It'll take a woman being put on a sex offender registry and losing custody of a child over public breastfeeding before that happens.
Advertisement
by Gauthier » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:14 am
by Deuxtete » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:15 am
Yorkvale wrote:Are people really ignoring the difference between breasts and pecks.....?
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:16 am
Yorkvale wrote:Are people really ignoring the difference between breasts and pecks.....?
by Deuxtete » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:16 am
by Deuxtete » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:17 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:Yorkvale wrote:Are people really ignoring the difference between breasts and pecks.....?
Sure, there are profound differences. But it should be up to the breast holder if the feel like they need to be contained or supported or whatever. If they're cool with them swinging in the breeze why should that be an issue for someone who doesn't have to carry them around?
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:18 am
Gauthier wrote:It's clearly a feminist plot to minimize the importance of bare male chests.
by The Black Forrest » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:18 am
Mefpan wrote:Can we please all keep our damn clothes on? I mean, we've invented those for a reason, you know.
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:18 am
Deuxtete wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Sure, there are profound differences. But it should be up to the breast holder if the feel like they need to be contained or supported or whatever. If they're cool with them swinging in the breeze why should that be an issue for someone who doesn't have to carry them around?
There are not profound differences, there are superficial visible differences.
by Sun Wukong » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:20 am
by The Black Forrest » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:20 am
by Dooom35796821595 » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:22 am
by Yorkvale » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:24 am
by BK117B2 » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:25 am
by Deuxtete » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:29 am
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:29 am
Yorkvale wrote: Its the appearance and cultural norm.
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:30 am
Yorkvale wrote:Deuxtete wrote:Are you literally unaware that women have pectoral muscles(Pecks).
Or are you ignoring that men can lactate?
Ignoring men can get breast cancer?
Read a fucking book.
I wasn't aware of the science behind it, however enlightening that may be. But the science isn't really what matters here. Its the appearance and cultural norm. As much as I hate to give into cultural norms, as the edgy individualistic entrepreneur I would like to be the very basic perception of boobs are incredibly sexualized. Which is all good for the playboy scene but not fitting for the public eye. I think the only exception should be for public artistry and women should have to get a license and be approved by the city for it.
by The Serbian Empire » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:30 am
by Deuxtete » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:35 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Deuxtete wrote:Are you literally unaware that women have pectoral muscles(Pecks).
Or are you ignoring that men can lactate?
Ignoring men can get breast cancer?
Read a fucking book.
People aren't that literal. You write about pecks and people usually think of a man. You write about breasts and people usually think of a woman.
by Yorkvale » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:35 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Yorkvale wrote:
I wasn't aware of the science behind it, however enlightening that may be. But the science isn't really what matters here. Its the appearance and cultural norm. As much as I hate to give into cultural norms, as the edgy individualistic entrepreneur I would like to be the very basic perception of boobs are incredibly sexualized. Which is all good for the playboy scene but not fitting for the public eye. I think the only exception should be for public artistry and women should have to get a license and be approved by the city for it.
Im sorry but getting a license to show the top part of your body is fucking stupid and so backward it hurts, sometimes social norms need to shredded like cabbage and changed, and the over-sexualisation of women's breasts (largely caused by Religion and conservative attitudes) and being all "hush hush not allowed to show because indecency" is one of them.
Just because its a social norm does not mean it has to stay that way for ever, social norms change constantly and they need to.
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:36 am
Deuxtete wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Are you really going to split hairs when we're essentially coming to the same conclusion?
Encouraging someone to think men have pecks(what stupid fucking word) and women have breasts and that we don't in fact have almost entirely the same shit is what props up "female breasts are genitalia" arguments. I'm splitting hairs, I'm applying biology to refute false ideas.
Is it so hard to believe I would prefer you to both agree with me, and walk away better informed.
Maybe you didn't know that the guy claiming women didn't have pectoral muscles was comically incorrect.
by Yorkvale » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:38 am
Deuxtete wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
People aren't that literal. You write about pecks and people usually think of a man. You write about breasts and people usually think of a woman.
How stupid people are isn't my problem. I passed high biology and human anatomy over 25 years ago, what I'm saying isn't news. If people aren't that basically educated they should at least have courtesy to not presume to be intelligent enough to think they can suggest what behavior is acceptable for common society.
by Deuxtete » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:39 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Yorkvale wrote:
I wasn't aware of the science behind it, however enlightening that may be. But the science isn't really what matters here. Its the appearance and cultural norm. As much as I hate to give into cultural norms, as the edgy individualistic entrepreneur I would like to be the very basic perception of boobs are incredibly sexualized. Which is all good for the playboy scene but not fitting for the public eye. I think the only exception should be for public artistry and women should have to get a license and be approved by the city for it.
Im sorry but getting a license to show the top part of your body is fucking stupid and so backward it hurts, sometimes social norms need to shredded like cabbage and changed, and the over-sexualisation of women's breasts (largely caused by Religion and conservative attitudes) and being all "hush hush not allowed to show because indecency" is one of them.
Just because its a social norm does not mean it has to stay that way for ever, social norms change constantly and they need to.
by Nikolausstadt » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:41 am
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:42 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cavirfi, East Leaf Republic, Ineva, Shrillland, Singaporen Empire, Uiiop
Advertisement