A nation has the right to take in immigrants, and should generally do so, however, a nation is also something that should preserve its culture, and it would seem that having such a drastic demographic change is not a good thing, it will not bring stability, and it will not bring peace.
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
by Ararat Mountain » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:24 pm
Ասդված I Am An
Վէրէվի Armenian
Բոլորը American
by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:27 pm
Ararat Mountain wrote:Sun Wukong wrote:Buddy, I'm not going to do your homework for you. Give me a reliable fucking statistic that backs your claim, or admit that you don't fucking have one.
Hundreds of pictures, videos, testimonials, etc. is my statistics? DO you really think that the government can afford to find the crazy amount of immigrants that (once they reach the shore) scatter across Europe, and ask them "Excuse me, but did you come here illegally?" LIKE ANY OF THE WOULD SAY "YES" OR EVEN UNDERSTAND ENGLISH
by Sun Wukong » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:27 pm
Ararat Mountain wrote:Sun Wukong wrote:Buddy, I'm not going to do your homework for you. Give me a reliable fucking statistic that backs your claim, or admit that you don't fucking have one.
Hundreds of pictures, videos, testimonials, etc. is my statistics? DO you really think that the government can afford to find the crazy amount of immigrants that (once they reach the shore) scatter across Europe, and ask them "Excuse me, but did you come here illegally?" LIKE ANY OF THE WOULD SAY "YES" OR EVEN UNDERSTAND ENGLISH
by Talvezout » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:27 pm
Ararat Mountain wrote:Sun Wukong wrote:Buddy, I'm not going to do your homework for you. Give me a reliable fucking statistic that backs your claim, or admit that you don't fucking have one.
Hundreds of pictures, videos, testimonials, etc. is my statistics? DO you really think that the government can afford to find the crazy amount of immigrants that (once they reach the shore) scatter across Europe, and ask them "Excuse me, but did you come here illegally?" LIKE ANY OF THE WOULD SAY "YES" OR EVEN UNDERSTAND ENGLISH
by Gauthier » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:42 pm
by New Granadeseret » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:43 pm
The Alexanderians wrote:New Granadeseret wrote:All this shows is non-Muslims are being a bit more varied in their choice of names then Muslims. Imagine for a moment if Christians used the name John in the same proportions...
Well the Spanish speaking nations have a penchant for the name Jesus, food for thought
by Talvezout » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:44 pm
Gauthier wrote:It's kekworthy hearing people cry about the popularity of 'Muhammad' as a name. It's like those people think they're living in an episode of Doctor Who but instead of people being marched off to get turned into Cybermen they become Muslims.
by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:46 pm
Mostrov wrote:Given we have fairly good reason to suspect that the Britons were not in fact happy with this, Bede, Gildas, and suchlike. Or the Anglo-Saxons in turn.
Why is cultural supplantation actually seen as either something of some ambivalence or a good thing? For that matter why is cultural preservation seen as undesirable? Surely the implementation of the monocultured nationstate has saved more lives than otherwise? I don't recall the fall of the Ottomans, Austro-Hungary, Russia or Yugoslavia too be a peaceful process in which tolerance and multiculturalism were praised by all.
A disingenuous statement, especially given its merely the Latin rendering of Arabic script that is dependant upon which country the parents culturally originate from for the different Anglicisations.
by American Imperial Union » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:51 pm
by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:53 pm
American Imperial Union wrote:We must preserve our culture and people at any cost.
We must be prepared to evacuate and resettle those not of our ideas and people from our society.
Western society is the most advanced, it's people of the highest order. Only societies and people that attempt to emulate ours succeeds. To allow the importation of these other cultures is dangerous to human progress.
The bastardization of our culture and people must be prevented. Those immigrants who make their way into Europe should be resettled.
I think it would be good to create a national community and unite our people into an ideology that preserves our culture and expands it.
by The Princes of the Universe » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:57 pm
by American Imperial Union » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:58 pm
I agree.Nationes Pii Redivivi wrote:American Imperial Union wrote:We must preserve our culture and people at any cost.
We must be prepared to evacuate and resettle those not of our ideas and people from our society.
Western society is the most advanced, it's people of the highest order. Only societies and people that attempt to emulate ours succeeds. To allow the importation of these other cultures is dangerous to human progress.
The bastardization of our culture and people must be prevented. Those immigrants who make their way into Europe should be resettled.
I think it would be good to create a national community and unite our people into an ideology that preserves our culture and expands it.
I hold any culture in contempt that crumbles in the face of people of different cultures. If it is so effete that it can be held up on its own, and the mere presence of different people is enough to erode and destroy it, why is it worth preserving?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ameriganastan, Daphomir, Eahland, Elwher, Google [Bot], La Xinga, Omphalos, Quaxoglia, The Caleshan Valkyrie, The Xenopolis Confederation
Advertisement