Advertisement
by Bralia » Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:54 am
Gallade wrote:Steamtopia wrote:The "keeping it illegal" part is the part I have difficulty with. It doesn't actually harm anyone.
There is an argument for the increased chance of complications if they procreate, however small. It is hard to find a substantive argument against recreational incest, true. Moral squeamishness doesn't really legally pass muster.
by Auremena » Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:57 am
Aaaand that's great great great...... Great great..... Great great grandpappy ...Bralia wrote:I hereby bring forth Charles V as an example of the "dangers" of incest! Just look at that chin. Look at it.Gallade wrote:There is an argument for the increased chance of complications if they procreate, however small. It is hard to find a substantive argument against recreational incest, true. Moral squeamishness doesn't really legally pass muster.
by Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:00 am
by Gallade » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:00 am
Bralia wrote:Gallade wrote:There is an argument for the increased chance of complications if they procreate, however small. It is hard to find a substantive argument against recreational incest, true. Moral squeamishness doesn't really legally pass muster.
I hereby bring forth Charles V as an example of the "dangers" of incest! Just look at that chin. Look at it.
by Eastern Equestria » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:01 am
Talvezout wrote:There's also a good amount of political ads, but that ain't a surprise.Kannap wrote:
I don't think I know many nationalistic Americans. 98% of the Americans I know are against everything.
I think it's just a left thing, but it apparently looks way better to be anti-US then pro-US.
I really haven't met any pro-US people though.
by Kannap » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:01 am
by Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:05 am
by Hurdegaryp » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:06 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Gallade » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:09 am
by Kannap » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:10 am
by Hurdegaryp » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:11 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Bralia » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:13 am
. Not exactly the kind of person you'd expect to be related to. That man must have had a horrible life . . . and if that autopsy report is to be believed . . . *shudders*by Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:17 am
by Kannap » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:18 am
by Kannap » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:20 am
by Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:20 am
by Jute » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:21 am
Who the hell pays 10 pounds for a cocktail anyway?A charity collection takes place in your office. For every UK£10.00 given, a blind person's sight is restored. Instead of donating UK£10.00, you use the money to treat yourself to a cocktail after work. Are you morally responsible for the continued blindness of the person who would have been treated had you made the donation?
"Boys and girls so happy, young and gay / Don't let false worldly joy carry your hearts away."
by Kannap » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:21 am
by Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:23 am
by Ava Ire » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:25 am
"Down to Gehenna or up to the Throne, he travels the fastest who travels alone." ~
by Kannap » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:29 am
Jute wrote:Who the hell pays 10 pounds for a cocktail anyway?A charity collection takes place in your office. For every UK£10.00 given, a blind person's sight is restored. Instead of donating UK£10.00, you use the money to treat yourself to a cocktail after work. Are you morally responsible for the continued blindness of the person who would have been treated had you made the donation?
http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/mo ... ault2.aspx
by Kannap » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:30 am
by Hurdegaryp » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:31 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Benuty, Cheroa, Elejamie, Forsher, Giovanniland, Google [Bot], Great Otter Empire, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Lower Antegria, Repreteop, Shrillland, Socialist Platypus, The Black Forrest, The Eur-asian Federation, The Vooperian Union, Trigori, Uiiop, Umeria, Yasuragi
